Analyze Diet
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2024; 4; 1292299; doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1292299

Development, refinement, and validation of an equine musculoskeletal pain scale.

Abstract: Musculoskeletal disease is a common cause of chronic pain that is often overlooked and inadequately treated, impacting the quality of life of humans and horses alike. Lameness due to musculoskeletal pain is prevalent in horses, but the perception of pain by owners is low compared with veterinary diagnosis. Therefore, this study aims to establish and validate a pain scale for chronic equine orthopaedic pain that is user-friendly for horse owners and veterinarians to facilitate the identification and monitoring of pain in horses. The newly developed musculoskeletal pain scale (MPS) was applied to 154 horses (mean age 20 ± 6.4 years SD) housed at an equine sanctuary, of which 128 (83%) suffered from chronic orthopaedic disease. To complete the MPS, the horses were observed and videotaped from a distance while at rest in their box or enclosure. In addition, they received a complete clinical and orthopaedic exam. The need for veterinary intervention to address pain (assessed and executed by the sanctuary independent from this study) was used as a longitudinal health outcome to determine the MPS's predictive validity. To determine the interrater agreement, the MPS was scored for a randomly selected subset of 30 horses by six additional blinded raters, three equine veterinary practitioners, and three experienced equestrians. An iterative process was used to refine the tool based on improvements in the MPS's correlation with lameness evaluated at the walk and trot, predictive validity for longitudinal health outcomes, and interrater agreement. The intraclass correlation improved from 0.77 of the original MPS to 0.88 of the refined version (95% confidence interval: 0.8-0.94). The refined MPS correlated significantly with lameness at the walk ( = 0.44,  = 0.001) and trot ( = 0.5,  < 0.0001). The refined MPS significantly differed between horses that needed veterinary intervention (mean MPS = 8.6) and those that did not (mean MPS = 5.0,  = 0.0007). In summary, the MPS showed good interrater repeatability between expert and lay scorers, significant correlation with lameness at the walk and trot, and good predictive validity for longitudinal health outcomes, confirming its ability to identify horses with orthopaedic health problems.
Publication Date: 2024-01-19 PubMed ID: 38312997PubMed Central: PMC10837853DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1292299Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study is about developing and testing a scale that can accurately measure chronic musculoskeletal pain in horses, a condition often under-recognized and poorly treated.

Objectives of the Research

  • The study aimed to create and validate a pain scale, known as the Musculoskeletal Pain Scale (MPS), for assessing chronic orthopedic pain in horses. This tool is intended to be easily used by both horse owners and veterinarians.
  • Another goal of the study was to monitor and identify pain in horses more effectively, thereby advancing their treatment and improving their quality of life.

Methodology

  • The researchers applied the new MPS to 154 horses, of which 83% were suffering from chronic orthopedic diseases.
  • The horses were observed and filmed while at rest, following which they were given a complete clinical and orthopedic examination.
  • The researchers also assessed the need for veterinary intervention as a means to determine the predictive power of the MPS, that was not influenced by this study.
  • To establish interrater agreement (consistency of scores given by different raters), six additional raters, three equine veterinary practitioners, and three experienced horse-riders, scored the MPS for a subset of 30 horses chosen randomly.
  • Based on the improvements in correlation with lameness evaluations, predictive validity for longitudinal health outcomes, and interrater agreement, the researchers used an iterative process to improve the MPS.

Results

  • The refined MPS showed a substantial improvement in the intraclass correlation from the original 0.77 to 0.88, indicating better consistency of ratings by different raters.
  • There was a significant correlation with lameness in horses at the walk and trot, further adding to its validity.
  • There was a notable difference in the average MPS scores of horses that required veterinary intervention (mean MPS = 8.6) as opposed to those that did not (mean MPS = 5.0), indicating the scale’s ability to identify horses needing medical attention.

Conclusion

  • The research concluded that the MPS achieves good repeatability across different raters.
  • It also demonstrated a significant correlation with lameness and a good predictive capability for long-term health outcomes.
  • Therefore, the study confirmed the MPS’s effectiveness in recognizing horses with orthopedic health issues, enabling timely intervention and treatment.

Cite This Article

APA
Auer U, Kelemen Z, Vogl C, von Ritgen S, Haddad R, Torres Borda L, Gabmaier C, Breteler J, Jenner F. (2024). Development, refinement, and validation of an equine musculoskeletal pain scale. Front Pain Res (Lausanne), 4, 1292299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1292299

Publication

ISSN: 2673-561X
NlmUniqueID: 9918227269806676
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 4
Pages: 1292299

Researcher Affiliations

Auer, Ulrike
  • Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kelemen, Zsofia
  • Equine Surgery Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University Equine Hospital, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Vogl, Claus
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
von Ritgen, Stephanie
  • Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Haddad, Rabea
  • Equine Surgery Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University Equine Hospital, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Torres Borda, Laura
  • Equine Surgery Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University Equine Hospital, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gabmaier, Christopher
  • Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Breteler, John
  • Equine Surgery Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University Equine Hospital, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jenner, Florien
  • Equine Surgery Unit, Department of Companion Animals and Horses, University Equine Hospital, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.