Analyze Diet
Veterinary immunology and immunopathology2024; 268; 110700; doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2023.110700

Impact of apitherapy on canine, equine, and chicken lymphocytes, in vitro.

Abstract: Apitherapy is a form of alternative medicine that utilizes products from the western honeybee (Apis mellifera), including honey, propolis, and honeybee venom, to improve the health status of human patients by altering host immunity. An added benefit of these products is that they are nutraceuticals and relatively inexpensive to aquire. Currently, little is known about the use of honeybee products in veterinary species, as well as their impact on host immunity. In the present in vitro study, honey, propolis, and honeybee venom were co-cultured with enriched canine, equine, and chicken peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) with cell proliferation, cell viability/apoptosis, and cellular morphology evaluated. Concanavalin A (Con A) and dexamethasone were used as stimulatory and suppressive controls, respectively. Honeybee products' effects on the three veterinary species varied by product and the species. Honey stimulated the PBLs proliferation in all three species but also displayed some increased cytotoxicity. Propolis stimulated proliferation in canine and equine PBLs, however, it suppressed proliferation in the chicken PBLs. Honeybee venom was the strongest PBL stimulant for all three species and in the equine, surpassed the stimulant response of Con A and yet, enhanced PBL cell viability post culture. In summary, the results of this preliminary in vitro study show that these three honeybee products do impact lymphocyte proliferation and viability in dogs, horses, and chickens, and that more research both in vitro and in vivo will be necessary to draw conclusions regarding their future use as immune stimulants or inhibitors.
Publication Date: 2024-01-04 PubMed ID: 38217942DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2023.110700Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The researchers in this study explored the effect of apitherapy, a form of alternative medicine using bee products, on the immune system responses of dogs, horses, and chickens. The study specifically examined the impact of honey, propolis, and bee venom on the proliferation and viability of these animals’ white blood cells.

Study Methodology

  • The studys’ primary aim was to understand how apitherapy, specifically using products derived from western honeybees, impacts the immune systems of dogs, horses, and chickens. The primary focus was on honey, propolis, and honeybee venom.
  • The researchers conducted this study in vitro – that is, in a controlled laboratory environment rather than within the living organism of the animals. This allowed the team to more closely control and observe the impacts of the bee products on the animals’ cells.
  • Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) – a type of white blood cell responsible for immune responses – from the animals were cultured with the bee products. The researchers measured the proliferation (growth and multiplication) of these cells, their viability (ability to survive), the occurrence of apoptosis (programmed cell death), and changes to the cells’ morphology (structure).
  • The team used Concanavalin A (Con A) and dexamethasone as controls. Con A is commonly used to stimulate cellular activity, whereas dexamethasone typically suppresses it. This context was valuable to compare how the bee products compared to these known stimulatory and suppressive substances.

Study Findings

  • The effects of the honeybee products varied depending on both the specific product used and the animal species involved.
  • Honey stimulated the proliferation of PBLs in all three species. However, there was also increased cytotoxicity observed, indicating a greater death rate of cells when cultured with honey.
  • Propolis had a stimulating effect on the PBLs of dogs and horses, enhancing their growth and multiplication. Contrastingly, it suppressed proliferation in chicken PBLs.
  • Honeybee venom was the most potent stimulant for PBLs among all three species. Especially in horses, its impact surpassed even the traditionally used stimulant, Con A. Interestingly, the venom also improved cell viability following culture.
  • The initial findings were encouraging but they suggest more research needs to be done. The ultimate goal is to understand if these honeybee products can be used as immune stimulants or inhibitors in veterinary medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Turn JT, Mayer J, Nagata K, Banovic F, Meichner K, Hurley DJ, Koslowski E, Gogal RM. (2024). Impact of apitherapy on canine, equine, and chicken lymphocytes, in vitro. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 268, 110700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2023.110700

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2534
NlmUniqueID: 8002006
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 268
Pages: 110700
PII: S0165-2427(23)00154-X

Researcher Affiliations

Turn, Jeffrey T
  • Department of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, and ETR Laboratories, Inc., Leominster, MA, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, and ETR Laboratories, Inc., Leominster, MA, USA.
Mayer, Joerg
  • Department of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, and ETR Laboratories, Inc., Leominster, MA, USA.
Nagata, Koichi
  • Department of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, and ETR Laboratories, Inc., Leominster, MA, USA.
Banovic, Frane
  • Department of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, and ETR Laboratories, Inc., Leominster, MA, USA.
Meichner, Kristina
  • Department of Pathology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, and ETR Laboratories, Inc., Leominster, MA, USA.
Hurley, David J
  • Department of Population Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, and ETR Laboratories, Inc., Leominster, MA, USA.
Koslowski, Eric
  • ETR Laboratories, Inc., Leominster, MA, USA.
Gogal, Robert M
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, and ETR Laboratories, Inc., Leominster, MA, USA. Electronic address: rgogal@uga.edu.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: We have nothing to declare with regards to this study. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.