Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2006; 29(6); 555-560; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2006.00803.x

Clinical efficacy of intravenous administration of marbofloxacin in a Staphylococcus aureus infection in tissue cages in ponies.

Abstract: Tissue cages (TC), implanted subcutaneously in the neck in eight ponies, were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) to determine the clinical efficacy of marbofloxacin in the treatment of this infection. From 21 h after inoculation, marbofloxacin (6 mg/kg) was administered intravenously (i.v.) once daily for 7 days. Samples of the tissue cage fluid (TCF) were taken to determine marbofloxacin concentrations (days 1, 3 and 7), using high-pressure liquid chromatography, and numbers of viable bacteria [colony forming units (CFU)] (days 1, 3, 7, 14 and 21). Statistical analysis was used to compare CFU before and after treatment. Clinical signs and CFU were used to evaluate the efficacy of treatment. Although, there was a slight decrease in CFU in all TC initially, the infection was not eliminated by marbofloxacin treatment in any of the ponies and abscesses formed. As the MIC (0.25 microg/mL) did not change during treatment and the concentration of marbofloxacin during treatment (mean concentration in TCF was 0.89 microg/mL on day 1, 0.80 microg/mL on day 3 and 2.77 microg/mL on day 7) was above MIC, we consider that the treatment failure might be attributable to the formation of a biofilm by S. aureus. Based on the present results, i.v. administration of marbofloxacin alone is not suitable for the elimination of S. aureus infections from secluded sites.
Publication Date: 2006-11-07 PubMed ID: 17083460DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2006.00803.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examines the effectiveness of marbofloxacin on the Staphylococcus aureus infection in ponies. Despite consistent doses, the treatment didn’t successfully eliminate the infection, possibly due to the bacteria’s biofilm formation.

Study Methodology

The researchers implanted tissue cages (TC) under the skin on the necks of eight ponies. These cages were then infected with the Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteria. The study’s main objective was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of marbofloxacin against this specific type of infection.

  • Marbofloxacin was administered once per day in doses of 6 mg/kg intravenously (into the vein) starting from 21 hours post-infection and lasting for seven days.
  • The study gathered tissue cage fluid (TCF) samples on days 1, 3, and 7 post-inoculation to measure the concentration of marbofloxacin. The process of high-pressure liquid chromatography was used for this purpose.
  • The samples were also analyzed for the number of viable bacteria (colony forming units or CFUs) on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21.

Results and Interpretation

  • The marbofloxacin had only a slight impact on reducing the number of CFUs initially in all tissue cages. However, the treatment could not completely remove the infection in any of the ponies studied. This was confirmed by the formation of abscesses post-treatment.
  • The researchers noted that the MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, the lowest concentration of an antibiotic that prevents bacterial growth) did not change during the course of treatment and the concentration of marbofloxacin measured in the TCF samples remained above the MIC. Therefore, it was reasonable to assume that the dosage was not the cause of treatment failure.
  • Instead, the researchers concluded that the probable reason for the treatment’s lack of success could be the S. aureus bacteria’s ability to form a biofilm, a protective shield that can make bacteria more resistant to antibiotics.

Conclusion

The research concluded that intravenous administration of marbofloxacin by itself is not effective in eliminating a Staphylococcus aureus infection from secluded sites, such as the implanted tissue cages in this study. Future treatment approaches may need to consider additional measures to counteract bacterial defensive mechanisms like biofilm formation.

Cite This Article

APA
Voermans M, van Soest JM, van Duijkeren E, Ensink JM. (2006). Clinical efficacy of intravenous administration of marbofloxacin in a Staphylococcus aureus infection in tissue cages in ponies. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 29(6), 555-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2006.00803.x

Publication

ISSN: 0140-7783
NlmUniqueID: 7910920
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 29
Issue: 6
Pages: 555-560

Researcher Affiliations

Voermans, M
  • Dierenkliniek de Morette, Asse, Belgium. margreetvoermans@hotmail.com
van Soest, J M
    van Duijkeren, E
      Ensink, J M

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / veterinary
        • Colony Count, Microbial / veterinary
        • Diffusion Chambers, Culture
        • Enzyme Inhibitors / administration & dosage
        • Enzyme Inhibitors / blood
        • Enzyme Inhibitors / pharmacology
        • Enzyme Inhibitors / therapeutic use
        • Fluoroquinolones / administration & dosage
        • Fluoroquinolones / blood
        • Fluoroquinolones / pharmacology
        • Fluoroquinolones / therapeutic use
        • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
        • Horse Diseases / microbiology
        • Horses
        • Injections, Intravenous / veterinary
        • Male
        • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
        • Quinolones / administration & dosage
        • Quinolones / blood
        • Quinolones / pharmacology
        • Quinolones / therapeutic use
        • Staphylococcal Infections / drug therapy
        • Staphylococcal Infections / veterinary
        • Staphylococcus aureus / drug effects
        • Topoisomerase II Inhibitors

        Citations

        This article has been cited 2 times.
        1. Shen J, Qian JJ, Gu JM, Hu XR. Marbofloxacin. Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online 2012 Apr 1;68(Pt 4):o998-9.
          doi: 10.1107/S1600536812009312pubmed: 22590047google scholar: lookup
        2. Nakatsuji T, Shi Y, Zhu W, Huang CP, Chen YR, Lee DY, Smith JW, Zouboulis CC, Gallo RL, Huang CM. Bioengineering a humanized acne microenvironment model: proteomics analysis of host responses to Propionibacterium acnes infection in vivo. Proteomics 2008 Aug;8(16):3406-15.
          doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800044pubmed: 18651708google scholar: lookup