Analyze Diet

Cryopreservation of stallion semen: laboratory assessment of sperm injuries after cushioned centrifugation and freezing with conventional and alternative directional freezing methods.

Abstract: Fresh 36 ejaculates of 13 stallions were split into two volumes, centrifuged with and without cushion and frozen with Conventional and two prototype, Drum and Directional, methods using 0.5 ml straws for the Conventional and Drum, and 2 ml flat straws for both the Drum and Directional. Cushioned centrifugation increased total motility (61.2 ± 18.6% vs. 57.5 ± 18.6%; P < 0.001) and mean velocity (84.3 ± 15.6% vs. 83.2 ± 13.8%; P < 0.05) when compared to not cushioned centrifugation, estimated after cooling the sperm at 4⁰C for 90 min before freezing. Cushioned centrifugation also increased (P < 0.001) spermatozoa with polarized mitochondrial membranes (46.8 ± 11.4% vs. 43.4 ± 10.6%) and intact plasmatic/acrosomal membranes (41.0 ± 11.2% vs. 38.5 ± 11.3%) of frozen/thawed sperm, with respect to not cushioned centrifugation. However, no effects of the centrifugation were evidenced for classical kinetic parameters. Flat straws had negative effect for almost all the parameters analyzed at thawing (T,) and after 3 hours' incubation at 37⁰C (T₁), while the Drum method with Paillettes did not show appreciable affects. The variability among stallions was relevant (5% to 69% variance for kinetics and membrane status), while the variability among ejaculates was minor (9% to 28%). Factorial analysis identified three relevant, factors with different informational content: Factor 1 represented by membranes status, Factor 2 by kinetics estimated at T₀, and Factor 3 by kinetics estimated at T₁. Cushioned centrifugation had some beneficial effects for the membrane status of the frozen/thawed sperm, while the use of flat straws needs to be improved.
Publication Date: 2016-11-01 PubMed ID: 29786173
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates the effectiveness of different semen freezing methods on stallion sperm. It finds that cushioned centrifugation provides some benefits for sperm health, but that the use of flat straws in the freezing process may need refinement.

Introduction and Study Design

  • The experiment involved the collection of 36 ejaculates from 13 stallions. These samples were divided into two volumes.
  • Each volume was processed using cushioned and uncushioned centrifugation – a method used to separate components based on size and density – and frozen using three different techniques: the traditional method and two prototypes referred to as the Drum and Directional methods.
  • The Conventional and Drum methods used 0.5 ml straws, while the Drum and Directional methods used larger, 2 ml flat straws.

Findings on Centrifugation

  • In comparing cushioned and uncushioned centrifugation, researchers found that the cushioned method led to better sperm motility and velocity, measured after samples were cooled to 4 degrees Celsius for 90 minutes prior to freezing.
  • Cushioned centrifugation also resulted in a greater percentage of spermatozoa with intact mitochondrial and acrosomal/plasmatic membranes after thawing, compared to uncushioned centrifugation.
  • However, the researchers observed no significant differences in classical kinetic parameters – measures of sperm movement – based on the type of centrifugation.

Findings on Freezing Methods

  • Researchers noted detrimental effects on most parameters measured at thawing and after 3 hours of incubation at 37 degrees Celsius for samples frozen with flat straws.
  • Contrarily, the Drum method, using a different container known as a Paillette, did not have notable negative impacts.

Inter-Stallion Variability

  • The disparities among stallions were prominent, with variance in kinetics and membrane status ranging from 5% to 69%.
  • Meanwhile, variability among different ejaculates from the same stallion was lesser, ranging from 9% to 28%.

Conclusion

  • The analysis identified three key factors with different impacts on sperm quality: membranes status, kinetics at T₀ (directly after thawing), and kinetics at T₁ (after 3 hours of incubation).
  • The cushioned centrifugation technique showed some positive effects on sperm membrane status post-thawing, indicating that this method could improve the outcome of the freezing process.
  • Meanwhile, the use of flat straws demonstrated poor results and researchers suggest this approach needs improvement.

Cite This Article

APA
Puglisi R, Bornaghi V, Severgnini A, Vanni R, Balduzzi D, Galli A. (2016). Cryopreservation of stallion semen: laboratory assessment of sperm injuries after cushioned centrifugation and freezing with conventional and alternative directional freezing methods. Jpn J Vet Res, 64(4), 235-245.

Publication

ISSN: 0047-1917
NlmUniqueID: 0376567
Country: Japan
Language: English
Volume: 64
Issue: 4
Pages: 235-245

Researcher Affiliations

Puglisi, Roberto
    Bornaghi, Valeria
      Severgnini, Alex
        Vanni, Roberta
          Balduzzi, Donatella
            Galli, Andrea

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Centrifugation / methods
              • Cryopreservation / veterinary
              • Freezing
              • Horses / physiology
              • Male
              • Semen Preservation / methods
              • Semen Preservation / veterinary
              • Specimen Handling
              • Sperm Motility
              • Spermatozoa

              Citations

              This article has been cited 1 times.
              1. Puglisi R, Severgnini A, Tava A, Montedoro M. In Vitro Assessment of the Antioxidant Properties of Aqueous Byproduct Extracts of Vitis vinifera.. Food Technol Biotechnol 2019 Mar;57(1):119-125.
                doi: 10.17113/ftb.57.01.19.5879pubmed: 31316284google scholar: lookup