FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Physiol / Changes in salivary oxytocin in response to biologically-rel...
Frontiers in physiology2024; 15; 1370557; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1370557

Changes in salivary oxytocin in response to biologically-relevant events in farm animals: method optimization and usefulness as a biomarker.

Abstract: Although best known for its established role in mediating parturition and lactation, the highly-conserved neuropeptide hormone oxytocin also mediates a range of social and stress-buffering processes across mammalian species. Measurements of peripheral oxytocin in plasma have long been considered the gold standard, but there is increasing interest in developing methods to detect oxytocin non-invasively in saliva. Here we present an analytical and biological validation of a novel method to measure salivary oxytocin (sOXT) in an under-studied research group: farm animals. Given their similarities with humans in physiology and brain, methods that can identify valued social contexts and social relationships for farm animals and investigate their function have implications for clinical research as well as for animal welfare science. However, current methods to measure sOXT vary greatly in terms of sample collection, pre-measurement processing and measurement and more rigorous standardization and validation of methods is critical to determine the utility of sOXT as a biomarker of salient social events and related emotions. We optimized a method for extracting sOXT in pigs and horses and measured sOXT in extracted samples using a commercially available enzyme-immunoassay. Extracted samples were within acceptable ranges for precision (CVs < 15.2%), parallelism and recovery (94%-99%) in both species. Salivary oxytocin increased in samples collected during birth in pigs (Friedmans, = 0.02) and horses (Wilcoxon, = 0.02). Salivary oxytocin tended to decrease in sows after a 90-min separation from their piglets (Wilcoxon, = 0.08). We conclude that sOXT can be reliably linked to physiological events that are mediated by the oxytocinergic system in farm animals, but that more research is needed to determine whether sOXT is a reliable trait marker for more general oxytocin system activation in response to salient social events. Future research should characterize how individual attributes and salivary parameters influence sOXT measurement and should emphasize reporting of analytical and biological validations to increase acceptance of non-invasive methods.
Copyright © 2024 Moscovice, Sobczak, Niittynen, Koski and Gimsa.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-03-19 PubMed ID: 38567114PubMed Central: PMC10985263DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1370557Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study presents an optimized method for measuring oxytocin, a hormone related to social and stress processes, in the saliva of farm animals, specifically pigs and horses. It also identifies the link between this “salivary oxytocin” and significant biological events. Additional research is recommended to confirm the use of salivary oxytocin as a marker for oxytocin activation in response to meaningful social events.

Introduction

  • The research aimed to develop and validate a non-invasive method for measuring oxytocin levels in farm animals’ saliva.
  • Oxytocin is a hormone renowned for its function in enabling childbirth and lactation, but it also plays a role in various social and stress-coping procedures.
  • Oxytocin levels are usually measured in the plasma, the liquid part of the blood, which is considered the standard procedure, but researchers have been exploring ways to detect it in the saliva as a non-invasive measure.

Method Optimisation and Validation

  • The researchers standardized a method for extracting oxytocin from the saliva of pigs and horses and assessed the obtained samples using a commercially available enzyme immunoassay – a technique to measure antibody-antigen reaction.
  • The extracted samples demonstrated acceptable precision, parallelism, and recovery rates in both species. Parallelism involves comparing the results of the immunoassay to a standard, while recovery is the ability to extract the same sample multiple times with similar results.

Biological Relevance and Biomarker Utility

  • The project determined that salivary oxytocin levels increased during childbirth in both pigs and horses.
  • In contrast, these levels tended to decrease in sows after they were separated from their piglets for 90 minutes.
  • These findings suggest a correlation between oxytocin levels in the saliva and biologically significant events modulated by the oxytocinergic system.
  • However, further research is required to establish salivary oxytocin as a reliable indicator of the general activation of the oxytocin system in response to significant social events.

Future Research Recommendations

  • The paper advocates for more research to understand how individual characteristics and salivary parameters influence the measurement of salivary oxytocin.
  • The investigators also stress the importance of reporting analytical and biological authenticity to encourage the acceptance of non-invasive procedures.

Cite This Article

APA
Moscovice LR, Sobczak B, Niittynen T, Koski SE, Gimsa U. (2024). Changes in salivary oxytocin in response to biologically-relevant events in farm animals: method optimization and usefulness as a biomarker. Front Physiol, 15, 1370557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1370557

Publication

Frontiers in physiology
ISSN: 1664-042X
NlmUniqueID: 101549006
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Pages: 1370557
PII: 1370557

Researcher Affiliations

Moscovice, Liza R
  • Psychophysiology Working Group, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Sobczak, Birgit
  • Psychophysiology Working Group, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Niittynen, Taru
  • Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Koski, Sonja E
  • Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Gimsa, Ulrike
  • Psychophysiology Working Group, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 53 references
  1. Andreasson U, Perret-Liaudet A, van Waalwijk van Doorn LJC, Blennow K, Chiasserini D, Engelborghs S. A practical guide to immunoassay method validation. Front. Neurol. 2015;6:179.
    doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00179pmc: PMC4541289pubmed: 26347708google scholar: lookup
  2. Baciadonna L, Duepjan S, Briefer EF, Padilla de la Torre M, Nawroth C. Looking on the bright side of livestock emotions—the potential of their transmission to promote positive welfare. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018;5:218.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00218pmc: PMC6143710pubmed: 30258847google scholar: lookup
  3. Bakdash JZ, Marusich LR. Repeated measures correlation. Front. Psychol. 2017;8:456.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00456pmc: PMC5383908pubmed: 28439244google scholar: lookup
  4. Bellagambi FG, Lomonaco T, Salvo P, Vivaldi F, Hangouët M, Ghimenti S. Saliva sampling: methods and devices. An overview. Trac. - Trends Anal. Chem. 2019;124:115781.
    doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115781google scholar: lookup
  5. Bienboire-Frosini C, Chabaud C, Cozzi A, Codecasa E, Pageat P. Validation of a commercially available enzyme immunoassay for the determination of oxytocin in plasma samples from seven domestic animal species. Front. Neurosci. 2017;11:524.
    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00524pmc: PMC5613128pubmed: 28983237google scholar: lookup
  6. Borrow AP, Cameron NM. The role of oxytocin in mating and pregnancy. Horm. Behav. 2012;61:266–276.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.11.001pubmed: 22107910google scholar: lookup
  7. Caicedo Mera JC, Cárdenas Molano MA, García López CC, Acevedo Triana C, Martínez Cotrina J. Discussions and perspectives regarding oxytocin as a biomarker in human investigations. Heliyon 2021;7:e08289.
    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08289pmc: PMC8581272pubmed: 34805562google scholar: lookup
  8. Caldwell HK. Oxytocin and vasopressin: powerful regulators of social behavior. Neuroscientist 2017;23:517–528.
    doi: 10.1177/1073858417708284pubmed: 28492104google scholar: lookup
  9. Castrén H, Algers B, de Passillé AM, Rushen J, Uvnäs-Moberg K. Early milk ejection, prolonged parturition and periparturient oxytocin release in the pig. Anim. Sci. 1993;57:465–471.
    doi: 10.1017/s1357729800042806google scholar: lookup
  10. Cerón JJ, Contreras-Aguilar MD, Escribano D, Martínez-Miró S, López-Martínez MJ, Ortín-Bustillo A. Basics for the potential use of saliva to evaluate stress, inflammation, immune system, and redox homeostasis in pigs. BMC Vet. Res. 2022;18:81.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03176-wpmc: PMC8883734pubmed: 35227252google scholar: lookup
  11. Cordoni G, Comin M, Collarini E, Robino C, Chierto E, Norscia I. Domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) engage in non-random post-conflict affiliation with third parties: cognitive and functional implications. Anim. Cogn. 2023;26:687–701.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01688-4pmc: PMC9950185pubmed: 36344830google scholar: lookup
  12. Donaldson ZR, Young LJ. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. Science 2008;322:900–904.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1158668pubmed: 18988842google scholar: lookup
  13. Driscoll CA, Macdonald DW, O’Brien SJ. From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009;106:9971–9978.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901586106pmc: PMC2702791pubmed: 19528637google scholar: lookup
  14. Engelmann M, Landgraf R, Wotjak CT. The hypothalamic-neurohypophysial system regulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis under stress: an old concept revisited. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2004;25:132–149.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2004.09.001pubmed: 15589266google scholar: lookup
  15. Gan HW, Leeson C, Aitkenhead H, Dattani M. Inaccuracies in plasma oxytocin extraction and enzyme immunoassay techniques. Compreh. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2023;15:100188.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2023.100188pmc: PMC10285453pubmed: 37360277google scholar: lookup
  16. Gnanadesikan GE, Hammock EAD, Tecot SR, Carter CS, MacLean EL. Specificity of plasma oxytocin immunoassays: a comparison of commercial assays and sample preparation techniques using oxytocin knockout and wildtype mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2021;132:105368.
    doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105368pmc: PMC8487999pubmed: 34364024google scholar: lookup
  17. Gnanadesikan GE, Hammock EAD, Tecot SR, Lewis RJ, Hart R, Carter CS. What are oxytocin assays measuring? Epitope mapping, metabolites, and comparisons of wildtype & knockout mouse urine. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2022;143:105827.
    doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105827pmc: PMC9807061pubmed: 35714438google scholar: lookup
  18. Gröschl M. The physiological role of hormones in saliva. BioEssays 2009;31:843–852.
    doi: 10.1002/bies.200900013pubmed: 19554609google scholar: lookup
  19. Hall SA, Farish M, Coe J, Baker E, Camerlink I, Lawrence AB. Minimally invasive biomarkers to detect maternal physiological status in sow saliva and milk. Animal 2021;15:100369.
    doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100369pubmed: 34607115google scholar: lookup
  20. Haluska GJ, Currie WB. Variation in plasma concentrations of oestradiol-17 beta and their relationship to those of progesterone, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F-2 alpha and oxytocin across pregnancy and at parturition in pony mares. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1988;84:635–646.
    doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0840635pubmed: 3199383google scholar: lookup
  21. Huffmeijer R, Alink LRA, Tops M, Grewen KM, Light KC, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Salivary levels of oxytocin remain elevated for more than two hours after intranasal oxytocin administration. Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 2012;33:21–25.
    pubmed: 22467107
  22. nKassambara A. (2023). Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests [R package rstatix version 0.7. 2]. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=rstatix (Accessed January 2, 2024).
  23. Lee VE, Arnott G, Turner SP. Social behavior in farm animals: applying fundamental theory to improve animal welfare. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022;9:932217.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.932217pmc: PMC9411962pubmed: 36032304google scholar: lookup
  24. Leng G, Sabatier N. Measuring oxytocin and vasopressin: bioassays, immunoassays and random numbers. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2016;28.
    doi: 10.1111/jne.12413pmc: PMC5096068pubmed: 27467712google scholar: lookup
  25. nLenth R., Singmann H., Love J., Buerkner P., Herve M. (2019). Package “emmeans.”. Available at: https://cran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2018-01-13/web/packages/emmeans/emmeans.pdf (Accessed February 9, 2023).
  26. López-Arjona M, Escribano D, Mateo SV, Contreras-Aguilar MD, Rubio CP, Tecles F. Changes in oxytocin concentrations in saliva of pigs after a transport and during lairage at slaughterhouse. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020;133:26–30.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.08.015pubmed: 32919235google scholar: lookup
  27. López-Arjona M, Mainau E, Navarro E, Contreras-Aguilar MD, Escribano D, Mateo SV. Oxytocin in bovine saliva: validation of two assays and changes in parturition and at weaning. BMC Vet. Res. 2021;17:140.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02838-5pmc: PMC8017845pubmed: 33794896google scholar: lookup
  28. López-Arjona M, Mateo SV, Cerón JJ, Martínez-Subiela S. Changes in salivary oxytocin after stroking in dogs: validation of two assays for its assessment. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021;136:527–534.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.04.007pubmed: 33882381google scholar: lookup
  29. López-Arjona M, Mateo SV, Manteca X, Escribano D, Cerón JJ, Martínez-Subiela S. Oxytocin in saliva of pigs: an assay for its measurement and changes after farrowing. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2020;70:106384.
    doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2019.106384pubmed: 31569032google scholar: lookup
  30. López-Arjona M, Padilla L, Roca J, Cerón JJ, Martínez-Subiela S. Ejaculate collection influences the salivary oxytocin concentrations in breeding male pigs. Animals 2020;10:1268–1312.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10081268pmc: PMC7460095pubmed: 32722376google scholar: lookup
  31. Lunney JK, Van Goor A, Walker KE, Hailstock T, Franklin J, Dai C. Importance of the pig as a human biomedical model. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021;13:5758.
    doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd5758pubmed: 34818055google scholar: lookup
  32. Lürzel S, Bückendorf L, Waiblinger S, Rault JL. Salivary oxytocin in pigs, cattle, and goats during positive human-animal interactions. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2020;115:104636.
    doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104636pubmed: 32160578google scholar: lookup
  33. MacLean EL, Gesquiere LR, Gee N, Levy K, Martin WL, Carter CS. Validation of salivary oxytocin and vasopressin as biomarkers in domestic dogs. J. Neurosci. Methods 2018;293:67–76.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.08.033pubmed: 28865986google scholar: lookup
  34. MacLean EL, Wilson SR, Martin WL, Davis JM, Nazarloo HP, Carter CS. Challenges for measuring oxytocin: the blind men and the elephant?. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019;107:225–231.
    doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.05.018pmc: PMC6634994pubmed: 31163380google scholar: lookup
  35. Marsh N, Marsh AA, Lee MR, Hurlemann R. Oxytocin and the neurobiology of prosocial behavior. Neuroscientist 2020;27:604–619.
    doi: 10.1177/1073858420960111pmc: PMC8640275pubmed: 32981445google scholar: lookup
  36. Martins D, Gabay AS, Mehta M, Paloyelis Y. Salivary and plasmatic oxytocin are not reliable trait markers of the physiology of the oxytocin system in humans. Elife 2020;9:624566–e62519.
    doi: 10.7554/ELIFE.62456pmc: PMC7732341pubmed: 33306025google scholar: lookup
  37. Marchant JN, Rudd AR, Mendl MT, Broom DM, Meredith MJ, Corning S. Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems. Vet. Rec. 2000;147:209–214.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.147.8.209pubmed: 10994922google scholar: lookup
  38. McCullough ME, Churchland PS, Mendez AJ. Problems with measuring peripheral oxytocin: can the data on oxytocin and human behavior be trusted?. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013;37:1485–1492.
    doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.04.018pubmed: 23665533google scholar: lookup
  39. Moscovice LR, Eggert A, Manteuffel C, Rault JL. Spontaneous helping in pigs is mediated by helper’s social attention and distress signals of individuals in need. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2023;290:20230665.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0665pmc: PMC10394407pubmed: 37528710google scholar: lookup
  40. Moscovice LR, Gimsa U, Otten W, Eggert A. Salivary cortisol, but not oxytocin, varies with social challenges in domestic pigs: implications for measuring emotions. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2022;16:899397.
    doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.899397pmc: PMC9169876pubmed: 35677575google scholar: lookup
  41. Mota-Rojas D, Marcet-Rius M, Domínguez-Oliva A, Martínez-Burnes J, Lezama-García K, Hernández-Ávalos I. The role of oxytocin in domestic animal’s maternal care: parturition, bonding, and lactation. Animals 2023;13:1207.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071207pmc: PMC10093258pubmed: 37048463google scholar: lookup
  42. Nawroth C, Langbein J, Coulon M, Gabor V, Oesterwind S, Benz-Schwarzburg J. Farm animal cognition-linking behavior, welfare and ethics. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019;6:24.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00024pmc: PMC6383588pubmed: 30838218google scholar: lookup
  43. Niittynen T, Riihonen V, Moscovice LR, Koski SE. Acute changes in oxytocin predict behavioral responses to foundation training in horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2022;254:105707.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105707google scholar: lookup
  44. Nyuyki KD, Waldherr M, Baeuml S, Neumann ID. Yes, I am ready now: differential effects of paced versus unpaced mating on anxiety and central oxytocin release in female rats. PLoS One 2011;6:e23599.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023599pmc: PMC3156771pubmed: 21858181google scholar: lookup
  45. Ogi A, Mariti C, Baragli P, Sergi V, Gazzano A. Effects of stroking on salivary oxytocin and cortisol in guide dogs: preliminary results. Animals 2020;10:708.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10040708pmc: PMC7222818pubmed: 32325673google scholar: lookup
  46. Rault JL, van den Munkhof M, Buisman-Pijlman FTA. Oxytocin as an indicator of psychological and social well-being in domesticated animals: a critical review. Front. Psychol. 2017;8:1521.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01521pmc: PMC5601408pubmed: 28955264google scholar: lookup
  47. Ross HE, Freeman SM, Spiegel LL, Ren X, Terwilliger EF, Young LJ. Variation in oxytocin receptor density in the nucleus accumbens has differential effects on affiliative behaviors in monogamous and polygamous voles. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:1312–1318.
    doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5039-08.2009pmc: PMC2768419pubmed: 19193878google scholar: lookup
  48. Tabak BA, Leng G, Szeto A, Parker KJ, Verbalis JG, Ziegler TE. Advances in human oxytocin measurement: challenges and proposed solutions. Mol. Psychiatry 2023;28:127–140.
    doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01719-zpmc: PMC9812775pubmed: 35999276google scholar: lookup
  49. Uvnäs-Moberg K, Ekström-Bergström A, Berg M, Buckley S, Pajalic Z, Hadjigeorgiou E. Maternal plasma levels of oxytocin during physiological childbirth - a systematic review with implications for uterine contractions and central actions of oxytocin. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19:285–317.
    doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2365-9pmc: PMC6688382pubmed: 31399062google scholar: lookup
  50. Valros A, Rundgren M, Špinka M, Saloniemi H, Hultén F, Uvnäs-Moberg K. Oxytocin, prolactin and somatostatin in lactating sows: associations with mobilisation of body resources and maternal behaviour. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004;85:3–13.
    doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00114-3google scholar: lookup
  51. Vivrette S, Kindahl H, Munro C, Roser J, Stabenfeldt G. Oxytocin release and its relationship to dihydro-15-keto PGF2alpha and arginine vasopressin release during parturition and to suckling in postpartum mares. Reproduction 2000;119:347–357.
    doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1190347pubmed: 10864848google scholar: lookup
  52. Ward SA, Kirkwood RN, Plush KL. Effects of oxytocin and carbetocin on farrowing performance. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2019;205:88–93.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.04.007pubmed: 31047762google scholar: lookup
  53. Wotjak CT, Ganster J, Kohl G, Holsboer F, Landgraf R, Engelmann M. Dissociated central and peripheral release of vasopressin, but not oxytocin, in response to repeated swim stress: new insights into the secretory capacities of peptidergic neurons. Neuroscience 1998;85:1209–1222.
    doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(97)00683-0pubmed: 9681958google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.