Analyze Diet
Journal of environmental quality2024; doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20634

Biochar captures ammonium and nitrate in easily extractable and strongly retained form without stimulating greenhouse gas emissions during composting.

Abstract: During composting of organic waste, nitrogen is lost through gaseous forms and ion leaching. Biochar has been shown to capture mineral nitrogen (N: NH and NO ) from compost, which we hypothesize reduces NO formation. However, associating N captured by biochar with the dynamics of NO and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during composting remains unstudied and was the aim of this work. We composted (outdoor for 148 days) together kitchen scraps (43.3% dw, where dw is dry weight), horse manure (40.9% dw), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L) straw (15.8% dw) without (Control) or with biochar (Bc, 15% compost dw). The biochar consisted of hardwood and softwood pieces pyrolyzed at 680°C and exhibited 60% of particles with 4-8 mm. We monitored compost GHG (CO, CH, NO) emissions, N content in compost and biochar particles (sequential extractions), and biochar surface transformations (SEM-EDX and C-NMR spectroscopy) along composting. Biochar did not significantly reduce or increase GHG emissions and N content (mg kg) in compost. However, the final NO amount (g compost pile) in the Bc treatment was significantly higher (54%) compared to the Control, indicating lower NO losses. Despite the high aromaticity and minimal contribution of carboxyl C to the biochar structure, biochar retained NH , mainly in easily extractable form (55%), in the first 2 weeks of composting and mainly in strongly retained form (75%) in the final compost. The NO content in biochar increased continuously during composting. In the final compost, the NO content extracted from biochar was 164 (37%, easily extractable), 80 (19%, moderately extractable), and 194 mg NO -N kg (44%, strongly retained). Although N retention in biochar was not accompanied by lower NO emissions, contradicting our hypothesis, we demonstrated the efficacy of biochar to recover N from organic waste without stimulating GHG emissions.
Publication Date: 2024-10-09 PubMed ID: 39384556DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20634Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examines how biochar, a form of charcoal, captures nitrogen during composting of organic waste without increasing emissions of greenhouse gases.

Background

  • The study was sparked by an understanding that during the process of composting organic materials, nitrogen is often lost. This nitrogen loss occurs through evaporation into the air (gas emissions) and being washed away (ion leaching).
  • Biochar, a form of charcoal used in soil amendment, is known to be able to interact with and capture mineral nitrogen from compost, reducing the formation of NO, a type of greenhouse gas. Yet, its exact relationship with the dynamics of greenhouse gas production during composting was unexplored.

Methodology

  • The researchers tested composting a mixture of kitchen waste, horse manure, and wheat straw, with and without the addition of biochar. This type of biochar was made from pyrolyzed hardwood and softwood with mostly 4-8mm particles.
  • They then monitored the emissions of greenhouse gases during the composting process, the nitrogen content in both the compost and the biochar particles, as well as the surface transformations of the biochar.

Results

  • They found that the usage of biochar neither significantly reduced nor increased the creation of greenhouse gases. It similarly had little effect on the overall nitrogen content of the compost.
  • However, they noticed that the amount of NO left in the compost pile at the end was much higher (by 54%) in those with added biochar. This implies a reduction in NO lost during the process.
  • The biochar appeared to quickly capture nitrogen during the first two weeks of composting, mainly in an easily extractable form. By the end of composting, the nitrogen was mostly in a strongly retained form.
  • The study showed that using biochar in composting can effectively recover nitrogen from organic waste without increasing greenhouse gas emissions, which contradicted their hypothesis that it would reduce emissions.

Cite This Article

APA
Busch F, Leal ODA, Siebers N, Brüggemann N. (2024). Biochar captures ammonium and nitrate in easily extractable and strongly retained form without stimulating greenhouse gas emissions during composting. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20634

Publication

ISSN: 1537-2537
NlmUniqueID: 0330666
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Busch, Franziska
  • Institute of Bio- and Geosciences-Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
  • Department of Earth System Sciences, Institute of Soil Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Leal, Otávio Dos Anjos
  • Institute of Bio- and Geosciences-Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Siebers, Nina
  • Institute of Bio- and Geosciences-Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Brüggemann, Nicolas
  • Institute of Bio- and Geosciences-Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.

Grant Funding

  • 313/323-400-00213 / Ministerium fu00fcr Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen

References

This article includes 72 references
  1. Agyarko‐Mintah E, Cowie A, Singh BP, Joseph S, van Zwieten L, Cowie A, Harden S, Smillie R. Biochar increases nitrogen retention and lowers greenhouse gas emissions when added to composting poultry litter. Waste Management 61, 138–149.
  2. Ajibade S, Nnadozie EC, Iwai CB, Ghotekar S, Chang SW, Ravindran B, Kumar Awasthi MK. Biochar‐based compost: A bibliometric and visualization analysis. Bioengineered 13(7–12), 15013–15032.
  3. Akdeniz N. A systematic review of biochar use in animal waste composting. Waste Management 88, 291–300.
  4. Awasthi MK, Wang M, Chen H, Wang Q, Zhao J, Ren X, Li D‐S, Awasthi SK, Shen F, Li R, Zhang Z. Heterogeneity of biochar amendment to improve the carbon and nitrogen sequestration through reduce the greenhouse gases emissions during sewage sludge composting. Bioresource Technology 224, 428–438.
  5. Beck‐Friis B, Smårs S, Jönsson H, Kirchmann H. SE—Structures and environment. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 78(4), 423–430.
    doi: 10.1006/jaer.2000.0662google scholar: lookup
  6. Bernal MP, Alburquerque JA, Moral R. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresource Technology 100(22), 5444–5453.
  7. Bouwman L, Goldewijk KK, van der Hoek KW, Beusen AHW, van Vuuren DP, Willems J, Rufino MC, Stehfest E. Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(52), 20882–20887.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012878108google scholar: lookup
  8. . Verordnung über die Ver‐wertung von Bioabfällen auf landwirtschaftlich, forstwirtschaftlich und gärtnerisch genutzten Böden (Bioabfallverordnung–BioAbfV): BioAbfV. .
  9. Cáceres R, Malińska K, Marfà O. Nitrification within composting: A review. Waste Management 72, 119–137.
  10. Canadell J, Monteiro P, Costa M, Da Cotrim Cunha L, Cox P, Eliseev AV, Henson S, Ishii M, Jaccard S, Koven C, Lohila A, Patra PK, Piao S, Rogelj J, Syampungani S, Zaehle S, Zickfeld K. Global carbon and other biogeochemical cycles and feedbacks. Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change pp. 673–816.
    doi: 10.1017/9781009157896.007google scholar: lookup
  11. Cao X, Pignatello JJ, Li Y, Lattao C, Chappell MA, Chen N, Miller LF, Mao J. Characterization of wood chars produced at different temperatures using advanced solid‐state 13C NMR spectroscopic techniques. Energy & Fuels 26(9), 5983–5991.
    doi: 10.1021/ef300947sgoogle scholar: lookup
  12. Castro‐Herrera D, Prost K, Schäfer Y, Kim D‐G, Yimer F, Tadesse M, Gebrehiwot M, Brüggemann N. Nutrient dynamics during composting of human excreta, cattle manure, and organic waste affected by biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality 51(1), 19–32.
    doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20312google scholar: lookup
  13. Castro‐Herrera D, Prost K, Kim D‐G, Yimer F, Tadesse M, Gebrehiwot M, Brüggemann N. Biochar addition reduces non‐CO2 greenhouse gas emissions during composting of human excreta and cattle manure. Journal of Environmental Quality 52(4), 814–828.
    doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20482google scholar: lookup
  14. Chen W, Liao X, Wu Y, Liang JB, Mi J, Huang J, Zhang H, Wu Y, Qiao Z, Li X, Wang Y. Effects of different types of biochar on methane and ammonia mitigation during layer manure composting. Waste Management 61, 506–515.
  15. Czekała W, Malińska K, Cáceres R, Janczak D, Dach J, Lewicki A. Co‐composting of poultry manure mixtures amended with biochar—The effect of biochar on temperature and C‐CO2 emission. Bioresource Technology 200, 921–927.
  16. De La Rosa J, Miller AZ, Knicker H. Soil‐borne fungi challenge the concept of long‐term biochemical recalcitrance of pyrochar. Scientific Reports 8(1), Article 2896.
  17. Duan P, Zhou J, Feng L, Jansen‐Willems AB, Xiong Z. Pathways and controls of N2O production in greenhouse vegetable production soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 55, 285–297.
  18. European Biochar Foundation. European biochar certificate—Guidelines for a sustainable production of biochar (Version 9.4E). .
  19. Fan C, Duan P, Zhang X, Shen H, Chen M, Xiong Z. Mechanisms underlying the mitigation of both N2O and NO emissions with field‐aged biochar in an Anthrosol. Geoderma 364, 114178.
  20. FAO. Guide to laboratory establishment for plant nutrient analysis (FAO fertilizer and plant nutrition) (Bulletin No. TC[M/I0131E/1/07.08/1100]). .
  21. Firmino MV, Trémier A. Nitrogen losses mitigation by supplementing composting mixture with biochar: Research of the ruling parameters. Waste and Biomass Valorization 15, 959–971.
  22. Fischer D, Glaser B. Synergisms between compost and biochar for sustainable soil amelioration. pp. 167–198.
    doi: 10.5772/31200google scholar: lookup
  23. Fowler D, Coyle M, Skiba U, Sutton MA, Cape JN, Reis S, Sheppard LJ, Jenkins A, Grizzetti B, Galloway JN, Vitousek P, Leach A, Bouwman AF, Butterbach‐Bahl K, Dentener F, Stevenson D, Amann M, Voss M. The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty‐first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368(1621), 20130164.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0164google scholar: lookup
  24. Hagemann N, Joseph S, Schmidt H‐P, Kammann CI, Harter J, Borch T, Young RB, Varga K, Taherymoosavi S, Elliott KW, McKenna A, Albu M, Mayrhofer C, Obst M, Conte P, Dieguez‐Alonso A, Orsetti S, Subdiaga E, Behrens S, Kappler A. Organic coating on biochar explains its nutrient retention and stimulation of soil fertility. Nature Communications 8(1), Article 1089.
  25. Hagemann N, Kammann CI, Schmidt HP, Kappler A, Behrens S. Nitrate capture and slow release in biochar amended compost and soil. PloS One 12(2), e0171214.
  26. Hagemann N, Subdiaga E, Orsetti S, de La Rosa JM, Knicker H, Schmidt H‐P, Kappler A, Behrens S. Effect of biochar amendment on compost organic matter composition following aerobic composting of manure. Science of the Total Environment 613–614, 20–29.
  27. Haider G, Steffens D, Müller C, Kammann CI. Standard extraction methods may underestimate nitrate stocks captured by field‐aged biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality 45(4), 1196–1204.
    doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.10.0529google scholar: lookup
  28. Haider G, Joseph S, Steffens D, Müller C, Taherymoosavi S, Mitchell D, Kammann CI. Mineral nitrogen captured in field‐aged biochar is plant‐available. Scientific Reports 10(1), Article 13816.
  29. He X, Chen L, Han L, Liu N, Cui R, Yin H, Huang G. Evaluation of biochar powder on oxygen supply efficiency and global warming potential during mainstream largescale aerobic composting. Bioresource Technology 245, 309–317.
  30. Hilscher A, Knicker H. Degradation of grass‐derived pyrogenic organic material, transport of the residues within a soil column and distribution in soil organic matter fractions during a 28 month microcosm experiment. Organic Geochemistry 42(1), 42–54.
  31. IPCC. Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. .
    doi: 10.1017/9781009157896google scholar: lookup
  32. Jia G, Shevliakova E, Artaxo P, De Noblet‐Ducoudré N, Houghton R, House J, Kitajima K, Lennard C, Popp A, Sirin A, Sukumar R, Verchot L. Land–climate interactions. Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial pp. 131–248.
    doi: 10.1017/9781009157988.004google scholar: lookup
  33. Joseph S, Kammann CI, Shepherd JG, Conte P, Schmidt H‐P, Hagemann N, Rich AM, Marjo CE, Allen J, Munroe P, Mitchell DRG, Donne S, Spokas K, Graber ER. Microstructural and associated chemical changes during the composting of a high temperature biochar: Mechanisms for nitrate, phosphate and other nutrient retention and release. Science of the Total Environment 618, 1210–1223.
  34. Kammann CI, Schmidt H‐P, Messerschmidt N, Linsel S, Steffens D, Müller C, Koyro H‐W, Conte P, Joseph S. Plant growth improvement mediated by nitrate capture in co‐composted biochar. Scientific Reports 5, Article 11080.
    doi: 10.1038/srep11080google scholar: lookup
  35. Kammann C, Glaser B, Schmidt H‐P. Combining biochar and organic amendments. Biochar in European soils and agriculture: Science and practice pp.136–160.
  36. Khan N, Clark I, Sánchez‐Monedero MA, Shea S, Meier S, Bolan N. Maturity indices in co‐composting of chicken manure and sawdust with biochar. Bioresource Technology 168, 245–251.
  37. Knicker H, Totsche KU, Almendros G, González‐Vila FJ. Condensation degree of burnt peat and plant residues and the reliability of solid‐state VACP MAS 13C NMR spectra obtained from pyrogenic humic material. Organic Geochemistry 36(10), 1359–1377.
  38. Lasaridi K, Protopapa I, Kotsou M, Pilidis G, Manios T, Kyriacou A. Quality assessment of composts in the Greek market: The need for standards and quality assurance. Journal of Environmental Management 80(1), 58–65.
  39. Lehmann J, Cowie A, Masiello CA, Kammann C, Woolf D, Amonette JE, Cayuela ML, Camps‐Arbestain M, Whitman T. Biochar in climate change mitigation. Nature Geoscience 14(12), 883–892.
  40. Li Y, Yu S, Strong J, Wang H. Are the biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus driven by the “FeIII–FeII redox wheel” in dynamic redox environments?. Journal of Soils and Sediments 12(5), 683–693.
  41. Li R, Wang Q, Zhang Z, Zhang G, Li Z, Wang L, Zheng J. Nutrient transformation during aerobic composting of pig manure with biochar prepared at different temperatures. Environmental Technology 36(5–8), 815–826.
  42. Li S, Song L, Jin Y, Liu S, Shen Q, Zou J. Linking N2O emission from biochar amended composting process to the abundance of denitrify (nirK and nosZ) bacteria community. AMB Express 6(1), Article 37.
  43. Liu N, Zhou J, Han L, Ma S, Sun X, Huang G. Role and multi‐scale characterization of bamboo biochar during poultry manure aerobic composting. Bioresource Technology 241, 190–199.
  44. Liu Q, Zhang Y, Liu B, Amonette JE, Lin Z, Liu G, Ambus P, Xie Z. How does biochar influence soil N cycle? A meta‐analysis. Plant and Soil 426(1–2), 211–225.
  45. Loganathan P, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J. Enhanced removal of nitrate from water using surface modification of adsorbents—A review. Journal of Environmental Management 131, 363–374.
  46. López‐Cano I, Roig A, Cayuela ML, Alburquerque JA, Sánchez‐Monedero MA. Biochar improves N cycling during composting of olive mill wastes and sheep manure. Waste Management 49, 553–559.
  47. Maheshwari DK. Composting for sustainable agriculture (Vol. 3). .
  48. Nguyen MK, Lin C, Hoang HG, Sanderson P, Dang BT, Bui XT, Nguyen NSH, Vo D‐VN, Tran HT. Evaluate the role of biochar during the organic waste composting process: A critical review. Chemosphere 299, 134488.
  49. Prost K, Borchard N, Siemens J, Kautz T, Séquaris J‐M, Möller A, Amelung W. Biochar affected by composting with farmyard manure. Journal of Environmental Quality 42(1), 164–172.
    doi: 10.2134/jeq2012.0064google scholar: lookup
  50. UBA. Nährstoffeinträge aus der Landwirtschaft und Stickstoffüberschuss. .
  51. Rynk R, van de Kamp M, Willson GB, Singley ME, Richard TL, Kolega JJ, Gouin F, Laliberty L, Kay D, Murphy D, Hoitink H, Brinton WF. On‐farm composting handbook. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service 152, 14853–5701.
  52. Sánchez‐García M, Alburquerque JA, Sánchez‐Monedero MA, Roig A, Cayuela ML. Biochar accelerates organic matter degradation and enhances N mineralisation during composting of poultry manure without a relevant impact on gas emissions. Bioresource Technology 192, 272–279.
  53. Sánchez‐Monedero MA, Roig A, Paredes C, Bernal MP. Nitrogen transformation during organic waste composting by the Rutgers system and its effects on pH, EC and maturity of the composting mixtures. Bioresource Technology 78(3), 301–308.
  54. Sánchez‐Monedero MA, Cayuela ML, Roig A, Jindo K, Mondini C, Bolan N. Role of biochar as an additive in organic waste composting. Bioresource Technology 247, 1155–1164.
  55. Schäfer Y. Impact of biochar on nutrient dynamics during composting of humanure, cattle manure and other organic materials‐–A case study from South Ethiopia. .
  56. Schmidt HP, Kammann C, Hagemann N, Leifeld J, Bucheli TD, Sánchez‐Monedero MA, Cayuela ML. Biochar in agriculture—A systematic review of 26 global meta‐analyses. GCB Bioenergy 13(11), 1708–1730.
    doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12889google scholar: lookup
  57. Sonoki T, Furukawa T, Jindo K, Suto K, Aoyama M, Sánchez‐Monedero MÁ. Influence of biochar addition on methane metabolism during thermophilic phase of composting. Journal of Basic Microbiology 53(7), 617–621.
    doi: 10.1002/jobm.201200096google scholar: lookup
  58. Steiner C, Das KC, Melear N, Lakly D. Reducing nitrogen loss during poultry litter composting using biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality 39(4), 1236–1242.
    doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0337google scholar: lookup
  59. VDLUFA. Methodenbuch Band II.2. Die Untersuchung von Sekundärrohstoffdüngern, Kultursubstraten und Bödenhilfsstoffen: Bestimmung von Phosphor und Kalium im Calcium‐Acetat‐Lactat‐Auszug. .
  60. VDLUFA. Methodenbuch Band II.2. Die Untersuchung von Sekundärrohstoff‐düngern, Kultursubstraten und Bödenhilfsstoffen: Bestimmung des wesentlichen Geh‐altes an verfügbarem Stickstoff (Ammonium und Nitrat): CaCl2‐Auszug. .
  61. Wang Y, Lin Y, Chiu PC, Imhoff PT, Guo M. Phosphorus release behaviors of poultry litter biochar as a soil amendment. Science of the Total Environment 512–513, 454–463.
  62. Wang Q, Awasthi MK, Ren X, Zhao J, Li R, Wang Z, Wang M, Chen H, Zhang Z. Combining biochar, zeolite and wood vinegar for composting of pig manure: The effect on greenhouse gas emission and nitrogen conservation. Waste Management 74, 221–230.
  63. Wang H, Lu Y, Xu J, Liu X, Sheng L. Effects of additives on nitrogen transformation and greenhouse gases emission of co‐composting for deer manure and corn straw. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 28(10), 13000–13020.
  64. Wang L, Olsen MN, Moni C, Dieguez‐Alonso A, de La Rosa JM, Stenrød M, Liu X, Mao L. Comparison of properties of biochar produced from different types of lignocellulosic biomass by slow pyrolysis at 600°C. Applications in Energy and Combustion Science 12, 100090.
  65. Wang Y, Villamil MB, Davidson PC, Akdeniz N. A quantitative understanding of the role of co‐composted biochar in plant growth using meta‐analysis. Science of the Total Environment 685, 741–752.
  66. Wang N, He Y, Zhao K, Lin X, He X, Chen A, Wu G, Zhang J, Yan B, Luo L, Xu D. Greenhouse gas emission characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural waste composting process: A review. Journal of Environmental Management 354, 120337.
  67. Yang B, Ma Y, Xiong Z. Effects of different composting strategies on methane, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide emissions and nutrient loss during small‐scale anaerobic composting. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(1), 446–455.
  68. Yin Y, Yang C, Li M, Zheng Y, Ge C, Gu J, Li H, Duan M, Wang X, Chen R. Research progress and prospects for using biochar to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions during composting: A review. Science of The Total Environment 798, 149294.
  69. Yuan J, Chadwick D, Zhang D, Li G, Chen S, Luo W, Du L, He S, Peng S. Effects of aeration rate on maturity and gaseous emissions during sewage sludge composting. Waste Management 56, 403–410.
  70. Zhang H, Marchant‐Forde JN, Zhang X, Wang Y. Effect of cornstalk biochar immobilized bacteria on ammonia reduction in laying hen manure composting. Molecules 25(7), 1560.
    doi: 10.3390/molecules25071560google scholar: lookup
  71. Zhou S, Jiang Z, Shen J, Yao Q, Yang X, Li X, Awasthi MK, Zhang Z. Biochar‐amended compost as a promising soil amendment for enhancing plant productivity: A meta‐analysis study. Science of The Total Environment 879, 163067.
  72. Zucconi F. Evaluating toxicity of immature compost. BioCycle 54–57.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.