FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Radiol Ultrasound / Radiation from the equine perineal region is low compared wi...
Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2024; doi: 10.1111/vru.13319

Radiation from the equine perineal region is low compared with the elbow and head 24 hours after bone scintigraphic examination.

Abstract: The timing of follow-up radiography and ultrasound in horses that undergo skeletal scintigraphy for lameness investigation varies internationally and between equine hospitals. The prospective, one-group, pretest, posttest study aimed to estimate radiation levels from horses three and 24 h after injection of hydroxydiphosphonate labeled with metastable technetium ( Tc-HDP) and investigate which anatomical locations of the horse had higher radiation levels. Included were 46 horses referred for lameness investigation between June and December 2021. Radiation levels from the horse surface were measured using an electronic device from six anatomical locations (head, elbow, dorsum, ventrum, stifle, and perineum) at two time points and adjusted to three and 24 h after injection of Tc-HDP using the radioactive decay law. The radiation measured was significantly different in the various locations of the horses for both time points. At 3 h after injection of Tc-HDP, the ventrum had the highest radiation dose. At 24 h, the radiation emitted from the perineal region was significantly lower (P < .0001) than from the elbow and head, which had the highest values. There was a negative correlation between age and the radiation detected at 24 h postinjection (P = .02). Radiation from the perineal region was low compared with other regions of the horse 24 h postscintigraphy. Additional care should be taken around the ventrum area during the scintigraphy examination and around the elbow and head at 24 h postscintigraphy to minimize radiation to personnel.
© 2024 The Authors. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Radiology.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-01-04 PubMed ID: 38178311DOI: 10.1111/vru.13319Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The presented research study focuses on analyzing the levels of radiation in different anatomical locations of horses, following a skeletal scintigraphy to investigate lameness. It discloses that the perineal region emits less radiation compared to other areas like elbow and head within 24 hours after the scintigraphy.

Study Intent and Methodology

  • The research is set up as a prospective, one-group, pretest, posttest study, conducted to measure and compare radiation levels from various parts of a horse’s body after they have been injected with a compound called hydroxydiphosphonate labeled with metastable technetium, known as Tc-HDP.
  • The purpose of this study was to identify which anatomical locations of a horse had higher radiation levels after the injection and to recognize the radiation distribution at two set time points: three hours and 24 hours post-injection.
  • A total of 46 horses undergoing a lameness investigation were chosen to be part of the study which took place from June to December 2021. This is utilized during lameness investigations as it helps to identify inflammation points or possible injured areas in the skeletal structure of horses.

Key Findings

  • The radiation measurements taken at all six anatomical regions of the horses: head, elbow, dorsum, ventrum, stifle, and perineum, indicated significantly different radiation levels across the various locations.
  • The area with the highest radiation emission three hours after injection with Tc-HDP was the ventrum, the underside part of the body of a horse.
  • 24 hours after the injection, the perineal region, the area around the anus and genitals, had significantly lower radiation when compared to the elbow and the head, which recorded the highest values.
  • The research also discerned a negative correlation between the age of a horse and the amount of radiation detected 24 hours after the Tc-HDP injection.

Recommendations and Implications

  • The primary implication of this research is for the personnel involved in the scintigraphy process. Steps should be taken to minimize potential radiation exposure, especially around the ventrum region during the scintigraphy and around the elbow and the head 24 hours post-scintigraphy.
  • Moreover, the study’s findings could influence decisions about the timing of follow-up radiography and ultrasound in horses that undergo skeletal scintigraphy, considering the variations in radiation levels according to time and anatomical position.

Cite This Article

APA
Marcelino L, Falk E, Johansson J, Rydén J, Uhlhorn M, Ley CJ. (2024). Radiation from the equine perineal region is low compared with the elbow and head 24 hours after bone scintigraphic examination. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.13319

Publication

Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association
ISSN: 1740-8261
NlmUniqueID: 9209635
Country: England
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Marcelino, Leticia
  • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Animal Hospital, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Falk, Emma
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johansson, Jessica
  • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Animal Hospital, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rydén, Jesper
  • Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uhlhorn, Margareta
  • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Animal Hospital, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ley, Charles J
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

References

This article includes 38 references
  1. Steyn PF, Uhrig J. The role of protective lead clothing in reducing radiation exposure rates to personnel during equine bone scintigraphy.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005;46(6):529-532.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00097.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  2. Hoskinson JJ. Equine nuclear scintigraphy: indications, uses, and techniques.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2001;17(1):63-74.
    doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30075-5google scholar: lookup
  3. Selberg K, Ross M. Advances in nuclear medicine.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2012;28(3):527-538.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.09.004google scholar: lookup
  4. Quiney LE, Ireland JL, Dyson SJ. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of skeletal scintigraphy in lame and poorly performing sports horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018;59(4):477-489.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12626google scholar: lookup
  5. Gardiner J. Nuclear Scintigraphy.. School of Veterinary Medicine Published June 6, 2018. Accessed February 7, 2023.
  6. Vautravers G, Coudry V, Denoix JM. Review of the use of transrectal ultrasonography for evaluation of the caudal lumbar-including lumbosacral-intervertebral discs and symphyses: normal and abnormal ultrasonographic appearance.. Equine Vet Educ 2021;33(6):310-319.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13313google scholar: lookup
  7. Werpy NM, Denoix JM. Imaging of the equine proximal suspensory ligament.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2012;28(3):507-525.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.08.005google scholar: lookup
  8. Sullivan HM, Barrett MF, Zhou T, Kawcak CE. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the suspensory ligament in quarter horses used for cutting.. J Equine Vet Sci 2022;119:104139.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104139google scholar: lookup
  9. Bevan JA, Tofe AJ, Benedict JJ, Francis MD, Barnett BL. Tc-99m HMDP (hydroxymethylene diphosphonate): a radiopharmaceutical for skeletal and acute myocardial infarct imaging. I. Synthesis and distribution in animals.. J Nucl Med 1980;21(10):961-966.
  10. Berry CR, Daniel GB. Chapter 1 - Radioactive decay.. Textbook of Veterinary Nuclear Medicine 2nd ed. American College of Veterinary Radiology; 2006;1-25.
  11. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. Accessed February 6, 2023. https://www.r-project.org/
  12. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.. J Stat Softw 2015;67:1-48.
    doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01google scholar: lookup
  13. Searle SR, Speed FM, Milliken GA. Population marginal means in the linear model: an alternative to least squares means.. Am Stat 1980;34(4):216-221.
    doi: 10.1080/00031305.1980.10483031google scholar: lookup
  14. Van den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen WU. The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy.. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43(9):1723-1738.
    doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3415-4google scholar: lookup
  15. Riddolls LJ, Byford GG, McKee SL. Biological and imaging characteristics and radiation dose rates associated with the use of technetium-99m-labelled imidodiphosphate in the horse.. Can J Vet Res 1996;60(2):81-88.
  16. Mageed M, Wegert J, Dyab S, Gerlach K. Furosemide administration onehour before bone scintigraphy examination in horses does not improve the image quality or reduce the radiation dose rate.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2021;62(1):126-132.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12917google scholar: lookup
  17. Gatherer ME, Faulkner J, Voûte LC. Exposure of veterinary personnel to ionising radiation during bone scanning of horses by nuclear scintigraphy with 99m technetium methylene diphosphonate.. Vet Rec 2007;160(24):832-835.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.160.24.832google scholar: lookup
  18. . The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017.. Accessed October 2, 2022.
  19. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection and Safety in Veterinary Medicine.. International Atomic Energy Agency Published online 2021.
  20. Deutsch E, Libson K, Becker CB. Preparation and biological distribution of technetium diphosphonate radiotracers synthesized without stannous ion.. J Nucl Med 1980;21(9):859-866.
  21. Kirchner PT, Simon MA. Radioisotopic evaluation of skeletal disease.. JBoneJointSurg 1981;63(4):673-681.
  22. Price JS, Jackson B, Eastell R. Age related changes in biochemical markers of bone metabolism in horses.. Equine Vet J 1995;27(3):201-207.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03063.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  23. Twardock AR. Equine bone scintigraphic uptake patterns related to age, breed, and occupation.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2001;17(1):75-94.
    doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30076-7google scholar: lookup
  24. Whitelock RG. Radiation hazards from horses undergoing scintigraphy using technetium−99m.. Equine Vet J 1997;29(1):26-30.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb01632.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  25. Yeung AWK. The “As Low As Reasonably Achievable” (ALARA) principle: a brief historical overview and a bibliometric analysis of the most cited publications.. Radioprotection 2019;54(2):103-109.
    doi: 10.1051/radiopro/2019016google scholar: lookup
  26. Perry Sprawls. The Physics and Instrumentation of Nuclear Medicine.. 1st ed. University Park Press; 1981.
  27. Nelson NC, Ballegeer EA. Nuclear scintigraphy.. Equine Surgery 4th ed. 2012;971-979.
    doi: 10.1016/b978-1-4377-0867-7.00069-7google scholar: lookup
  28. Neuwirth L, Romine C. Ancillary equipment to increase quality and reduce radiation exposure in the equine nuclear medicine laboratory.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41(5):470-475.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb01873.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  29. Okamoto Y. Accumulation of technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate: conditions affecting adsorption to hydroxyapatite.. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology 1995;80(1):115-119.
    doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(95)80027-1google scholar: lookup
  30. Voute LC, Webbon PM, Whitelock R. Rules, regulations and safety aspects of scintigraphy.. Equine Vet Educ 1995;7(3):169-172.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.1995.tb01216.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  31. Villoing D, Borrego D, Preston DL. Trends in occupational radiation doses for U.S. radiologic technologists performing general radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures, 1980-2015.. Radiology 2021;300(3):605-612.
    doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204501google scholar: lookup
  32. Winter MD, Berry CR, Reese DJ. Nuclear scintigraphy in horses.. Compend Contin Educ Vet 2010;32(12):E5.
  33. Weaver MP. Twenty years of equine scintigraphy-a coming of age?. Equine Vet J 1995;27(3):163-165.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03057.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  34. Sporn A, Berner D, Winter K, Mageed M, Brehm W, Gerlach K. Quantitative evaluation of bone scintigraphy of the spinous processes of the equine thoracic spine at different times after administering 99m Tc-hydroxymethylene-diphosphonate.. Vet Rec 2014;174(20):505-505.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.102104google scholar: lookup
  35. Fogelman I, Pearson DW, Bessent RG, Tofe AJ, Francis MD. A comparison of skeletal uptakes of three diphosphonates by whole-body retention: concise communication.. J Nucl Med 1981;22(10):880-883.
  36. Mageed M, Dyab S, Swagemakers JH, Gerlach K. The impact of different bone tracers and acquisition times on image quality of equine bone scintigraphy.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2022;63(5):593-600.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.13107google scholar: lookup
  37. Fürst A, Meier D, Michel S, Schmidlin A, Held L, Laib A. Effect of age on bone mineral density and micro architecture in the radius and tibia of horses: an Xtreme computed tomographic study.. BMC Vet Res 2008;4(1):3.
    doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-4-3google scholar: lookup
  38. Rudd TG, Allen DR, Smith FD. Technetium-99m-labeled methylene diphosphonate and hydroxyethylidine diphosphonate-biologic and clinical comparison: concise communication.. J Nucl Med 1979;20(8):821-826.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.