Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record2019; 184(3); 92-94; doi: 10.1136/vr.l16

Equine piroplasmosis – the view of a practitioner from an endemic region.

Abstract: The research article explores Equine Piroplasmosis (EP), a tick-borne disease prevalent in certain regions worldwide. It is endemic and causes significant economic losses while also restricting horse movement. The article […]
Publication Date: 2019-01-19 PubMed ID: 30655402DOI: 10.1136/vr.l16Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores Equine Piroplasmosis (EP), a tick-borne disease prevalent in certain regions worldwide. It is endemic and causes significant economic losses while also restricting horse movement. The article further discusses EP’s cause, transmission, management, diagnosis, treatment, and the need for broader awareness among practitioners and stakeholders in endemic and non-endemic countries.

Equine Piroplasmosis (EP)

  • EP is a tick-borne disease most rampant in particular global regions, including Europe, tropical or subtropical Asia, South and Central America, and Africa.
  • The disease results in significant economic losses and limits the movement of horses.
  • Seronegative horses are the only ones allowed to be imported to non-endemic regions like the USA, Canada, Australia, and Japan to prevent EP from spreading.

Causative Agents and Transmission

  • EP is caused by two haemoprotozoan parasites of the phylum Apicomplexa: Babesia caballi (intraerythrocytic) and Theileria equi (intraerythrocytic and intralymphocytic).
  • These parasites have different life cycles and are transmitted by ixodid ticks of several genera, including Rhipicephalus, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, and Boophilus.

Management of EP

  • The management approach depends on whether the practitioners operate from an endemic or disease-free area.
  • In disease-free regions, early detection of carriers and instances is critical to avoid disease introduction.
  • However, practitioners in endemic areas aim to determine whether observed symptoms align with clinical piroplasmosis or can be ascribed to a different disease.

Diagnosis of EP

  • Although the clinical signs of both parasitic infections are similar, their treatment and prognosis differ, necessitating laboratory-based differential diagnoses.
  • Practitioners often diagnose EP based on clinical and epidemiological data alone, implementing treatment regimens without performing laboratory confirmation tests. However, this might not be sufficient, pooling more emphasis on using serological or PCR tests for confirmation in cases of chronic or atypical infections.

Treatment of EP

  • The treatment practices for EP differ significantly between endemic and non-endemic countries. In disease-free regions, it is critical to eliminate all parasitic infestations in horses to limit further transmission.
  • Treatment often includes administering imidocarb dipropionate doses, but achieving total parasite eradication is challenging and can result in side effects like local injection site swelling, muscle inflammation, and other adverse reactions.

Conclusion and Recommendations

  • There is a general lack of awareness about EP among equine practitioners in non-endemic countries. In contrast, practitioners in endemic regions tend to under-address this issue.
  • To secure international horse trade, it is imperative to have reliable and timely data about EP cases’ numbers and location and clearly understand the associated economic losses.

Cite This Article

APA
Leblond A. (2019). Equine piroplasmosis – the view of a practitioner from an endemic region. Vet Rec, 184(3), 92-94. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.l16

Publication

ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 184
Issue: 3
Pages: 92-94

Researcher Affiliations

Leblond, Agnès
  • EPIA, UMR 0346, Epidémiologie des maladies Animales et zoonotiques, INRA, VetAgro Sup, University of Lyon, F-69280, Marcy L'Etoile, France.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Babesiosis / epidemiology
  • Endemic Diseases / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Veterinarians / psychology

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Peris MP, Serrano M, Romero A, García M, Halaihel N, Castillo JA, Gracia MJ. Prevalence rates of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi in the horse population of northern Spain: a serological and molecular study. Vet Res Commun 2025 Mar 24;49(3):151.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-025-10722-ypubmed: 40126690google scholar: lookup
  2. Sadeddine R, Righi S, Saidani K, Benakhla A. First Molecular Characterization of Theileria equi from Northeastern Algeria. Acta Parasitol 2025 Mar 6;70(2):66.
    doi: 10.1007/s11686-025-01006-1pubmed: 40050535google scholar: lookup