Analyze Diet
Veterinary sciences2022; 9(9); 464; doi: 10.3390/vetsci9090464

Comparison of Two Leptospira Type Strains of Serovar Grippotyphosa in Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) Diagnostics for the Detection of Infections with Leptospires in Horses, Dogs and Pigs.

Abstract: The MAT test is of great importance in the diagnosis of leptospiral infections. Based on various differences, the serovar Grippotyphosa has been divided into two types, Moskva V and Duyster. Differences or similarities of the two type strains in the context of leptospiral diagnostics have not yet been elucidated in more detail; therefore both strains were analysed in MAT diagnostics for the detection of leptospiral infections in pigs, dogs and horses. Serum samples from 2996 pigs, 55 dogs and 35 horses, as well as vitreous and/or aqueous fluid samples from these and 13 additional horses were analysed by MAT; available supplementary samples were tested for leptospires by PCR. In pigs, 92.6% of the samples with both strains received an identical titre result in the MAT test, whereas in dogs and horses only 53.0% and 43.6% had concordant results. Since infections with the serovar Grippotyphosa occur more frequently in dogs and horses overall, more differences were observed here. In the case of discrepant serological results, supplementary samples and PCR examinations were not able to add information on the true status. Further analyses of follow-up studies or at least serum pairs from dogs and horses infected with the serovar Grippotyphosa are necessary.
Publication Date: 2022-08-29 PubMed ID: 36136680PubMed Central: PMC9503138DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9090464Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research analyzes and compares the effectivity of two type strains, Moskva V and Duyster, of the serovar Grippotyphosa, in the Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) for diagnosing leptospiral infections in pigs, dogs, and horses.

Research Objectives

  • This study aims to examine the differences or similarities between two type strains, Moskva V and Duyster, of the serovar Grippotyphosa, in the context of leptospiral diagnostics.
  • It also strives to provide insight into the effectiveness of these strains when used in MAT diagnostics for detecting leptospiral infections in pigs, dogs, and horses.

Methodology

  • Samples were taken from a population of 2996 pigs, 55 dogs, and 35 horses.
  • Vitreous and/or aqueous fluid samples were also collected from these animal groups and 13 additional horses.
  • The samples were tested with the MAT; supplementary samples were further evaluated for leptospires using PCR.

Findings

  • In pigs, identical titre results were received in 92.6% of the samples with both strains in the MAT test.
  • However, in dogs and horses, only 53.0% and 43.6% had matching outcomes respectively.
  • As infections with the serovar Grippotyphosa are more common in dogs and horses, more significant differences were noticed in these groups.
  • On using supplementary samples and PCR examinations for cases with divergent serological results, no additional information on the true status could be derived.

Conclusion

  • The research concludes that additional evaluations regarding follow-up studies or at least serum pairs from dogs and horses infected with the serovar Grippotyphosa are needed for complete understanding.
  • Within the scope of this study, the two type strains have shown certain variances in their effectiveness during MAT diagnostics, especially in the detection of leptospiral infection in dogs and horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Strutzberg-Minder K, Ullerich A, Dohmann K, Boehmer J, Goris M. (2022). Comparison of Two Leptospira Type Strains of Serovar Grippotyphosa in Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) Diagnostics for the Detection of Infections with Leptospires in Horses, Dogs and Pigs. Vet Sci, 9(9), 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9090464

Publication

ISSN: 2306-7381
NlmUniqueID: 101680127
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 9
PII: 464

Researcher Affiliations

Strutzberg-Minder, Katrin
  • IVD Innovative Veterinary Diagnostics (IVD GmbH), 30926 Seelze, Germany.
Ullerich, Astrid
  • IVD Innovative Veterinary Diagnostics (IVD GmbH), 30926 Seelze, Germany.
Dohmann, Karen
  • IVD Innovative Veterinary Diagnostics (IVD GmbH), 30926 Seelze, Germany.
Boehmer, Jan
  • IVD Innovative Veterinary Diagnostics (IVD GmbH), 30926 Seelze, Germany.
Goris, Marga
  • OIE and National Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Leptospirosis, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 48 references
  1. Sykes JE, Reagan KL, Nally JE, Galloway RL, Haake DA. Role of Diagnostics in Epidemiology, Management, Surveillance, and Control of Leptospirosis.. Pathogens 2022 Mar 24;11(4).
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens11040395pmc: PMC9032781pubmed: 35456070google scholar: lookup
  2. OIE. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. OIE; Paris, France: 2022. Leptospirosis; pp. 1–13.
  3. Guedes IB, de Souza GO, Castro JFP, Cavalini MB, de Souza Filho AF, Heinemann MB. Usefulness of the Ranking Technique in the Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) to Predict the Most Likely Infecting Serogroup of Leptospira.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:654034.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.654034pmc: PMC7965942pubmed: 33748224google scholar: lookup
  4. Wilkinson DA, Edwards M, Benschop J, Nisa S. Identification of pathogenic Leptospira species and serovars in New Zealand using metabarcoding.. PLoS One 2021;16(9):e0257971.
  5. Ahmed A, Engelberts MF, Boer KR, Ahmed N, Hartskeerl RA. Development and validation of a real-time PCR for detection of pathogenic leptospira species in clinical materials.. PLoS One 2009 Sep 18;4(9):e7093.
  6. Stoddard RA. Detection of pathogenic Leptospira spp. through real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting the LipL32 gene.. Methods Mol Biol 2013;943:257-66.
    doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-353-4_17pubmed: 23104295google scholar: lookup
  7. Ferreira AS, Costa P, Rocha T, Amaro A, Vieira ML, Ahmed A, Thompson G, Hartskeerl RA, Inácio J. Direct detection and differentiation of pathogenic Leptospira species using a multi-gene targeted real time PCR approach.. PLoS One 2014;9(11):e112312.
  8. Miotto BA, da Hora AS, Taniwaki SA, Brandão PE, Heinemann MB, Hagiwara MK. Development and validation of a modified TaqMan based real-time PCR assay targeting the lipl32 gene for detection of pathogenic Leptospira in canine urine samples.. Braz J Microbiol 2018 Jul-Sep;49(3):584-590.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.09.004pmc: PMC6066729pubmed: 29233483google scholar: lookup
  9. Ahmed AA, Goris MGA, Meijer MC. Development of lipL32 real-time PCR combined with an internal and extraction control for pathogenic Leptospira detection.. PLoS One 2020;15(11):e0241584.
  10. Pérez LJ, Lanka S, DeShambo VJ, Fredrickson RL, Maddox CW. A Validated Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Infectious Leptospira spp.: A Novel Assay for the Detection and Differentiation of Strains From Both Pathogenic Groups I and II.. Front Microbiol 2020;11:457.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00457pmc: PMC7100377pubmed: 32265882google scholar: lookup
  11. Levett PN. Leptospirosis.. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001 Apr;14(2):296-326.
    doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.296-326.2001pmc: PMC88975pubmed: 11292640google scholar: lookup
  12. Ellis WA. Animal leptospirosis.. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2015;387:99-137.
    doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-45059-8_6pubmed: 25388134google scholar: lookup
  13. Goris M.G.A., Leeflang M.M.G.. Establishment of Valid Laboratory Case Definition for Human Leptospirosis. J. Bacteriol. Parasitol. 2012;3:2.
    doi: 10.4172/2155-9597.1000132google scholar: lookup
  14. Miotto BA, Tozzi BF, Penteado MS, Guilloux AGA, Moreno LZ, Heinemann MB, Moreno AM, Lilenbaum W, Hagiwara MK. Diagnosis of acute canine leptospirosis using multiple laboratory tests and characterization of the isolated strains.. BMC Vet Res 2018 Jul 17;14(1):222.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1547-4pmc: PMC6050646pubmed: 30016949google scholar: lookup
  15. Wollanke B, Gerhards H, Ackermann K. Infectious Uveitis in Horses and New Insights in Its Leptospiral Biofilm-Related Pathogenesis.. Microorganisms 2022 Feb 7;10(2).
  16. Desai S, van Treeck U, Lierz M, Espelage W, Zota L, Sarbu A, Czerwinski M, Sadkowska-Todys M, Avdicová M, Reetz J, Luge E, Guerra B, Nöckler K, Jansen A. Resurgence of field fever in a temperate country: an epidemic of leptospirosis among seasonal strawberry harvesters in Germany in 2007.. Clin Infect Dis 2009 Mar 15;48(6):691-7.
    doi: 10.1086/597036pubmed: 19193108google scholar: lookup
  17. Nau LH, Emirhar D, Obiegala A, Mylius M, Runge M, Jacob J, Bier N, Nöckler K, Imholt C, Below D, Princk C, Dreesman J, Ulrich RG, Pfeffer M, Mayer-Scholl A. [Leptospirosis in Germany: current knowledge on pathogen species, reservoir hosts, and disease in humans and animals].. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2019 Dec;62(12):1510-1521.
    doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03051-4pubmed: 31745576google scholar: lookup
  18. Strutzberg-Minder K, Tschentscher A, Beyerbach M, Homuth M, Kreienbrock L. Passive surveillance of Leptospira infection in swine in Germany.. Porcine Health Manag 2018;4:10.
    doi: 10.1186/s40813-018-0086-5pmc: PMC5872537pubmed: 29610674google scholar: lookup
  19. Naudet J, Crespin L, Cappelle J, Kodjo A, Ayral F. Circulating serogroups of Leptospira in swine from a 7-year study in France (2011-2017).. Porcine Health Manag 2022 Apr 4;8(1):15.
    doi: 10.1186/s40813-022-00257-ypmc: PMC8978166pubmed: 35379346google scholar: lookup
  20. Macaluso G, Torina A, Blanda V, Guercio A, Lastra A, Giacchino I, D'Agostino R, Sciacca C, D'Incau M, Bertasio C, Grippi F. Leptospira in Slaughtered Fattening Pigs in Southern Italy: Serological Survey and Molecular Typing.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 25;12(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12050585pmc: PMC8909543pubmed: 35268152google scholar: lookup
  21. Geisen V.. Leptospirose bei Hunden in Süddeutschland. Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; München, Germany: 2009.
  22. Gerlach T., Stephan I.. Epidemiologische Situation der kaninen Leptospirose in Norddeutschland in den Jahren 2003–2006. Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2007;35:421–429.
  23. Mayer-Scholl A, Luge E, Draeger A, Nöckler K, Kohn B. Distribution of Leptospira serogroups in dogs from Berlin, Germany.. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2013 Mar;13(3):200-2.
    doi: 10.1089/vbz.2012.1121pubmed: 23428087google scholar: lookup
  24. Delaude A, Rodriguez-Campos S, Dreyfus A, Counotte MJ, Francey T, Schweighauser A, Lettry S, Schuller S. Canine leptospirosis in Switzerland-A prospective cross-sectional study examining seroprevalence, risk factors and urinary shedding of pathogenic leptospires.. Prev Vet Med 2017 Jun 1;141:48-60.
  25. López MC, Vila A, Rodón J, Roura X. Leptospira seroprevalence in owned dogs from Spain.. Heliyon 2019 Aug;5(8):e02373.
  26. Piredda I, Ponti MN, Piras A, Palmas B, Pintore P, Pedditzi A, Chisu V. New Insights on Leptospira Infections in a Canine Population from North Sardinia, Italy: A Sero-Epidemiological Study.. Biology (Basel) 2021 Jun 7;10(6).
    doi: 10.3390/biology10060507pmc: PMC8226461pubmed: 34200298google scholar: lookup
  27. Ellis W.A.. Leptospira and Leptospirosis. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology Springer; Berlin, Germany: 2015. Horses and Donkeys; pp. 109–110.
    doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-45059-8google scholar: lookup
  28. Divers TJ, Chang YF, Irby NL, Smith JL, Carter CN. Leptospirosis: An important infectious disease in North American horses.. Equine Vet J 2019 May;51(3):287-292.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13069pubmed: 30629756google scholar: lookup
  29. Hartskeerl RA, Goris MG, Brem S, Meyer P, Kopp H, Gerhards H, Wollanke B. Classification of leptospira from the eyes of horses suffering from recurrent uveitis.. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2004 Apr;51(3):110-5.
  30. Pikalo J, Sattler T, Eichinger M, Loitsch A, Sun H, Schmoll F, Schusser GF. [Occurrance of antibodies against Leptospira in horses in Middle Germany].. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2016 May-Jun;129(5-6):202-8.
    pubmed: 27344912
  31. Wollanke B., Gerhards H., Brem S., Meyer P., Kopp H.. Etiology of equine recurrent uveitis (ERU): Autoimmune disease or intraocular leptospiral infection?. Pferdeheilkunde 2004;20:327–340.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20040403google scholar: lookup
  32. Loibl J., Gerhards H., Brem S., Wollanke B.. Improving the laboratory diagnosis of leptospiral uveitis in horses by using an indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Leptospira spp. in intraocular samples. Pferdeheilkunde Equine Med. 2018;34:267–277.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20180308google scholar: lookup
  33. Wollanke B., Geiger T., Gerhards H.. Evaluation of “SNAP® Lepto”-ELISA and comparison with MAT and PCR results for diagnosis of leptospiral uveitis in horses using intraocular samples. Pferdeheilkunde Equine Med. 2018;34:508–516.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20180601google scholar: lookup
  34. Dorrego-Keiter E, Tóth J, Dikker L, Sielhorst J, Schusser GF. [Detection of leptospira by culture of vitreous humor and detection of antibodies against leptospira in vitreous humor and serum of 225 horses with equine recurrent uveitis].. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2016 May-Jun;129(5-6):209-15.
    pubmed: 27344913
  35. Geiger T, Gerhards H, Wollanke B. Detection of Anti-LipL32 Antibodies in Serum Samples from Horses with Chronic Intraocular Infection with Leptospira spp.. Pathogens 2021 Oct 14;10(10).
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens10101325pmc: PMC8537251pubmed: 34684272google scholar: lookup
  36. Fingerhut L, Yücel L, Strutzberg-Minder K, von Köckritz-Blickwede M, Ohnesorge B, de Buhr N. Ex Vivo and In Vitro Analysis Identify a Detrimental Impact of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps on Eye Structures in Equine Recurrent Uveitis.. Front Immunol 2022;13:830871.
    doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.830871pmc: PMC8896353pubmed: 35251020google scholar: lookup
  37. WOLFF JW, BOHLANDER H. Bovine leptospirosis; a survey of the epidemiology and serology and an investigation on the possible occurrence in bovines in the Netherlands.. Doc Med Geogr Trop 1952 Sep;4(3):257-65.
    pubmed: 12989055
  38. Steinen AC, Schuurman JL, Gravekamp C, Korver H, Terpstra WJ. Muskrats as carriers of pathogenic leptospires in The Netherlands.. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1992 Jan;61(1):43-50.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00572121pubmed: 1315497google scholar: lookup
  39. Levett P.N., Smythe L.. International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes; Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Leptospiraceae: Minutes of the closed meeting, 18 September 2007, Quito, Ecuador. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008;58:1049–1050.
  40. OIE. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. OIE; Paris, France: 2018. Leptospirosis; pp. 503–516.
  41. Malalana F, Blundell RJ, Pinchbeck GL, Mcgowan CM. The role of Leptospira spp. in horses affected with recurrent uveitis in the UK.. Equine Vet J 2017 Nov;49(6):706-709.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12683pmc: PMC5655720pubmed: 28321895google scholar: lookup
  42. Mayer-Scholl A, Draeger A, Luge E, Ulrich R, Nöckler K. Comparison of two PCR systems for the rapid detection of Leptospira spp. from kidney tissue.. Curr Microbiol 2011 Apr;62(4):1104-6.
    doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9829-5pubmed: 21132297google scholar: lookup
  43. Faber NA, Crawford M, LeFebvre RB, Buyukmihci NC, Madigan JE, Willits NH. Detection of Leptospira spp. in the aqueous humor of horses with naturally acquired recurrent uveitis.. J Clin Microbiol 2000 Jul;38(7):2731-3.
  44. Sauvage AC, Monclin SJ, Elansary M, Hansen P, Grauwels MF. Detection of intraocular Leptospira spp. by real-time polymerase chain reaction in horses with recurrent uveitis in Belgium.. Equine Vet J 2019 May;51(3):299-303.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13012pubmed: 30144314google scholar: lookup
  45. Haake DA, Levett PN. Leptospirosis in humans.. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2015;387:65-97.
    doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-45059-8_5pmc: PMC4442676pubmed: 25388133google scholar: lookup
  46. Reagan KL, Sykes JE. Diagnosis of Canine Leptospirosis.. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2019 Jul;49(4):719-731.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2019.02.008pubmed: 30961998google scholar: lookup
  47. Ghneim GS, Viers JH, Chomel BB, Kass PH, Descollonges DA, Johnson ML. Use of a case-control study and geographic information systems to determine environmental and demographic risk factors for canine leptospirosis.. Vet Res 2007 Jan-Feb;38(1):37-50.
    doi: 10.1051/vetres:2006043pubmed: 17074294google scholar: lookup
  48. Hetrick K, Harkin KR, Peddireddi L, Henningson J. Evaluation by polymerase chain reaction assay of persistent shedding of pathogenic leptospires in the urine of dogs with leptospirosis.. J Vet Intern Med 2022 Jan;36(1):133-140.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16309pmc: PMC8783323pubmed: 34799884google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Aguilar-Montes de Oca S, Montes-de-Oca-Jiménez R, Carlos Vázquez-Chagoyán J, Barbabosa-Pliego A, Eliana Rivadeneira-Barreiro P, C Zambrano-Rodríguez P. The Use of Peptides in Veterinary Serodiagnosis of Infectious Diseases: A Review. Vet Sci 2022 Oct 12;9(10).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9100561pubmed: 36288174google scholar: lookup
  2. Santos GFD, Petri FAM, Pires GP, Panneitz AK, Braga ER, Malcher CS, Mongruel ACB, de Castro JHT, Mathias LA, de Oliveira LG. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Leptospira spp. Infection in Backyard Pigs in the State of Paraná, Brazil. Trop Med Infect Dis 2023 Oct 6;8(10).
    doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8100468pubmed: 37888596google scholar: lookup