Analyze Diet
Veterinary research communications2023; doi: 10.1007/s11259-023-10206-x

Evaluation of a smartphone electrocardiograph in healthy foals and comparison to standard base-apex electrocardiography.

Abstract: Smartphone-based technology for ECG recording has recently spread as a complementary tool for electrocardiographic screening and monitoring in adult horses and in other animal species. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a smartphone-based ECG in healthy foals. This was a prospective observational study (authorization n. 45,865/2016) including 22 foals aged less than 21 days. A reference standard base-apex ECG (rECG) was acquired, and a smartphone ECG (sECG) was recorded immediately after by using a smartphone-based single lead electrocardiograph. All ECG tracings were evaluated in a blind fashion by a single board-certified cardiologist, who judged whether the tracings were acceptable for interpretation and performed ECG measurements and diagnosis. The Spearman correlation coefficient, the Cohen's k test and the Bland-Altman test were used to assess the agreement between sECG and rECG. All sECG tracings were acceptable for interpretation. All foals showed sinus rhythm on both rRCG and sECG tracings, with perfect agreement in heart rate classification (κ = 0.87; p < 0.001). No clinically relevant differences were found in the assessment of waves and intervals duration. Concerning P wave and QRS complex polarity, the percentage of agreement between rECG and sECG was 78% and 83%, respectively. About ECG tracing quality, rECG and sECG showed a substantial agreement (κ = 0.624; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the smartphone-based ECG device tested in the present study recorded good quality single-lead ECG tracings in foals, reliable for heart rate and ECG measurements, but different polarity of P waves and QRS complexes was found in some foals in comparison to rECG.
Publication Date: 2023-11-10 PubMed ID: 37947988PubMed Central: 7754639DOI: 10.1007/s11259-023-10206-xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research conducted provides evidence that utilising smartphone-based technology for recording electrocardiograms (ECGs) is feasible and accurate in young, healthy foals. The study compared the results of traditional base-apex electrocardiograms (rECGs) with smartphone ECGs (sECGs) and found a high level of agreement between the two methods.

Research Methodology

  • The study was a prospective observational one, and it included 22 foals that were younger than 21 days.
  • For each foal, a traditional rECG was taken first, followed by an sECG recording using a smartphone-based single-lead electrocardiograph.
  • All the ECG readings were evaluated blindly by a single, board-certified cardiologist. The cardiologist determined whether the readings were suitable for interpretation and then performed necessary ECG measurements and diagnoses.
  • The researchers used several statistical tests: the Spearman correlation coefficient, the Cohen’s k test, and the Bland-Altman test to analyse the agreement between the rECGs and the sECGs.

Results of the Study

  • All the sECG tracings were deemed valid for analysis. The heart rates recorded in both methods agreed perfectly, indicating high reliability of the sECGs.
  • There were no significant differences detected in the evaluation of wave duration and interval timing across the two ECG methods.
  • When comparing the polarity of P waves and QRS complexes, the agreement between the rECGs and sECGs was moderately high, at 78% and 83% respectively.
  • When evaluating the overall quality of ECG traces, there was a substantial agreement between the traditional and the smartphone method.

Conclusions

  • The research concluded that a smartphone-based ECG device can effectively record single-lead ECG traces in foals.
  • These sECG recordings are reliable for assessing heart rate and making ECG measurements.
  • However, discrepancies were noted in the polarity of some P waves and QRS complexes compared to the traditional rECGs. This suggests that while sECGs can be a valuable diagnostic tool, they may not entirely replace traditional methods in certain circumstances.

Cite This Article

APA
Bindi F, Vezzosi T, Sala G, Freccero F, Marmorini P, Bonelli F, Sgorbini M. (2023). Evaluation of a smartphone electrocardiograph in healthy foals and comparison to standard base-apex electrocardiography. Vet Res Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-023-10206-x

Publication

ISSN: 1573-7446
NlmUniqueID: 8100520
Country: Switzerland
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Bindi, Francesca
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, via Livornese, San Piero a Grado, 56122, Italy.
Vezzosi, Tommaso
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, via Livornese, San Piero a Grado, 56122, Italy. tommaso.vezzosi@unipi.it.
Sala, Giulia
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, via Livornese, San Piero a Grado, 56122, Italy.
Freccero, Francesca
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, 40064, Italy.
Marmorini, Paola
  • Private Practitioner, Pisa, Italy.
Bonelli, Francesca
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, via Livornese, San Piero a Grado, 56122, Italy.
Sgorbini, Micaela
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, via Livornese, San Piero a Grado, 56122, Italy.

References

This article includes 20 references
  1. Alberti E, Stucchi L, Pesce V, Stancari G, Ferro E, Ferrucci F, Zucca E. Evaluation of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device accuracy in field and in hospital conditions in horses.. Vet Rec Open 7:e000441.
    doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2020-000441pubmed: 33381302pmc: 7754639google scholar: lookup
  2. Bonelli F, Vezzosi T, Meylan M, Nocera I, Ferrulli V, Buralli C, Meucci V, Tognetti R. Comparison of smartphone-based and standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy dairy cows.. J Vet Intern Med 33:981–986.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15396pubmed: 30592089google scholar: lookup
  3. Desrochers A. Techniques in diagnosis and monitoring of Cardiovascular Disease.. In: McKinnon Angus O, Squires Edward L, Vaala Wendy E, Varner Dickson D (eds) Equine Reproduction, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, pp 499–506.
  4. Haberman ZC, Jahn RT, Bose R, Tun H, Shinbane JS, Doshi RN, Chang PM, Saxon LA. Wireless smartphone ECG enables large-scale screening in diverse populations.. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26:520–526.
    doi: 10.1111/jce.12634pubmed: 25651872google scholar: lookup
  5. Ho C-L, Fu Y-C, Lin M-C, Chan S-C, Hwang B, Jan S-L. Smartphone applications (apps) for heart rate measurement in children: comparison with Electrocardiography Monitor.. Pediatr Cardiol 35:726–731.
    doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0844-8pubmed: 24259012google scholar: lookup
  6. King A, Rolph KE, Dzikiti L, Cavanaugh SM. Overall good agreement of smartphone-based and standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy sheep.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 18:1–5.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.23.02.0126google scholar: lookup
  7. Kraus MS, Gelzer AR, Rishniw M. Detection of heart rate and rhythm with a smartphone-based electrocardiograph versus a reference standard electrocardiograph in dogs and cats.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 249:189–194.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.249.2.189pubmed: 27379594google scholar: lookup
  8. Kraus MS, Rishniw M, Divers TJ, Reef VB, Gelzer AR. Utility and accuracy of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device as compared to a standard base-apex electrocardiogram in the horse.. Res Vet Sci 125:141–147.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.05.018pubmed: 31228737google scholar: lookup
  9. Nguyen HH, Van Hare GF, Rudokas M, Bowman T, Silva JNA. SPEAR trial: Smartphone Pediatric ElectrocARdiogram Trial.. PLoS ONE 10:e0136256.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136256pubmed: 26295569pmc: 4546652google scholar: lookup
  10. Nógrádi N. Electrocardiography in the neonatal Foal.. In: Costa LR, Paradis MR (eds) Manual of clinical procedures in the horse. John Wiley & Sons, pp 427–428.
  11. Saxon LA. Ubiquitous Wireless ECG Recording: a powerful Tool Physicians should embrace.. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 24:480–483.
    doi: 10.1111/jce.12097pubmed: 23421574google scholar: lookup
  12. Sgorbini M. Evaluation at birth of some semeiological, haematological and biochemical parameters in 99 standardbred foals.. Ippologia 18:21–25.
  13. Smith JS, Ward JL, Schneider BK, Smith FL, Mueller MS, Heller MC. Comparison of standard electrocardiography and smartphone-based electrocardiography recorded at two different anatomic locations in healthy meat and dairy breed does.. Front Vet Sci 7:416.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00416pubmed: 32903541pmc: 7438445google scholar: lookup
  14. Tarakji KG, Wazni OM, Callahan T, Kanj M, Hakim AH, Wolski K, Wilkoff BL, Saliba W, Lindsay BD. Using a novel wireless system for monitoring patients after the atrial fibrillation ablation procedure: the iTransmit study.. Heart Rhythm 12:554–559.
    doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.11.015pubmed: 25460854google scholar: lookup
  15. van Loon G. Electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis.. In: Marr C, Bown M (eds) Cardiology of the horse, 2nd edn. Saunders Elsevier, pp 59–73.
  16. Vezzosi T, Buralli C, Marchesotti F, Porporato F, Tognetti R, Zini E, Domenech O. Diagnostic accuracy of a smartphone electrocardiograph in dogs: comparison with standard 6-lead electrocardiography.. Vet J 216:33–37.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.06.013pubmed: 27687923google scholar: lookup
  17. Vezzosi T, Sgorbini M, Bonelli F, Buralli C, Pillotti M, Meucci V, Tognetti R. Evaluation of a smartphone electrocardiograph in healthy horses: comparison with standard base-apex electrocardiography.. J Equine Vet Sci 67:61–65.
  18. Vezzosi T, Tognetti R, Buralli C, Marchesotti F, Patata V, Zini E, Domenech O. Home monitoring of heart rate and heart rhythm with a smartphone-based ECG in dogs.. Vet Rec 184:96.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.104917pubmed: 30559174google scholar: lookup
  19. Vitale V, Vezzosi T, Tognetti R, Fraschetti C, Sgorbini M. Evaluation of a new portable 1-lead digital cardiac monitor (eKuore) compared with standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy horses.. PLoS ONE 16:e0255247.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255247pubmed: 34343184pmc: 8330948google scholar: lookup
  20. Welch-Huston B, Durward‐Akhurst S, Norton E, Ellingson L, Rendahl A, McCue M. Comparison between smartphone electrocardiography and standard three‐lead base apex electrocardiography in healthy horses.. Vet Rec 187:e70.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105759pubmed: 32414909pmc: 7606555google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.