Analyze Diet
Klinicheskaia laboratornaia diagnostika2019; 63(6); 378-384; doi: 10.18821/0869-2084-2018-63-6-378-384

[Comparative analysis of LAMP and Real Time PCR methods to detect pathogens of glanders and meliodosis.].

Abstract: Results of detection of Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei DNA strains by LAMP (Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification) and Real Time PCR are shown. It has been revealed that, in Real Time PCR, primers steadily detected DNA of those microorganism for the sequences of which they were designed. The above mentioned primers did not detect DNA of heterologous strains. During LAMP method no set of primers showed high analytical sensitivity and specificity. Primers did not detected DNA of all the strains under research to target genes of which they were not intended, but they were capable of directing the synthesis of fragments of genes of heterologous strains. Furthermore, it was difficult to reach the same results during repeated experiments. Failures during LAMP may occur due to existence of GC-reach regions in Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei genomes and due to emergence of secondary structures in isothermical conditions. It is recommended to use Real Time PCR in order to detect pathogens, in case of such matrixes as Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei DNAs which are very complicated for LAMP.
Publication Date: 2019-02-01 PubMed ID: 30702233DOI: 10.18821/0869-2084-2018-63-6-378-384Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study compares the effectiveness of two DNA detection methods, LAMP and Real Time PCR, in identifying specific strains of the bacteria Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei, which cause glanders and melioidosis respectively. The study suggests that Real Time PCR is the more effective method for detecting these pathogens due to issues with sensitivity, specificity, and reliability in the LAMP method.

Comparison of LAMP and Real Time PCR methods

In this study, Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) and Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) methods were compared for their ability to detect the presence of DNA from two bacteria, Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei.

  • Real Time PCR: In this method, the study showed that the selected primers (short strands of DNA that serve as starting points for DNA synthesis) consistently detected DNA of the specific strains of bacteria they were designed for, and were not confused by DNA of unrelated strains.
  • LAMP: By contrast, the LAMP approach proved less reliable. No set of primers showed high sensitivity (the ability to correctly identify positive results) and high specificity (the ability to correctly identify negative results). Furthermore, the LAMP results were less consistent in repeated experiments, which questions the reliability of the method.

Challenges with the LAMP Method

Several reasons were identified that might explain the issues encountered with the LAMP method in this study.

  • Complexity of DNA: The genomes of Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei are rich in GC (guanine and cytosine) regions. Such regions can form strong bonds and create complex secondary structures that are difficult for the LAMP method to handle.
  • Unintended DNA synthesis: The LAMP method’s primers were found to direct the synthesis of DNA from genes they were not targeted for, which could lead to false positive results.

Recommendation

Given the difficulties and inconsistencies identified with the LAMP method, the study recommends the use of Real Time PCR for detecting these bacterial strains in complex genetic materials such as the DNA of Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei. Real Time PCR demonstrated consistent and reliable results and was able to accurately identify the target bacterial DNA.

Cite This Article

APA
Shchit IY, Ignatov KB, Biketov SF. (2019). [Comparative analysis of LAMP and Real Time PCR methods to detect pathogens of glanders and meliodosis.]. Klin Lab Diagn, 63(6), 378-384. https://doi.org/10.18821/0869-2084-2018-63-6-378-384

Publication

ISSN: 0869-2084
NlmUniqueID: 9432021
Country: Russia (Federation)
Language: rus
Volume: 63
Issue: 6
Pages: 378-384

Researcher Affiliations

Shchit, I Yu
  • State Scientific Center of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Obolensk, Russia.
Ignatov, K B
  • The Vavilov Institute of General Genetics Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
  • All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology.
Biketov, S F
  • State Scientific Center of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Obolensk, Russia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Burkholderia mallei
  • Burkholderia pseudomallei
  • DNA, Bacterial / isolation & purification
  • Glanders / diagnosis
  • Horses
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Grant Funding

  • The Russian Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.