Analyze Diet
Frontiers in genetics2025; 16; 1534461; doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1534461

Annotation of cis-regulatory-associated histone modifications in the genomes of two Thoroughbred stallions.

Abstract: The Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes (FAANG) consortium aims to annotate animal genomes across species, and work in the horse has substantially contributed to that goal. As part of this initiative, chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq) was performed to identify histone modifications corresponding to enhancers (H3K4me1), promoters (H3K4me3), activators (H3K27ac), and repressors (H3K27me3) in eight tissues from two Thoroughbred stallions: adipose, parietal cortex, heart, lamina, liver, lung, skeletal muscle, and testis. The average genome coverage of peaks identified by MACS2 for H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K27ac was 6.2%, 2.2%, and 4.1%, respectively. Peaks were called for H3K27me3, a broad mark, using both MACS2 and SICERpy, with MACS2 identifying a greater average number of peaks (158K; 10.4% genome coverage) than SICERpy (32K; 24.3% genome coverage). Tissue-unique peaks were identified with BEDTools, and 1%-47% of peaks were unique to a tissue for a given histone modification. However, correlations among usable reads, total peak number, and unique peak number ranged from 0.01 to 0.92, indicating additional data collection is necessary to parse technical from true biological differences. These publicly available data expand a growing resource available for identifying regulatory regions within the equine genome, and they serve as a reference for genome regulation across healthy tissues of the adult Thoroughbred stallion.
Publication Date: 2025-02-27 PubMed ID: 40084169PubMed Central: PMC11903428DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1534461Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article is about the detailed genomic investigation of two Thoroughbred stallions, contributing to the goal of annotating animal genomes under the auspices of the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes (FAANG) consortium.

FAANG Consortium and Histone Modifications

  • The Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes (FAANG) consortium is an international collaboration aimed at generating comprehensive maps of functional elements in the genomes of domesticated animal species. The main objective is to enable a better understanding of biology, selective breeding for genetic improvement, and prediction of traits associated with genetic sequences.
  • In the context of this study, histone modifications were examined to characterize and understand their role in gene regulation. Histones are proteins around which DNA is wound, impacting how genes are expressed. Changes in the modifications of these histones can affect this expression.

ChIP-seq Analysis and Results

  • As part of the research, the team performed Chromatin Immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq), a technique that identifies the binding sites of DNA-associated proteins and analyzes protein-DNA interactions. It was used to identify histone modifications related to gene regulators such as enhancers, promoters, activators, and repressors in eight different tissues from two Thoroughbred stallions.
  • The genome coverage of the identified peaks for each histone modification was reported in terms of percentages.
  • Interestingly, the average genome coverage differed based on the histone modification identified, which could suggest different levels of gene activity or regulation associated with these histone marks.

Correlation and Future Work

  • The statistical analysis performed indicated correlations among usable reads, total peak number, and unique peak number ranging from 0.01 to 0.92. This variability suggests that further data collection will be required to differentiate between true biological differences and those resulting from technical aspects of the data generation process.
  • This research adds value to the growing resources that help identify regulatory regions in the equine (horse) genome. It can also serve as a reference for better understanding genome regulation across healthy tissues in adult Thoroughbred stallions.

Cite This Article

APA
Barber AM, Kingsley NB, Peng S, Giulotto E, Bellone RR, Finno CJ, Kalbfleisch T, Petersen JL. (2025). Annotation of cis-regulatory-associated histone modifications in the genomes of two Thoroughbred stallions. Front Genet, 16, 1534461. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1534461

Publication

ISSN: 1664-8021
NlmUniqueID: 101560621
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 16
Pages: 1534461

Researcher Affiliations

Barber, Alexa M
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center, Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Omaha, NE, United States.
  • Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Kingsley, Nicole B
  • Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
  • Veterinary Genetics Laboratory, Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Peng, Sichong
  • Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Giulotto, Elena
  • Department of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Bellone, Rebecca R
  • Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
  • Veterinary Genetics Laboratory, Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Finno, Carrie J
  • Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Kalbfleisch, Ted
  • Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Petersen, Jessica L
  • Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 44 references
  1. Adkemir K. C., Le V. T., Chandran S., Li Y., Verhaak R. G., Beroukhim R.. Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer. Nat. Genet. 52 (3), 294–305.
    doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0564-ypmc: PMC7058537pubmed: 32024999google scholar: lookup
  2. Barber A.. Stallion FAANG histone ChIP-seq analyzed data. .
  3. Cappelletti E., Piras F. M., Sola L., Petersen J. L., Bellone R. R., Finno C. J.. The localization of centromere protein A is conserved among tissues. Commun. Biol. 6, 963.
    doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05335-7pmc: PMC10514049pubmed: 37735603google scholar: lookup
  4. Chen Y., Negre N., Li Q., Mieczkowska J. O., Slattery M., Liu T.. Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity. Nat. Methods 9, 609–614.
    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1985pmc: PMC3477507pubmed: 22522655google scholar: lookup
  5. Claringbould A., Zaugg J. B.. Enhancers in disease: molecular basis and emerging treatment strategies. Trends Mol. Med. 27 (11), 1060–1073.
    doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2021.07.012pubmed: 34420874google scholar: lookup
  6. Diaz A., Park K., Lim D. A., Song J. S.. Normalization, bias correction, and peak calling for ChIP-seq. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 11 (3), 9.
    doi: 10.1515/1544-6115.1750pmc: PMC3342857pubmed: 22499706google scholar: lookup
  7. Donnelly C. G., Bellone R. R., Hales E. N., Nguyen A., Katzman S. A., Dujovne G. A.. Generation of a biobank from two adult thoroughbred stallions for the functional annotation of animal genomes initiative. Front. Genet. 12, 650305.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.650305pmc: PMC7982670pubmed: 33763124google scholar: lookup
  8. Giuffra E., Tuggle C. K.. Functional annotation of animal genomes (FAANG): current achievements and roadmap. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 7, 65–88.
  9. Hindorff L. A., Sethupathy P., Junkins H. A., Ramos E. M., Mehta J. P., Collins F. S.. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. PNAS 106 (23), 9362–9367.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903103106pmc: PMC2687147pubmed: 19474294google scholar: lookup
  10. Hisey E. A., Hermans H., Lounsberry Z. T., Avila F., Grahn R. A., Knickelbein K. E.. Whole genome sequencing identified a 16 kilobase deletion on ECA13 associated with distichiasis in Friesian horses. BMC Genomics 21 (1), 848.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07265-8pmc: PMC7706231pubmed: 33256610google scholar: lookup
  11. Hosogane M., Funayama R., Shirota M., Nakayama K.. Lack of transcription triggers H3K27me3 accumulation in the gene body. Cell Rep. 16 (3), 696–706.
    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.034pubmed: 27396330google scholar: lookup
  12. Keiser A. A., Woods M. A.. Examining the contribution of histone modification to sex differences in learning and memory. Learn. and Mem. 26, 318–331.
    doi: 10.1101/lm.048850.118pmc: PMC6699407pubmed: 31416905google scholar: lookup
  13. Kfoury N., Qi Z., Prager B. C., Rubin J. B., Broestl L., Berrett K. C.. Brd4-bound enhancers drive cell-intrinsic sex differences in glioblastoma. PNAS 118 (16), e2017148118.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017148118pmc: PMC8072233pubmed: 33850013google scholar: lookup
  14. Kingsley N. B., Hamilton N. A., Lindgren G., Orlando L., Bailey E., Brooks S.. “Adopt-a-Tissue” initiative advances efforts to identify tissue-specific histone marks in the mare. Front. Genet. 12, 649959.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.649959pmc: PMC8033197pubmed: 33841506google scholar: lookup
  15. Kingsley N. B., Kern C., Creppe C., Hales E. N., Zhou H., Kalbfleisch T. S.. Functionally annotating regulatory elements in the equine genome using histone mark ChIP-seq. Genes 11 (1), 3.
    doi: 10.3390/genes11010003pmc: PMC7017286pubmed: 31861495google scholar: lookup
  16. Krueger F.. Trim galore! (version 0.6.5). .
  17. Landt S. G., Marinov G. K., Kundaje A., Kheradpour P., Pauli F., Batzoglou S.. ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia. Genome Res. 22 (9), 1813–1831.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.136184.111pmc: PMC3431496pubmed: 22955991google scholar: lookup
  18. Li H.. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv Genomics .
    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1303.3997google scholar: lookup
  19. Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N.. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinf 25 (16), 2078–2079.
  20. Lopes-Ramos C. M., Chen C. Y., Kuijer M. L., Paulson J. N., Sonawane A. R., Fagny M.. Sex differences in gene expression and regulatory networks across 29 human tissues. Cell Rep. 31 (12), 107795.
  21. Maurano M. T., Humbert R., Rynes E., Thurman R. E., Haugen E., Wang H.. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337 (6099), 1190–1195.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1222794pmc: PMC3771521pubmed: 22955828google scholar: lookup
  22. Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft excel. .
  23. Nakato R., Shirahige K.. Recent advances in ChIP-seq analysis: from quality management to whole-genome annotation. Briefings Bioinf 18 (2), 279–290.
    doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw023pmc: PMC5444249pubmed: 26979602google scholar: lookup
  24. Oksuz O., Narendra V., Lee C. H., Descostes N., LeRoy G., Raviram R.. Capturing the onset of PRC2-mediated repressive domain formation. Mol. Cell 70 (6), 1149–1162.
  25. Pagès H., Carlson M., Aboyoun P., Falcon S., Morgan M.. txdbmaker: tools for making TxDb objects from genomic annotations. R. package version 1.2.1 .
  26. Peng J. C., Karpen G. H.. Epigenetic regulation of heterochromatic DNA stability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 18 (2), 204–211.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2008.01.021pmc: PMC2814359pubmed: 18372168google scholar: lookup
  27. Peng S., Dahlgren A. R., Donnelly C. G., Hales E. N., Petersen J. L., Bellone R. R.. Functional annotation of the animal genomes: an integrated annotation resource for the horse. PLoS Genet. 19 (3), e1010468.
  28. Quinlan A. R., Hall I. M.. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinf 26 (6), 841–842.
  29. Ramírez F., Dündar F., Diehl S., Grüning B. A., Manke T.. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W187–W191.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gku365pmc: PMC4086134pubmed: 24799436google scholar: lookup
  30. Schmitges F. W., Prusty A. B., Faty M., Stützer A., Lingaraju G. M., Aiwazian J.. Histone methylation by PRC2 is inhibited by active chromatin marks. Mol. Cell 42 (3), 330–341.
    doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.025pubmed: 21549310google scholar: lookup
  31. Shen E. Y., Ahern T. H., Cheung I., Straubhaar J., Dincer A., Houston I.. Epigenetics and sex differences in the brain: a genome-wide comparison of histone-3 lysine-4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) in male and female mice. Exp. Neurol. 268, 21–29.
  32. Steinhauser S., Kurzawa N., Eils R., Herrmann C.. A comprehensive comparison of tools for differential ChIP-seq analysis. Briefings Bioinf 17 (6), 953–966.
    doi: 10.1093/bib/bbv110pmc: PMC5142015pubmed: 26764273google scholar: lookup
  33. The ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489 (7414), 57–74.
    doi: 10.1038/nature11247pmc: PMC3439153pubmed: 22955616google scholar: lookup
  34. The FAANG Consortium, Andersson L., Archibald A. L., Bottema C. D., Brauning R., Burgess S. C., Zhou H.. Coordinated international action to accelerate genome-to-phenome with FAANG, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes project. Genome Biol. 16, 57.
    doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0622-4pmc: PMC4373242pubmed: 25854118google scholar: lookup
  35. Tuggle C. K., Giuffra E., White S. N., Clarke L., Zhou H., Ross P. J.. GO-FAANG meeting: a gathering on functional annotation of animal genomes. Anim. Genet. 47 (5), 528–533.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12466pmc: PMC5082551pubmed: 27453069google scholar: lookup
  36. van der Lee R., Correard S., Wasserman W. W.. Deregulated regulators: disease-causing cis variants in transcription factor genes. Trends Genet. 36 (7), P523–P539.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.04.006pubmed: 32451166google scholar: lookup
  37. Wang Q., Li M., Wu T., Zhan L., Li L., Chen M.. Exploring epigenomic datasets by ChIPseeker. Curr. Protoc. 2 (10), e585.
    doi: 10.1002/cpz1.585pubmed: 36286622google scholar: lookup
  38. Xiang G., Keller C. A., Giardine B., An L., Li Q., Zhang Y.. S3norm: simultaneous normalization of sequencing depth and signal-to-noise ratio in epigenomic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 48 (8), e43.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa105pmc: PMC7192629pubmed: 32086521google scholar: lookup
  39. Xu S., Grullon S., Ge K., Peng W.. Spatial clustering for identification of ChIP-enriched regions (SICER) to map regions of histone methylation patterns in embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 1150, 97–111.
    doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0512-6_5pmc: PMC4152844pubmed: 24743992google scholar: lookup
  40. Yu G., Wang L., He Q.. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics 31 (14), 2382–2383.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv145pubmed: 25765347google scholar: lookup
  41. Zang C., Schones D. E., Zeng C., Cui K., Zhao K., Peng W.. A clustering approach for identification of enriched domains from histone modification ChIP-Seq data. Bioinf 25 (15), 1952–1958.
  42. Zhang Q., Zeng X., Younkin S., Kawli T., Snyder M. P., Keleş S.. Systematic evaluation of the impact of ChIP-seq read designs on genome coverage, peak identification, and allele-specific binding detection. BMC Bioinf. 17 (1), 96.
    doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-0957-1pmc: PMC4765064pubmed: 26908256google scholar: lookup
  43. Zhang T., Xia W., Song X., Mao Q., Huang X., Chen B.. Super-enhancer hijacking LINC01977 promotes malignancy of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma addicted to the canonical TGF-b/SMAD3 pathway. J. Hematol. Oncol. 15, 114.
    doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01331-2pmc: PMC9389757pubmed: 35982471google scholar: lookup
  44. Zhang Y., Liu T., Meyer C. A., Eeckhoute J., Johnson D. S., Bernstein B. E.. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9 (9), R137.
    doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137pmc: PMC2592715pubmed: 18798982google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.