Analyze Diet
Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2026; 61(2); e70183; doi: 10.1111/rda.70183

Comparative Evaluation of Follicular Flushing Frequency and Scraping Time During Ovum Pick-Up in Mares: Effects on Oocyte Recovery Rate and Technical Considerations.

Abstract: Transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration or ovum pick-up (OPU) has become the standard technique for oocyte collection in mares for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Although repeated follicular flushes and wall scraping are commonly used to improve oocyte recovery rate (ORR), the relative contribution of each remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of multiple flushes versus controlled scraping time on ORR in mares. A controlled trial was conducted in two phases: (1) an ex vivo phase using slaughterhouse ovaries (n = 32), and (2) an in vivo phase in clinically healthy mares (n = 9). Follicles were assigned to two groups: multiple flushes (MF, 10 flushes with intermittent scraping, lasting 18 s in total) or single flush (SF, 18 s of continuous scraping followed by 1 flush). A total of 489 follicles were aspirated ex vivo and 143 in vivo. Results showed no significant difference in ORR between MF and SF groups in either phase (ex vivo: 63.8% vs. 59.5%; in vivo: 48.3% vs. 44.3%; p > 0.05). However, MF used significantly more flushing medium per follicle in the ex vivo model (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in aspiration time or incidence of clots and blockages in the aspiration lines. A significant correlation was observed between clot number and aspiration system blockage (r = 0.497, p = 0.036). Continuous scraping without repeated flushing reduces medium usage but may increase operator fatigue and the risk of clot formation and system obstructions. Therefore, optimising scraping duration could improve the efficiency of oocyte recovery procedures while simplifying the technique and reducing costs. Further research is required to refine scraping protocols, reduce operator fatigue, and prevent complications related to clot formation.
Publication Date: 2026-02-12 PubMed ID: 41674388PubMed Central: PMC12895297DOI: 10.1111/rda.70183Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Comparative Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study evaluated two common techniques used during ovum pick-up (OPU) in mares—multiple follicular flushes with intermittent scraping versus continuous scraping followed by a single flush—to determine their effects on the oocyte recovery rate (ORR) and potential technical challenges.

Background

  • Ovum pick-up (OPU) via transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration is used to collect oocytes from mares for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), a reproductive technology.
  • Enhancing the oocyte recovery rate is critical for the success of ICSI procedures.
  • Two methods are commonly used to improve ORR during OPU:
    • Repeated follicular flushing combined with intermittent scraping of the follicle wall.
    • Continuous scraping with a single flush afterward.
  • The specific contribution of flushing frequency versus scraping duration in ORR had not been clearly established prior to this study.

Study Design

  • The research was conducted in two phases:
    • Ex vivo phase: Using ovaries collected from 32 slaughtered mares to simulate controlled follicular aspiration (total 489 follicles).
    • In vivo phase: Using 9 clinically healthy live mares (total 143 follicles aspirated).
  • Follicles were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups for aspiration:
    • Multiple Flushes (MF): 10 follicular flushes with intermittent scraping lasting a total of 18 seconds.
    • Single Flush (SF): Continuous scraping for 18 seconds, followed by a single flush.

Key Findings

  • Oocyte Recovery Rate (ORR):
    • No statistically significant difference between MF and SF groups in either ex vivo or in vivo phases:
      • Ex vivo: 63.8% (MF) vs. 59.5% (SF)
      • In vivo: 48.3% (MF) vs. 44.3% (SF)
  • Flushing Medium Use:
    • MF technique used significantly more flushing medium per follicle in the ex vivo phase compared to SF (which has cost and resource implications).
  • Aspiration Time and Technical Issues:
    • No significant differences were found in the overall aspiration time or the incidence of clots and blockages within the aspiration lines between the two methods.
    • However, there was a significant positive correlation between the number of clots formed and blockages in the aspiration system (r = 0.497, p = 0.036), indicating clot formation can negatively impact the procedure.
  • Operator Considerations:
    • Continuous scraping (SF method) may increase operator fatigue because of longer, uninterrupted scraping action.
    • MF may mitigate operator fatigue but increases medium usage.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Since ORR was similar between MF and SF, the choice of technique may hinge on balancing medium consumption, operator fatigue, and technical ease.
  • Continuous scraping with fewer flushes reduces medium used but might increase fatigue and clot-related complications.
  • Multiple flushing reduces clotting risk at the expense of using more medium.
  • Optimizing scraping duration and technique could enhance procedural efficiency, reduce costs, and improve operator comfort.
  • Further research is needed to refine scraping protocols, mitigate operator fatigue, and minimize clot formation to prevent aspiration blockages.

Cite This Article

APA
Márquez-Moya A, Carreras-Vico N, Sala-Ayala L, Martínez-Boví R, Cuervo-Arango J. (2026). Comparative Evaluation of Follicular Flushing Frequency and Scraping Time During Ovum Pick-Up in Mares: Effects on Oocyte Recovery Rate and Technical Considerations. Reprod Domest Anim, 61(2), e70183. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.70183

Publication

ISSN: 1439-0531
NlmUniqueID: 9015668
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 61
Issue: 2
Pages: e70183
PII: e70183

Researcher Affiliations

Márquez-Moya, Adrián
  • Equine Fertility Group, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Spain.
Carreras-Vico, Nerea
  • Equine Fertility Group, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Spain.
Sala-Ayala, Laura
  • Equine Fertility Group, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Spain.
Martínez-Boví, Rebeca
  • Equine Fertility Group, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Spain.
Cuervo-Arango, Juan
  • Equine Fertility Group, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Spain.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Female
  • Horses
  • Oocyte Retrieval / veterinary
  • Oocyte Retrieval / methods
  • Ovarian Follicle
  • Oocytes

Grant Funding

  • GIR24-12 / Universidad San Pablo - CEU

Conflict of Interest Statement

: While preparing this work, ChatGPT was used as an AI‐assisted tool to refine the language and clarity of our written text. Following its use, we thoroughly reviewed and edited the content to ensure accuracy and appropriateness, taking full responsibility for the final published version of the article. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 22 references
  1. Alm H, Torner H, Kanitz W, Becker F, Hinrichs K. Comparison of Different Methods for the Recovery of Horse Oocytes. Equine Veterinary Journal 29: 47–50.
  2. Breton AL, Lewis N. Equine ART and Antral Follicle Count: Can We Deepen Our Understanding to Improve Outcomes?. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 59, no. S2: e14625.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.14625pubmed: 39233592google scholar: lookup
  3. Brück I, Greve T, Hyttel P. Morphology of the Oocyte‐Follicular Connection in the Mare. Anatomy and Embryology 199, no. 1: 21–28.
    doi: 10.1007/s004290050205pubmed: 9924931google scholar: lookup
  4. Brück I, Raun K, Synnestvedt B, Greve T. Follicle Aspiration in the Mare Using a Transvaginal Ultrasound‐Guided Technique. Equine Veterinary Journal 24, no. 1: 58–59.
  5. Claes A, Stout TAE. Success Rate in a Clinical Equine In Vitro Embryo Production Program. Theriogenology 187: 215–218.
  6. Colleoni S, Barbacini S, Necchi D, Duchi R, Lazzari G, Galli C. Application of Ovum Pick‐Up, Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and Embryo Culture in Equine Practice. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, 554–559.
  7. Cuervo‐Arango J, Claes AN, Stout TA. A Retrospective Comparison of the Efficiency of Different Assisted Reproductive Techniques in the Horse, Emphasising the Impact of Maternal Age. Theriogenology 132: 36–44.
  8. Cuervo‐Arango J, Claes AN, Stout TAE. Mare and Stallion Effects on Blastocyst Production in a Commercial Equine Ovum Pick‐Up–Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Program. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 31, no. 12: 1894–1903.
    doi: 10.1071/rd19201pubmed: 31634435google scholar: lookup
  9. Cuervo‐Arango J, Necchi D, Clutton‐Brock A, Profaska M, Crabtree J, Claes A. Transvaginal Follicle Aspiration in Mares: A Description of Different Techniques and Comparison of Results Across Different OPU Clinics. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 60, no. 3: e70043.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.70043pubmed: 40056006google scholar: lookup
  10. Cuervo‐Arango J, Sala‐Ayala L, Márquez‐Moya A, Martínez‐Boví R. The Influence of Aspiration Pressure, Follicle Flushing Method and Needle Rotation During Single‐Operator OPU Technique on Oocyte Recovery and Embryo Production in the Mare. Animals 15, no. 6: 832.
    doi: 10.3390/ani15060832pmc: PMC11939359pubmed: 40150362google scholar: lookup
  11. Felix MR, Turner RM, Dobbie T, Hinrichs K. Successful In Vitro Fertilisation in the Horse: Production of Blastocysts and Birth of Foals After Prolonged Sperm Incubation for Capacitation. Biology of Reproduction 107, no. 6: 1551–1564.
    doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioac172pmc: PMC9752964pubmed: 36106756google scholar: lookup
  12. Fonte JS, Alonso MA, Junior MPM. Successful Equine In Vitro Embryo Production by ICSI – Effect of Season, Mares' Age, Breed, and Phase of the Estrous Cycle on Embryo Production. Theriogenology 223: 47–52.
  13. Gérard N, Robin E. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of the Preovulatory Follicle Differenciation and Ovulation: What Do We Know in the Mare Relative to Other Species. Theriogenology 130: 163–176.
  14. Hawley LR, Enders AC, Hinrichs K. Comparison of Equine and Bovine Oocyte‐Cumulus Morphology Within the Ovarian Follicle. Biology of Reproduction 52: 243–252.
  15. Hinrichs K, Schnobrich M, Fernandes CB, Fleury P, Barillari V, Bruggeworth S. Complications Associated With Equine Transvaginal Ultrasound‐Guided Follicle Aspiration: Practitioner Survey and Field Results. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 146: 105363.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105363pubmed: 39880294google scholar: lookup
  16. Lazzari G, Colleoni S, Crotti G. Laboratory Production of Equine Embryos. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 89: 103097.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103097pubmed: 32563445google scholar: lookup
  17. Márquez‐Moya A, Sala‐Ayala L, Carreras‐Vico N, Martínez‐Boví R, Cuervo‐Arango J. Factors Influencing Oocyte Recovery During Ultrasound‐Guided Follicle Aspiration in Mares: A Postmortem Study. Theriogenology 235: 39–45.
  18. Rodriguez J, Maserati M, Robilotta T. Recovery of Equine Oocytes in Ambulatory Practice and Potential Complications. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 98: 103324.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103324pubmed: 33663711google scholar: lookup
  19. Russell W M S, Burch R L. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. .
  20. Sala‐Ayala L, Pytel A T, Stychno K, Cuervo‐Arango J. Use of Excised Ovaries for Oocyte Recovery by Ultrasound Guided Follicular Aspiration – Validation of an Experimental Model for Research Purposes in Live Mares Ovum Pick Up. Theriogenology 228: 9–16.
  21. Scarlet D, Schuler G, Malama E. Endocrine Profile and OPU‐ICSI Outcomes in Mares: A Comparative Study. Reproduction & Fertility 6, no. 3: e250027.
    doi: 10.1530/raf-25-0027pmc: PMC12231760pubmed: 40539920google scholar: lookup
  22. Van den Branden E, Salamone M, Broothaers K. Physiological and Behavioral Parameters of Pain and Stress in Mares During and After Transvaginal Ultrasound‐Guided Follicular Aspiration. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 12: 1574351.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1574351pmc: PMC12014748pubmed: 40271484google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.