Analyze Diet
Talanta2015; 144; 922-932; doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.048

Optimization and validation method to evaluate the residues of β-lactams and tetracyclines in kidney tissue by UPLC-MS/MS.

Abstract: Methods are validated by a process that defines the analytical requirements and confirms that the investigated method is capable of performing consistently. A quantitative and confirmatory method for determining the presence of β-lactam and tetracycline multiresidues in avian, bovine, equine, and swine kidney tissues using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was developed, optimized, and validated. Analytes were extracted from the kidneys by a mixture of water and acetonitrile, and the extract was then purified with hexane and C18 (dispersive phase). The method was evaluated by the following parameters: linearity, matrix effect, specificity, decision limits (CCα), detection capability (CCβ), accuracy, precision, trueness, limits of detection (LOD), limits of quantification (LOQ), and robustness. The validated method presented a broad linear study range and significant matrix effect. The limit of detection (LOD) was defined from 2.5 to 25.0 µg kg(-1), and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was defined from 5.0 to 50.0 µg kg(-1) for individual analytes. The resultant recovery values ranged from 98.1% to 107.3% in repeatability conditions and from 95.2% to 106% under intralaboratory reproducibility conditions for the studied analytes. It was concluded that the performance parameters demonstrated total method adequacy for detecting and quantifying β-lactam and tetracycline residues in swine, equine, bovine, and avian kidneys.
Publication Date: 2015-07-17 PubMed ID: 26452909DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.048Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research developed and validated a method to detect and measure residues of β-lactam and tetracycline antibiotics in kidney tissues of birds, cows, horses, and pigs using ultra-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS).

Method Development and Optimization

The researchers established a method for identifying and measuring residues of β-lactam and tetracycline antibiotics in kidney tissue from various animals. They achieved this by:

  • Extracting these residues from the kidneys using a mix of water and acetonitrile.
  • Purifying the extract using hexane and C18, a type of adsorbent material.

Method Validation

To validate and evaluate the effectiveness of their method, the researchers applied a variety of analytical performance parameters:

  • Linearity: The method demonstrated a wide linear range, meaning it can accurately measure a broad range of concentrations.
  • Matrix effect: The method showed a significant matrix effect, implying that the compound of interest (drug residues) and other components within samples (the matrix) can interact, potentially affecting analysis accuracy.
  • Specificity: This parameter tested whether the method could selectively measure β-lactam and tetracycline residues without being affected by other substances present in the samples.
  • Decision limits (CCα) and detection capability (CCβ): These parameters established the threshold levels for determining whether a specific sample is noncompliant with regulations.
  • Accuracy, precision, and trueness: These parameters gauged the correctness, repeatability, and closeness of the method’s measurements to actual values, respectively.
  • Limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantification (LOQ): These parameters determined the smallest amount of β-lactam and tetracycline residues the method could reliably detect and measure. These were defined as ranging from 2.5 to 25.0 µg kg(-1) for LOD and from 5.0 to 50.0 µg kg(-1) for LOQ.
  • Robustness: This determined whether minor changes in the method’s parameters would drastically affect its results.

Method Performance

The validity of the method was confirmed through recovery values, which measures the extent to which the original amount of β-lactam and tetracycline in the samples can be retrieved after the analysis process. The recovery values ranged:

  • From 98.1% to 107.3% in repeatability conditions, indicating the method could consistently produce similar results when applied repeatedly under identical conditions.
  • From 95.2% to 106% under intralaboratory reproducibility conditions, suggesting that the method can consistently produce similar results when conducted by different personnel or using different equipment within the same lab.

Overall, these results indicated that the proposed method is suitable for detecting and quantifying β-lactam and tetracycline residues in the kidney tissues of swine, horses, cows, and birds.

Cite This Article

APA
de Almeida MP, Rezende CP, Ferreira FD, de Souza LF, de Assis DC, de Figueiredo TC, de Oliveira Leite M, de Vasconcelos Cançado S. (2015). Optimization and validation method to evaluate the residues of β-lactams and tetracyclines in kidney tissue by UPLC-MS/MS. Talanta, 144, 922-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.048

Publication

ISSN: 1873-3573
NlmUniqueID: 2984816R
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 144
Pages: 922-932
PII: S0039-9140(15)30172-7

Researcher Affiliations

de Almeida, Marcos Pego
  • Laboratório Nacional Agropecuário (Lanagro-MG), Av. Rômulo Joviano, s/n, Pedro Leopoldo, MG CEP 33600-000, Brazil.
Rezende, Cristiana Perdigão
  • Laboratório Nacional Agropecuário (Lanagro-MG), Av. Rômulo Joviano, s/n, Pedro Leopoldo, MG CEP 33600-000, Brazil.
Ferreira, Flavia Domingues
  • Laboratório Nacional Agropecuário (Lanagro-MG), Av. Rômulo Joviano, s/n, Pedro Leopoldo, MG CEP 33600-000, Brazil.
de Souza, Leonardo Francisco
  • Laboratório Nacional Agropecuário (Lanagro-MG), Av. Rômulo Joviano, s/n, Pedro Leopoldo, MG CEP 33600-000, Brazil.
de Assis, Débora Cristina Sampaio
  • Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG CEP 30123-970, Brazil.
de Figueiredo, Tadeu Chaves
  • Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG CEP 30123-970, Brazil.
de Oliveira Leite, Mônica
  • Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG CEP 30123-970, Brazil.
de Vasconcelos Cançado, Silvana
  • Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG CEP 30123-970, Brazil. Electronic address: silvanavc@ufmg.br.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / analysis
  • Birds
  • Cattle
  • Chromatography, Liquid / methods
  • Horses
  • Kidney / chemistry
  • Limit of Detection
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Swine
  • Tandem Mass Spectrometry
  • Tetracyclines / analysis
  • beta-Lactams / analysis

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Sheng YM, Liang J, Xie J. Indirect Competitive Determination of Tetracycline Residue in Honey Using an Ultrasensitive Gold-Nanoparticle-Linked Aptamer Assay.. Molecules 2020 May 4;25(9).
    doi: 10.3390/molecules25092144pubmed: 32375304google scholar: lookup
  2. Lei Z, Liu Q, Yang B, Xiong J, Li K, Ahmed S, Hong L, Chen P, He Q, Cao J. Clinical Efficacy and Residue Depletion of 10% Enrofloxacin Enteric-Coated Granules in Pigs.. Front Pharmacol 2017;8:294.
    doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00294pubmed: 28588496google scholar: lookup
  3. de Assis DC, da Silva GR, Lanza IP, Ribeiro AC, Lana ÂM, Lara LJ, de Figueiredo TC, Cançado SV. Evaluation of the Presence and Levels of Enrofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Sulfaquinoxaline and Oxytetracycline in Broiler Chickens after Drug Administration.. PLoS One 2016;11(11):e0166402.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166402pubmed: 27846314google scholar: lookup