FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Reprod Domest Anim / Dystocia frequency and causes in horses with pregnancy disor...
Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2024; 59(3); e14541; doi: 10.1111/rda.14541

Dystocia frequency and causes in horses with pregnancy disorders or a history of dystocia: A prospective study.

Abstract: Dystocia typically presents a life-threatening condition for both the mare and the foal. This prospective long-term study aimed to ascertain whether mares with prior pregnancy disorders or a history of dystocia were at a higher risk of experiencing subsequent dystocia in comparison to those without such medical antecedents. To achieve this goal, the authors analysed 207 parturitions and 164 mares over a 10-year period. Of these, 57 were associated with pregnancy disorders or prior dystocia (Group 1), while 150 parturitions followed uneventful pregnancies in mares that had not yet experienced dystocia (Group 2). Mares in Group 1 were significantly more likely to develop dystocia than those in Group 2 (p = .0180; odds ratio = 2.98). Foetal causes of dystocia were more prevalent than maternal causes (p < .0389). Maternal mortality stood at 0.5%, and neonatal mortality reached 1.9%. The results demonstrate that mares are at significantly higher risk of developing dystocia after experiencing pregnancy disorders or parturition complications during previous pregnancies, emphasizing the need for systematic birth monitoring.
© 2024 The Authors. Reproduction in Domestic Animals published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-03-01 PubMed ID: 38426354DOI: 10.1111/rda.14541Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study looks at whether horses (mares) that have had pregnancy complications or difficulties during childbirth (dystocia) are more likely to experience problems with childbirth in the future. The findings suggest that these mares are indeed more at risk, emphasizing the importance of closely monitoring them when they give birth.

Research Methodology

  • The authors conducted a prospective long-term study over 10 years.
  • The sample included 207 instances of childbirth (parturitions) involving 164 mares.
  • Out of these, 57 childbirths involved mares with a history of pregnancy complications or previous childbirth difficulties (Group 1).
  • The rest of the sample (150 childbirths) involved mares with no such history (Group 2).
  • The researchers compared the occurrence of childbirth difficulties in these two groups.

Findings

  • The study found that mares in Group 1 were significantly more likely to experience dystocia than those in Group 2. This means that horses that have had pregnancy complications or previous childbirth difficulties are more likely to experience childbirth difficulties again in the future.
  • The odds ratio of 2.98 suggests that mares with such a history are almost three times more likely to experience dystocia.
  • Foetal causes of dystocia were found to be more common than maternal causes, but both were significant.
  • There was a 0.5% rate of maternal death and a 1.9% rate of neonatal (newborn) death observed in the study.

Conclusion

  • The research highlights the need for careful and systematic monitoring of mares that have previously experienced pregnancy or childbirth complications. Such careful observation may help to mitigate risks during childbirth, thereby reducing the rate of dystocia and associated mortality rates.

Cite This Article

APA
Ellerbrock M, Krohn J, Büttner K, Wehrend A. (2024). Dystocia frequency and causes in horses with pregnancy disorders or a history of dystocia: A prospective study. Reprod Domest Anim, 59(3), e14541. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14541

Publication

Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene
ISSN: 1439-0531
NlmUniqueID: 9015668
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 59
Issue: 3
Pages: e14541

Researcher Affiliations

Ellerbrock, Markus
  • Veterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Krohn, Judith
  • Veterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Büttner, Kathrin
  • Unit of Biomathematics and Data Processing, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-Universität-Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Wehrend, Axel
  • Veterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Pregnancy
  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Female
  • Prospective Studies
  • Dystocia / epidemiology
  • Dystocia / veterinary
  • Fetus
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Amin YA, Noseer EA, El-Naga EMA. Changes in the fetal fluids compositions during dystocia of dairy buffaloes. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2020;8:728-734.
    doi: 10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.7.728.734google scholar: lookup
  2. Arthur GH, Bee D. General considerations. 1996;pp. 185-194.
  3. Blanchard TL, Morehead JP, Whitman JL, Peterson ES. How to provide obstetrical intervention in equine ambulatory practice. Proceedings Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 2011;57:280-283.
  4. Dicken M, Gee EK, Rogers CW, Mayhew IG. Gestation length and occurrence of daytime gestation length and occurrence of daytime foaling of standardbred mares on two stud farms in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 2012;60:42-46.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2011.632340google scholar: lookup
  5. Ellerbrock M, Wehrend A. Definition, incidence and causes of dystocia in horses - A review of the literature. Tierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere 2023;51:22-34.
    doi: 10.1055/a-2006-9248google scholar: lookup
  6. Ellerbrock M, Wehrend A. Morbidity and mortality of mare and foal following dystocia - A literature review. Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere 2023;51:314-326.
    doi: 10.1055/a-2180-2182google scholar: lookup
  7. Frazer GS. Review of the use of fetotomy to resolve dystocia in the Mare. Proceedings Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 1997;43:262-268.
  8. Frazer GS, Perkins NR, Embertson RM. Normal parturition and evaluation of the mare in dystocia. Equine Veterinary Education 1999;11:41-46.
  9. Freeman DE, Hungerford LL, Schaeffer D, Lock TF, Sertich PL, Baker GJ, Vaala WE, Johnston JK. Caesarean section and other methods for assisted delivery: Comparison of effects on mare mortality and complications. Equine Veterinary Journal 1999;31:203-207.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb03173.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  10. Ginther OJ, Williams D. On-the-farm incidence and nature of equine dystocias. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1996;16:159-164.
    doi: 10.1016/s0737-0806(96)80131-6google scholar: lookup
  11. Haas SD, Bristol F, Card CE. Risk factors associated with the incidence of foal mortality in an extensively managed mare herd. The Canadian Veterinary Journal = La Revue Veterinaire Canadienne 1996;37:91-95.
  12. Hawkins DL. Dystocia. Proceedings Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 1982;28:411-413.
  13. Karadjole T, Bačić G, Mačešić N, Karadjole M, Dobranić T, Makek Z, Samardžija M, Getz I, Stokovic I. Ursachen von Dystokien bei Stuten. Tierärztliche Umschau 2008;63:183-185.
  14. Lanci A, Perina F, Donadoni A, Castagnetti C, Mariella J. Dystocia in the standardbred Mare: A retrospective study from 2004 to 2020. Animals 2022;12:1486.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12121486google scholar: lookup
  15. Leidl W, Stolla R, Schmid G. Zur Schwergeburt bei der Stute. I. Ursachen, konservative Geburtshilfe und Fetotomie. Tierärztliche Umschau 1993;48:408-412.
  16. Lu KG, Barr BS, Embertson R, Dallap Schaer B. Dystocia-A true equine emergency. Clinical Techniques in Equine Practice 2006;5:145-153.
    doi: 10.1053/j.ctep.2006.03.008google scholar: lookup
  17. McCue PM, Ferris RA. Parturition, dystocia and foal survival. A retrospective study of 1047 births. Equine Veterinary Journal 2012;44(Suppl.41):22-25.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00476.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  18. McGladdery A. Dystocia and postpratum complications in the mare. Practice 2001;23:74-80.
    doi: 10.1136/inpract.23.2.74google scholar: lookup
  19. Nagel C, Aurich J, Aurich C. Prediction of the onset of parturition in horses and cattle. Theriogenology 2020;150:308-312.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.072google scholar: lookup
  20. Pynn OD. Managing dystocia in the field (Chapter 170). 2015;pp. 709-712.
  21. Roberts SJ. Dystocia-its causes (Chapter VII). 1986;pp. 277-286.
  22. Rosales C, Krekeler N, Tennent-Brown B, Stevenson MA, Hanlon D. Periparturient characteristics of mares and their foals on a New Zealand thoroughbred stud farm. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 2017;65:24-29.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2016.1244021google scholar: lookup
  23. Threlfall WR. Parturition and dystocia (Chapter 14). 2007;pp. 118-130.
  24. Vandeplassche M. Dystocia (chapter 68). 1993;pp. 578-587.
  25. Youngquist RS. Equine obstetrics. 1986;pp. 693-699.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.