FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Biology (Basel) / DNA Methylation of Igf2r Promoter CpG Island 2 Governs Cis-A...
Biology2025; 14(6); 678; doi: 10.3390/biology14060678

DNA Methylation of Igf2r Promoter CpG Island 2 Governs Cis-Acting Inheritance and Gene Dosage in Equine Hybrids.

Abstract: Genomic imprinting is critical for mammalian development, but its regulation varies across species. The insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (IGF2R), which is a maternally expressed imprinted gene critical for cell proliferation and differentiation, as well as embryonic and placental development, is classically regulated by differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and lncRNA- in mice. However, studies on this in equus are scarce, especially in terms of mechanistic studies. In the present study, heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, brain, and muscle samples were obtained from horses, donkeys, and hybrids, and gene expression and imprinting state were tested to investigate the imprinting regulation of in these animals. Bisulfite sequencing combined with an allele-specific expression analysis revealed a tissue-specific loss of imprinting in the mule liver and hybrid brain tissues. Strikingly, we found that the maternal-specific expression of equine did not rely on the canonical DMRs or lncRNA-. Surprisingly, DNA methylation of a specific region called CpG island 2 (CpGI2) in the promoter showed -acting inheritance, meaning that the DNA methylation patterns of the parental alleles are retained in hybrid tissues. Notably, the DNA methylation of CpGI2 correlated negatively with expression in the spleen (R = 0.8797, = 6.46 × 10), lung (R = 0.8569, = 1.57 × 10), and kidney (R = 0.8650, = 3.85 × 10). Our findings suggest that imprinting may work differently in other species. This study provides a framework for understanding imprinting diversity in hybrids and shows that equine hybrids can be used to study how epigenetic inheritance works.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-06-11 PubMed ID: 40563929PubMed Central: PMC12189881DOI: 10.3390/biology14060678Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigates the regulation of the imprinted gene IGF2R in horses, donkeys, and their hybrids (mules), focusing on DNA methylation patterns and gene expression.
  • The researchers discovered a unique regulatory mechanism involving a specific CpG island in the IGF2R promoter that governs gene expression and imprinting in equine hybrids, differing from classical models seen in other mammals.

Background

  • Genomic Imprinting: A genetic phenomenon where genes are expressed in a parent-of-origin-specific manner, crucial for normal development in mammals.
  • IGF2R Gene: This maternally expressed imprinted gene plays a key role in cell proliferation, differentiation, and development of embryos and placenta.
  • Known Regulation in Mice: Traditionally controlled by differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA), which regulate gene expression specifically from one parental allele.
  • Research Gap: Mechanistic studies on IGF2R imprinting regulation in equids (horses, donkeys) are limited, especially regarding epigenetic mechanisms in hybrids.

Research Methods

  • Sample Collection: Tissues including heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, brain, and muscle from horses, donkeys, and their hybrids (mules) were collected.
  • Gene Expression Analysis: Expression levels of IGF2R were measured to determine imprinting status and if expression was parent-specific or biallelic.
  • Bisulfite Sequencing: Used to analyze DNA methylation patterns in specific gene regions, providing insight into epigenetic regulation.
  • Allele-Specific Expression: Techniques identifying whether gene expression occurs from the maternal or paternal allele in hybrids.

Key Findings

  • Tissue-Specific Loss of Imprinting: In mules, the liver and brain tissues showed loss of the typical parent-specific expression of IGF2R, indicating tissue-specific variation in imprinting.
  • Non-Canonical Regulation: Unlike mice, equine IGF2R maternal expression did not depend on the well-known DMRs or lncRNA-based mechanisms.
  • Role of CpG Island 2 (CpGI2): A specific region in the IGF2R promoter called CpGI2 was identified as crucial for imprinting.
  • Cis-Acting Inheritance: DNA methylation patterns of CpGI2 were preserved from the parental alleles into hybrid tissues, meaning parental epigenetic marks are maintained in offspring.
  • Correlation with Gene Expression: DNA methylation levels at CpGI2 inversely correlated with IGF2R expression, particularly in spleen (R = 0.8797), lung (R = 0.8569), and kidney (R = 0.8650), indicating methylation suppresses gene expression.

Implications

  • Species-Specific Imprinting: The regulation of IGF2R imprinting in horses and hybrids differs significantly from classical models in mice, highlighting evolutionary diversity in imprinting mechanisms.
  • Epigenetic Inheritance in Hybrids: The study reveals that epigenetic marks like DNA methylation can be inherited in a parent-specific manner (cis-acting) even across species crosses, as seen in equine hybrids.
  • Model for Imprinting Studies: Equine hybrids (mules) serve as a valuable model system for studying epigenetic inheritance and the diversity of imprinting mechanisms in mammals.
  • Broader Understanding: Findings encourage further exploration of DNA methylation beyond canonical DMRs and lncRNAs, expanding understanding of imprinting regulation.

Conclusion

  • This research provides new insights into how genomic imprinting can be regulated through DNA methylation at non-canonical regions like CpGI2 in the IGF2R promoter in equids.
  • The retention of parental methylation patterns in hybrids emphasizes the importance of epigenetic mechanisms in governing gene dosage and inheritance across species.
  • The discovery underscores the evolutionary variability of imprinting and sets a foundation for future studies on epigenetic inheritance using hybrid animal models.

Cite This Article

APA
Wang X, Shen Y, Ren H, Yi M, Bou G. (2025). DNA Methylation of Igf2r Promoter CpG Island 2 Governs Cis-Acting Inheritance and Gene Dosage in Equine Hybrids. Biology (Basel), 14(6), 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14060678

Publication

Biology
ISSN: 2079-7737
NlmUniqueID: 101587988
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 6
PII: 678

Researcher Affiliations

Wang, Xisheng
  • Lin He's Academician Workstation of New Medicine and Clinical Translation, Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China.
Shen, Yingchao
  • Anchee (Shandong) Animal Nutrition Research Academy Co., Ltd., Jinan 250104, China.
Ren, Hong
  • Vocational and Technical College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Yi, Minna
  • Equus Research Center, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
  • College of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Bou, Gerelchimeg
  • Equus Research Center, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
  • College of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.

Grant Funding

  • 202402010752 / The medical health science and technology project of Shandong Province
  • 6001/601004001 / Jining Medical University scientific research start-up funds for young doctor

Conflict of Interest Statement

Yingchao Shen was employed by the company Anchee (Shandong) Animal Nutrition Research Academy Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shandong. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 43 references
  1. Schuff M, Strong AD, Welborn LK, Ziermann-Canabarro JM. Imprinting as Basis for Complex Evolutionary Novelties in Eutherians. Biology 2024;13:682.
    doi: 10.3390/biology13090682pmc: PMC11428813pubmed: 39336109google scholar: lookup
  2. Barlow DP, Bartolomei MS. Genomic imprinting in mammals. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014;6:a018382.
    doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018382pmc: PMC3941233pubmed: 24492710google scholar: lookup
  3. Surani MA, Barton SC, Norris ML. Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 1984;308:548–550.
    doi: 10.1038/308548a0pubmed: 6709062google scholar: lookup
  4. Barton SC, Surani MA, Norris ML. Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development. Nature 1984;311:374–376.
    doi: 10.1038/311374a0pubmed: 6482961google scholar: lookup
  5. Qu W, Hashimoto S, Shimada A, Nakatani Y, Ichikawa K, Saito TL, Ogoshi K, Matsushima K, Suzuki Y, Sugano S. Genome-wide genetic variations are highly correlated with proximal DNA methylation patterns. Genome Res. 2012;22:1419–1425.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.140236.112pmc: PMC3409255pubmed: 22689467google scholar: lookup
  6. Yang YL, Fan XH, Yan JY, Chen MY, Zhu M, Tang YJ, Liu SY, Tang ZL. A comprehensive epigenome atlas reveals DNA methylation regulating skeletal muscle development. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:1313–1329.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1203pmc: PMC7897484pubmed: 33434283google scholar: lookup
  7. Vuu YM, Roberts CT, Rastegar M. MeCP2 Is an Epigenetic Factor That Links DNA Methylation with Brain Metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:4218.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms24044218pmc: PMC9966807pubmed: 36835623google scholar: lookup
  8. Hughes J, Surakhy M, Can S, Ducker M, Davies N, Szele F, Bühnemann C, Carter E, Trikin R, Crump MP. Maternal transmission of an Igf2r domain 11: IGF2 binding mutant allele (Igf2rI1565A) results in partial lethality, overgrowth and intestinal adenoma progression. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:11388.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47827-9pmc: PMC6684648pubmed: 31388182google scholar: lookup
  9. Sandovici I, Georgopoulou A, Pérez-García V, Hufnagel A, López-Tello J, Lam BYH, Schiefer SN, Gaudreau C, Santos F, Hoelle K. The imprinted Igf2-Igf2r axis is critical for matching placental microvasculature expansion to fetal growth. Dev. Cell. 2022;57:63–79.e8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.12.005pmc: PMC8751640pubmed: 34963058google scholar: lookup
  10. Wang XS, Asgenbaatar N, Shen YC, Yi MN, Zhao BL, Ren H, Davshilt T, Ulaangerel T, Wang M, Burenbaatar A. Lower expression of the equine maternally imprinted gene IGF2R is related to the slow proliferation of hinny embryonic fibroblast. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023;50:185–192.
    doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07937-6pubmed: 36319787google scholar: lookup
  11. Gicquel C, Weiss J, Amiel J, Gaston V, Le Bouc Y, Scott CD. Epigenetic abnormalities of the mannose-6-phosphate/ IGF2 receptor gene are uncommon in human overgrowth syndromes. J. Med. Genet. 2004;41:e4.
    doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.010488pmc: PMC1757252pubmed: 14729844google scholar: lookup
  12. Vu TH, Jirtle RL, Hoffman AR. Cross-species clues of an epigenetic imprinting regulatory code for the IGF2R gene. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2006;113:202–208.
    doi: 10.1159/000090833pubmed: 16575181google scholar: lookup
  13. Wutz A, Smrzka OW, Schweifer N, Schellander K, Wagner EF, Barlow DP. Imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island. Nature 1997;389:745–749.
    doi: 10.1038/39631pubmed: 9338788google scholar: lookup
  14. Sleutels F, Zwart R, Barlow DP. The non-coding Air RNA is required for silencing autosomal imprinted genes. Nature 2002;415:810–813.
    doi: 10.1038/415810apubmed: 11845212google scholar: lookup
  15. Wutz A, Smrzka OW, Barlow DP. Making sense of imprinting the mouse and human IGF2R loci. Novartis Found. Symp. 1998;214:251–259; discussion 260–263.
    doi: 10.1002/9780470515501.ch15pubmed: 9601022google scholar: lookup
  16. Yotova IY, Vlatkovic IM, Pauler FM, Warczok KE, Ambros PF, Oshimura M, Theussl HC, Gessler M, Wagner EF, Barlow DP. Identification of the human homolog of the imprinted mouse Air non-coding RNA. Genomics 2008;92:464–473.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.08.004pmc: PMC2846268pubmed: 18789384google scholar: lookup
  17. Dini P, Kalbfleisch T, Uribe-Salazar JM, Carossino M, Ali HE, Loux SC, Esteller-Vico A, Norris JK, Anand L, Scoggin KE. Parental bias in expression and interaction of genes in the equine placenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021;118:e2006474118.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006474118pmc: PMC8072238pubmed: 33853939google scholar: lookup
  18. Wang X, Miller DC, Harman R, Antczak DF, Clark AG. Paternally expressed genes predominate in the placenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013;110:10705–10710.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308998110pmc: PMC3696791pubmed: 23754418google scholar: lookup
  19. Wang XS, Bou G, Zhang XZ, Tao L, Shen YC, Na RG, Liu GQ, Ren H, Ren XJ, Song LJ. A Fast PCR Test for the Simultaneous Identification of Species and Gender in Horses, Donkeys, Mules and Hinnies. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;102:103458.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103458pubmed: 34119210google scholar: lookup
  20. Feinstein SI, Miller DA, Ehrlich M, Gehrke CW, Eden LB, Miller OJ. DNA methylation is not increased in mouse-human somatic cell hybrids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985;824:336–340.
    doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(85)90040-5pubmed: 3986207google scholar: lookup
  21. Scott EY, Mansour T, Bellone RR, Brown CT, Mienaltowski MJ, Penedo MC, Ross PJ, Valberg SJ, Murray JD, Finno CJ. Identification of long non-coding RNA in the horse transcriptome. BMC Genom. 2017;18:511.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3884-2pmc: PMC5496257pubmed: 28676104google scholar: lookup
  22. Li Q, Eichten SR, Hermanson PJ, Springer NM. Inheritance Patterns and Stability of DNA Methylation Variation in Maize Near-Isogenic Lines. Genetics 2014;196:667–676.
    doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.158980pmc: PMC3948799pubmed: 24361940google scholar: lookup
  23. Yamasaki Y, Kayashima T, Soejima H, Kinoshita A, Yoshiura K, Matsumoto N, Ohta T, Urano T, Masuzaki H, Ishimaru T. Neuron-specific relaxation of Igf2r imprinting is associated with neuron-specific histone modifications and lack of its antisense transcript Air. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005;14:2511–2520.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi255pubmed: 16037066google scholar: lookup
  24. Pervjakova N, Kasela S, Morris AP, Kals M, Metspalu A, Lindgren CM, Salumets A, Mägi R. Imprinted genes and imprinting control regions show predominant intermediate methylation in adult somatic tissues. Epigenomics 2016;8:789–799.
    doi: 10.2217/epi.16.8pmc: PMC5066126pubmed: 27004446google scholar: lookup
  25. Sharp AJ, Stathaki E, Migliavacca E, Brahmachary M, Montgomery SB, Dupre Y, Antonarakis SE. DNA methylation profiles of human active and inactive X chromosomes. Genome Res. 2011;21:1592–1600.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.112680.110pmc: PMC3202277pubmed: 21862626google scholar: lookup
  26. Vilain A, Bernardino J, Gerbault-Seureau M, Vogt N, Niveleau A, Lefrançois D, Malfoy B, Dutrillaux B. DNA methylation and chromosome instability in lymphoblastoid cell lines. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 2000;90:93–101.
    doi: 10.1159/000015641pubmed: 11060456google scholar: lookup
  27. Santoro F, Mayer D, Klement RM, Warczok KE, Stukalov A, Barlow DP, Pauler FM. Imprinted Igf2r silencing depends on continuous Airn lncRNA expression and is not restricted to a developmental window. Development 2013;140:1184–1195.
    doi: 10.1242/dev.088849pubmed: 23444351google scholar: lookup
  28. Springer MS, Foley NM, Brady PL, Gatesy J, Murphy WJ. Evolutionary Models for the Diversification of Placental Mammals Across the KPg Boundary. Front. Genet. 2019;10:1241.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01241pmc: PMC6896846pubmed: 31850081google scholar: lookup
  29. Ge DY, Feijó A, Wen ZX, Abramov AV, Lu L, Cheng JL, Pan SK, Ye SC, Xia L, Jiang XL. Demographic History and Genomic Response to Environmental Changes in a Rapid Radiation of Wild Rats. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021;38:1905–1923.
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa334pmc: PMC8097305pubmed: 33386846google scholar: lookup
  30. Marra NJ, Richards VP, Early A, Bogdanowicz SM, Bitar PDP, Stanhope MJ, Shivji MS. Comparative transcriptomics of elasmobranchs and teleosts highlight important processes in adaptive immunity and regional endothermy. BMC Genom. 2017;18:87.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3411-xpmc: PMC5278576pubmed: 28132643google scholar: lookup
  31. Vrana PB, Guan XJ, Ingram RS, Tilghman SM. Genomic imprinting is disrupted in interspecific Peromyscus hybrids. Nat. Genet. 1998;20:362–365.
    doi: 10.1038/3833pubmed: 9843208google scholar: lookup
  32. Brown AP, Parameswaran S, Cai L, Elston S, Pham C, Barski A, Weirauch MT, Ji H. TET1 regulates responses to house dust mite by altering chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation, and gene expression in airway epithelial cells. Res. Sq. 2023.
    doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3726852/v1google scholar: lookup
  33. Cao S, Chen K, Lu K, Chen S, Zhang X, Shen C, Zhu S, Niu Y, Fan L, Chen ZJ. Asymmetric variation in DNA methylation during domestication and de-domestication of rice. Plant Cell 2023;35:3429–3443.
    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad160pmc: PMC10473196pubmed: 37279583google scholar: lookup
  34. Cusack M, King HW, Spingardi P, Kessler BM, Klose RJ, Kriaucionis S. Distinct contributions of DNA methylation and histone acetylation to the genomic occupancy of transcription factors. Genome Res. 2020;30:1393–1406.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.257576.119pmc: PMC7605266pubmed: 32963030google scholar: lookup
  35. Kalscheuer VM, Mariman EC, Schepens MT, Rehder H, Ropers HH. The insulin-like growth factor type-2 receptor gene is imprinted in the mouse but not in humans. Nat. Genet. 1993;5:74–78.
    doi: 10.1038/ng0993-74pubmed: 8220428google scholar: lookup
  36. Wang XY, Moazed D. DNA sequence-dependent epigenetic inheritance of gene silencing and histone H3K9 methylation. Science 2017;356:88–91.
    doi: 10.1126/science.aaj2114pmc: PMC5718040pubmed: 28302794google scholar: lookup
  37. Xiong X, Geden CJ, Tan YJ, Zhang Y, Zhang DP, Werren JH, Wang X. Genome Structure, Evolution, and Host Shift of. Biol. Basel 2024;13:952.
    doi: 10.3390/biology13110952pmc: PMC11592040pubmed: 39596907google scholar: lookup
  38. Lee J, Inoue K, Ono R, Ogonuki N, Kohda T, Kaneko-Ishino T, Ogura A, Ishino F. Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells. Development 2002;129:1807–1817.
    doi: 10.1242/dev.129.8.1807pubmed: 11934847google scholar: lookup
  39. Castora FJ, Arnheim N, Simpson MV. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism: Evidence that variants detected by restriction enzymes differ in nucleotide sequence rather than in methylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980;77:6415–6419.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6415pmc: PMC350295pubmed: 6256736google scholar: lookup
  40. de Oliveira NFP, Persuhn DC, Dos Santos M. Can Global DNA Methylation Be Influenced by Polymorphisms in Genes Involved in Epigenetic Mechanisms? A Review. Genes 2024;15:1504.
    doi: 10.3390/genes15121504pmc: PMC11675890pubmed: 39766772google scholar: lookup
  41. Kieffer-Kwon KR, Tang ZH, Mathe E, Qian JS, Sung MH, Li GL, Resch W, Baek S, Pruett N, Grontved L. Interactome Maps of Mouse Gene Regulatory Domains Reveal Basic Principles of Transcriptional Regulation. Cell 2013;155:1507–1520.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.039pmc: PMC3905448pubmed: 24360274google scholar: lookup
  42. Xu DH, Zhang CR, Bi XM, Xu JK, Guo SN, Li PH, Shen YT, Cai JL, Zhang NH, Tian GH. Mapping enhancer and chromatin accessibility landscapes charts the regulatory network of Alzheimer’s disease. Comput. Biol. Med. 2024;168:107802.
    doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107802pubmed: 38056211google scholar: lookup
  43. Qian J, Liu SX. CRISPR/dCas9-Tet1-Mediated DNA Methylation Editing. Bio-Protocol 2024;14:e4976.
    doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4976pmc: PMC11056002pubmed: 38686348google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,093 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.