Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2024; doi: 10.1111/evj.14076

Anastomotic techniques for small intestinal obstruction in horses. A scoping review.

Abstract: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a significant cause of surgery in adult horses presenting with colic pain. SBOs often require resection and anastomosis. While various techniques for intestinal anastomoses have been developed, it remains uncertain if any fully meet our clinical needs. Objective: To conduct a scoping review of publications on anastomosis techniques and outcomes for the treatment of SBO. Methods: Scoping review. Methods: A literature review was conducted using the CAB, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Peer-reviewed scientific articles in English, published between 1992 and 2023, were included. A quality assessment was performed for potentially eligible articles. Experimental studies, case reports, and case series with less than five cases were excluded and relevant data on study methods and sample size were extracted and charted from remaining articles. Anastomosis type and outcome were reported for articles considered potentially eligible for meta-analysis. Articles in which only overall outcome was reported or details on type of anastomosis were not reported were excluded for the final charting. Results: Of 3024 articles, 210 underwent a quality assessment. The most common study designs were case reports and case series (64.3%), followed by experimental studies (17.1%). After further exclusions, 104 articles met the inclusion criteria. In only 42 articles detailed data on type of anastomosis and relative outcome were reported. A total of 23 anastomosis types were reported for the treatment of SBO, with 6 different outcomes evaluated. Both short- and long-term survival rates consistently exceed 70% for all types of anastomosis (jejuno-jejunal, jejuno-ileal, and jejunocaecal). Conclusions: Non-English language studies and conference proceedings were excluded. Conclusions: The body of literature focused on surgical treatment for SBO exhibits low-quality evidence. Several techniques of anastomosis were described for different pathologies. However, there is a lack of homogeneity in reporting outcome for each surgical technique. Furthermore, outcomes considered varied significantly among studies and were sometimes poorly reported, although success rates are generally high. Overall, there is a need for better-structured studies on existing and commonly used techniques before comparing techniques and exploring other innovative approaches.
Publication Date: 2024-02-20 PubMed ID: 38379364DOI: 10.1111/evj.14076Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article deals with a comprehensive review of techniques used for anastomosis (intestinal rejoining) during surgeries for small bowel obstructions (SBO) in horses.

Objective and Methodology

  • The purpose of this study is to undertake a scoping review of published literature on anastomosis techniques and their outcomes for treating small bowel obstructions in horses.
  • The researchers conducted a meticulous literature review using various databases like CAB, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, filtering for peer-reviewed scientific articles published in English between 1992 and 2023. Potentially applicable articles were quality assessed to select the ones suitable for the study.
  • The study excluded experimental studies, case reports, and case series with fewer than five cases. Furthermore, the research only included articles with detailed information about the anastomosis type and its associated outcomes and disregarded articles without this detailed information or that only reported the overall result.

Results

  • From a total of 3024 articles, 210 were quality assessed, from which only 104 met the actual inclusion criteria. Detailed information on the type of anastomosis and its relative outcomes was reported only in 42 articles.
  • There were 23 reported anastomosis types used for treating SBO in horses, with six different outcomes evaluated. The methods included jejuno-jejunal, jejuno-ileal, and jejunocaecal anastomosis. Survival rates post these surgeries were found to be fairly high, with both short and long-term survival rates consistently exceeding 70% for all types of anastomosis.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that the available literature primarily focused on surgical treatment for SBO presented low-quality evidence. There were a variety of anastomosis techniques described for different pathologies, but there lacked a uniform reporting system concerning the outcomes for each surgical technique.
  • The metrics for gauging outcomes varied widely across studies and were sometimes inadequately reported. Despite this, the success rates of these techniques were found to be generally high.
  • The study recommends better-structured studies on the standard and commonly used techniques before comparing and exploring new and innovative approaches to anastomosis.

Cite This Article

APA
Giusto G, Cerullo A, Gandini M. (2024). Anastomotic techniques for small intestinal obstruction in horses. A scoping review. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14076

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Giusto, Gessica
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Cerullo, Anna
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Gandini, Marco
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

References

This article includes 22 references
  1. Archer DC, Proudman CJ. Epidemiological clues to preventing colic.. Vet J 2006;172(1):29-39.
  2. Southwood LL. Medical versus surgical treatment of the horse with colic. In: Southwood LL, editor. Practical guide to equine colic. Wiley; 2012. p. 164-172.
  3. Barker I, Freeman SL. Assessment of costs and insurance policies for referral treatment of equine colic.. Vet Rec 2019;185(16):508.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105415google scholar: lookup
  4. French NP, Smith J, Edwards GB, Proudman CJ. Equine surgical colic: risk factors for postoperative complications.. Equine Vet J 2002;34(5):444-449.
  5. Proudman CJ, Smith JE, Edwards GB, French NP. Long-term survival of equine surgical colic cases. Part 1: patterns of mortality and morbidity.. Equine Vet J 2002;34(5):432-437.
  6. Rudnick MJ, Denagamage TN, Freeman DE. Effects of age, disease and anastomosis on short- and long-term survival after surgical correction of small intestinal strangulating diseases in 89 horses.. Equine Vet J 2022;54(6):1031-1038.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13558google scholar: lookup
  7. Freeman DE, Hammock P, Baker GJ, Goetz T, Foreman JH, Schaeffer DJ. Short- and long-term survival and prevalence of postoperative ileus after small intestinal surgery in the horse.. Equine Vet J 2000;32(S32):42-51.
  8. Stewart S, Southwood LL, Aceto HW. Comparison of short- and long-term complications and survival following jejunojejunostomy, jejunoileostomy and jejunocaecostomy in 112 horses: 2005-2010.. Equine Vet J 2014;46(3):333-338.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12143google scholar: lookup
  9. Ziegler AL, Freeman CK, Fogle CA, Burke MJ, Davis JL, Cook VL. Multicentre, blinded, randomised clinical trial comparing the use of flunixin meglumine with firocoxib in horses with small intestinal strangulating obstruction.. Equine Vet J 2019;51(3):329-335.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13013google scholar: lookup
  10. van Loon JPAM, Visser EMS, de Mik-van Mourik M, Kerbert P, Huppes T, Menke ES. Colic surgery in horses: a retrospective study into short- and long-term survival rate, complications and rehabilitation toward sporting activity.. J Equine Vet 2020;90:103012.
  11. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 3: long-term complications and survival.. Equine Vet J 2005;37(4):310-314.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054529445google scholar: lookup
  12. Proudman CJ, Edwards GB, Barnes J. Differential survival in horses requiring end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomosis compared to those requiring side-to-side jejunocaecal anastomosis.. Equine Vet J 2007;39(2):181-185.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407x171354google scholar: lookup
  13. Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ. Comparison of complications and long-term survival rates following hand-sewn versus stapled side-to-side jejunocecostomy in horses with colic [published correction appears in J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011 Jan 1;238(1):65].. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010;237(9):1060-1067.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.237.9.1060google scholar: lookup
  14. Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ, Cleary OB. Long-term survival in horses with strangulating obstruction of the small intestine managed without resection.. Equine Vet J 2014;46(6):711-717.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12216google scholar: lookup
  15. Giusto G, Cerullo A, Labate F, Gandini M. Incomplete ileocecal bypass for Ileal pathology in horses: 21 cases (2012-2019).. Animals 2021;11(2):403.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020403google scholar: lookup
  16. Gandini M, Cerullo A, Giusto G. Scoping review: occurrence and definitions of postoperative complications in equine colic surgery.. Equine Vet J 2023;55(4):563-572.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13881google scholar: lookup
  17. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation.. Ann Intern Med 2018;169(7):467-473.
    doi: 10.7326/m18-0850google scholar: lookup
  18. Gelardi F, Kirienko M, Sollini M. Climbing the steps of the evidence-based medicine pyramid: highlights from annals of nuclear medicine 2019.. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021;48(5):1293-1301.
  19. Spadari A, Gialletti R, Gandini M, Valle E, Cerullo A, Cavallini D. Short-term survival and postoperative complications rates in horses undergoing colic surgery: a multicentre study.. Animals 2023;13(6):1107.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13061107google scholar: lookup
  20. Gandini M, Giusto G. Development of a classification system for equine postoperative complications and its application in a cohort of 190 horses undergoing emergency laparotomy.. Vet Rec 2023;192(11):e2782.
    doi: 10.1002/vetr.2782google scholar: lookup
  21. Freeman DE, Southwood LL, Epstein K, Hardy J, Archer DC. Referral of horses with colic: a time to review.. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2022;68:470-475.
  22. Kassahun WT, Babel J, Mehdorn M. Assessing differences in surgical outcomes following emergency abdominal exploration for complications of elective surgery and high-risk primary emergencies.. Sci Rep 2022;12(1):1349.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.