Analyze Diet
Archives of Razi Institute2023; 78(4); 1305-1312; doi: 10.32592/ARI.2023.78.4.1305

Identification of Burkholderia mallei Isolates with Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism.

Abstract: Burkholderia mallei is the main cause of glanders as a dangerous contagious zoonosis disease that is mostly observed in single-hoofed animals, especially horses. Modern molecular techniques have been recently employed to improve epidemiology for identifying and searching for strains of this bacterium at different times and locations. Due to the unknown number of circulating strains and lack of preventive methods, glanders is still observed in the form of epidemics. The present study aimed to evaluate six field isolates plus two laboratory strains of Borkolderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. All the isolates and strains were microbially cultured in the glycerol nutrient and glycerol agar media. The individually grown colonies of the bacterium were used in the biochemical tests. The DNA of isolates was extracted by boiling, and the PCR-RFLP test was conducted on their genome. Finally, the bacterium was injected into guinea pigs to induce the Straus reaction. The biochemical assays (or bioassays) confirmed the isolates as Burkholderia mallei. The PCR-RFLP assay demonstrated a product for Burkholderia mallei with a length of 650 bp. Nevertheless, 250 and 400 bp were produced for Burkholderia pseudomallei. The swollen scrotum pointed to the occurrence of the Straus reaction. The PCR-RFLP is a proper differential diagnosis technique for B. mallei; moreover, it is a suitable method for differentiating between Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei. This technique can detect Burkholderia mallei in a short time with high precision and sensitivity.
Publication Date: 2023-08-31 PubMed ID: 38226390PubMed Central: PMC10787924DOI: 10.32592/ARI.2023.78.4.1305Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on the application of molecular techniques, specifically PCR-RFLP, to identify strains of Burkholderia mallei, a bacterium that causes a contagious zoonosis disease known as glanders.

Objective and methodology

  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method in identifying strains of Burkholderia mallei and distinguishing them from other bacteria species.
  • Six field isolates and two laboratory strains of Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei were evaluated.
  • The bacterial strains and isolates were cultured in glycerol nutrient and glycerol agar media to facilitate growth.
  • Biochemical tests were performed on the individually grown bacterial colonies.
  • The DNA of the isolates was extracted using a boiling method, and the PCR-RFLP test was performed on the extracted genome.
  • Finally, the bacterium was injected into guinea pigs to provoke the Straus reaction, a telltale symptom of glanders.

Key findings

  • The biochemical tests confirmed the identity of the isolates as Burkholderia mallei.
  • In the PCR-RFLP test, a product length of 650 base pairs on the gel was indicative of Burkholderia mallei, whereas lengths of 250 and 400 base pairs represented Burkholderia pseudomallei.
  • The occurrence of the Straus reaction in the guinea pigs (evidenced by a swollen scrotum) further substantiated the presence of Burkholderia mallei.

Conclusions and implications

  • The researchers concluded that the PCR-RFLP method is an effective diagnostic tool for differentiating the strains of Burkholderia mallei from other bacteria, highlighting its sensitivity, precision, and rapid detection capabilities.
  • This study’s findings provide valuable insights for clinical and public health usage, particularly in the rapid identification, prevention, and outbreak control of glanders disease.

Cite This Article

APA
Abnaroodheleh F, Mosavari N, Pourbakhsh SA, Tadayon K, Jamshidian M. (2023). Identification of Burkholderia mallei Isolates with Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism. Arch Razi Inst, 78(4), 1305-1312. https://doi.org/10.32592/ARI.2023.78.4.1305

Publication

ISSN: 2008-9872
NlmUniqueID: 101549567
Country: Iran
Language: English
Volume: 78
Issue: 4
Pages: 1305-1312

Researcher Affiliations

Abnaroodheleh, F
  • Veterinary Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mosavari, N
  • Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Pourbakhsh, S A
  • Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Tadayon, K
  • Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Jamshidian, M
  • Veterinary Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses / genetics
  • Animals
  • Guinea Pigs
  • Burkholderia mallei / genetics
  • Glanders / diagnosis
  • Glanders / microbiology
  • Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
  • Glycerol
  • Burkholderia pseudomallei / genetics
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Horse Diseases

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 19 references
  1. Dvorak GD, Spickler AR. Glanders. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;233(4):570–7.
    pubmed: 18710311
  2. Akbarein H, Bahonar A, Dabbagh MA, Bolouki Z, Hosseini SS. Glanders, a new vision on an old biological weapon. J Army Univ Med Sci 2012;10(2):143–62.
  3. Khaki P, Mosavari N, Khajeh NS, Emam M, Ahouran M, Hashemi S. Glanders outbreak at Tehran zoo, Iran. 2012;4(1):3.
    pmc: PMC3391557pubmed: 22783454
  4. Pal V, Kumar S, Malik P, Rai GP. Evaluation of recombinant proteins of Burkholderia mallei for serodiagnosis of glanders. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2012;19(8):1193–8.
    pmc: PMC3416092pubmed: 22695165
  5. Songsri J, Kinoshita Y, Kwanhian W, Wisessombat S, Tangpong J, Rahman-Khan MS. Cross-reactivity of latex agglutination assay complicates the identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei from soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2018;365(22).
    pubmed: 30346523
  6. Van Zandt KE, Greer MT, Gelhaus HC. Glanders: an overview of infection in humans. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2013;8:131.
    pmc: PMC3766238pubmed: 24004906
  7. Gilad J, Schwartz D, Amsalem Y. Clinical features and laboratory diagnosis of infection with the potential bioterrorism agents Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei. Int J Biomed Sci 2007;3(3):144.
    pmc: PMC3614684pubmed: 23675037
  8. Karimi A, Mosavari N. Development of Rose Bengal test against mallein test for rapid diagnosis of equine glanders. Trop Anim Health Prod 2019;51(7):1969–74.
    pubmed: 31041722
  9. Gee JE, Sacchi CT, Glass MB, De BK, Weyant RS, Levett PN. Use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for rapid identification and differentiation of Burkholderia pseudomallei and B. mallei. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41(10):4647–54.
    pmc: PMC254370pubmed: 14532197
  10. Segonds C, Heulin T, Marty N, Chabanon G. Differentiation of Burkholderia species by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and application to cystic fibrosis isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37(7):2201–8.
    pmc: PMC85118pubmed: 10364586
  11. Ulrich RL, Ulrich MP, Schell MA, Kim HS, DeShazer D. Development of a polymerase chain reaction assay for the specific identification of Burkholderia mallei and differentiation from Burkholderia pseudomallei and other closely related Burkholderiaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2006;55(1):37–45.
    pubmed: 16546342
  12. Coenye T, Spilker T, Martin A, LiPuma JJ. Comparative assessment of genotyping methods for epidemiologic study of Burkholderia cepacia genomovar III. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40(9):3300–7.
    pmc: PMC130787pubmed: 12202570
  13. Dashtipour S, Tadayon K, Mosavari N, Bidouki S. A customized dual-locus VNTR combination for genotyping Burkholderia mallei field isolates in Iran. Vet Res Biol Product 2018;31(2):51–8.
  14. Tanpiboonsak S, Paemanee A, Bunyarataphan S, Tungpradabkul S. PCR-RFLP based differentiation of Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei. Mol Cell Probes 2004;18(2):97–101.
    pubmed: 15051118
  15. Glass MB, Popovic T. Preliminary evaluation of the API 20NE and RapID NF plus systems for rapid identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei and B. mallei. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43(1):479–83.
    pmc: PMC540150pubmed: 15635021
  16. Mojgani N, Babaie M, Shakibamehr N, Mohammad Taheri M, Mosavari N, Ghaempanah A. Purification and biological analysis of specific antigens (ESAT6/CFP10) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Iranian J Vet Sci Technol 2020;12(2):59–67.
  17. Mardani M, Kamali M. A review on glanders: re-emerging threat. Res Med 2011;35(3):174–81.
  18. Tay ST, Cheah PC, Puthucheary SD. Sequence polymorphism and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the flagellin gene of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48(4):1465–7.
    pmc: PMC2849561pubmed: 20089759
  19. Winstanley C, Morgan JAW. The bacterial flagellin gene as a biomarker for detection, population genetics and epidemiological analysis. Microbiology (Reading) 1997;143 ( Pt 10):3071–84.
    pubmed: 9353913

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Sukmanadi M, Khairullah AR, Wardhani BWK, Mustofa I, Aliyah SH, Moses IB, Ahmad RZ, Khalisa AT, Pratama BP, Kusala MKJ, Kurniasih DAA, Akintunde AO, Fauziah I, Wibowo S, Furqoni AH, Fauzia KA, Melati I, Kurniawan M'. Glanders: Historical military use and potential bioterrorism concern. Open Vet J 2025 Sep;15(9):3912-3930.
    doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i9.1pubmed: 41200364google scholar: lookup