Analyze Diet
mBio2024; 16(2); e0348223; doi: 10.1128/mbio.03482-23

Functional assessment of the glycoproteins of a novel Hendra virus variant reveals contrasting fusogenic capacities of the receptor-binding and fusion glycoproteins.

Abstract: A novel Hendra virus (HeV) genotype (HeV genotype 2 [HeV-g2]) was recently isolated from a deceased horse, revealing high-sequence conservation and antigenic similarities with the prototypic strain, HeV-g1. As the receptor-binding (G) and fusion (F) glycoproteins of HeV are essential for mediating viral entry, functional characterization of emerging HeV genotypic variants is key to understanding viral entry mechanisms and broader virus-host co-evolution. We first confirmed that HeV-g2 and HeV-g1 glycoproteins share a close phylogenetic relationship, underscoring HeV-g2's relevance to global health. Our data showed that HeV-g2 glycoproteins induced cell-cell fusion in human cells, shared receptor tropism with HeV-g1, and cross-reacted with antibodies raised against HeV-g1. Despite these similarities, HeV-g2 glycoproteins yielded reduced syncytia formation compared to HeV-g1. By expressing heterotypic combinations of HeV-g2, HeV-g1, and Nipah virus (NiV) glycoproteins, we found that while HeV-g2 G had strong fusion-promoting abilities, HeV-g2 F consistently displayed hypofusogenic properties. These fusion phenotypes were more closely associated with those observed in the related NiV. Further investigation using HeV-g1 and HeV-g2 glycoprotein chimeras revealed that multiple domains may play roles in modulating these fusion phenotypes. Altogether, our findings may establish intrinsic fusogenic capacities of viral glycoproteins as a potential driver behind the emergence of new henipaviral variants. Objective: HeV is a zoonotic pathogen that causes severe disease across various mammalian hosts, including horses and humans. The identification of unrecognized HeV variants, such as HeV-g2, highlights the need to investigate mechanisms that may drive their evolution, transmission, and pathogenicity. Our study reveals that HeV-g2 and HeV-g1 glycoproteins are highly conserved in identity, function, and receptor tropism, yet they differ in their abilities to induce the formation of multinucleated cells (syncytia), which is a potential marker of viral pathogenesis. By using heterotypic combinations of HeV-g2 with either HeV-g1 or NiV glycoproteins, as well as chimeric HeV-g1/HeV-g2 glycoproteins, we demonstrate that the differences in syncytial formation can be attributed to the intrinsic fusogenic capacities of each glycoprotein. Our data indicate that HeV-g2 glycoproteins have fusion phenotypes closely related to those of NiV and that fusion promotion may be a crucial factor driving the emergence of new henipaviral variants.
Publication Date: 2024-12-20 PubMed ID: 39704501PubMed Central: PMC11796360DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03482-23Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study analyzed the functional differences between the glycoproteins of a newly identified Hendra virus variant (HeV-g2) and the original strain (HeV-g1), focusing on how their fusion proteins contribute to viral entry and cell-cell fusion.
  • Although HeV-g2 shares high genetic and antigenic similarity with HeV-g1, it exhibits distinct fusion behavior, which may influence viral infectivity and pathogenicity.

Background and Importance

  • Hendra virus (HeV) is a zoonotic pathogen known to cause severe respiratory and neurological disease in horses and humans.
  • The entry of HeV into host cells is mediated by two key glycoproteins on the viral surface:
    • Glycoprotein G (receptor-binding protein)
    • Glycoprotein F (fusion protein)
  • Understanding the function of these glycoproteins is critical for insights into how the virus infects host cells and spreads, as well as for developing therapeutic or preventive strategies.
  • Recently, a novel genotype of HeV, named HeV genotype 2 (HeV-g2), was isolated, raising questions about its functional and pathogenic properties compared to the prototypic HeV strain (HeV-g1).

Research Goals

  • To compare the glycoproteins of HeV-g2 with those of HeV-g1, specifically regarding their phylogenetic relationship, receptor binding, and capacity to induce cell fusion.
  • To explore how differences in the glycoproteins’ fusion abilities might influence viral pathogenicity and evolution.
  • To use chimeric and heterotypic glycoprotein combinations from HeV-g1, HeV-g2, and a related virus, Nipah virus (NiV), to dissect the functional roles of each glycoprotein.

Key Findings

  • Phylogenetic and Antigenic Relationships:
    • HeV-g2 glycoproteins are closely related to HeV-g1, indicating they share a recent common ancestor and thus are relevant in global health contexts.
    • Antibodies raised against HeV-g1 also recognize HeV-g2 glycoproteins, demonstrating antigenic similarity.
  • Receptor Tropism and Fusion Capacity:
    • Both HeV-g2 and HeV-g1 glycoproteins bind the same host cell receptor, indicating similar cell targeting.
    • HeV-g2 glycoproteins induce fusion between cells (syncytia formation), but to a lesser extent than HeV-g1, indicating reduced fusogenicity.
  • Heterotypic Glycoprotein Combinations:
    • When mixing glycoproteins from HeV-g2, HeV-g1, and NiV, it was found that the HeV-g2 G protein strongly promotes fusion.
    • The HeV-g2 F protein consistently showed lower fusion capacity (“hypofusogenic”) compared to HeV-g1 F.
    • These fusion traits in HeV-g2 F resembled those of the related NiV F protein, linking HeV-g2 functionally closer to NiV in terms of fusion behavior.
  • Chimeric Glycoprotein Studies:
    • Creating hybrids (chimeras) between HeV-g1 and HeV-g2 glycoproteins showed that multiple structural domains contribute to their different fusion properties.
    • This suggests that complex interactions within and between glycoprotein domains regulate viral fusion capacity.

Implications and Conclusions

  • The intrinsic fusogenic properties of viral glycoproteins, especially the fusion (F) protein, play a significant role in virus-host interaction, viral spread, and potentially pathogenicity.
  • The finding that HeV-g2 fusion characteristics are similar to Nipah virus indicates evolutionary and functional links among henipaviruses that could affect viral emergence and host adaptation.
  • Reduced syncytia formation by HeV-g2 might influence the virus’s pathogenicity or transmissibility compared to HeV-g1, though more research would be needed to confirm clinical impacts.
  • Understanding these functional differences provides key insights for surveillance of emerging variants and may inform the development of vaccines or therapeutics targeting viral entry mechanisms.

Cite This Article

APA
Ma AZ, Yeo YY, Lee JF, Kim CM, Ezzatpour S, Menchaca C, Upadhye V, Annand EJ, Eden J-S, Plowright RK, Peel AJ, Buchholz DW, Aguilar HC. (2024). Functional assessment of the glycoproteins of a novel Hendra virus variant reveals contrasting fusogenic capacities of the receptor-binding and fusion glycoproteins. mBio, 16(2), e0348223. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03482-23

Publication

ISSN: 2150-7511
NlmUniqueID: 101519231
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 2
Pages: e0348223
PII: e03482-23

Researcher Affiliations

Ma, Andrew Z
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Yeo, Yao Yu
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Lee, Jean F
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Kim, Colin M
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Ezzatpour, Shahrzad
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Menchaca, Carolina
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Upadhye, Viraj
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Annand, Edward J
  • Epidemiology Surveillance and Laboratory Section, Animal Health Policy Branch, Animal Division, Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Eden, John-Sebastian
  • Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Centre for Virus Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Plowright, Raina K
  • Department of Public and Ecosystem Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Peel, Alison J
  • Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Buchholz, David W
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Aguilar, Hector C
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Hendra Virus / genetics
  • Hendra Virus / physiology
  • Hendra Virus / classification
  • Animals
  • Humans
  • Horses
  • Viral Fusion Proteins / genetics
  • Viral Fusion Proteins / metabolism
  • Virus Internalization
  • Glycoproteins / genetics
  • Glycoproteins / metabolism
  • Receptors, Virus / metabolism
  • Phylogeny
  • Henipavirus Infections / virology
  • Henipavirus Infections / veterinary
  • Viral Tropism
  • Genotype
  • Cell Line
  • Cell Fusion
  • Viral Envelope Proteins / genetics
  • Viral Envelope Proteins / metabolism

Grant Funding

  • R01 AI109022 / NIAID NIH HHS
  • T32 EB023860 / NIBIB NIH HHS
  • D18AC00031-PREEMPT / DARPA
  • DE190100710 / ARC DECRA

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 45 references
  1. Drexler JF, Corman VM, Müller MA, Maganga GD, Vallo P, Binger T, Gloza-Rausch F, Cottontail VM, Rasche A, Yordanov S. Bats host major mammalian paramyxoviruses. Nat Commun 3:796.
    doi: 10.1038/ncomms1796pmc: PMC3343228pubmed: 22531181google scholar: lookup
  2. Pernet O, Schneider BS, Beaty SM, LeBreton M, Yun TE, Park A, Zachariah TT, Bowden TA, Hitchens P, Ramirez CM, Daszak P, Mazet J, Freiberg AN, Wolfe ND, Lee B. Evidence for henipavirus spillover into human populations in Africa. Nat Commun 5:5342.
    doi: 10.1038/ncomms6342pmc: PMC4237230pubmed: 25405640google scholar: lookup
  3. Rima B, Balkema-Buschmann A, Dundon WG, Duprex P, Easton A, Fouchier R, Kurath G, Lamb R, Lee B, Rota P, Wang L, ICTV Report Consortium. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: paramyxoviridae. J Gen Virol 100:1593–1594.
    doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001328pmc: PMC7273325pubmed: 31609197google scholar: lookup
  4. Murray K, Selleck P, Hooper P, Hyatt A, Gould A, Gleeson L, Westbury H, Hiley L, Selvey L, Rodwell B. A morbillivirus that caused fatal disease in horses and humans. Science 268:94–97.
    doi: 10.1126/science.7701348pubmed: 7701348google scholar: lookup
  5. Halpin K, Rota P. A review of hendra virus and nipah virus infections in man and other animals. Zoonoses Infect Affect Hum Anim 997–1012.
  6. Halpin K, Hyatt AD, Fogarty R, Middleton D, Bingham J, Epstein JH, Rahman SA, Hughes T, Smith C, Field HE, Daszak P, Henipavirus Ecology Research Group. Pteropid bats are confirmed as the reservoir hosts of henipaviruses: a comprehensive experimental study of virus transmission. Am J Trop Med Hyg 85:946–951.
    doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0567pmc: PMC3205647pubmed: 22049055google scholar: lookup
  7. . Prioritizing diseases for research and development in emergency contexts.. 2023.
  8. Gamble A, Yeo YY, Butler AA, Tang H, Snedden CE, Mason CT, Buchholz DW, Bingham J, Aguilar HC, Lloyd-Smith JO. Drivers and distribution of henipavirus-induced syncytia: what do we know?. Viruses 13:1755.
    doi: 10.3390/v13091755pmc: PMC8472861pubmed: 34578336google scholar: lookup
  9. Negrete OA, Levroney EL, Aguilar HC, Bertolotti-Ciarlet A, Nazarian R, Tajyar S, Lee B. EphrinB2 is the entry receptor for Nipah virus, an emergent deadly paramyxovirus. Nature 436:401–405.
    doi: 10.1038/nature03838pubmed: 16007075google scholar: lookup
  10. Bonaparte MI, Dimitrov AS, Bossart KN, Crameri G, Mungall BA, Bishop KA, Choudhry V, Dimitrov DS, Wang L-F, Eaton BT, Broder CC. Ephrin-B2 ligand is a functional receptor for Hendra virus and Nipah virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:10652–10657.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504887102pmc: PMC1169237pubmed: 15998730google scholar: lookup
  11. Negrete OA, Wolf MC, Aguilar HC, Enterlein S, Wang W, Mühlberger E, Su SV, Bertolotti-Ciarlet A, Flick R, Lee B. Two key residues in ephrinB3 are critical for its use as an alternative receptor for Nipah virus. PLOS Pathog 2:e7.
  12. Xu K, Broder CC, Nikolov DB. Ephrin-B2 and ephrin-B3 as functional henipavirus receptors. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23:116–123.
  13. Lee B, Pernet O, Ahmed AA, Zeltina A, Beaty SM, Bowden TA. Molecular recognition of human ephrinB2 cell surface receptor by an emergent African henipavirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E2156–E2165.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501690112pmc: PMC4418902pubmed: 25825759google scholar: lookup
  14. Laing ED, Navaratnarajah CK, Cheliout Da Silva S, Petzing SR, Xu Y, Sterling SL, Marsh GA, Wang L-F, Amaya M, Nikolov DB, Cattaneo R, Broder CC, Xu K. Structural and functional analyses reveal promiscuous and species specific use of ephrin receptors by Cedar virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:20707–20715.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911773116pmc: PMC6789926pubmed: 31548390google scholar: lookup
  15. Pryce R, Azarm K, Rissanen I, Harlos K, Bowden TA, Lee B. A key region of molecular specificity orchestrates unique ephrin-B1 utilization by Cedar virus. Life Sci Alliance 3:e201900578.
    doi: 10.26508/lsa.201900578pmc: PMC6925387pubmed: 31862858google scholar: lookup
  16. Rissanen I, Ahmed AA, Azarm K, Beaty S, Hong P, Nambulli S, Duprex WP, Lee B, Bowden TA. Idiosyncratic Mòjiāng virus attachment glycoprotein directs a host-cell entry pathway distinct from genetically related henipaviruses.. Nat Commun 8:16060.
    doi: 10.1038/ncomms16060pmc: PMC5510225pubmed: 28699636google scholar: lookup
  17. Cheliout Da Silva S, Yan L, Dang HV, Xu K, Epstein JH, Veesler D, Broder CC. Functional analysis of the fusion and attachment glycoproteins of mojiang henipavirus.. Viruses 13:517.
    doi: 10.3390/v13030517pmc: PMC8004131pubmed: 33809833google scholar: lookup
  18. Zhang X-A, Li H, Jiang F-C, Zhu F, Zhang Y-F, Chen J-J, Tan C-W, Anderson DE, Fan H, Dong L-Y, Li C, Zhang P-H, Li Y, Ding H, Fang L-Q, Wang L-F, Liu W. A zoonotic henipavirus in febrile patients in China.. N Engl J Med 387:470–472.
    doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2202705pubmed: 35921459google scholar: lookup
  19. Zeltina A, Bowden TA, Lee B. Emerging paramyxoviruses: receptor tropism and zoonotic potential.. PLOS Pathog 12:e1005390.
  20. Pager CT, Dutch RE. Cathepsin L is involved in proteolytic processing of the Hendra virus fusion protein.. J Virol 79:12714–12720.
  21. Pager CT, Craft WW, Patch J, Dutch RE. A mature and fusogenic form of the Nipah virus fusion protein requires proteolytic processing by cathepsin L.. Virology (Auckl) 346:251–257.
    doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.01.007pmc: PMC7111743pubmed: 16460775google scholar: lookup
  22. Aguilar HC, Henderson BA, Zamora JL, Johnston GP. Paramyxovirus glycoproteins and the membrane fusion process.. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep 3:142–154.
    doi: 10.1007/s40588-016-0040-8pmc: PMC5270710pubmed: 28138419google scholar: lookup
  23. Broder CC, Xu K, Nikolov DB, Zhu Z, Dimitrov DS, Middleton D, Pallister J, Geisbert TW, Bossart KN, Wang L-F. A treatment for and vaccine against the deadly Hendra and Nipah viruses.. Antiviral Res 100:8–13.
  24. Annand EJ, Horsburgh BA, Xu K, Reid PA, Poole B, de Kantzow MC, Brown N, Tweedie A, Michie M, Grewar JD. Novel Hendra virus variant detected by sentinel surveillance of horses in Australia.. Emerg Infect Dis 28:693–704.
    doi: 10.3201/eid2803.211245pmc: PMC8888208pubmed: 35202527google scholar: lookup
  25. Wang J, Anderson DE, Halpin K, Hong X, Chen H, Walker S, Valdeter S, van der Heide B, Neave MJ, Bingham J, O’Brien D, Eagles D, Wang L-F, Williams DT. A new Hendra virus genotype found in Australian flying foxes.. Virol J 18:197.
    doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01652-7pmc: PMC8510678pubmed: 34641882google scholar: lookup
  26. Peel AJ, Yinda CK, Annand EJ, Dale AS, Eby P, Eden J-S, Jones DN, Kessler MK, Lunn TJ, Pearson T, Schulz JE, Smith IL, Munster VJ, Plowright RK, Bat One Health Group. Novel Hendra virus variant circulating in black flying foxes and grey-headed flying foxes, Australia.. Emerg Infect Dis 28:1043–1047.
    doi: 10.3201/eid2805.212338pmc: PMC9045453pubmed: 35447052google scholar: lookup
  27. Taylor J, Thompson K, Annand EJ, Massey PD, Bennett J, Eden J-S, Horsburgh BA, Hodgson E, Wood K, Kerr J, Kirkland P, Finlaison D, Peel AJ, Eby P, Durrheim DN. Novel variant Hendra virus genotype 2 infection in a horse in the greater Newcastle region, New South Wales, Australia.. One Health 15:100423.
  28. Wang Z, Dang HV, Amaya M, Xu Y, Yin R, Yan L, Hickey AC, Annand EJ, Horsburgh BA, Reid PA, Smith I, Eden J-S, Xu K, Broder CC, Veesler D. Potent monoclonal antibody–mediated neutralization of a divergent Hendra virus variant.. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119:e2122769119.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122769119pmc: PMC9295758pubmed: 35617431google scholar: lookup
  29. Stone JA, Vemulapati BM, Bradel-Tretheway B, Aguilar HC. Multiple strategies reveal a bidentate interaction between the Nipah virus attachment and fusion glycoproteins.. J Virol 90:10762–10773.
    doi: 10.1128/JVI.01469-16pmc: PMC5110167pubmed: 27654290google scholar: lookup
  30. Bradel-Tretheway BG, Zamora JLR, Stone JA, Liu Q, Li J, Aguilar HC. Nipah and Hendra virus glycoproteins induce comparable homologous but distinct heterologous fusion phenotypes.. J Virol 93:e00577-19.
    doi: 10.1128/JVI.00577-19pmc: PMC6580972pubmed: 30971473google scholar: lookup
  31. Yeo YY, Buchholz DW, Gamble A, Jager M, Aguilar HC. Headless henipaviral receptor binding glycoproteins reveal fusion modulation by the head/stalk interface and post-receptor binding contributions of the head domain.. J Virol 95:e0066621.
    doi: 10.1128/JVI.00666-21pmc: PMC8475510pubmed: 34288734google scholar: lookup
  32. Behner L, Zimmermann L, Ringel M, Weis M, Maisner A. Formation of high-order oligomers is required for functional bioactivity of an African bat henipavirus surface glycoprotein.. Vet Microbiol 218:90–97.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.03.031pubmed: 29685227google scholar: lookup
  33. Maar D, Harmon B, Chu D, Schulz B, Aguilar HC, Lee B, Negrete OA. Cysteines in the stalk of the nipah virus G glycoprotein are located in a distinct subdomain critical for fusion activation.. J Virol 86:6632–6642.
    doi: 10.1128/JVI.00076-12pmc: PMC3393546pubmed: 22496210google scholar: lookup
  34. Bradel-Tretheway BG, Liu Q, Stone JA, McInally S, Aguilar HC. Novel functions of Hendra virus G N-Glycans and comparisons to Nipah virus.. J Virol 89:7235–7247.
    doi: 10.1128/JVI.00773-15pmc: PMC4473544pubmed: 25948743google scholar: lookup
  35. Aguilar HC, Matreyek KA, Choi DY, Filone CM, Young S, Lee B. Polybasic KKR motif in the cytoplasmic tail of Nipah virus fusion protein modulates membrane fusion by inside-out signaling.. J Virol 81:4520–4532.
    doi: 10.1128/JVI.02205-06pmc: PMC1900187pubmed: 17301148google scholar: lookup
  36. Letko M, Seifert SN, Olival KJ, Plowright RK, Munster VJ. Bat-borne virus diversity, spillover and emergence.. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:461–471.
    doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0394-zpmc: PMC7289071pubmed: 32528128google scholar: lookup
  37. Liu Q, Stone JA, Bradel-Tretheway B, Dabundo J, Benavides Montano JA, Santos-Montanez J, Biering SB, Nicola AV, Iorio RM, Lu X, Aguilar HC. Unraveling a three-step spatiotemporal mechanism of triggering of receptor-induced Nipah virus fusion and cell entry.. PLOS Pathog 9:e1003770.
  38. Liu Q, Bradel-Tretheway B, Monreal AI, Saludes JP, Lu X, Nicola AV, Aguilar HC. Nipah virus attachment glycoprotein stalk C-terminal region links receptor binding to fusion triggering.. J Virol 89:1838–1850.
    doi: 10.1128/JVI.02277-14pmc: PMC4300768pubmed: 25428863google scholar: lookup
  39. Bishop KA, Hickey AC, Khetawat D, Patch JR, Bossart KN, Zhu Z, Wang L-F, Dimitrov DS, Broder CC. Residues in the stalk domain of the Hendra virus G glycoprotein modulate conformational changes associated with receptor binding.. J Virol 82:11398–11409.
    doi: 10.1128/JVI.02654-07pmc: PMC2573269pubmed: 18799571google scholar: lookup
  40. Zhu Q, Biering SB, Mirza AM, Grasseschi BA, Mahon PJ, Lee B, Aguilar HC, Iorio RM. Individual N-glycans added at intervals along the stalk of the Nipah virus G protein prevent fusion but do not block the interaction with the homologous F protein.. J Virol 87:3119–3129.
    doi: 10.1128/JVI.03084-12pmc: PMC3592174pubmed: 23283956google scholar: lookup
  41. Gardner AE, Dutch RE. A conserved region in the F subunit of paramyxovirus fusion proteins is involved in fusion regulation.. J Virol 81:8303–8314.
    doi: 10.1128/JVI.00366-07pmc: PMC1951327pubmed: 17507474google scholar: lookup
  42. Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, Dufayard J-F, Guindon S, Lefort V, Lescot M, Claverie J-M, Gascuel O. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist.. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W465–W469.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn180pmc: PMC2447785pubmed: 18424797google scholar: lookup
  43. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340pmc: PMC390337pubmed: 15034147google scholar: lookup
  44. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552.
  45. Chevenet F, Brun C, Bañuls AL, Jacq B, Christen R. TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:439.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-439pmc: PMC1615880pubmed: 17032440google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Pigeaud DD, Fenton KA, Turcinovic J, Borisevich V, Agans KN, Deer DJ, Harrison MB, Fears AC, Dobias NS, Prasad AN, Smith IL, Williams DT, Woolsey CB, Broder CC, Cross RW, Geisbert TW. Experimental challenge of African green monkeys with contemporary Hendra virus isolates produces divergent clinical disease.. Emerg Microbes Infect 2025 Dec;14(1):2544735.
    doi: 10.1080/22221751.2025.2544735pubmed: 40768740google scholar: lookup