Are Equine Assisted Interactions (EAI) a Dark Horse Bet? A Systematic Review on Measuring the Psychological and Physiological Effects of EAI on PTSD, Anxiety and/or Mood Disorders.
Abstract: Background: Conventional forms of trauma-focused psychological interventions seem to be less effective in military veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Equine Assisted Interventions (EAI) have become increasingly popular as an additional treatment, resulting in increasing research on the effects of EAI. However, no systematic review on the effects of EAI has focused on PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders and whether the effects are reflected in psychological and physiological measures. This systematic review investigated the treatment effects, study design, population, intervention, and psychological and physiological measurements in EAI research. Methods: The search strategy yielded 1028 original articles from 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and CAB Abstracts. These articles were screened by 2 individual blinded researchers with Rayyan according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and rendered 31 eligible studies. Results: Although all quantitative studies reported 1 or more positive treatment effects on symptoms of PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders, well-designed studies were sparse. This review demonstrated a lack of methodological information and few randomized controlled studies, in addition to a large heterogeneity in population characteristics, interventions, terminology, and questionnaires. Conclusion: Future studies should address these methodological considerations in order to advance the understanding of EAI and optimize their efficacy in treating PTSD, anxiety and/or mood disorders.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This research systematically reviewed existing studies on the use of Equine Assisted Interventions (EAI) for treating PTSD, anxiety, and mood disorders, focusing on both psychological and physiological outcomes.
While many studies reported positive effects, the review highlights significant methodological limitations and variability, suggesting the need for more rigorous research to confirm and optimize the benefits of EAI.
Background
Conventional psychological treatments targeting trauma, especially for military veterans with PTSD, often show limited effectiveness.
Equine Assisted Interventions (EAI), therapy involving interactions with horses, are gaining popularity as an alternative or complementary approach for mental health treatment.
Prior to this study, no comprehensive systematic review specifically examined EAI’s effects on PTSD, anxiety, and mood disorders by assessing both psychological symptoms and physiological measures.
Research Objectives
To systematically review the treatment effects of EAI on PTSD, anxiety, and mood disorders.
To analyze the study designs, populations involved, types of EAI interventions used, and the psychological and physiological outcome measures applied.
To identify gaps and inconsistencies in the existing research literature.
Methods
Database Search: Three electronic databases were searched—PubMed, Scopus, and CAB Abstracts—yielding 1028 original articles.
Screening: Two independent, blinded researchers screened the articles using the Rayyan software following PRISMA guidelines.
Inclusion: After screening, 31 studies met eligibility criteria to be included in the systematic review.
Key Findings
Positive Effects: Every quantitative study included reported at least one positive treatment effect of EAI on symptoms of PTSD, anxiety, or mood disorders.
Methodological Concerns: Despite positive findings, there was a scarcity of well-designed studies, especially randomized controlled trials (RCTs), considered the gold standard for clinical research.
Heterogeneity: There was substantial variability in the characteristics of study populations (e.g., different demographics and clinical profiles), types of EAI interventions, terminology used across studies, and questionnaires/measurement tools.
Physiological Measures: Fewer studies incorporated physiological outcomes alongside psychological assessments, limiting understanding of the full scope of EAI effects.
Reporting Gaps: Many studies lacked detailed methodological information which hinders replication and thorough evaluation of study quality.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Although EAI shows promise as a complementary therapy for PTSD, anxiety, and mood disorders, the current evidence base is limited by methodological weaknesses and inconsistency.
Future research should prioritize:
Conducting more randomized controlled trials to provide high-quality evidence.
Standardizing intervention protocols and terminology to reduce heterogeneity.
Incorporating both psychological and physiological outcome measures to fully capture treatment effects.
Detailed reporting of study methodologies to improve reproducibility and allow for meta-analytic synthesis.
Addressing these issues will help clarify the therapeutic potential of EAI and optimize its use in clinical settings, especially for populations where conventional treatments are less effective.
Cite This Article
APA
Kapteijn C, Reinders N, Hueting M, Van Huffelen RA, Vermetten E, Rodenburg B, Endenburg N.
(2025).
Are Equine Assisted Interactions (EAI) a Dark Horse Bet? A Systematic Review on Measuring the Psychological and Physiological Effects of EAI on PTSD, Anxiety and/or Mood Disorders.
Psychiatry Clin Psychopharmacol, 35(Suppl 1), S90-S112.
https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2025.24958
Animals in Science & Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Reinders, Nadieh
Animals in Science & Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hueting, Martine
Military Mental Health Care Ministry of Defense, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Van Huffelen, Rogier Alexander
Mentrum Psychiatric Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vermetten, Eric
Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rodenburg, Bas
Animals in Science & Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Endenburg, Nienke
Animals in Science & Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Eric Vermetten is an Associate Editor at Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, however, his involvement in the peer-review process was solely as an author. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
References
This article includes 62 references
Coventry PA, Meader N, Melton H. Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: systematic review and component network meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2020;17(8):e1003262.
Boss L, Branson S, Hagan H, Krause-Parello C. A systematic review of equine-assisted interventions in military veterans diagnosed with PTSD. J Vet Stud 2019;5(1).
Marchand WR, Andersen SJ, Smith JE, Hoopes KH, Carlson JK. Equine-assisted activities and therapies for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: current state, challenges and future directions. Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks) 2021;5:2470547021991556.
Rigby BR, Davis RW, Bittner MD, Harwell RW, Johnson GA, Nichols DL. Changes in motor skill proficiency after equine-assisted activities and brain-building tasks in youth with neurodevelopmental disorders. Front Vet Sci 2020;7(22).
Beetz A, Uvnäs-Moberg K, Julius H, Kotrschal K. Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: the possible role of oxytocin. Front Psychol 2012;3:234.
Handlin L, Hydbring-Sandberg E, Nilsson A, Ejdebäck M, Jansson A, Uvnäs-Moberg K. Short-term interaction between dogs and their owners: effects on oxytocin, cortisol, insulin and heart rate—an exploratory study. Anthrozoös 2011;24(3):301 315.
Lanning BA, Wilson AL, Woelk R, Beaujean AA. Therapeutic horseback riding as a complementary intervention for military service members with PTSD. Human-animal interaction bulletin 2018;6(2):58 82.
Mueller MK, McCullough L. Effects of equine-facilitated psychotherapy on post-traumatic stress symptoms in youth. J Child Fam Stud 2017;26(4):1164 1172.
Monroe M, Whitworth JD, Wharton T, Turner J. Effects of an equine-assisted therapy program for military veterans with self-reported PTSD. Soc Animals 2019;29(5-6):577 590.
Steele E, Wood DS, J Usadi E, Applegarth DM. TRR’s warrior camp: an intensive treatment program for combat trauma in active military and veterans of all eras. Mil Med 2018;183(Suppl 1):403 407.
Lanning BA, Wilson AL, Krenek N, Beaujean AA. Using therapeutic riding as an intervention for combat veterans: an international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) approach. Occup Ther Ment Health 2017;33(3):259 278.
McCullough L, Risley-Curtiss C, Rorke J. Equine facilitated psychotherapy: a pilot study of effect on posttraumatic stress symptoms in maltreated youth. J Infant Child Adolesc Psychother 2015;14(2):158 173.
Acri M, Morrissey M, Peth-Pierce R. An equine-assisted therapy for youth with mild to moderate anxiety: manual development and fidelity. J Child Fam Stud 2021;30(10):2461 2467.
Craig EA. Equine-assisted psychotherapy among adolescents with ACEs: cultivating Altercentrism, expressiveness, communication composure, and interaction management. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 2020;37(6):643 656.
Craig EA, Nieforth L, Rosenfeld C. Communicating resilience among adolescents with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) through equine assisted psychotherapy (EAP). West J Commun 2020;84(4):400 418.
Campbell HM, Raisch DW, Sather MR, Warren SR, Segal AR. A comparison of veteran and nonveteran motivations and reasons for participating in clinical trials. Mil Med 2007;172(1):27 30.
Varker T, Jones KA, Arjmand H-A. Dropout from guideline-recommended psychological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord Rep 2021;4.
Edwards-Stewart A, Smolenski DJ, Bush NE. Posttraumatic stress disorder treatment dropout among military and veteran populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Stress 2021;34(4):808 818.
Imel ZE, Laska K, Jakupcak M, Simpson TL. Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 2013;81(3):394 404.
Mulick PS, Landes SJ, Kanter JW. Contextual behavior therapies in the treatment of PTSD: a review. Int J Behav Consult Ther 2011;7(1):23 31.
Vujanovic AA, Youngwirth NE, Johnson KA, Zvolensky MJ. Mindfulness-based acceptance and posttraumatic stress symptoms among trauma-exposed adults without axis I psychopathology. J Anxiety Disord 2009;23(2):297 303.
Bernstein A, Tanay G, Vujanovic AA. Concurrent relations between mindful attention and awareness and psychopathology among trauma-exposed adults. J Cogn Psychother 2011;25(2):99 113.
Vujanovic AA, Niles BL, Pietrefesa A, Schmertz SK, Potter CM. Mindfulness in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder among military veterans. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2011;42(1):24 31.
Yang M, Mady N, Linnaranta O. Utility of psychophysiological metrics in guiding treatment of trauma symptoms: a systematic review. J Behav Cogn Ther 2021;31(3):249 266.
Hyde J, Ryan KM, Waters AM. Psychophysiological Markers of Fear and Anxiety. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019;21(7):56.