Clinical and clinicopathologic effects of large doses of raw linseed oil as compared to mineral oil in healthy horses.
Abstract: The clinical and clinicopathologic effects of raw linseed oil and mineral oil were compared. In a crossover experimental design trial, 6 horses were given either raw linseed oil (2.5 mL/kg body weight) or mineral oil (10 mL/kg body weight), twice, 12 hours apart. Two weeks later, the horses received the opposite treatment. All horses given mineral oil or linseed oil developed nonformed feces by 24 hours of the first administration of oil. Horses treated with mineral oil had formed feces at 48 hours; horses treated with linseed oil developed normally formed feces at 96 to 108 hours. All horses treated with linseed oil had signs of depression and anorexia, and 3 had signs of mild colic. These signs were not observed in horses treated with mineral oil. Concentrations of serum glucose and bilirubin were significantly higher in horses treated with linseed oil when compared with horses treated with mineral oil.
Publication Date: 1998-02-12 PubMed ID: 9348497DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1997.tb00468.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Clinical Trial
- Comparative Study
- Controlled Clinical Trial
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study is about the effect of large doses of raw linseed oil, in comparison to mineral oil, on the clinical and clinicopathologic states of healthy horses. The findings show that raw linseed oil may cause negative side effects like depression, anorexia, and mild colic in horses.
Research Design
- The study was structured as a crossover experimental trial. This means that all participants (in this case, horses) receive all treatments in different sequences, allowing each horse to serve as its own control. This design helps to reduce the potential influence of uncontrolled variables.
- Here, six healthy horses were given either raw linseed oil (at a dosage of 2.5 mL/kg of body weight) or mineral oil (at a dosage of 10 mL/kg of body weight), twice, with a 12-hour gap in between. After a two-week washout period, the horses then received the opposite treatment that they did not receive during the first phase.
Results
- All horses, given either mineral or linseed oil, developed nonformed feces within 24 hours of the first administration of oil, suggesting that large doses of either oil can disrupt normal digestive processes.
- However, horses gave different responses to the two types of oils: Those treated with mineral oil had formed feces by 48 hours while those given linseed oil took longer (96 to 108 hours) to develop normally formed feces.
- The linseed oil also appeared to have adverse effects on the horses, causing signs of depression and anorexia, with three of the horses showing signs of mild colic. Such signs were not observed in the horses treated with mineral oil, suggesting that mineral oil, despite causing short-term disruption in normal feces formation, is better tolerated than linseed oil.
- The linseed oil also caused a significant increase in serum glucose and bilirubin concentrations as compared to the mineral oil. These biochemical parameters are often monitored in equine health checks: High glucose levels may indicate stress or metabolic issues, whereas elevated bilirubin can be a marker for liver disease or hemolysis (destruction of red blood cells).
Conclusion
- Overall, the study suggests that, while large doses of both raw linseed oil and mineral oil can disrupt normal digestive processes in horses, linseed oil may cause additional negative side effects such as depression, anorexia, and mild colic, as well as elevations in serum glucose and bilirubin levels. Therefore, caution is advised when considering the use of raw linseed oil for horses, especially at large doses.
Cite This Article
APA
Schumacher J, DeGraves FJ, Spano JS.
(1998).
Clinical and clinicopathologic effects of large doses of raw linseed oil as compared to mineral oil in healthy horses.
J Vet Intern Med, 11(5), 296-299.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.1997.tb00468.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Large Animal Surgery and Medicine, Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, AL 36849-5522, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Aspartate Aminotransferases / blood
- Bilirubin / blood
- Blood Cell Count / veterinary
- Blood Glucose / analysis
- Blood Proteins / analysis
- Blood Urea Nitrogen
- Cathartics / administration & dosage
- Cathartics / adverse effects
- Cathartics / pharmacology
- Creatinine / blood
- Cross-Over Studies
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
- Electrolytes / blood
- Female
- Heart Rate / drug effects
- Heart Rate / physiology
- Horses / blood
- Horses / physiology
- Intubation, Gastrointestinal
- Linseed Oil / administration & dosage
- Linseed Oil / adverse effects
- Male
- Mineral Oil / administration & dosage
- Mineral Oil / pharmacology
- Phosphorus / blood
- Time Factors
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists