Analyze Diet
Biology letters2007; 3(4); 395-397; doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0089

Extreme sex ratio variation in relation to change in condition around conception.

Abstract: Adaptive theory predicts that mothers would be advantaged by adjusting the sex ratio of their offspring in relation to their offspring's future reproductive success. Studies investigating sex ratio variation in mammals have produced notoriously inconsistent results, although recent studies suggest more consistency if sex ratio variation is related to maternal condition at conception, potentially mediated by changes in circulating glucose level. Consequently, we hypothesized that change in condition might better predict sex ratio variation than condition per se. Here, we investigate sex ratio variation in feral horses (Equus caballus), where sex ratio variation was previously shown to be related to maternal condition at conception. We used condition measures before and after conception to measure the change in condition around conception in individual mothers. The relationship with sex ratio was substantially more extreme than previously reported: 3% of females losing condition gave birth to a son, whereas 80% of those females that were gaining condition gave birth to a son. Change in condition is more predictive of sex ratio than actual condition, supporting previous studies, and shows the most extreme variation in mammals ever reported.
Publication Date: 2007-04-19 PubMed ID: 17439844PubMed Central: PMC2390657DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0089Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper evaluates how changes in a mother’s body condition around the time of conception impact the sex ratio of their offspring, using feral horses as a subject. Specifically, it shows that only 3% of the females who lost condition gave birth to a male, while 80% of those who were improving their condition gave birth to a male. The paper asserts that change in condition is a better predictor of offspring sex than the actual condition.

Adaptive Theory and Sex Ratios

  • In accordance with adaptive theory, it’s speculated that mothers could benefit by adjusting the sex ratio of their offspring based on their potential for future reproductive success.
  • This theory has been tested a lot in mammals, but the results have been inconsistent.
  • Recent studies, however, suggest that changes in a mother’s condition at the time of conception, possibly triggered by changes in circulating glucose levels, can consistently explain variations in sex ratios.

The Hypothesis of the Study

  • The researchers propose that sex ratio changes might be better predicted by changes in the mother’s condition rather than their condition at the time of conception.

Empirical Investigation using Feral Horses

  • The research records observations from feral horses, where previous studies have already found a relationship between maternal condition at conception and offspring sex ratio.
  • To test their hypothesis, the researchers measured the change in condition around the time of conception in individual mothers, using the difference in condition measurements taken before and after conception.

Key Findings of the Study

  • The sex ratio swings revealed by the research were even more extreme than previously documented: only 3% of females that lost condition gave birth to a son, whereas 80% of those that were gaining condition gave birth to a son.
  • The change in condition is a stronger predictor of sex ratio variation than actual condition, backing prior research, and shows the most extreme sex ratio variation ever recorded in mammals.

Cite This Article

APA
Cameron EZ, Linklater WL. (2007). Extreme sex ratio variation in relation to change in condition around conception. Biol Lett, 3(4), 395-397. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0089

Publication

ISSN: 1744-9561
NlmUniqueID: 101247722
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 3
Issue: 4
Pages: 395-397

Researcher Affiliations

Cameron, Elissa Z
  • Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa. ezcameron@zoology.up.ac.za
Linklater, Wayne L

    MeSH Terms

    • Adaptation, Biological
    • Animals
    • Animals, Wild / physiology
    • Body Constitution
    • Female
    • Fertilization
    • Horses / physiology
    • Male
    • Sex Ratio

    References

    This article includes 34 references
    1. Berry DP, Macdonald KA, Penno JW, Roche JR. Association between body condition score and live weight in pasture-based Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.. J Dairy Res 2006 Nov;73(4):487-91.
      doi: 10.1017/S0022029906002020pubmed: 16827949google scholar: lookup
    2. Brown G.R.. Sex-biased investment in nonhuman primates: can Trivers & Willard's theory be tested?. Anim. Behav. 2001;61:683–694.
      doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1659google scholar: lookup
    3. Cameron EZ. Facultative adjustment of mammalian sex ratios in support of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: evidence for a mechanism.. Proc Biol Sci 2004 Aug 22;271(1549):1723-8.
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2773pmc: PMC1691777pubmed: 15306293google scholar: lookup
    4. Cameron EZ, Linklater WL. Individual mares bias investment in sons and daughters in relation to their condition.. Anim Behav 2000 Sep;60(3):359-367.
      doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1480pubmed: 11007645google scholar: lookup
    5. Cameron E.Z, Linklater W.L, Stafford K.J, Veltman C.J. Birth sex ratios relate to mare condition at conception in Kaimanawa horses. Behav. Ecol. 1999;10:472–475.
      doi: 10.1093/beheco/10.5.472google scholar: lookup
    6. Cameron E.Z, Linklater W.L, Stafford K.J, Minot E.O. Aging and improving reproductive success in horses: declining residual reproductive value or just older and wiser?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2000;47:243–249.
      doi: 10.1007/s002650050661google scholar: lookup
    7. Cameron E.Z, Linklater W.L, Stafford K.J, Minot E.O. Social group and maternal behaviour in feral horses, Equus caballus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2003;53:92–101.
    8. Cameron EZ, Lemons PR, Bateman PW, Bennett NC. Experimental alteration of litter sex ratios in a mammal.. Proc Biol Sci 2008 Feb 7;275(1632):323-7.
      pmc: PMC2593724pubmed: 18048284doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1401google scholar: lookup
    9. Carroll CL, Huntington PJ. Body condition scoring and weight estimation of horses.. Equine Vet J 1988 Jan;20(1):41-5.
    10. Clark AB. Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate.. Science 1978 Jul 14;201(4351):163-5.
      doi: 10.1126/science.201.4351.163pubmed: 17801832google scholar: lookup
    11. Clutton-Brock TH, Iason GR. Sex ratio variation in mammals.. Q Rev Biol 1986 Sep;61(3):339-74.
      doi: 10.1086/415033pubmed: 3532167google scholar: lookup
    12. Duncan P. Horses and grasses: the nutritional ecology of Equids and their impact on the Camargue. Springer; New York, NY: 1992.
    13. Ewen JG, Cassey P, Møller AP. Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds?. Proc Biol Sci 2004 Jun 22;271(1545):1277-82.
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2735pmc: PMC1691727pubmed: 15306352google scholar: lookup
    14. Festa-Bianchet M. Offspring sex ratio studies of mammals: does publication depend upon the quality of the research or the direction of the results?. Ecoscience 1996;3:42–44.
    15. Frank S.A. Sex allocation theory for birds and mammals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1990;21:13–55.
    16. Gutiérrez-Adán A, Granados J, Pintado B, De La Fuente J. Influence of glucose on the sex ratio of bovine IVM/IVF embryos cultured in vitro.. Reprod Fertil Dev 2001;13(5-6):361-5.
      pubmed: 11833931doi: 10.1071/rd00039google scholar: lookup
    17. Gutiérrez-Adán A, Perez-Crespo M, Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Ramirez MA, Moreira P, Pintado B, Lonergan P, Rizos D. Developmental consequences of sexual dimorphism during pre-implantation embryonic development.. Reprod Domest Anim 2006 Oct;41 Suppl 2:54-62.
    18. Henneke DR, Potter GD, Kreider JL, Yeates BF. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares.. Equine Vet J 1983 Oct;15(4):371-2.
    19. Hewison AJ, Gaillard JM. Successful sons or advantaged daughters? The Trivers-Willard model and sex-biased maternal investment in ungulates.. Trends Ecol Evol 1999 Jun;14(6):229-234.
      doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01592-Xpubmed: 10354625google scholar: lookup
    20. Huntingdon P, Cleland F. Horse sense: the Australian guide to horse husbandry. Agmedia; Melbourne, Australia: 1992.
    21. Kiltie R.A. Intraspecific variation in the mammalian gestation period. J. Mammal. 1982;63:646–652.
      doi: 10.2307/1380270google scholar: lookup
    22. Larson MA, Kimura K, Kubisch HM, Roberts RM. Sexual dimorphism among bovine embryos in their ability to make the transition to expanded blastocyst and in the expression of the signaling molecule IFN-tau.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 Aug 14;98(17):9677-82.
      doi: 10.1073/pnas.171305398pmc: PMC55511pubmed: 11481449google scholar: lookup
    23. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ. Tests for cooperative behaviour between stallions.. Anim Behav 2000 Dec;60(6):731-743.
      doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1525pubmed: 11124871google scholar: lookup
    24. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ, Minot EO, Stafford KJ. Stallion harassment and the mating system of horses.. Anim Behav 1999 Aug;58(2):295-306.
      doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1155pubmed: 10458881google scholar: lookup
    25. Linklater W.L, Cameron E.Z, Stafford K.J, Veltman C.J. Social and spatial structure and range use by Kaimanawa wild horses (Equus caballus: Equidae). New Zeal. J. Ecol. 2000;24:139–152.
    26. Monard A.-M, Duncan P, Fritz H, Feh C. Variations in the birth sex ratio and neonatal mortality in a natural herd of horses. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1997;41:243–249.
      doi: 10.1007/s002650050385google scholar: lookup
    27. Myers J.H. Sex ratio adjustment under food stress: maximization of quality or numbers of offspring?. Am. Nat. 1978;112:381–388.
      doi: 10.1086/283280google scholar: lookup
    28. Oftedal O.T. Pregnancy and lactation. In: Hudson R.J, White R.G, editors. Bioenergetics of wild herbivores. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 1985. pp. 215–238.
    29. Platt H. A survey of perinatal mortality and disorders in the Thoroughbred. The Animal Health Trust; Newmarket, UK: 1978.
    30. Robertson BC, Elliott GP, Eason DK, Clout MN, Gemmell NJ. Sex allocation theory aids species conservation.. Biol Lett 2006 Jun 22;2(2):229-31.
      doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0430pmc: PMC1618899pubmed: 17148369google scholar: lookup
    31. Roche JR, Lee JM, Berry DP. Pre-conception energy balance and secondary sex ratio--partial support for the Trivers-Willard hypothesis in dairy cows.. J Dairy Sci 2006 Jun;89(6):2119-25.
    32. Rudman R, Keiper RR. The body condition of feral ponies on Assateague Island.. Equine Vet J 1991 Nov;23(6):453-6.
    33. Sheldon BC. Maternal dominance, maternal condition, and offspring sex ratio in ungulate mammals.. Am Nat 2004 Jan;163(1):40-54.
      doi: 10.1086/381003pubmed: 14767835google scholar: lookup
    34. Trivers RL, Willard DE. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring.. Science 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90-2.
      doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.90pubmed: 4682135google scholar: lookup

    Citations

    This article has been cited 17 times.
    1. Borgstede M. Evolutionary dynamics of the Trivers-Willard effect: A nonparametric approach.. Ecol Evol 2021 Sep;11(18):12676-12685.
      doi: 10.1002/ece3.8012pubmed: 34594530google scholar: lookup
    2. Shakeri YN, White KS, Waite JN. Staying close to home: Ecological constraints on space use and range fidelity in a mountain ungulate.. Ecol Evol 2021 Aug;11(16):11051-11064.
      doi: 10.1002/ece3.7893pubmed: 34429902google scholar: lookup
    3. Swegen A. Maternal recognition of pregnancy in the mare: does it exist and why do we care?. Reproduction 2021 May 5;161(6):R139-R155.
      doi: 10.1530/REP-20-0437pubmed: 33957605google scholar: lookup
    4. Marei WFA, Khalil WA, Pushpakumara APG, El-Harairy MA, Abo El-Atta AMA, Wathes DC, Fouladi-Nashta A. Polyunsaturated fatty acids influence offspring sex ratio in cows.. Int J Vet Sci Med 2018;6(Suppl):S36-S40.
      doi: 10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.01.006pubmed: 30761319google scholar: lookup
    5. Burger D, Thomas S, Aepli H, Dreyer M, Fabre G, Marti E, Sieme H, Robinson MR, Wedekind C. Major histocompatibility complex-linked social signalling affects female fertility.. Proc Biol Sci 2017 Dec 6;284(1868).
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1824pubmed: 29212724google scholar: lookup
    6. Douhard M, Festa-Bianchet M, Pelletier F. Maternal condition and previous reproduction interact to affect offspring sex in a wild mammal.. Biol Lett 2016 Aug;12(8).
      doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0510pubmed: 27512136google scholar: lookup
    7. Veller C, Haig D, Nowak MA. The Trivers-Willard hypothesis: sex ratio or investment?. Proc Biol Sci 2016 May 11;283(1830).
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0126pubmed: 27170721google scholar: lookup
    8. Kim TB, Oh JK, Kim KT, Yoon SJ, Kim SW. Does the Mother or Father Determine the Offspring Sex Ratio? Investigating the Relationship between Maternal Digit Ratio and Offspring Sex Ratio.. PLoS One 2015;10(11):e0143054.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143054pubmed: 26575995google scholar: lookup
    9. Kuhl J, Stock KF, Wulf M, Aurich C. Maternal Lineage of Warmblood Mares Contributes to Variation of Gestation Length and Bias of Foal Sex Ratio.. PLoS One 2015;10(10):e0139358.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139358pubmed: 26436555google scholar: lookup
    10. Crawford JC, Drea CM. Baby on board: olfactory cues indicate pregnancy and fetal sex in a non-human primate.. Biol Lett 2015 Feb;11(2):20140831.
      doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0831pubmed: 25716086google scholar: lookup
    11. Henderson LJ, Evans NP, Heidinger BJ, Adam A, Arnold KE. Maternal condition but not corticosterone is linked to offspring sex ratio in a passerine bird.. PLoS One 2014;9(10):e110858.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110858pubmed: 25347532google scholar: lookup
    12. Contasti AL, Tissier EJ, Johnstone JF, McLoughlin PD. Explaining spatial heterogeneity in population dynamics and genetics from spatial variation in resources for a large herbivore.. PLoS One 2012;7(10):e47858.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047858pubmed: 23118900google scholar: lookup
    13. Schmidt CM, Hood WR. Calcium availability influences litter size and sex ratio in white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus).. PLoS One 2012;7(8):e41402.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041402pubmed: 22870218google scholar: lookup
    14. Pryke SR, Rollins LA. Mothers adjust offspring sex to match the quality of the rearing environment.. Proc Biol Sci 2012 Oct 7;279(1744):4051-7.
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1351pubmed: 22859597google scholar: lookup
    15. Cameron EZ, Setsaas TH, Linklater WL. Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13850-3.
      doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900639106pubmed: 19667179google scholar: lookup
    16. Mathews F, Johnson PJ, Neil A. You are what your mother eats: evidence for maternal preconception diet influencing foetal sex in humans.. Proc Biol Sci 2008 Jul 22;275(1643):1661-8.
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0105pubmed: 18430648google scholar: lookup
    17. Cameron EZ, Lemons PR, Bateman PW, Bennett NC. Experimental alteration of litter sex ratios in a mammal.. Proc Biol Sci 2008 Feb 7;275(1632):323-7.
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1401pubmed: 18048284google scholar: lookup