FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Res Commun / Global distribution of Neorickettsia risticii, the causative...
Veterinary research communications2026; 50(3); 205; doi: 10.1007/s11259-026-11146-y

Global distribution of Neorickettsia risticii, the causative agent of potomac horse fever: a systematic review.

Abstract: Potomac Horse Fever (PHF), also known as equine neorickettsiosis (EN) or equine monocytic ehrlichiosis is an acute, potentially fatal infectious disease in horses caused by the monocytotropic rickettsia bacterium Neorickettsia risticii. This obligate intracellular bacterium is maintained throughout the life cycle of digenetic trematodes which utilize multiple intermediate and definitive hosts. Research on N. risticii is scattered across multiple continents, with most studies originating from North and South America. Therefore, a systematic review is needed to consolidate global evidence, clarify the geographic distribution and host range of this pathogen, and identify knowledge gaps to guide future surveillance, diagnosis, and control strategies. Therefore, we conducted the first systematic review of the distribution of Neorickettsia risticii in horses and invertebrates. A comprehensive search of five electronic databases was performed to retrieve studies that reported the occurrence of N. risticii. Retrieved records were screened and assessed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. Twenty-seven eligible studies published between 1990 and 2024 were included in the qualitative synthesis of this review. The reported prevalence in horses varied widely by diagnostic method: serological surveys detected N. risticii antibodies in 5.45%–26.6% of sampled populations, whereas molecular assays reported PCR positivity ranging from 0%–14.38%. Neorickettsia risticii DNA has also been detected in a variety of invertebrate and wildlife hosts, including bats, trematodes, snails, aquatic insects, and soft ticks. These findings highlight the complex ecology of N. risticii and its presence across diverse host groups, although its prevalence remains generally low. The distribution of studies was geographically skewed towards North America, revealing significant gaps in surveillance in other regions.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2026-03-18 PubMed ID: 41848949PubMed Central: PMC12999721DOI: 10.1007/s11259-026-11146-yGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This research systematically reviews the global distribution and host range of Neorickettsia risticii, the bacterium causing Potomac Horse Fever, synthesizing data from multiple studies to clarify its prevalence and ecological complexity across various species and regions.

Background

  • Potomac Horse Fever (PHF): An acute infectious disease in horses caused by Neorickettsia risticii, also called equine neorickettsiosis or equine monocytic ehrlichiosis.
  • Pathogen Characteristics: Neorickettsia risticii is a monocytotropic rickettsia, meaning it infects monocytes, and exists as an obligate intracellular bacterium, meaning it lives inside host cells.
  • Life Cycle: This bacterium is maintained throughout the life cycle of digenetic trematodes (parasitic flatworms), which involve multiple intermediate and definitive hosts.
  • Scientific Gap: Research on N. risticii is dispersed, predominantly from North and South America, with little consolidated information on its global distribution.

Objectives

  • Conduct a systematic review to consolidate global evidence regarding the distribution of Neorickettsia risticii.
  • Determine its geographic spread and host range, particularly in horses and relevant invertebrates.
  • Identify gaps in knowledge to guide improvements in disease surveillance, diagnosis, and control.

Methodology

  • Performed a comprehensive search of five electronic databases to collect studies reporting the occurrence of N. risticii.
  • Applied PRISMA 2020 guidelines to screen, select, and assess retrieved studies rigorously to ensure quality and consistency.
  • Included 27 eligible studies published from 1990 to 2024 for qualitative synthesis.

Key Findings – Prevalence in Horses

  • Prevalence varied significantly depending on diagnostic technique:
    • Serological surveys: Detected antibodies against N. risticii in 5.45% to 26.6% of horses tested, indicating exposure to the bacterium.
    • Molecular assays (PCR): Detected presence of N. risticii DNA in 0% to 14.38% of tested populations, indicating current or recent infection.
  • The wide range in detection rates may be due to differences in testing methods, timing of sample collection, geographic locations, or horse populations.

Key Findings – Detection in Other Hosts

  • N. risticii DNA was also found in a variety of invertebrates and wildlife species:
    • Bats
    • Trematodes (the parasitic flatworms involved in lifecycle)
    • Snails
    • Aquatic insects
    • Soft ticks
  • This diversity highlights the complex ecology and transmission dynamics of the bacterium.
  • Despite its broad host range, the overall prevalence in these species was generally low.

Geographical Distribution and Surveillance Gaps

  • The majority of studies originated from North America, skewing the understanding of global distribution.
  • Noticeable gaps exist in research and surveillance in other continents, such as Asia, Africa, and Europe.
  • This uneven distribution of data limits comprehensive understanding of the pathogen’s true global impact and potential risk areas.

Implications and Future Directions

  • Enhanced global surveillance is needed to fill geographic gaps and better track N. risticii distribution beyond Americas.
  • Improved diagnostic standardization across regions and host species could lead to more consistent prevalence estimates.
  • Understanding transmission ecology among various hosts, including wildlife and invertebrates, can inform targeted control and prevention strategies.
  • The systematic consolidation of data supports veterinary health professionals and researchers in prioritizing resource allocation and research efforts to mitigate PHF impacts worldwide.

Cite This Article

APA
Onyiche TE, Peng TL. (2026). Global distribution of Neorickettsia risticii, the causative agent of potomac horse fever: a systematic review. Vet Res Commun, 50(3), 205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-026-11146-y

Publication

Veterinary research communications
ISSN: 1573-7446
NlmUniqueID: 8100520
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 50
Issue: 3
PII: 205

Researcher Affiliations

Onyiche, ThankGod Emmanuel
  • Departments of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, University of Maiduguri, P.M.B. 1069, Maiduguri, Nigeria. Thankgod.Onyiche@nwu.ac.za.
  • Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa. Thankgod.Onyiche@nwu.ac.za.
Peng, Tan Li
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kota Bharu, Pengkalan Chape, 16100, Malaysia. li.peng@umk.edu.my.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: Approval was not required. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 59 references
  1. Atwill ER, Mohammed HO, Lopez JW, McCulloch CE, Dubovi EJ. Cross-sectional evaluation of environmental, host, and management factors associated with risk of seropositivity to Ehrlichia risticii in horses of New York State. Am J Vet Res 57(3):278–285.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.1996.57.03.278pubmed: 8669755google scholar: lookup
  2. Baird JD, Arroyo LG. Historical aspects of Potomac horse fever in Ontario (1924–2010). T Can Vet J 54(6):565.
    pmc: PMC3659452pubmed: 24155447
  3. Barlough JE, Reubel GH, Madigan JE, Vredevoe LK, Miller PE, Rikihisa Y. Detection of Ehrlichia risticii, the agent of Potomac horse fever, in freshwater stream snails (Pleuroceridae: Juga spp.) from northern California. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(8):2888–2893.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.8.2888-2893.1998pmc: PMC106788pubmed: 9687446google scholar: lookup
  4. Barquez RM, Díaz MM, Ojeda RA. Mamíferos de Argentina. Sistemática y Distribución. Editorial SAREM, Mendoza, Argentina, 375. Pp. 330.1.
  5. Bertin FR, Reising A, Slovis NM, Constable PD, Taylor SD. Clinical and clinicopathological factors associated with survival in 44 horses with equine neorickettsiosis (Potomac horse Fever). J Vet Intern Med 27(6):1528–1534.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.12209pubmed: 24118378google scholar: lookup
  6. Biswas BIS, Mukherjee D, Mattingly-Napier BL, Dutta SK. Diagnostic application of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Ehrlichia risticii in equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Potomac horse fever). J Clin Microbiol 29(10):2228–2233.
    doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2228-2233.1991pmc: PMC270303pubmed: 1939575google scholar: lookup
  7. Chae JS, Pusterla N, Johnson E, DeRock E, Lawler SP, Madigan JE. Infection of aquatic insects with trematode metacercariae carrying Ehrlichia risticii, the cause of Potomac horse fever. J Med Entomol 37(4):619–625.
    doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-37.4.619pubmed: 10916305google scholar: lookup
  8. Cicuttin GL, Boeri EJ, Beltrán FJ, Dohmen FE. Molecular detection of Neorickettsia risticii in Brazilian free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 33:648–650.
    doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2013000500016google scholar: lookup
  9. Cicuttin GL, De Salvo MN, La Rosa I, Dohmen FEG. Neorickettsia risticii, Rickettsia sp. and Bartonella sp. in Tadarida brasiliensis bats from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infec Dis 52:1–5.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2017.04.004pubmed: 28673455google scholar: lookup
  10. Cicuttin GL, De Salvo MN, Hercolini C, Arístegui E, Bruno A, Brambati D, Nava S. Detection of Neorickettsia sp. in Oligoryzomys flavescens rodent from a protected urban area in Buenos Aires City (Argentina). Vet Parasitol: Regional Studies Rep 32, 100742.
    pubmed: 35725109
  11. Coffman EA, Abd-Eldaim M, Craig LE. Abortion in a horse following Neorickettsia risticii infection. J Vet Diag Investig 20(6):827–830.
    doi: 10.1177/104063870802000622pubmed: 18987240google scholar: lookup
  12. Coimbra HS, Schuch LFD, Veitenheimer-Mendes IL, Meireles MCA. Neorickettsia (ehrlichia) risticii no sul do brasil: Heleobia spp.(mollusca: Hydrobilidae) e parapleurolophocecous cercariae (trematoda: Digenea) como possíveis vetores. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 72:325–329.
    doi: 10.1590/1808-1657v72p3252005google scholar: lookup
  13. Costa RL, Vitari GLV, Silva CB. Molecular investigation of Neorickettsia risticii in trematodes and snails in a region with serological evidence of this agent in horses, state of Rio de Janeiro. Arquivo Brasileiro de Med Veterinária e Zootecnia 68:1470–1478.
    doi: 10.1590/1678-4162-8804google scholar: lookup
  14. de Mello VVC, de Oliveira LB, Coelho TFSB. Diversity of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp. and Neorickettsia spp. in vampire bats. Curr Res Parasitol Vector-Borne Dis 100182.
    pmc: PMC11215215pubmed: 38952690
  15. Dutra F, Schuch LFD, Delucchi E. Equine monocytic Ehrlichiosis (Potomac horse fever) in horses in Uruguay and southern Brazil. J Veterinary Diagn Invest 13(5):433–437.
    doi: 10.1177/104063870101300514pubmed: 11580069google scholar: lookup
  16. Fortin-Trahan R, Sjolin E, Lack A. Diagnosis of Potomac horse fever (syn. equine neorickettsiosis) in 2 foals in southwestern Ontario. Can Vet J 64(12):1129–1132.
    pmc: PMC10637704pubmed: 38046433
  17. Giannelli V, Di Gregorio V, Iebba V. Microbiota and the gut-liver axis: bacterial translocation, inflammation and infection in cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 20(45):16795.
    doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.16795pmc: PMC4258550pubmed: 25492994google scholar: lookup
  18. Gibson KE, Rikihisa Y. Molecular link of different stages of the trematode host of Neorickettsia risticii to Acanthatrium oregonense. Environ Microbiol 10(8):2064–2073.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01625.xpubmed: 18422641google scholar: lookup
  19. Gibson KE, Rikihisa Y, Zhang C, Martin C. Neorickettsia risticii is vertically transmitted in the trematode Acanthatrium oregonense and horizontally transmitted to bats. Environ Microbiol 7(2):203–212.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00683.xpubmed: 15658987google scholar: lookup
  20. Greiman SE, Tkach M, Vaughan JA, Tkach VV. Laboratory maintenance of the bacterial endosymbiont, Neorickettsia sp., through the life cycle of a digenean, Plagiorchis elegans. Exp Parasitol 157:78–83.
    doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2015.06.015pmc: PMC4729577pubmed: 26160679google scholar: lookup
  21. Hahn NE, Fletcher M, Rice RM. Attempted transmission of Ehrlichia risticii, causative agent of Potomac horse fever, by the ticks, Dermacentor variabilis, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum. Exp Appl Acarol 8:41–50.
    doi: 10.1007/BF01193380pubmed: 2307070google scholar: lookup
  22. Heller MC, McClure J, Pusterla N, Pusterla JB, Stahel S. Two cases of Neorickettsia (Ehrlichia) risticii infection infection in horses from Nova Scotia. Can Vet J 45(5):421.
    pmc: PMC548627pubmed: 15206592
  23. Hornok S, Szőke K, Estók P. Assessing bat droppings and predatory bird pellets for vector-borne bacteria: molecular evidence of bat-associated Neorickettsia sp. in Europe. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 111:1707–1717.
    doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1043-7pubmed: 29492770google scholar: lookup
  24. Ikeda P, Torres JM, Placa AJV. Molecular survey of Anaplasmataceae agents and Coxiellaceae in non-hematophagous bats and associated ectoparasites from Brazil. Parasitologia 1(4):197–209.
    doi: 10.3390/parasitologia1040021google scholar: lookup
  25. Kiper ML, Traub-Dargatz JL, Salman MD, Rikihisa Y. Risk factors for equine monocytic ehrlichiosis seropositivity in horses in Colorado. Prev Vet Med 13(4):251–259.
    doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(92)90040-Mgoogle scholar: lookup
  26. Knowles RC, Anderson CW, Shipley WD. Acute equine diarrhoea syndrome (AEDS): a preliminary report, in Proceedings. Am. Asso Equine Practitioner 29: 353–357.
  27. Levine JF, Levy MG, Nicholson WL, Irby WS, Gager R, Apperson CS. Attempted mechanical transfer of Ehrlichia risticii by tabanids (Diptera: tabanidae). J Med Entomol 29(5):806–812.
    doi: 10.1093/jmedent/29.5.806pubmed: 1404259google scholar: lookup
  28. Long MT, Goetz TE, Kakoma I. Evaluation of fetal infection and abortion in pregnant ponies experimentally infected with Ehrlichia risticii. Am J Vet Res 56(10):1307–1316.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.1995.56.10.1307pubmed: 8928947google scholar: lookup
  29. Long MT, Goetz TE, Whiteley HE. Identification of Ehrlichia risticii as the causative agent of two equine abortions following natural maternal infection. J Vet Diag Invest 7(2):201–205.
    doi: 10.1177/104063879500700206pubmed: 7619902google scholar: lookup
  30. Madigan JE, Barlough JE, Rikihisa Y, Wen B, Miller PE, Sampson TJ. Identification of an enzootic diarrhea (Shasta River Crud) in northern California as Potomac horse fever. J Equine Vet Sci 17(5):270–272.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(97)80046-9google scholar: lookup
  31. Madigan JE, Pusterla N, Johnson E. Transmission of Ehrlichia risticii, the agent of Potomac horse fever, using naturally infected aquatic insects and helminth vectors: preliminary report. Equine Vet J 32(4):275–279.
    doi: 10.2746/042516400777032219pubmed: 10952374google scholar: lookup
  32. Mlangeni MA. Molecular epidemiology of dourine, equine piroplasmosis and ehrlichiosis from donkeys and horses in South Africa. 2016.
  33. Moreira L, Cardoso KM, Aboud-Dutra AE, Ferrão CM, Gazêta GS. Frequency of equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (EME) in Brazil. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 33:697–699.
    doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2013000600001google scholar: lookup
  34. Mott J, Rikihisa Y, Zhang Y, Reed SM, Yu CY. Comparison of PCR and culture to the indirect fluorescent-antibody test for diagnosis of Potomac horse fever. J Clin Microbiol 35(9):2215–2219.
    doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.9.2215-2219.1997pmc: PMC229942pubmed: 9276390google scholar: lookup
  35. Mott J, Muramatsu Y, Seaton E, Martin C, Reed S, Rikihisa Y. Molecular analysis of Neorickettsia risticii in adult aquatic insects in Pennsylvania, in horses infected by ingestion of insects, and isolated in cell culture. J Clin Microbiol 40(2):690–693.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.2.690-693.2002pmc: PMC153368pubmed: 11825999google scholar: lookup
  36. Navone GT, Notarnicola J, Nava SRRM, Robles MDR, Galliari C, Lareschi M. Arthropods and helminths assemblage in sigmodontine rodents from wetlands of the Rio de la Plata, Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 16(1):121–133.
  37. Olchowy TW, Ames TR, Molitor TW. Serodiagnosis of equine monocytic ehrlichiosis in selected groups of horses in Minnesota. J Am Vet Med Asso 196(12):1967–1970.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1990.196.12.1967pubmed: 2195001google scholar: lookup
  38. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71.
    doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71pmc: PMC8005924pubmed: 33782057google scholar: lookup
  39. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372. n160.
    pmc: PMC8005925pubmed: 33781993
  40. Palmer JE. Potomac horse fever. Vet Clin North Am (Eq Pract) 9:399–410.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30406-6pubmed: 8358652google scholar: lookup
  41. Park BK, Kim MJ, Kim EH, Kim MS, Na DG, Chae JS. Identification of trematode cercariae carrying Neorickettsia risticii in freshwater stream snails. Ann New York Acad Sci 990(1):239–247.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07371.xpubmed: 12860634google scholar: lookup
  42. Paulino PG, Almosny N, Oliveira R. Detection of Neorickettsia risticii, the agent of Potomac horse fever, in horses from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Sci rep 10(1):7208.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64328-2pmc: PMC7190851pubmed: 32350359google scholar: lookup
  43. Polop J, Priotto J, Steinmann A. Manual de control de roedores en municipios. Pp. 93.
  44. Pusterla N, Leutenegger CM, Sigrist B, Chae JS, Lutz H, Madigan JE. Detection and quantitation of Ehrlichia risticii genomic DNA in infected horses and snails by real-time PCR. Vet Parasitol 90(1–2):129–135.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00227-2pubmed: 10828519google scholar: lookup
  45. Pusterla N, Johnson E, Chae JS, Pusterla JB, DeRock E, Madigan JE. Infection rate of Ehrlichia risticii, the agent of Potomac horse fever, in freshwater stream snails (Juga yrekaensis) from northern California. Vet Parasitol 92(2):151–156.
    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00309-5pubmed: 10946138google scholar: lookup
  46. Pusterla N, Johnson EM, Chae JS, Madigan JE. Digenetic trematodes, Acanthatrium sp. and Lecithodendrium sp., as vectors of Neorickettsia risticii, the agent of Potomac horse fever.. J Helminthol 77(4):335–339.
    doi: 10.1079/JOH2003181pubmed: 14627451google scholar: lookup
  47. Pusterla N, Hagerty D, Mapes S. Detection of Neorickettsia risticii from various freshwater snail species collected from a district irrigation canal in Nevada County, California.. Vet J 197(2):489–491.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.02.024pubmed: 23566936google scholar: lookup
  48. Reubel GH, Barlough JE, Madigan JE. Production and characterization of Ehrlichia risticii, the agent of Potomac horse fever, from snails (Pleuroceridae: Juga spp.) in aquarium culture and genetic comparison to equine strains.. J Clin Microbiol 36(6):1501–1511.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.6.1501-1511.1998pmc: PMC104868pubmed: 9620368google scholar: lookup
  49. Rikihisa Y. Rickettsial diseases.. .
  50. Rikihisa Y, Perry BD, Cordes DO. Ultrastructural study of rickettsial organisms in the large colon of ponies experimentally infected with Potomac Horse Fever.. Infect Immun 49:505–512.
    doi: 10.1128/iai.49.3.505-512.1985pmc: PMC261190pubmed: 4030091google scholar: lookup
  51. Rikihisa Y, Reed SM, Sams RA, Gordon JC, Pretzman CI. Serosurvey of horses with evidence of equine monocytic ehrlichiosis.. J Am Vet Med Asso 197(10):1327–1332.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1990.197.10.1327pubmed: 2266048google scholar: lookup
  52. Rikihisa Y, Johnson GJ, Wang YZ, Reed SM, Fertel R, Cooke HJ. Loss of adsorptive capacity for sodium chloride as a cause of diarrhea in Potomac horse fever.. Res Vet Sci 52:353–362.
    doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(92)90037-3pubmed: 1352409google scholar: lookup
  53. Ristic M, Holland CJ, Dawson JE, Sessions J, Palmer J. Diagnosis of equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Potomac horse fever) by indirect immunofluorescence.. J Am Vet Med Asso 189(1):39–46.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1986.189.01.39pubmed: 3525479google scholar: lookup
  54. Roier EC, Costa RL, Pires MS. Epidemiological survey of Neorickettsia risticii in equids from the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 36(10):939–946.
    doi: 10.1590/s0100-736x2016001000004google scholar: lookup
  55. Schofield F. An investigation into an endemic disease of horses (occurring chiefly in Kent and Essex counties of the Province of Ontario).. Rep Ont Vet Coll 49:41–49.
  56. Usinger RL. Aquatic Insects of California.. .
  57. Van Der Kolk JH, Bernadina WE, Visser IJ. A horse seropositive for Ehrlichia risticii.. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 116:69–72.
    pubmed: 1996460
  58. Vaughan JA, Tkach VV, Greiman SE. Neorickettsial endosymbionts of the digenea: diversity, transmission and distribution.. Adv Parasitol 79:253–297.
    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-398457-9.00003-2pubmed: 22726644google scholar: lookup
  59. Xiong Q, Bekebrede H, Sharma P, Arroyo LG, Baird JD, Rikihisa Y. An ecotype of Neorickettsia risticii causing Potomac horse fever in Canada.. Appl Environ Microbiol 82(19):6030–6036.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.01366-16pmc: PMC5038023pubmed: 27474720google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,093 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.