FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021; 2021; 2217761; doi: 10.1155/2021/2217761

Australian Community and Health Professionals Perceptions of Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy.

Abstract: Mental health conditions are increasingly prevalent in the Australian population, and despite the large evidence-based support for contemporary treatments, there are barriers which inhibit their efficacy. Thus, there is a perceived need for therapists to consider other therapeutic options which have potential to enhance treatment outcomes. There is increasing acceptance for complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) among general practitioners and clients/general community. Specifically, more than 70% of Australians utilize CAM. Equine-assisted psychotherapy (EAP) is an underutilized, culturally sensitive, complementary therapy, which has the potential to mitigate barriers of conventional therapy. The present study aimed to determine the level of knowledge about and general acceptance of EAP as a treatment for general psychopathology symptomology within community members and health professionals. The current sample included 144 community members and 55 health professionals, all with Australian citizenship. Data analysis comprised the independent t-test and two hierarchical multiple regressions. Results indicated that community members are significantly more accepting of EAP as a treatment compared to health professionals. Of the predictors tested, higher social support and openness within community members were significant predictors of accepting perceptions, and rural location was the only significant predictor for health professional's accepting perceptions of EAP. This is one of the first studies to investigate perceptions of EAP outside the EAP field and through comparison between community members and health professionals. The current study identifies the need for future research to further investigate perceptions of EAP among Australian health professionals.
Copyright © 2021 P. Stapleton and K. T. Grimmett.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-12-10 PubMed ID: 34925526PubMed Central: PMC8683167DOI: 10.1155/2021/2217761Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the perception of Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP), an alternative form of treatment for mental health conditions, among Australian community members and health professionals. The study found that community members are more accepting of EAP, and the level of openness and social support significantly affects their acceptance, while the rural location of health professionals is a significant factor in their acceptance of EAP.

Research Purpose and Methodology

  • The study aimed to gain insights into how community members and health professionals perceive EAP as a treatment for general psychopathology symptoms and their level of knowledge about it.
  • The researchers collected data from a sample of 144 community members and 55 health professionals who are Australian citizens.
  • They used an independent t-test and two hierarchical multiple regressions for data analysis.

Key Findings

  • The researchers found that community members are generally more accepting of EAP as a treatment compared to health professionals.
  • Among community members, higher levels of social support and openness were significant predictors of accepting views towards EAP.
  • The rural location of health professionals was found to be the only significant predictor for their accepting perceptions of EAP.

Implications and Future Research

  • This study is one of the first to explore perceptions of EAP outside the field of EAP and through a comparison between community members and health professionals.
  • It highlights the need for more research to understand the perception towards EAP among Australian health professionals.
  • Such research could potentially help address any misconceptions and improve the overall acceptance and knowledge of EAP as a therapeutic option for mental health conditions.

Cite This Article

APA
Stapleton P, Grimmett KT. (2021). Australian Community and Health Professionals Perceptions of Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2021, 2217761. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2217761

Publication

Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM
ISSN: 1741-427X
NlmUniqueID: 101215021
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 2021
Pages: 2217761

Researcher Affiliations

Stapleton, P
  • School of Psychology, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4229, Australia.
Grimmett, K T
  • School of Psychology, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4229, Australia.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 59 references
  1. World Health Organization. Promoting Mental Health: Concepts, Emerging Evidence, Practice. Geneva Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004.
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Mental and Behavioural Conditions. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2018.
  3. National Mental Health Commission. The Impact of Poor Mental Health-An Economic Issue. Sydney, Australia: National Mental Health Commission; 2016.
  4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Burden of Disease. Sydney, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2015.
  5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural and Remote Health. Sydney, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2020.
  6. Black Dog Institute. Facts and Figures about Mental Health: Mental Illness in Australia. Randwick, Australia: Black Dog Institute; 2011.
  7. Wampold B. E.. The Basics of Psychotherapy: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. 2nd. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association; 2019.
    doi: 10.1037/0000117-000google scholar: lookup
  8. Campbell LF, Norcross JC, Vasquez MJ, Kaslow NJ. Recognition of psychotherapy effectiveness: the APA resolution.. Psychotherapy (Chic) 2013 Mar;50(1):98-101.
    doi: 10.1037/a0031817pubmed: 23505985google scholar: lookup
  9. Cuijpers P. Targets and outcomes of psychotherapies for mental disorders: an overview.. World Psychiatry 2019 Oct;18(3):276-285.
    doi: 10.1002/wps.20661pmc: PMC6732705pubmed: 31496102google scholar: lookup
  10. Australian Government Department of Health. Medicare Benefits Schedule. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of Health; 2019.
  11. Leach MJ. Profiling the Australian Consumer of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Secondary Analysis of National Health Survey Data.. Altern Ther Health Med 2016 Jul;22(4):64-72.
    pubmed: 27548495
  12. Harbeson L., Stones A., Cabiria J., Blackwell J., Stones A.. Psychotherapists perceptions and use of projection in equine-assisted interventions: a phenomenological study. San Diego, CA, USA: Northcentral University; 2019. Dissertation.
  13. Lee K., Dabelko-Schoeny H., Jedlicka H., Burns T.. Older adults’ perceived benefits of equine-assisted psychotherapy: implications for social work. Research on Social Work Practice 2020;30(4):399–407.
    doi: 10.1177/1049731519890399google scholar: lookup
  14. Mercer J.. Alternative Psychotherapies: Evaluating Unconventional Mental Health Treatments. Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman and Littlefield; 2014.
  15. Reid R, Steel A, Wardle J, Trubody A, Adams J. Complementary medicine use by the Australian population: a critical mixed studies systematic review of utilisation, perceptions and factors associated with use.. BMC Complement Altern Med 2016 Jun 11;16:176.
    doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1143-8pmc: PMC4902999pubmed: 27289517google scholar: lookup
  16. Veatch R. M., Guidry-Grimes L. K.. The Basics of Bioethics. 4th. New York, NY, USA: Routledge; 2020.
  17. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st century/Committee on Quality Health Care in America. Washington, D.C, USA: The National Academies Press; 2001.
  18. Hagermoser Sanetti LM, Collier-Meek MA. Increasing implementation science literacy to address the research-to-practice gap in school psychology.. J Sch Psychol 2019 Oct;76:33-47.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.07.008pubmed: 31759467google scholar: lookup
  19. Fine A.. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy Foundations and Guidelines for Animal-Assisted Interventions. 5th. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 2019.
  20. Fournier A.. Animal-assisted Intervention: Thinking Empirically. Basingstoke, UK: Springer Nature; 2019.
  21. Animal Medicines Australia. Pet Ownership in Australia. Barton, Australia: Animal Medicines Australia; 2019.
  22. Hallberg L.. The Clinical Practice of Equine-Assisted Therapy: Including Horses in Human Healthcare. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge; 2018.
  23. Ford C.. Dancing with horses: combining dance/movement therapy and equine facilitated psychotherapy. American Journal of Dance Therapy 2013;35(2):93–117.
    doi: 10.1007/s10465-013-9156-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  24. Chandler C.. Animal-assisted Therapy in Counselling. 3rd. Oxfordshire, UK: Taylor and Francis; 2017.
  25. EAGALA. Professional Experiential Therapy that Drives Change. Santaquin, UT, USA: EAGALA; 2018.
  26. Signal T., Taylor N., Botros H., Prentice K., Lazarus K.. Whispering to horses: childhood sexual abuse, depression and the efficacy of equine facilitated therapy. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand 2013;5(1):24–32.
  27. Cody P., Steiker L., Szymandera M.. Equine therapy: substance abusers’ “healing through horses. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions 2011;11(2):198–204.
    doi: 10.1080/1533256x.2011.571189google scholar: lookup
  28. Plume J.. Four legged healers: horse culture as medicine. Tribal College 2016;27(4):p. 34.
  29. Frederick KE, Ivey Hatz J, Lanning B. Not Just Horsing Around: The Impact of Equine-Assisted Learning on Levels of Hope and Depression in At-Risk Adolescents.. Community Ment Health J 2015 Oct;51(7):809-17.
    doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9836-xpubmed: 25698076google scholar: lookup
  30. Waite B., Bourke L.. It’s different with a horse’: horses as a tool for engagement in a horse therapy program for marginalised young people. Youth Studies Australia 2013;32(4):15–24.
  31. Bennett B., Woodman E.. The potential of equine-assisted psychotherapy for treating trauma in Australian aboriginal peoples. British Journal of Social Work 2019;49(4):1041–1058.
    doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcz053google scholar: lookup
  32. Geist T.. Conceptual framework for animal assisted therapy. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal 2011;28(3):243–256.
    doi: 10.1007/s10560-011-0231-3google scholar: lookup
  33. Masini A. Equine-assisted psychotherapy in clinical practice.. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2010 Oct;48(10):30-4.
    doi: 10.3928/02793695-20100831-08pubmed: 20873699google scholar: lookup
  34. Earles JL, Vernon LL, Yetz JP. Equine-assisted therapy for anxiety and posttraumatic stress symptoms.. J Trauma Stress 2015 Apr;28(2):149-52.
    doi: 10.1002/jts.21990pubmed: 25782709google scholar: lookup
  35. Wilson K, Buultjens M, Monfries M, Karimi L. Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy for adolescents experiencing depression and/or anxiety: A therapist's perspective.. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2017 Jan;22(1):16-33.
    doi: 10.1177/1359104515572379pubmed: 26668260google scholar: lookup
  36. Irvine L.. We Are Best Friends: Animals in Society. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI; 2019.
    doi: 10.3390/books978-3-03921-537-9google scholar: lookup
  37. Galbraith N, Moss T, Galbraith V, Purewal S. A systematic review of the traits and cognitions associated with use of and belief in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).. Psychol Health Med 2018 Aug;23(7):854-869.
    doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1442010pubmed: 29468890google scholar: lookup
  38. Hötzel M., Vieira M., Leme D.. Exploring horse owners’ and caretakers’ perceptions of emotions and associated behaviors in horses. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2019;29:18–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.10.002google scholar: lookup
  39. Menzies I.. Horses for Discourses: A Critical Examination of the Horse in Australian Culture. Ann arbor, MI, USA: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2019.
  40. Statistics Solutions. Sample Size Formula. 2020.
  41. Martens B., Witt J., Elliott S., Darveaux D.. Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice 1985;16(2):191–198.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191google scholar: lookup
  42. Elliott S., Treuting M.. The behavior intervention rating scale: development and validation of a pretreatment acceptability and effectiveness measure. Journal of School Psychology 1991;29(1):43–51.
    doi: 10.1016/0022-4405(91)90014-igoogle scholar: lookup
  43. Kazdin AE. Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior.. J Appl Behav Anal 1980 Summer;13(2):259-73.
    doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-259pmc: PMC1308130pubmed: 7380752google scholar: lookup
  44. Saucier G. Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers.. J Pers Assess 1994 Dec;63(3):506-16.
    doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8pubmed: 7844738google scholar: lookup
  45. Dwight C., Cummings K., Glenar J.. Comparison of criterion-related validity coefficients for the mini-markers and Goldberg’s markers of the big five personality factors. Journal of Personality Assessment 1998;70(3):541–550.
    doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa7003_11google scholar: lookup
  46. Seibert S. E., Kraimer M. L.. The five-factor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2001;58(1):1–21.
    doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2000.1757google scholar: lookup
  47. Thompson E.. Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2007;38(2):p. 227.
    doi: 10.1177/0022022106297301google scholar: lookup
  48. Mooradian T., Nezlek J.. Comparing the NEO-FFI and saucier’s mini-markers as measures of the big five. Personality and Individual Differences 1996;21(2):213–215.
    doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00057-8google scholar: lookup
  49. Wongpakaran T, Wongpakaran N, Ruktrakul R. Reliability and Validity of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Thai Version.. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2011;7:161-6.
    doi: 10.2174/1745017901107010161pmc: PMC3219878pubmed: 22114620google scholar: lookup
  50. Stewart RC, Umar E, Tomenson B, Creed F. Validation of the multi-dimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) and the relationship between social support, intimate partner violence and antenatal depression in Malawi.. BMC Psychiatry 2014 Jun 17;14:180.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-244x-14-180pmc: PMC4074419pubmed: 24938124google scholar: lookup
  51. Mohammad AH, Al Sadat N, Loh SY, Chinna K. Validity and reliability of the hausa version of multidimensional scale of perceived social support index.. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2015 Feb;17(2):e18776.
    doi: 10.5812/ircmj.18776pmc: PMC4376991pubmed: 25838933google scholar: lookup
  52. Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S.. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th. London, UK: Pearson; 2013.
  53. de Goeij MC, van Diepen M, Jager KJ, Tripepi G, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. Multiple imputation: dealing with missing data.. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013 Oct;28(10):2415-20.
    doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft221pubmed: 23729490google scholar: lookup
  54. Allen P., Bennett K., Heritage B.. SPSS Statistics: A Practical Guide. 4th. Boston, MA, USA: Cengage; 2019.
  55. Statistic Solutions. Assumptions of multiple linear regression. 2020.
  56. Cohen J.. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge Academic; 1988.
  57. Erens B, Burkill S, Couper MP, Conrad F, Clifton S, Tanton C, Phelps A, Datta J, Mercer CH, Sonnenberg P, Prah P, Mitchell KR, Wellings K, Johnson AM, Copas AJ. Nonprobability Web surveys to measure sexual behaviors and attitudes in the general population: a comparison with a probability sample interview survey.. J Med Internet Res 2014 Dec 8;16(12):e276.
    doi: 10.2196/jmir.3382pmc: PMC4275497pubmed: 25488851google scholar: lookup
  58. Malhotra N., Krosnick J. A.. The effect of survey mode and sampling on inferences about political attitudes and behaviour: comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet surveys with nonprobability samples. Political Analysis 2007;15(3):286–323.
    doi: 10.1093/pan/mpm003google scholar: lookup
  59. Yeager D. S., Krosnick J. A., Chang L.. Comparing the accuracy of RDD telephone surveys and internet surveys conducted with probability and non-probability samples. Public Opinion Quarterly 2011;75(4):709–747.
    doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr020google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,850 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.