Analyze Diet
Veterinary microbiology1984; 9(1); 65-76; doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(84)90079-8

Ecology of Rhodococcus equi.

Abstract: A selective broth enrichment technique was used to study the distribution of Rhodococcus equi in soil and grazing animals. Rhodococcus equi was isolated from 54% of soils examined and from the gut contents, rectal faeces and dung of all grazing herbivorous species examined. Rhodococcus equi was not isolated from the faeces or dung of penned animals which did not have access to grazing. The isolation rate from dung was much higher than from other samples and this was found to be due to the ability of R. equi to multiply more readily in dung. Delayed hypersensitivity tests were carried out on horses, sheep and cattle, but only horses reacted significantly. The physiological characteristics of R. equi and the nature of its distribution in the environment suggested that R. equi is a soil organism.
Publication Date: 1984-02-01 PubMed ID: 6719819DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(84)90079-8Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the presence of bacterium Rhodococcus equi in soils and grazing animals using a selective broth enrichment technique, establishing the bacterium as a soil organism, influencing horses primarily.

Methodology and Findings

  • The study utilized a selective broth enrichment technique to determine the distribution of Rhodococcus equi, a bacterium of considerable significance in equine medicine, in various environments and hosts.
  • More than half of the soils that they analyzed (54%) contained Rhodococcus equi. This points towards the prominence of the bacterium in the soil environment.
  • Furthermore, the research team found Rhodococcus equi in the gut contents, rectal faeces, and dung of all grazing herbivorous species they inspected. This suggests that this bacterium is part of the normal gut flora for these animals, particularly when they are grazing.
  • In contrast, Rhodococcus equi was absent in penned animals without access to pastures for grazing. This indicates that the bacterium’s prevalence in animals could be directly linked to their exposure to soil and grass, reiterating its status as a soil organism.

Significance of Dung in Bacteria Multiplication

  • The researchers identified that the bacterium multiplies more prolifically in dung, explaining the higher rate of isolation in these samples compared to others.
  • This suggests that dung forms an ideal environment for bacterial propagation. When passed out and mixed with soil, dung might help in preserving and multiplying the bacterium in the environment, thus contributing to its endemicity in soils.

Host Reactivity

  • The team conducted delayed hypersensitivity tests, an immune response test, on horses, sheep, and cattle. The results showed that only horses reacted notably, implying that they might be more susceptible to infections caused by this bacterium.
  • This information can be crucial for veterinary medicine, particularly concerning horses’ health and any potential interventions in managing Rhodococcus equi-related diseases.

Understanding the Nature of R. equi

  • Based on R. equi’s physiological characteristics and distribution patterns observed in this study, the researchers concluded that R. equi is a soil organism.
  • This finding adds value to our understanding of this bacterium’s ecology and helps devise better strategies for its management and control, particularly in settings where it may pose a threat to the health of grazing animals, especially horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Barton MD, Hughes KL. (1984). Ecology of Rhodococcus equi. Vet Microbiol, 9(1), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(84)90079-8

Publication

ISSN: 0378-1135
NlmUniqueID: 7705469
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
Pages: 65-76

Researcher Affiliations

Barton, M D
    Hughes, K L

      MeSH Terms

      • Actinomycetales / growth & development
      • Actinomycetales / immunology
      • Actinomycetales / isolation & purification
      • Animal Husbandry
      • Animals
      • Antigens, Bacterial / immunology
      • Artiodactyla / microbiology
      • Australia
      • Digestive System / microbiology
      • Ecology
      • Feces / microbiology
      • Horses / microbiology
      • Hypersensitivity, Delayed
      • Rabbits / microbiology
      • Soil Microbiology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 24 times.
      1. Dos Santos RM, Marchioro SB, Ribeiro MB, da Conceição Aquino de Sá M, Pereira VC, de Farias APF, Nascimento RJM, Freire SM. Assessment of rSodC, rPknG, rNanH, and rSpaC as Antigens for Diagnostic Tools Against Caseous Lymphadenitis. Curr Microbiol 2022 Aug 8;79(9):283.
        doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-02974-7pubmed: 35934734google scholar: lookup
      2. Cohen ND, Kahn SK, Bordin AI, Gonzales GM, da Silveira BP, Bray JM, Legere RM, Ramirez-Cortez SC. Association of pneumonia with concentrations of virulent Rhodococcus equi in fecal swabs of foals before and after intrabronchial infection with virulent R. equi. J Vet Intern Med 2022 May;36(3):1139-1145.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.16409pubmed: 35322902google scholar: lookup
      3. Michelet L, de Cruz K, Karoui C, Tambosco J, Moyen JL, Hénault S, Boschiroli ML. Second line molecular diagnosis for bovine tuberculosis to improve diagnostic schemes. PLoS One 2018;13(11):e0207614.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207614pubmed: 30475835google scholar: lookup
      4. Willingham-Lane JM, Coulson GB, Hondalus MK. Identification of a VapA virulence factor functional homolog in Rhodococcus equi isolates housing the pVAPB plasmid. PLoS One 2018;13(10):e0204475.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204475pubmed: 30286098google scholar: lookup
      5. Wright LM, Carpinone EM, Bennett TL, Hondalus MK, Starai VJ. VapA of Rhodococcus equi binds phosphatidic acid. Mol Microbiol 2018 Feb;107(3):428-444.
        doi: 10.1111/mmi.13892pubmed: 29205554google scholar: lookup
      6. Willingham-Lane JM, Berghaus LJ, Giguère S, Hondalus MK. Influence of Plasmid Type on the Replication of Rhodococcus equi in Host Macrophages. mSphere 2016 Sep-Oct;1(5).
        doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00186-16pubmed: 27747295google scholar: lookup
      7. Petrovski S, Seviour RJ, Tillett D. Genome sequence and characterization of a Rhodococcus equi phage REQ1. Virus Genes 2013 Jun;46(3):588-90.
        doi: 10.1007/s11262-013-0887-1pubmed: 23381579google scholar: lookup
      8. Miranda-Casoluengo R, Coulson GB, Miranda-Casoluengo A, Vázquez-Boland JA, Hondalus MK, Meijer WG. The hydroxamate siderophore rhequichelin is required for virulence of the pathogenic actinomycete Rhodococcus equi. Infect Immun 2012 Dec;80(12):4106-14.
        doi: 10.1128/IAI.00678-12pubmed: 22966042google scholar: lookup
      9. Hébert L, Cauchard J, Doligez P, Quitard L, Laugier C, Petry S. Viability of Rhodococcus equi and Parascaris equorum eggs exposed to high temperatures. Curr Microbiol 2010 Jan;60(1):38-41.
        doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9497-5pubmed: 19727941google scholar: lookup
      10. Muscatello G, Gilkerson JR, Browning GF. Detection of virulent Rhodococcus equi in exhaled air samples from naturally infected foals. J Clin Microbiol 2009 Mar;47(3):734-7.
        doi: 10.1128/JCM.01395-08pubmed: 19144811google scholar: lookup
      11. Muscatello G, Anderson GA, Gilkerson JR, Browning GF. Associations between the ecology of virulent Rhodococcus equi and the epidemiology of R. equi pneumonia on Australian thoroughbred farms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006 Sep;72(9):6152-60.
        doi: 10.1128/AEM.00495-06pubmed: 16957241google scholar: lookup
      12. Gabriels P, Joosen H, Put E, Verhaegen J, Magerman K, Cartuyvels R. Recurrent Rhodococcus equi infection with fatal outcome in an immunocompetent patient. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006 Jan;25(1):46-8.
        doi: 10.1007/s10096-005-0068-9pubmed: 16424975google scholar: lookup
      13. Vanniasinkam T, Barton MD, Heuzenroeder MW. B-Cell epitope mapping of the VapA protein of Rhodococcus equi: implications for early detection of R. equi disease in foals. J Clin Microbiol 2001 Apr;39(4):1633-7.
      14. Sellon DC, Besser TE, Vivrette SL, McConnico RS. Comparison of nucleic acid amplification, serology, and microbiologic culture for diagnosis of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals. J Clin Microbiol 2001 Apr;39(4):1289-93.
      15. McNeil MM, Brown JM. The medically important aerobic actinomycetes: epidemiology and microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 1994 Jul;7(3):357-417.
        doi: 10.1128/CMR.7.3.357pubmed: 7923055google scholar: lookup
      16. Beebe JL, Koneman EW. Recovery of uncommon bacteria from blood: association with neoplastic disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995 Jul;8(3):336-56.
        doi: 10.1128/CMR.8.3.336pubmed: 7553569google scholar: lookup
      17. Takai S, Kawazu S, Tsubaki S. Immunoglobulin and specific antibody responses to Rhodococcus (Corynebacterium) equi infection in foals as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 1986 May;23(5):943-7.
        doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.5.943-947.1986pubmed: 3711280google scholar: lookup
      18. Takai S, Ohkura H, Watanabe Y, Tsubaki S. Quantitative aspects of fecal Rhodococcus (Corynebacterium) equi in foals. J Clin Microbiol 1986 Apr;23(4):794-6.
        doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.4.794-796.1986pubmed: 3700632google scholar: lookup
      19. Müller F, Schaal KP, von Graevenitz A, von Moos L, Woolcock JB, Wüst J, Yassin AF. Characterization of Rhodococcus equi-like bacterium isolated from a wound infection in a noncompromised host. J Clin Microbiol 1988 Apr;26(4):618-20.
        doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.4.618-620.1988pubmed: 3366859google scholar: lookup
      20. Prescott JF. Rhodococcus equi: an animal and human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 1991 Jan;4(1):20-34.
        doi: 10.1128/CMR.4.1.20pubmed: 2004346google scholar: lookup
      21. Savitske BJ, Dulli RJ, Paul NC, Washburn KE. Transtracheal Wash Fluid Collection and Analysis in Healthy Goats. J Vet Intern Med 2025 Sep-Oct;39(5):e70211.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.70211pubmed: 40958735google scholar: lookup
      22. Huguet A-S, Gourbeyre O, Bousquet-Mélou A, Ferran AA, Lallemand EA. Reassessment of extracellular and intracellular activity of macrolides, rifampicin, and doxycycline against Rhodococcus equi based on bacterial counts and microscopy. Microbiol Spectr 2025 Sep 2;13(9):e0120525.
        doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01205-25pubmed: 40728410google scholar: lookup
      23. Huguet AS, Gourbeyre O, Bernand A, Philibert C, Bousquet-Melou A, Lallemand EA, Ferran AA. Comparative bactericidal activity of four macrolides alone and combined with rifampicin or doxycycline against Rhodococcus equi at concentrations achievable in foals. Front Pharmacol 2024;15:1458496.
        doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1458496pubmed: 39624843google scholar: lookup
      24. Li N, Wu C, Cao P, Chen D, Chen F, Shen X. Multiple systemic infections caused by Rhodococcus equi: a case report. Access Microbiol 2024;6(2).
        doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000600.v4pubmed: 38482363google scholar: lookup