Comparison of alveolar ventilation, oxygenation, pressure support, and respiratory system resistance in response to noninvasive versus conventional mechanical ventilation in foals.
Abstract: To compare the efficacy of positive pressure ventilation applied through a mask versus an endotracheal tube, using anesthetized/paralyzed foals as a model for foals with hypoventilation. Methods: Six 1-month-old foals. Methods: A crossover design was used to compare the physiologic response of foals to 2 ventilatory techniques, noninvasive mask mechanical ventilation (NIMV) versus endotracheal mechanical ventilation (ETMV), during a single period of anesthesia and paralysis. Arterial pH, PaO2, PaCO2, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2 tension, airway pressures, total respiratory system resistance, resistance across the upper airways (proximal to the midtracheal region), and positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) were measured. Only tidal volume (VT; 10, 12.5, and 15 ml/kg of body weight) or PEEP (7 cm of H2O) varied. Results: Compared with ETMV, use of NIMV at equivalent VT resulted in PaCO2 and pH values that were significantly higher, but PaO2 was only slightly lower. Between the 2 methods, peak airway pressure was similar, but peak expiratory flow was significantly lower and total respiratory resistance higher at each VT for NIMV. Delivery of PEEP (7 cm of H2O) was slightly better for ETMV (7.1 +/- 1.3 cm of H2O) than for NIMV (5.6 +/- 0.6 cm of H2O). Conclusions: These data suggest that use of NIMV induces similar physiologic effects as ETMV, but the nasal cavities and mask contribute greater dead space, manifesting in hypercapnia. Increasing the VT used on a per kilogram of body weight basis, or the use of pressure-cycled ventilation might reduce hypercapnia during NIMV. Conclusions: Use of NIMV might be applicable in selected foals, such as those with hypoventilation and minimal changes in lung compliance, during weaning from endotracheal mechanical ventilation, or for short-term ventilation in weak foals.
Publication Date: 1997-12-24 PubMed ID: 9401700
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Clinical Trial
- Journal Article
- Randomized Controlled Trial
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article investigates the effectiveness of noninvasive mask mechanical ventilation compared to traditional endotracheal mechanical ventilation in foals under anesthesia. The study found that both methods had similar physiological effects, but the mask method resulted in slightly higher carbon dioxide levels, suggesting the possibility of adjusting ventilation strategies to reduce this.
Research Methodology
- The research was conducted using a crossover design, which allowed the researchers to compare the response of the foals to the two ventilation techniques, noninvasive mask mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and endotracheal mechanical ventilation (ETMV).
- Measurements for various physiological markers were taken during the study. These included arterial pH, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2 tension, airway pressures, total respiratory system resistance, and positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP).
- The only variables in the experiment were the tidal volume or PEEP. Tidal volume refers to the amount of air that moves in and out of the lungs during normal breathing, while PEEP is the pressure in the lungs above atmospheric pressure that exists at the end of exhalation.
Research Findings
- Results showed that using NIMV led to significantly higher PaCO2 and pH levels compared to ETMV, while oxygenation (PaO2) was slightly lower.
- The peak airway pressure was similar between the two methods, but the flow of air during exhalation (peak expiratory flow) was significantly lower for NIMV and total respiratory resistance was higher at every level of tidal volume.
- Furthermore, PEEP delivery was slightly more effective with ETMV than NIMV.
- The research concluded that although physiologic effects with the use of NIMV and ETMV are similar, NIMV contributes to a higher dead space due to the nasal cavities and the mask, leading to higher carbon dioxide levels (hypercapnia).
- The researchers suggest adjusting the ventilation strategies such as increasing the volume of air moved per breath (tidal volume) or using pressure-cycled ventilation to reduce hypercapnia when using NIMV.
Potential Applications
- Given the findings, the researchers suggest that NIMV could be suitable for certain foals, such as those with hypoventilation and minimal changes in lung compliance.
- It could be considered for use during weaning from endotracheal mechanical ventilation, or for short-term ventilation in weak foals.
Cite This Article
APA
Hoffman AM, Kupcinskas RL, Paradis MR.
(1997).
Comparison of alveolar ventilation, oxygenation, pressure support, and respiratory system resistance in response to noninvasive versus conventional mechanical ventilation in foals.
Am J Vet Res, 58(12), 1463-1467.
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Aging / physiology
- Airway Resistance / physiology
- Animals
- Blood Gas Analysis / methods
- Blood Gas Analysis / veterinary
- Body Weight / physiology
- Cross-Over Studies
- Horse Diseases / physiopathology
- Horses / physiology
- Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
- Hypercapnia / physiopathology
- Hypercapnia / veterinary
- Hypoventilation / physiopathology
- Hypoventilation / veterinary
- Lung Compliance / physiology
- Models, Biological
- Oxygen Consumption / physiology
- Positive-Pressure Respiration
- Pulmonary Ventilation / physiology
- Respiration, Artificial / methods
- Respiration, Artificial / veterinary
- Respiratory Physiological Phenomena
- Tidal Volume / physiology
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists