Precision and accuracy of a point of care glucometer for detection of hypoglycaemia in horses.
Abstract: Point-of-care (POC) glucometry is commonly used in horses; however, measurement error with this method when analysing hypoglycaemic samples (<4mmol/L) is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the precision and accuracy of glucometry in hypoglycaemic horses in comparison to a laboratory method of glucose measurement (LAB). Repeatability coefficients were 0.47mmol/L for POC and 0.09mmol/L for LAB, and coefficients of variation were 10% and 2.11%, for the POC and LAB methods, respectively. Systemic bias with the POC method was present, with a mean bias of -0.26mmol/L (95% limits of agreement: -0.88 - 0.37) in comparison to LAB, and <70% of measurements were within 20% of paired LAB results. Prior to use of glucometers, assessment of the diagnostic performance of the equipment is necessary, including determination of acceptable criteria and reference ranges for hypoglycaemic samples.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Publication Date: 2024-04-08 PubMed ID: 38599544DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106109Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study is aimed at determining the precision and accuracy of point-of-care (POC) glucometers in detecting hypoglycaemia in horses, and how they compare with a standard laboratory method.
Objective of the Study
- The research focuses on evaluating the measurement error of POC glucometry, a common method used in horses to measure glucose levels, especially when analysing hypoglycaemic samples (those with glucose level less than 4mmol/L).
Methodology and Findings
- The research compared glucometry results from a point-of-care glucometer (POC) with those obtained from a standard laboratory method of glucose measurement (LAB).
- For determining the precision of these methods, repeatability coefficients were calculated. The coefficients were 0.47mmol/L for POC and 0.09mmol/L for LAB, indicating a higher accuracy in the laboratory method.
- The coefficient of variation, another measure of precision, was found to be 10% for the POC method and 2.11% for the LAB method, again placing the LAB method as more precise.
Systemic Bias and Accuracy
- The study found systemic bias in the POC method with a mean bias of -0.26mmol/L as compared to the LAB method.
- The limits of agreement were between -0.88 and 0.37, and less than 70% of measurements with the POC method were within 20% of the results obtained using LAB, indicating less accuracy in the POC method.
Conclusion and Recommendations
- Overall, the findings of the study signal the need for further evaluation of the diagnostic performance of glucometers.
- Specifically, criteria such as reference ranges for hypoglycaemic samples and other measurement standards need to be established to ensure accurate and reliable detection of hypoglycaemia in horses.
Cite This Article
APA
Hughes K, Moore C, Woods S, Wilkes E.
(2024).
Precision and accuracy of a point of care glucometer for detection of hypoglycaemia in horses.
Vet J, 106109.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106109 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Boorooma Street, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678 Australia. Electronic address: krhughes@csu.edu.au.
- School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Boorooma Street, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678 Australia.
- School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Boorooma Street, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678 Australia.
- School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Boorooma Street, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678 Australia.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Conflict of Interest Statement None of the authors have financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of this paper.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists