Analyze Diet
Theriogenology2023; 214; 134-140; doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.09.010

Effect of different manual puncture methods on donkey embryo before vitrification.

Abstract: The application of embryo recovery and transfer technology in the donkey industry is far lower than that of horses and cattle. Sometimes the recovered embryos could not be transferred in time, which required embryo cryopreservation. The embryo cryopreservation technology is more conducive to the preservation and transportation of recovered embryos with excellent genetic traits. However, this technique for donkey embryos is not efficient and needs further optimization. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different manual puncture methods on the viability and pregnancy rates of vitrified-thawed donkey embryos. A total of 117 donkey embryos were recovered on day 7-8 post-ovulation and were divided into four groups by random assortment. There were 28 embryos without puncture or cryopreservation (Control). 58 embryos were manually punctured using a 29G needle (VG, n = 29) or microneedle with a sharp tip of <10 μm (VM, n = 29), then vitrified in 15% EG + 15% DMSO + 0.5 M sucrose. Another 31 embryos were punctured with a microneedle and vitrified with 10% EG + 10% DMSO +0.5 M sucrose +2 mol/L proline (VMP). Both fresh embryos and vitrified-thawed embryos were incubated for 3 h (38.5 °C, 5% CO in air) before embryo transfer. The results showed that the embryo recovery rates on day 7.5 and 8 were higher than day 7 (P < 0.05). After incubation, dead cells were assessed and the percentages of dead cells in VM and VMP were lower than that in VG (P < 0.05), although both were higher than those in Control (P < 0.05). The pregnancy rates after 23 days post transfer were assessed and the results showed that the pregnancy rate in VG (8.0%) was lower than that in Control (41.7%), VM (24.0%) and VMP (29.6%) (P < 0.05). No pregnancies resulted from the 10 embryos with diameters ≤650 μm in VG, which lower than either VM (33.3%) or VMP (38.9%) (P 650 μm in diameter (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the embryo recovery rate on day 7 after ovulation was relatively low, and it was more appropriate to extend it to day 8. Microneedle puncture could reduce embryo damage and achieve a higher pregnancy rate compared with 29G needles. Proline has the potential to improve donkey embryo cryopreservation.
Publication Date: 2023-09-15 PubMed ID: 37866302DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.09.010Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper evaluates how different puncture methods affect the viability and pregnancy rates of frozen and then thawed donkey embryos. The study is aimed at improving the efficiency of donkey embryo cryopreservation, a technology helpful for the preservation and transfer of recovered embryos with superior genetic traits.

Purpose and Methodology

  • The study’s objective was to optimize the embryo cryopreservation method in donkeys, which is currently known to be inefficient. It sought to investigate the impacts of various manual puncture techniques on the survivability and pregnancy rates of donkey embryos post-vitrification (a freezing process) and thawing.
  • The researchers amassed a total of 117 donkey embryos on day 7-8 post-ovulation, which were then divided into four random groups: Control, VG, VM, and VMP. Each group underwent different treatment procedures before vitrification.

Experiment Groups and Results

  • The ‘Control’ group consisted of 28 embryos that were not subjected to any punctures or cryopreservation, serving as a baseline for the study.
  • The ‘VG’ group had 29 embryos that were manually punctured using a 29G needle.
  • The ‘VM’ group also had 29 embryos that were manually punctured using a microneedle with a sharp tip of less than 10 micrometers.
  • The ‘VMP’ group consisted of 31 embryos punctured with a microneedle and then vitrified using a different solution containing proline.
  • Each batch of fresh and vitrified-thawed embryos was incubated for 3 hours before being transferred.
  • The results indicated higher embryo recovery rates on day 7.5 and 8 compared to day 7.
  • The percentages of dead cells post-incubation in VM and VMP groups were lower than the VG group, although all were higher than the Control group.
  • The pregnancy rate in the VG group was lower than in the Control, VM, and VMP groups. No pregnancies resulted from any VG embryos that were ≤650 μm in diameter, unlike the VM and VMP groups. The pregnancy rates among all vitrification groups remained consistent when embryos were >650 μm in diameter.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that waiting until day 8 post-ovulation for embryo recovery was more effective. Puncturing embryos using a microneedle caused less damage and resulted in higher pregnancy rates than with 29G needles. Also, the finding suggests that proline could potentially improve donkey embryo cryopreservation techniques.

Cite This Article

APA
Li N, Dai S, Wu H, Zhang F, Song S, Guo Y, Wang S, Chang S, Zeng S. (2023). Effect of different manual puncture methods on donkey embryo before vitrification. Theriogenology, 214, 134-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.09.010

Publication

ISSN: 1879-3231
NlmUniqueID: 0421510
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 214
Pages: 134-140
PII: S0093-691X(23)00369-2

Researcher Affiliations

Li, Nan
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Dai, Shizhen
  • National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Wu, Hao
  • National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhang, Fuyue
  • National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Song, Shuang
  • National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Guo, Yajun
  • National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Wang, Shiwei
  • National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Chang, Siyu
  • National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zeng, Shenming
  • National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. Electronic address: zengsm@cau.edu.cn.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Female
  • Pregnancy
  • Cryopreservation / veterinary
  • Cryopreservation / methods
  • Dimethyl Sulfoxide
  • Embryo, Mammalian
  • Equidae
  • Sucrose
  • Vitrification

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.