Analyze Diet
Veterinary ophthalmology2024; doi: 10.1111/vop.13185

Consensus guidelines for nomenclature of companion animal inherited retinal disorders.

Abstract: Companion animals, namely dogs, cats, and horses, can be affected with many forms of hereditary retinal disease. The number of such diseases characterized in the last decade has increased substantially, and nomenclature is nonstandardized, heterogenous, and confusing. We provide in this viewpoint article consensus guidelines for naming of companion animal hereditary retinal diseases, either prospectively or retrospectively. These consensus guidelines have been developed with the purpose of standardizing nomenclature. We provide examples for the iterative nomenclature process and a comprehensive File S1 on proposed renaming of previously described diseases.
Publication Date: 2024-02-09 PubMed ID: 38334230DOI: 10.1111/vop.13185Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on providing standard naming guidelines for inherited retinal diseases in pets like dogs, cats, and horses, as the increasing number of these diseases and their inconsistent and confusing naming practice calls for a standardized nomenclature.

Non-Standard Nomenclature Issues

  • The research is premised on the proliferating occurrences of hereditary retinal diseases among companion animals such as dogs, cats, and horses.
  • It outlines the substantial increase in such diseases over the last decade, and the difficulties encountered as a result of the nonstandard, heterogeneous, and confusing nomenclature currently in use.

Consensus Guidelines Objective

  • The paper establishes consensus guidelines for the nomenclature of these diseases, either for future references or for renaming those which have already been described.
  • It emphasizes how these guidelines aim to Standardize the nomenclature process, providing clarity and consistency.
  • By doing this, it is easier for practitioners and researchers to communicate about the diseases and their progression effectively.

Nomenclature Process and Renaming Propositions

  • The researchers give examples of how this nomenclature process can be implemented in an iterative manner.
  • They have a detailed ‘File S1’ dedicated to proposed renamings of previously documented diseases in accordance to the newly established guidelines.
  • These guidelines offer potential for an organized, easy-to-understand, and standardized naming system for hereditary retinal diseases, reducing the confusion that marked the previous nomenclature system.

Cite This Article

APA
Mowat FM, Iwabe S, Aguirre GD, Petersen-Jones SM. (2024). Consensus guidelines for nomenclature of companion animal inherited retinal disorders. Vet Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.13185

Publication

ISSN: 1463-5224
NlmUniqueID: 100887377
Country: England
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Mowat, Freya M
  • Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Iwabe, Simone
  • Altasciences Preclinical Scranton, Scott Township, Pennsylvania, USA.
Aguirre, Gustavo D
  • Division of Experimental Retinal Therapies, Department of Clinical Sciences & Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Petersen-Jones, Simon M
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

Grant Funding

  • K08EY028628 / NEI NIH HHS

References

This article includes 12 references
  1. Bunel M, Chaudieu G, Hamel C. Natural models for retinitis pigmentosa: progressive retinal atrophy in dog breeds.. Hum Genet 2019;138:441-453.
  2. Winkler PA, Occelli LM, Petersen-Jones SM. Large animal models of inherited retinal degenerations: a review.. Cells 2020;9:882.
  3. Kostic C, Arsenijevic Y. Animal modelling for inherited central vision loss.. J Pathol 2016;238:300-310.
  4. Petersen-Jones SM, Komáromy AM. Dog models for blinding inherited retinal dystrophies.. Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev 2015;26:15-26.
  5. Miyadera K, Acland GM, Aguirre GD. Genetic and phenotypic variations of inherited retinal diseases in dogs: the power of within- and across-breed studies.. Mamm Genome 2012;23:40-61.
  6. Corvi R, Petersen-Jones S, Guadalini A, Chaudieu G. Chapter 10.1 known genes-mutations and genetic testing.. In: Narfstrom K, Stades F, eds. ECVO Manual for Presumed Hereditary Eye Disease in Dogs and Cats. ECVO HED Committee; 2013.
  7. Veske A, Nilsson SE, Narfstrom K, Gal A. Retinal dystrophy of Swedish briard/briard-beagle dogs is due to a 4-bp deletion in RPE65.. Genomics 1999;57:57-61.
  8. Bainbridge JW, Mehat MS, Sundaram V. Long-term effect of gene therapy on Leber's congenital amaurosis.. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1887-1897.
  9. Petersen-Jones SM, Annear MJ, Bartoe JT. Gene augmentation trials using the Rpe65-deficient dog: contributions towards development and refinement of human clinical trials.. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012;723:177-182.
  10. Acland GM, Aguirre GD, Ray J. Gene therapy restores vision in a canine model of childhood blindness.. Nat Genet 2001;28:92-95.
  11. Donner J, Freyer J, Davison S. Genetic prevalence and clinical relevance of canine mendelian disease variants in over one million dogs.. PLoS Genet 2023;19:e1010651.
  12. Kaukonen M, Woods S, Ahonen S. Maternal inheritance of a recessive RBP4 defect in canine congenital eye disease.. Cell Rep 2018;23:2643-2652.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.