Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2024; 56(6); 1155-1161; doi: 10.1111/evj.14095

Factors associated with development of post-operative reflux in horses with large colon volvulus and association with complications and outcomes.

Abstract: Post-operative reflux (POR) is rare following large colon volvulus (LCV) but does occur despite the absence of a small intestinal lesion. The prevalence, risk factors and association with survival of POR after LCV are currently unknown. Objective: To determine the prevalence of POR in horses with an LCV and its association with survival. A further objective was to assess factors which may predict POR. The hypothesis was that horses with POR following LCV surgery have a worse outcome for survival compared to those without POR. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study. Methods: Clinical data of client owned horses which underwent colic surgery at a single UK referral hospital between 2008 and 2021, where LCV was the primary finding, were retrieved from hospital records. Statistical analyses included chi-squared, t-tests and odds ratios (ORs). Horses with concurrent lesions, and those that did not survive past anaesthetic recovery, were excluded from analysis. POR was defined as ≥2 L of gastric reflux on at least one occasion. Results: A total of 128 horses were included in the study, 23 of which had POR (18%). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 86%, 95% in the non-POR and 44% in the POR group. Horses with POR were less likely to survive to discharge than those without (OR = 26, 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.68-88.0], p < 0.001), and less likely to be alive 3 years after surgery (OR = 13.4, 95% CI [2.78-64.8], p < 0.001). Conclusions: Due to the retrospective study design, full data sets were not available for every case because clinical records were incomplete or, at that time, certain tests were not performed or clinical variables were not measured. Conclusions: POR in LCV cases is a negative prognostic indicator for survival.
Publication Date: 2024-04-12 PubMed ID: 38613156DOI: 10.1111/evj.14095Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study investigates the prevalence, risk factors, and impact of post-operative reflux (POR) on the survival of horses suffering from major colon twists, known as large colon volvulus (LCV). The study concludes that horses displaying POR after LCV surgery have a worse prognosis for survival compared to horses without POR.

Study Methodology

  • The authors of the paper conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study, reviewing clinical data from a single UK-based veterinary referral hospital.
  • The data spanned thirteen years, between 2008 and 2021.
  • The clinical data included those of horses that had undergone colic surgery, with LCV being the primary finding.
  • Any horses with concurrent lesions, and those that did not survive past the anaesthetic recovery stage, were excluded from the study.
  • For the purpose of this study, POR was defined as a minimum of 2 litres of gastric reflux on at least one occasion.

Study Results

  • Out of the 128 horses included in the study, 23 (or around 18%) experienced post-operative reflux (POR).
  • The overall survival rate to hospital discharge was observed to be 86%. However, on closer examination, the survival rate was 95% for horses not showing POR and dropped sharply to 44% for horses with POR.
  • The statistical outcome of the study validated the initial hypothesis. Horses with POR were significantly less likely to survive to discharge (odds ratio of 26) and less likely to be alive three years after surgery (odds ratio of 13.4).

Conclusions of the Research

  • The authors acknowledge the limitations of the study. Due to the retrospective nature of the research, complete data sets were not available for each case. The reasons for missing data ranged from incomplete clinical records to the unavailability of tests or unmeasured clinical variables at the time of recording.
  • Despite these limitations, the study effectively established that post-operative reflux (POR) in cases of large colon volvulus (LCV) serves as a negative prognostic indicator for the survival of the horses, thus guiding veterinary interventions accordingly.

Cite This Article

APA
Watrobska N, Gough R, Hallowell G, Haugaard S, McGovern KF. (2024). Factors associated with development of post-operative reflux in horses with large colon volvulus and association with complications and outcomes. Equine Vet J, 56(6), 1155-1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14095

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 56
Issue: 6
Pages: 1155-1161

Researcher Affiliations

Watrobska, Natalia
  • Donnington Grove Veterinary Group, Newbury, UK.
Gough, Rachel
  • Donnington Grove Veterinary Group, Newbury, UK.
Hallowell, Gayle
  • Equine Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Haugaard, Simon
  • University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
McGovern, Kate F
  • Donnington Grove Veterinary Group, Newbury, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horse Diseases / mortality
  • Intestinal Volvulus / veterinary
  • Intestinal Volvulus / surgery
  • Intestinal Volvulus / mortality
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Postoperative Complications / veterinary
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Male
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Colonic Diseases / veterinary
  • Colonic Diseases / surgery
  • Colonic Diseases / mortality
  • Risk Factors
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux / veterinary

References

This article includes 28 references
  1. Proudman CJ, Smith JE, Edwards GB, French NP. Long‐term survival of equine surgical colic cases. Part 1: patterns of mortality and morbidity.. Equine Vet J 2002;34:432–437.
  2. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 1: short‐term survival following a single laparotomy.. Equine Vet J 2005;37:296–302.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054529409google scholar: lookup
  3. Suthers JM, Pinchbeck GL, Proudman CJ, Archer DC. Risk factors for large colon volvulus in the UK.. Equine Vet J 2013;45:558–563.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12039google scholar: lookup
  4. Suthers JM, Pinchbeck GL, Proudman CJ, Archer DC. Survival of horses following strangulating large colon volvulus.. Equine Vet J 2013;45:219–223.
  5. Gazzerro DM, Southwood LL, Lindborg S. Short‐term complications after colic surgery in geriatric versus mature non‐geriatric horses.. Vet Surg 2015;44:256–264.
  6. Holcombe SJ, Rodriguez KM, Haupt JL, Campbell JO, Chaney KP, Sparks HD. Prevalence of and risk factors for postoperative ileus after small intestinal surgery in two hundred and thirty‐three horses.. Vet Surg 2009;38:368–372.
  7. Roussel AJ Jr, Cohen ND, Hooper RN, Rakestraw PC. Risk factors associated with development of postoperative ileus in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:72–78.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.219.72google scholar: lookup
  8. Boorman S, Stefanovski D, Southwood LL. Clinical findings associated with development of postoperative reflux and short‐term survival after small intestinal surgery in geriatric and mature nongeriatric horses.. Vet Surg 2019;48:795–802.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13217google scholar: lookup
  9. Hunt JM, Edwards GB, Clarke KW. Incidence, diagnosis and treatment of postoperative complications in colic cases.. Equine Vet J 1986;18:264–270.
  10. Torfs S, Delesalle J, Dewulf L, Devisscher L, Deprez P. Risk factors for equine postoperative ileus and effectiveness of prophylactic lidocaine.. J Vet Intern Med 2009;23:606–611.
  11. Cohen ND, Lester GD, Sanchez LC, Merritt AM, Roussel AJ Jr. Evaluation of risk factors associated with development of postoperative ileus in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;225:1070–1078.
  12. Blikslager AT, Bowman KF, Levine JF, Bristol DG, Roberts MC. Evaluation of factors associated with postoperative ileus in horses: 31 cases (1990‐1992).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994;205:1748–1752.
  13. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 2: short‐term complications.. Equine Vet J 2005;37:303–309.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054529364google scholar: lookup
  14. McGovern KF, Suthers JM, James FM, O'Meara BJ, Parker RA, Foote AK. Gastric impaction associated with displacement and volvulus of the large colon in seven mature horses.. Equine Vet Educ 2015;27(9):453–459.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12396google scholar: lookup
  15. French NP, Smith J, Edwards GB, Proudman CJ. Equine surgical colic: risk factors for postoperative complications.. Equine Vet J 2002;34:444–449.
  16. Walton BL, Lehmann M, Skorczewski T, Holle LA, Beckman JD, Cribb JA. Elevated hematocrit enhances platelet accumulation following vascular injury.. Blood 2017;129(18):2537–2546.
  17. Rychter J, Clavé P. Intestinal inflammation in postoperative ileus: pathogenesis and therapeutic targets.. Gut 2013;62(11):1534–1535.
  18. Boeckxstaens GE, DeJonge WJ. Neuroimmune mechanisms in postoperative ileus.. Gut 2009;58(9):1300–1311.
    doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.169250google scholar: lookup
  19. De Winter B‐Y, De Man J‐G. Interplay between inflammation, immune system and neuronal pathways: effect on gastrointestinal motility.. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16(44):5523–5535.
    doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5523google scholar: lookup
  20. De Ceulaer K, Delesalle C, van Elzen R, van Brantegem L, Weyns A, van Ginneken C. Morphological changes in the small intestinal smooth muscle layers of horses suffering from small intestinal strangulation. Is there a basis for predisposition for reduced contractility?. Equine Vet J 2011;43(4):439–445.
  21. Tang J, Xiang Z, Bernards M, Chen S. Peritoneal adhesions: occurrence, prevention and experimental models.. Acta Biomater 2020;116:84–104.
  22. Rakestraw PC, Hardy J. Large intestine.. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, editors. Equine surgery. St. Louis: Saunders; 2006. p. 436–478..
  23. Smith LJ, Mair TS. Are horses that undergo an exploratory laparotomy for correction of a right dorsal displacement of the large colon predisposed to post operative colic, compared to other forms of large colon displacement?. Equine Vet J 2009;42(1):44–46.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x464122google scholar: lookup
  24. Hoaglund EL, Hess AM, Hassel DM. Retrospective evaluation of the effect of intravenous fluid administration on development of postoperative reflux in horses with colic (2004‐2012): 194 horses.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2018;28(6):566–572.
    doi: 10.1111/vec.12776google scholar: lookup
  25. Sheats MK, Cook VL, Jones SL, Blikslager AT, Pease AP. Use of ultrasound to evaluate outcome following colic surgery for equine large colon volvulus.. Equine Vet J 2010;42(1):47–52.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x456040google scholar: lookup
  26. Mair T, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 3: long‐term complications and survival.. Equine Vet J 2005;37:310–314.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054529445google scholar: lookup
  27. Proudman CJ, Smith JE, Edwards GB, French NP. Long‐term survival of equine surgical colic cases. Part 2: modelling postoperative survival.. Equine Vet J 2002;34(5):438–443.
  28. Driscoll N, Baia P, Fischer AT, Brauer T, Klohnen A. Large colon resection and anastomosis in horses: 52 cases (1996–2006).. Equine Vet J 2008;40:342–347.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408x293529google scholar: lookup