FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Genes (Basel) / Comparative Transcriptome and MicroRNA Profiles of Equine Me...
Genes2025; 16(8); 936; doi: 10.3390/genes16080936

Comparative Transcriptome and MicroRNA Profiles of Equine Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Fibroblasts, and Their Extracellular Vesicles.

Abstract: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a promising tool in regenerative medicine due to their ability to secrete paracrine factors that modulate tissue repair. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by MSCs contain bioactive molecules (e.g., mRNAs, miRNAs, proteins) and play a key role in intercellular communication. This study compared the transcriptomic profiles (mRNA and miRNA) of equine MSCs derived from adipose tissue (AT-MSCs), bone marrow (BM-MSCs), and ovarian fibroblasts (as a differentiated control). Additionally, miRNAs present in EVs secreted by these cells were characterized using next-generation sequencing. All cell types met ISCT criteria for MSCs, including CD90 expression, lack of MHC II, trilineage differentiation, and adherence. EVs were isolated using ultracentrifugation and validated with nanoparticle tracking analysis and flow cytometry (CD63, CD81). Differential expression analysis revealed distinct mRNA and miRNA profiles across cell types and their secreted EVs, correlating with tissue origin. BM-MSCs showed unique regulation of genes linked to early development and osteogenesis. EVs contained diverse RNA species, including miRNA, mRNA, lncRNA, rRNA, and others. In total, 227 and 256 mature miRNAs were detected in BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs, respectively, including two novel miRNAs per MSC type. Fibroblasts expressed 209 mature miRNAs, including one novel miRNA also found in MSCs. Compared to fibroblasts, 60 and 92 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified in AT-MSCs and BM-MSCs, respectively. The results indicate that MSC tissue origin influences both transcriptomic profiles and EV miRNA content, which may help to interpret their therapeutic potential. Identifying key mRNAs and miRNAs could aid in future optimizing of MSC-based therapies in horses.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-08-05 PubMed ID: 40869984PubMed Central: PMC12386118DOI: 10.3390/genes16080936Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Comparative Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research compares the gene expression (mRNA and miRNA) profiles of different types of equine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and fibroblasts, as well as the microRNAs found in their secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs), to better understand their molecular characteristics and potential for regenerative medicine.

Introduction to Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Extracellular Vesicles

  • MSCs have regenerative abilities largely due to their secretion of paracrine factors—bioactive molecules that facilitate tissue repair and wound healing.
  • Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small membrane-bound particles released by cells that carry various molecules such as mRNAs, miRNAs, proteins, and other RNAs, which function in intercellular communication.
  • The study focuses on equine MSCs derived from two tissue types: adipose tissue (AT-MSCs) and bone marrow (BM-MSCs), and compares them to ovarian fibroblasts which act as a differentiated control cell type.

Methods and Cell Characterization

  • All cell types used in the study were validated to meet the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) criteria for MSCs:
    • Positive for CD90 surface marker
    • Negative for Major Histocompatibility Complex class II (MHC II) expression
    • Ability to differentiate into three lineages (trilineage differentiation)
    • Adherence to plastic culture surfaces
  • Extracellular vesicles were isolated using ultracentrifugation methods to ensure purity.
  • EVs were verified through:
    • Nano-particle tracking analysis (to determine size and concentration)
    • Flow cytometry for EV surface markers CD63 and CD81

Transcriptomic and miRNA Profiling

  • Next-generation sequencing was used to analyze mRNA and miRNA expression profiles from the MSCs, fibroblasts, and their respective EVs.
  • Distinct expression profiles were observed between the MSC types and fibroblasts, correlating with their tissue origins:
    • BM-MSCs had unique gene expression, especially in genes related to early development and bone formation (osteogenesis).
    • EVs contained a diverse array of RNA types beyond miRNAs, including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and messenger RNAs (mRNAs).
  • In terms of miRNAs detected:
    • AT-MSCs had 256 mature miRNAs, including 2 previously unidentified novel miRNAs.
    • BM-MSCs had 227 mature miRNAs, also including 2 novel miRNAs.
    • Fibroblasts expressed 209 mature miRNAs, including 1 novel miRNA that was also shared with MSCs.
  • Comparison between cell types revealed significant differences:
    • 60 miRNAs were differentially expressed in AT-MSCs compared to fibroblasts.
    • 92 miRNAs were differentially expressed in BM-MSCs compared to fibroblasts.

Biological and Therapeutic Implications

  • The tissue source of MSCs significantly influences both the comprehensive transcriptomic signatures and the miRNA cargo of their extracellular vesicles.
  • These molecular differences may underlie the distinct therapeutic potentials observed in MSCs derived from different tissues.
  • Identification of key mRNAs and miRNAs that are unique or enriched in MSCs or their EVs could inform the development and optimization of MSC-based regenerative therapies in horses.
  • This detailed molecular profiling can help in selecting the most appropriate MSC source or in engineering EVs with desired therapeutic properties.

Conclusion

  • This study provides comprehensive transcriptomic and microRNA profiles of equine MSCs from adipose and bone marrow sources compared to fibroblasts, together with characterization of their EV miRNA content.
  • It highlights the importance of MSC tissue origin on gene and miRNA expression, offering molecular insights critical for enhancing MSC-based treatments in veterinary regenerative medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Sawicki S, Bugno-Poniewierska M, Żurowski J, Szmatoła T, Semik-Gurgul E, Bochenek M, Karnas E, Gurgul A. (2025). Comparative Transcriptome and MicroRNA Profiles of Equine Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Fibroblasts, and Their Extracellular Vesicles. Genes (Basel), 16(8), 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080936

Publication

Genes
ISSN: 2073-4425
NlmUniqueID: 101551097
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 8
PII: 936

Researcher Affiliations

Sawicki, Sebastian
  • Department of Animal Reproduction, Anatomy and Genomics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.
Bugno-Poniewierska, Monika
  • Department of Animal Reproduction, Anatomy and Genomics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.
Żurowski, Jakub
  • Department of Basic Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Redzina 1C, 30-248 Krakow, Poland.
Szmatoła, Tomasz
  • Department of Basic Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Redzina 1C, 30-248 Krakow, Poland.
Semik-Gurgul, Ewelina
  • Department of Animal Molecular Biology, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1 St., 32-083 Balice, Poland.
Bochenek, Michał
  • Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Gronostajowa 9, 30-387 Krakow, Poland.
Karnas, Elżbieta
  • Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Krakow, Poland.
Gurgul, Artur
  • Department of Basic Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Redzina 1C, 30-248 Krakow, Poland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / metabolism
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / cytology
  • Horses / genetics
  • Extracellular Vesicles / metabolism
  • Extracellular Vesicles / genetics
  • MicroRNAs / genetics
  • Fibroblasts / metabolism
  • Transcriptome / genetics
  • Female
  • Adipose Tissue / cytology
  • Adipose Tissue / metabolism
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Cell Differentiation / genetics
  • RNA, Messenger / genetics

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 92 references
  1. Hagen A, Lehmann H, Aurich S, Bauer N, Melzer M, Moellerberndt J, Patané V, Schnabel CL, Burk J. Scalable Production of Equine Platelet Lysate for Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Culture. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;8:613621.
    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.613621pmc: PMC7859354pubmed: 33553119google scholar: lookup
  2. Esteves CL, Sheldrake TA, Mesquita SP, Pesántez JJ, Menghini T, Dawson L, Péault B, Donadeu FX. Isolation and characterization of equine native MSC populations. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017;8:80.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0525-2pmc: PMC5395828pubmed: 28420427google scholar: lookup
  3. Charlotte M, Gardner S, Harman RM, Van de Walle GR. The mesenchymal stromal cell secretome impairs methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms via cysteine protease activity in the equine model. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2020;9:746–757.
    doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0333pmc: PMC7308642pubmed: 32216094google scholar: lookup
  4. Reynolds DE, Vallapureddy P, Morales R-TT, Oh D, Pan M, Chintapula U, Linardi RL, Gaesser AM, Ortved K, Ko J. Equine mesenchymal stem cell derived extracellular vesicle immunopathology biomarker discovery. J. Extracell. Biol. 2023;2:89.
    doi: 10.1002/jex2.89pmc: PMC11080797pubmed: 38938916google scholar: lookup
  5. Perrini C, Strillacci MG, Bagnato A, Esposti P, Marini M, Corradetti B, Bizzaro D, Idda A, Ledda S, Capra E. Microvesicles secreted from equine amniotic derived cells and their potential role in reducing inflammation in endometrial cells in an in-vitro model. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2016;7:169.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0429-6pmc: PMC5114748pubmed: 27863532google scholar: lookup
  6. Harman RM, Patel RS, Fan JC, Park JE, Rosenberg BR, Van de Walle GR. Single-cell RNA sequencing of equine mesenchymal stromal cells from primary donor-matched tissue sources reveals functional heterogeneity in immune modulation and cell motility. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020;11:524.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-02043-5pmc: PMC7716481pubmed: 33276815google scholar: lookup
  7. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, Krause DS, Deans RJ, Keating A, Prockop DJ, Horowitz EM. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006;8:315–317.
    doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905pubmed: 16923606google scholar: lookup
  8. Rieger J, Kaessmeyer S, Al Masri S, Hünigen H, Plendl J. Endothelial cells and angiogenesis in the horse in health and disease—A review. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 2020;49:656–678.
    doi: 10.1111/ahe.12588pubmed: 32639627google scholar: lookup
  9. Mocchi M, Grolli S, Dotti S, Di Silvestre D, Villa R, Berni P, Conti V, Passignani G, Brambilla F, Bue MD. Equine Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Freeze-Dried Secretome (Lyosecretome) for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Diseases: Production Process Validation and Batch Release Test for Clinical Use. Pharmaceuticals 2021;14:553.
    doi: 10.3390/ph14060553pmc: PMC8226765pubmed: 34200627google scholar: lookup
  10. Konala VBR, Mamidi MK, Bhonde R, Das AK, Pochampally R, Pal R. The current landscape of the mesenchymal stromal cell secretome: A new paradigm for cell-free regeneration. Cytotherapy 2016;18:13–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.10.008pmc: PMC4924535pubmed: 26631828google scholar: lookup
  11. van Niel G, D’Angelo G, Raposo G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:213–228.
    doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.125pubmed: 29339798google scholar: lookup
  12. Pavani KC, Hendrix A, van Den Broeck W, Couck L, Szymanska K, Lin X, Koster JD, Soom AV, Leemans B. Isolation and characterization of functionally active extracellular vesicles from culture medium conditioned by bovine embryos in vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;20:38.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms20010038pmc: PMC6337605pubmed: 30577682google scholar: lookup
  13. Yáñez-Mó M, Siljander PR-M, Andreu Z, Bedina Zavec A, Borràs FE, Buzas EI, Buzas K, Casal E, Cappello F, Carvalho J. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2015;4:27066.
    doi: 10.3402/jev.v4.27066pmc: PMC4433489pubmed: 25979354google scholar: lookup
  14. Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, Antoniou A, Arab T, Archer F, Atkin-Smith GK. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2018;7:1535750.
    doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750pmc: PMC6322352pubmed: 30637094google scholar: lookup
  15. Gandham S, Su X, Wood J, Nocera AL, Alli SC, Milane L, Zimmerman A, Amiji M, Ivanov AR. Technologies and standardization in research on extracellular vesicles. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:1066–1098.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.05.012pmc: PMC7302792pubmed: 32564882google scholar: lookup
  16. Tetta C, Consiglio AL, Bruno S, Tetta E, Gatti E, Dobreva M, Cremonesi F, Camussi G. The role of microvesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells in tissue regeneration; a dream for tendon repair?. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2012;2:212–221.
    pmc: PMC3666529pubmed: 23738299
  17. Collino F, Pomatto M, Bruno S, Lindoso RS, Tapparo M, Sicheng W, Quesenberry P, Camussi G. Exosome and microvesicle-enriched fractions isolated from mes- enchymal stem cells by gradient separation showed different molecular signatures and functions on renal tubular epithelial cells. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2017;13:226–243.
    doi: 10.1007/s12015-016-9713-1pmc: PMC5380712pubmed: 28070858google scholar: lookup
  18. Théry C, Ostrowski M, Segura E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2009;9:581–593.
    doi: 10.1038/nri2567pubmed: 19498381google scholar: lookup
  19. O’bRien K, Breyne K, Ughetto S, Laurent LC, Breakefield XO. RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2020;21:585–606.
    doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0251-ypmc: PMC7249041pubmed: 32457507google scholar: lookup
  20. Pavani KC, Meese T, Pascottini OB, Guan X, Lin X, Peelman L, Hamacher J, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Deforce D, Boel A. Hatching is modulated by microRNA-378a-3p derived from extracellular vesicles secreted by blastocysts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2022;119:e2122708119.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122708119pmc: PMC8944274pubmed: 35298333google scholar: lookup
  21. Alhattab D, Jamali F, Ali D, Hammad H, Adwan S, Rahmeh R, Samarah O, Salah B, Hamdan M, Awidi A. An insight into the whole transcriptome profile of four tissue-specific human mesenchymal stem cells. Regen Med 2019;14:841–865.
    doi: 10.2217/rme-2018-0137pubmed: 30702025google scholar: lookup
  22. Heo JS, Choi Y, Kim H-S, Kim HO. Comparison of molecular profiles of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, placenta and adipose tissue. Int J Mol Med 2016;37:115–125.
    doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2413pmc: PMC4687432pubmed: 26719857google scholar: lookup
  23. Zhan X-S, El-Ashram S, Luo D-Z, Luo H-N, Wang B-Y, Chen S-F, Bai Y-S, Chen Z-S, Liu C-Y, Ji H-Q. A comparative study of biological characteristics and transcriptome profiles of mesenchymal stem cells from different canine tissues. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:1485.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms20061485pmc: PMC6471769pubmed: 30934541google scholar: lookup
  24. Monaco E, Sobreira de Lima A, Bionaz M, Maki A, Wilson SM, Hurley WL, Wheeler MB. Morphological and transcriptomic comparison of adipose and bone marrow derived porcine stem cells. Open Tissue Eng Regen Med J 2009;2:20–33.
    doi: 10.2174/1875043500902010020google scholar: lookup
  25. Yamamoto Y, Banas A, Murata S, Ishikawa M, Lim CR, Teratani T, Hatada I, Matsubara K, Kato T, Ochiya T. A comparative analysis of the transcriptome and signal pathways in hepatic differentiation of human adipose mesenchymal stem cells. FEBS J 2008;275:1260–1273.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06287.xpubmed: 18318837google scholar: lookup
  26. Yang Y, Wang H, Chang KH, Qu H, Zhang Z, Xiong Q, Qi H, Cui P, Lin Q, Ruan X. Transcriptome dynamics during human erythroid differentiation and development. Genomics 2013;102:431–441.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.09.005pmc: PMC4151266pubmed: 24121002google scholar: lookup
  27. Ugurlu B, Karaoz E. Comparison of similar cells: Mesenchymal stromal cells and fibroblasts. Acta Histochem 2020;122:151634.
    doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2020.151634pmc: PMC7550172pubmed: 33059115google scholar: lookup
  28. Muhl L, Genové G, Leptidis S, Liu J, He L, Mocci G, Sun Y, Gustafsson S, Buyandelger B, Chivukula IV. Single-cell analysis uncovers fibroblast heterogeneity and criteria for fibroblast and mural cell identification and discrimination. Nat Commun 2020;11:3953.
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17740-1pmc: PMC7414220pubmed: 32769974google scholar: lookup
  29. Sawicki S, Gurgul A, Gabryś J, Kij-Mitka B, Bochenek M, Karnas E, Podstawski Z, Długosz B, Bugno-Poniewierska M. Extracellular vesicles obtained from equine mesenchymal stem cells isolated from adipose tissue improve selected parameters of stallion semen after cryopreservation. Ann Anim Sci 2023;25:189–200.
    doi: 10.2478/aoas-2024-0073google scholar: lookup
  30. Buss DG, Giuliano EA, Sharma A, Mohan RR. Isolation and cultivation of equine corneal keratocytes, fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. Vet Ophthalmol 2010;13:37–42.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2009.00755.xpmc: PMC2930189pubmed: 20149174google scholar: lookup
  31. Kroll KW, Mokaram NE, Pelletier AR, Frankhouser DE, Westphal MS, Stump PA, Stump CL, Bundschuh R, Blachly JS, Yan P. Quality control for RNA-Seq (QuaCRS): An integrated quality control pipeline.. Cancer Inform 2014;13:7–14.
    doi: 10.4137/CIN.S14022pmc: PMC4214596pubmed: 25368506google scholar: lookup
  32. Dodt M, Roehr JT, Ahmed R, Dieterich C. FLEXBAR—Flexible barcode and adapter processing next-generation sequencing platforms.. Biology 2012;1:895–905.
    doi: 10.3390/biology1030895pmc: PMC4009805pubmed: 24832523google scholar: lookup
  33. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq—A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.. Bioinformatics 2015;31:166–169.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638pmc: PMC4287950pubmed: 25260700google scholar: lookup
  34. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.. Genome Biol 2014;15:550.
    doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8pmc: PMC4302049pubmed: 25516281google scholar: lookup
  35. Ge SX, Son EW, Yao R. iDEP: An integrated web application for differential expression and pathway analysis of RNA-Seq data.. BMC Bioinform 2018;19:534.
    doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2486-6pmc: PMC6299935pubmed: 30567491google scholar: lookup
  36. Kwong KS, Holland B, Cheung SH. A modified benjamini-hochberg multiple comparisons procedure for controlling the false discovery rate.. J Stat Plan Infer 2002;104:351–362.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(01)00252-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  37. Yuan JS, Wang D, Stewart CN Jr. Statistical methods for efficiency adjusted real-time PCR quantification.. Biotechnol J 2008;3:112–123.
    doi: 10.1002/biot.200700169pubmed: 18074404google scholar: lookup
  38. Riveroll AL, Skyba-Lewin S, Lynn KD, Mubyeyi G, Abd-El-Aziz A, Kibenge FST, Kibenge MJT, Cohen AM, Esparza-Gonsalez B, McDuffee L. Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for Gene Expression Studies in an Equine Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation Model by Proteome Analysis and Reverse-Transcriptase Quantitative Real-Time PCR.. Genes 2023;14:673.
    doi: 10.3390/genes14030673pmc: PMC10048155pubmed: 36980946google scholar: lookup
  39. Johnston AG, Anam M, Dutta A, Su Z. TGIRT-seq to profile tRNA-derived RNAs and associated RNA modifications.. Methods Enzymol 2025;711:223–240.
    doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2024.11.001pmc: PMC11890191pubmed: 39952707google scholar: lookup
  40. Aparicio-Puerta E, Lebrón R, Rueda A, Gómez-Martín C, Giannoukakos S, Jaspez D, Medina JM, Zubkovic A, Jurak I, Fromm B. sRNAbench and sRNAtoolbox 2019: Intuitive fast small RNA profiling and differential expression.. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:W530–W535.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz415pmc: PMC6602500pubmed: 31114926google scholar: lookup
  41. Bourin P, Bunnell BA, Casteilla L, Dominici M, Katz AJ, March KL, Redl H, Rubin JP, Yoshimura K, Gimble JM. Stromal cells from the adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction and culture expanded adipose tissue-derived stromal/stem cells: A joint statement of the International Federation for Adipose Therapeutics and Science (IFATS) and the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT). Cytotherapy 2013;15:641–648.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.02.006pmc: PMC3979435pubmed: 23570660google scholar: lookup
  42. Lara E, Rivera N, Cabezas J, Navarrete F, Saravia F, Rodriguez-Alvarez L, Castro F. Endometrial stem cells in farm animals: Potential role in uterine physi-ology and pathology.. Bioengineering 2018;5:75.
    doi: 10.3390/bioengineering5030075pmc: PMC6163755pubmed: 30231577google scholar: lookup
  43. Cabezas J, Rojas D, Navarrete F, Ortiz R, Rivera G, Saravia F, Rodriguez-Alvarez L, Castro F. Equine mesenchymal stem cells derived from endometrial or adipose tissue share significant biological properties, but have distinctive pattern of surface markers and migration.. Therio 2018;106:93–102.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.09.035pubmed: 29049924google scholar: lookup
  44. Castro FO, Torres A, Cabezas J, Rodriguez-Alvarez L. Combined use of platelet rich plasma and vitamin C positively affects differentiation in vitro to mesodermal lineage of adult adipose equine mesenchymal stem cells.. Res Vet Sci 2014;96:95–101.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.12.005pubmed: 24377415google scholar: lookup
  45. Uder C, Brückner S, Winkler S, Tautenhahn HM, Christ B. Mammalian MSC from selected species: Features and applications: Cross-species MSC.. Cytometry 2018;93:32–49.
    doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23239pubmed: 28906582google scholar: lookup
  46. Marolt Presen D, Traweger A, Gimona M, Redl H. Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Based Bone Regeneration Therapies: From Cell Transplantation and Tissue Engineering to Therapeutic Secretomes and Extracellular Vesicles.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019;7:352.
    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00352pmc: PMC6890555pubmed: 31828066google scholar: lookup
  47. Scotti C, Piccinini E, Takizawa H, Todorov A, Bourgine P, Papadimitropoulos A, Barbero A, Manz MG, Martin I. Engineering of a functional bone organ through endochondral ossification.. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:3997–4002.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220108110pmc: PMC3593845pubmed: 23401508google scholar: lookup
  48. Sacchetti B, Funari A, Michienzi S, Di Cesare S, Piersanti S, Saggio I, Tagliafico E, Ferrari S, Robey PG, Riminucci M. Self- renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment.. Cell 2007;131:324–336.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.025pubmed: 17956733google scholar: lookup
  49. Brocher J, Janicki P, Voltz P, Seebach E, Neumann E, Mueller-Ladner U, Richter W. Inferior ectopic bone formation of mesenchymal stromal cells from adipose tissue compared to bone marrow: Rescue by chondrogenic pre-induction.. Stem Cell Res 2013;11:1393–1406.
    doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.07.008pubmed: 24140198google scholar: lookup
  50. Wei X, Liu Q, Guo S, Wu Y. Role of WNT5A in periodontal tissue development, maintance, and periodontitis: Implications for periodontal regeneration (Review). Mol Med Rep 2020;23:167.
    doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11806pmc: PMC7821221pubmed: 33398377google scholar: lookup
  51. Regard JB, Zhong Z, Williams BO, Yang Y. Wnt signaling in bone development and disease: Making stronger bone with Wnts.. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2012;4:a007997.
    doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a007997pmc: PMC3504445pubmed: 23209148google scholar: lookup
  52. Hojo H, Ohba S, Chung UI. Signaling pathways regulating the specification and differentiation of the osteoblast lineage.. Regen Ther 2015;1:57–62.
    doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2014.10.002pmc: PMC6581763pubmed: 31245441google scholar: lookup
  53. Nakanishi R, Akiyama H, Kimura H, Otsuki B, Shimizu M, Tsuboyama T, Nakamura T. Osteoblast-targeted expression of Sfrp4 in mice results in low bone mass.. J Bone Miner Res 2008;23:271–277.
    doi: 10.1359/jbmr.071007pubmed: 17907918google scholar: lookup
  54. Haraguchi R, Kitazawa R, Mori K, Tachibana R, Kiyonari H, Imai Y, Abe T, Kitazawa S. sFRP4-dependent Wnt signal modulation is critical for bone remodeling during postnatal development and age-related bone loss.. Sci Rep 2016;6:25198.
    doi: 10.1038/srep25198pmc: PMC4846872pubmed: 27117872google scholar: lookup
  55. Ivanova NB, Dimos JT, Schaniel C, Hackney JA, Moore KA, Lemischka IR. A stem cell molecular signature.. Science 2002;298:601–604.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1073823pubmed: 12228721google scholar: lookup
  56. Etheridge SL, Spencer GJ, Heath DJ, Genever PG. Expression profiling and functional analysis of wnt signaling mechanisms in mesenchymal stem cells.. Stem Cells 2004;22:849–860.
    doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-5-849pubmed: 15342948google scholar: lookup
  57. Robledo RF, Rajan L, Li X, Lufkin T. The Dlx5 and Dlx6 homeobox genes are essential for craniofacial, axial, and appendicular skeletal development.. Genes Dev 2002;16:1089–1101.
    doi: 10.1101/gad.988402pmc: PMC186247pubmed: 12000792google scholar: lookup
  58. Zerucha T, Ekker M. Distal-less-related homeobox genes of vertebrates: Evolution, function, and regulation.. Biochem Cell Biol 2000;78:593–601.
    doi: 10.1139/o00-066pubmed: 11103950google scholar: lookup
  59. Kang S, Oh SC, Min BW, Lee DH. Transglutaminase 2 regulates self-renewal and stem cell marker of human colorectal cancer stem cells.. Anticancer Res 2018;38:787–794.
    doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12285pubmed: 29374703google scholar: lookup
  60. Laurentino TDS, Soares RDS, Marie SKN, Oba-Shinjo SM. LOXL3 Function Beyond Amino Oxidase and Role in Pathologies, Including Cancer.. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:3587.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms20143587pmc: PMC6678131pubmed: 31340433google scholar: lookup
  61. Van Boxtel AL, Gansner JM, Hakvoort HW, Snell H, Legler J, Gitlin JD. Lysyl oxidase-like 3b is critical for cartilage maturation during zebrafish craniofacial development.. Matrix Biol 2011;30:178–187.
    doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.12.002pmc: PMC3089694pubmed: 21244857google scholar: lookup
  62. Zhang J, Yang R, Liu Z, Hou C, Zong W, Zhang A, Sun X, Gao J. Loss of lysyl oxidase-like 3 causes cleft palate and spinal deformity in mice.. Hum Mol Genet 2015;24:6174–6185.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv333pmc: PMC4599675pubmed: 26307084google scholar: lookup
  63. Laverriere AC, MacNeill C, Mueller C, Poelmann RE, Burch JB, Evans T. GATA-4/5/6, a subfamily of three transcription factors transcribed in developing heart and gut.. J Biol Chem 1994;269:23177–23184.
    doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)31636-8pubmed: 8083222google scholar: lookup
  64. Fujikura J, Yamato E, Yonemura S, Hosoda K, Masui S, Nakao K, Miyazaki J, Niwa H. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells is induced by GATA factors.. Genes Dev 2002;16:784–789.
    doi: 10.1101/gad.968802pmc: PMC186328pubmed: 11937486google scholar: lookup
  65. Hasegawa S, Fujiwara T, Okitsu Y, Kato H, Sato Y, Fukuhara N, Onishi Y, Shimizu R, Yamamoto M, Harigae H. Effects of in vivo deletion of GATA2 in bone marrow stromal cells.. Exp Hematol 2017;56:31–45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2017.08.004pubmed: 28866324google scholar: lookup
  66. Kamata M, Okitsu Y, Fujiwara T, Kanehira M, Nakajima S, Takahashi T, Inoue A, Fukuhara N, Onishi Y, Ishizawa K. GATA2 regulates differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.. Haematol 2014;99:1686–1696.
    doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.105692pmc: PMC4222475pubmed: 25150255google scholar: lookup
  67. Bae S, Park CW, Son HK, Ju HK, Paik D, Koh GY, Kim J, Kim H, Jeon CJ. Fibroblast activation protein alpha identifies mesenchymal stromal cells from human bone marrow.. Br J Haematol 2008;142:827–830.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07241.xpubmed: 18510677google scholar: lookup
  68. Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A. Rho GTPases in cell biology.. Nature 2002;420:629–635.
    doi: 10.1038/nature01148pubmed: 12478284google scholar: lookup
  69. Cantley LC. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway.. Science 2002;296:1655–1657.
    doi: 10.1126/science.296.5573.1655pubmed: 12040186google scholar: lookup
  70. Chang F, Lee JT, Navolanic PM, Steelman LS, Shelton JG, Blalock WL, Franklin RA, McCubrey JA. Involvement of PI3K/Akt pathway in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and neoplastic transformation: A target for cancer chemotherapy.. Leukemia 2003;17:590–603.
    doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402824pubmed: 12646949google scholar: lookup
  71. Zhang WB, Zhong WJ, Wang L. A signal-amplification circuit between miR-218 and Wnt/beta-catenin signal promotes human adipose tissue-derived stem cells osteogenic differentiation.. Bone 2014;58:59–66.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.09.015pubmed: 24091133google scholar: lookup
  72. Angoulvant D, Ivanes F, Ferrera R, Matthews PG, Nataf S, Ovize M. Mesenchymal stem cell conditioned media attenuates in vitro and ex vivo myocardial reperfusion injury.. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011;30:95–102.
    doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.08.023pubmed: 21030271google scholar: lookup
  73. Covas DT, Panepucci RA, Fontes AM, Silva WA Jr, Orellana MD, Freitas MC, Neder L, Santos AR, Peres LC, Jamur MC. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells obtained from diverse human tissues share functional properties and gene-expression profile with CD146+ perivascular cells and fibroblasts.. Exp Hematol 2008;36:642–654.
    doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.12.015pubmed: 18295964google scholar: lookup
  74. Baboolal TG, Boxall SA, Churchman SM, Buckley CT, Jones E, McGonagle D. Intrinsic multipotential mesenchymal stromal cell activity in gelatinous Heberden’s nodes in osteoarthritis at clinical presentation.. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16:R119.
    doi: 10.1186/ar4574pmc: PMC4075346pubmed: 24894724google scholar: lookup
  75. Wagner W, Wein F, Seckinger A, Frankhauser M, Wirkner U, Krause U, Blake J, Schwager C, Eckstein V, Ansorge W. Comparative characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood.. Exp Hematol 2005;33:1402–1416.
    doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2005.07.003pubmed: 16263424google scholar: lookup
  76. Sottile M, Hocking C. Fibronectin polymerization regulates the composition and stability of extracellular matrix fibrils and cell-matrix adhesions.. Mol Biol Cell 2002;13:3546–3559.
    doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-01-0048pmc: PMC129965pubmed: 12388756google scholar: lookup
  77. Arredondo R, Poggioli F, Martínez-Díaz S, Piera-Trilla M, Torres-Claramunt R, Tío L, Monllau JC. Fibronectin-coating enhances attachment and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells on a polyurethane meniscal scaffold.. Regen Ther 2021;18:480–486.
    doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2021.11.001pmc: PMC8633527pubmed: 34926733google scholar: lookup
  78. Ren Z, Hou Y, Ma S, Tao Y, Li J, Cao H, Ji L. Effects of CCN3 on fibroblast proliferation, apoptosis and extracellular matrix production.. Int J Mol Med 2014;33:1607–1612.
    doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1735pubmed: 24715059google scholar: lookup
  79. Navarrete F, Wong YS, Cabezas J, Riadi G, Manríquez J, Rojas D, Castro FO. Distinctive Cellular Transcriptomic Signature and MicroRNA Cargo of Extracellular Vesicles of Horse Adipose and Endometrial Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Same Donors.. Cell Reprogram 2020;22:311–327.
    doi: 10.1089/cell.2020.0026pubmed: 32991224google scholar: lookup
  80. Nawaz M, Fatima F, Vallabhaneni KC, Penfornis P, Valadi H, Ekström K, Kholia S, Whitt JD, Fernandes JD, Pochampally R. Extracellular Vesicles: Evolving Factors in Stem Cell Biology.. Stem Cells Int 2016;2016:1073140.
    doi: 10.1155/2016/1073140pmc: PMC4663346pubmed: 26649044google scholar: lookup
  81. Ghafouri-Fard S, Niazi V, Taheri M. Role of miRNAs in conveying message of stem cells via extracellular vesicles. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2020;117:104569.
    doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2020.104569pubmed: 33160962google scholar: lookup
  82. Eirin A, Riester S.M, Zhu X.-Y, Tang H, Evans J.M, O’brien D, Wijnen A.J, Lerman L.O. MicroRNA and mRNA cargo of extracellular vesicles from porcine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Gene 2014;551:55–64.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.08.041pmc: PMC4174680pubmed: 25158130google scholar: lookup
  83. Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Gong H, Luo S, Cui Y. The Role of Exosomes and Their Applications in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:12204.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms222212204pmc: PMC8622108pubmed: 34830085google scholar: lookup
  84. Jahan S, Mukherjee S, Ali S, Bhardwaj U, Choudhary R.K, Balakrishnan S, Naseem A, Mir S.A, Banawas S, Alaidarous M. Pioneer Role of Extracellular Vesicles as Modulators of Cancer Initiation in Progression, Drug Therapy, and Vaccine Prospects. Cells 2022;11:490.
    doi: 10.3390/cells11030490pmc: PMC8833976pubmed: 35159299google scholar: lookup
  85. Kirk T, Ahmed A, Rognoni E. Fibroblast Memory in Development, Homeostasis and Disease. Cells 2021;10:2840.
    doi: 10.3390/cells10112840pmc: PMC8616330pubmed: 34831065google scholar: lookup
  86. Liu K, Cui Y, Han H, Guo E, Shi X, Xiong K, Zhang N, Zhai S, Sang S, Liu M. Fibroblast atlas: Shared and specific cell types across tissues. Sci. Adv. 2025;11:eado0173.
    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado0173pmc: PMC11963979pubmed: 40173240google scholar: lookup
  87. Quiros R.M, Valianou M, Kwon Y, Brown K.M, Godwin A.K, Cukierman E. Ovarian normal and tumor-associated fibroblasts retain in vivo stromal characteristics in a 3-D matrix-dependent manner. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008;110:99–109.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.03.006pmc: PMC2612536pubmed: 18448156google scholar: lookup
  88. Vlieghe H, Leonel E.C.R, Asiabi P, Amorim C.A. The characterization and therapeutic applications of ovarian theca cells: An update. Life Sci. 2023;317:121479.
    doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121479pubmed: 36758341google scholar: lookup
  89. Plikus M.V, Wang X, Sinha S, Forte E, Thompson S.M, Herzog E.L, Driskell R.R, Rosenthal N, Biernaskie J, Horsley V. Fibroblasts: Origins, definitions, and functions in health and disease. Cell 2021;184:3852–3872.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.024pmc: PMC8566693pubmed: 34297930google scholar: lookup
  90. Masi I, Ottavi F, Caprara V, Rio D.D, Kunkl M, Spadaro F, Licursi V, Tuosto L, Bagnato A, Rosano’ L. The extracellular matrix protein type I collagen and fibronectin are regulated by β-arrestin-1/endothelin axis in human ovarian fibroblasts. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2025;44:64.
    doi: 10.1186/s13046-025-03327-5pmc: PMC11844176pubmed: 39985042google scholar: lookup
  91. Kinnear H.M, Tomaszewski C.E, Chang A.L, Moravek M.B, Xu M, Padmanabhan V, Shikanov A. The ovarian stroma as a new frontier. Reproduction 2020;160:R25–R39.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-19-0501pmc: PMC7453977pubmed: 32716007google scholar: lookup
  92. Yun Y.R, Won J.E, Jeon E, Lee S, Kang W, Jo H, Jang J.H, Shin U.S, Kim H.W. Fibroblast growth factors: Biology, function, and application for tissue regeneration. J. Tissue Eng. 2010;2010:218142.
    doi: 10.4061/2010/218142pmc: PMC3042641pubmed: 21350642google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,093 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.