Rate of intrachain contact formation in an unfolded protein: temperature and denaturant effects.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
- Research Support
- U.S. Gov't
- Non-P.H.S.
Summary
This research article discusses the effects of temperature and denaturant concentration on the rate of intrachain diffusion in an unfolded protein, specifically horse cytochrome c. The study found that as denaturant concentration decreases, the chain’s diffusion accelerates, while higher denaturant concentrations indicate an Arrhenius activation barrier comparable to solvent viscosity effects. The findings suggest that inter-residue energetic interactions do not control conformational diffusion in unfolded states, even under folding conditions.
Research Methodology
The researchers used several technical methods to assess the rate of intrachain diffusion in an unfolded protein:
- A ligand was photodissociated from the heme iron of unfolded horse cytochrome c, a protein. This method allowed for the stimulation of the protein.
- Transient optical absorption spectroscopy was utilized to measure the timescale of the diffusive motions that bring the heme into contact with its native ligand, Met80. This spectroscopy measurement provided a quantifiable rate of how fast the protein changes its structure.
- The rate at which a 62 residue intrachain loop formed under both folding and unfolding conditions was evaluated to determine the dynamics of the chain.
Key Findings
The study unveiled a few primary findings:
- The diffusion of the chain accelerates as the concentration of the denaturant decreases. When absent of denaturant, the contact formation rate approached a value around 6×10(5) s(-1). This shows that lower denaturant levels allow the protein to reconfigure at a faster pace.
- The temperature dependence of the rate of contact formation indicated an Arrhenius activation barrier, or the minimum energy necessary to start a chemical reaction. This was noted to be approximately 20 kJ/mol at high denaturant concentrations, which is comparable to what is expected from solvent viscosity effects alone.
- It was also revealed that although the Arrhenius activation energy (Ea) increased as the concentration of the denaturant decreased, the overall rate of diffusion increased. This suggests that reducing the denaturant concentration, though it raises the energy barrier, actually increases the rate of protein structure change.
- The research concluded that inter-residue energetic interactions do not control conformational diffusion in unfolded states, even under folding conditions. This means that the energy interactions between residues do not have a dominant influence on the rate at which the protein changes its conformation.
These results provide valuable insights into protein dynamics and may have applications in understanding and treating diseases related to protein misfolding such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.
Cite This Article
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Physics Department, University of Florida, PO Box 118440, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. sjhagen@ufl.edu
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Binding Sites
- Cytochrome c Group / chemistry
- Cytochrome c Group / metabolism
- Diffusion / drug effects
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
- Guanidine / pharmacology
- Heme / metabolism
- Horses
- Kinetics
- Ligands
- Methionine / metabolism
- Protein Conformation / drug effects
- Protein Denaturation / drug effects
- Protein Folding
- Solvents
- Temperature
- Thermodynamics
Citations
This article has been cited 8 times.- Milanesi L, Waltho JP, Hunter CA, Shaw DJ, Beddard GS, Reid GD, Dev S, Volk M. Measurement of energy landscape roughness of folded and unfolded proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012 Nov 27;109(48):19563-8.
- Sinha KK, Udgaonkar JB. Barrierless evolution of structure during the submillisecond refolding reaction of a small protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008 Jun 10;105(23):7998-8003.
- Doucet D, Roitberg A, Hagen SJ. Kinetics of internal-loop formation in polypeptide chains: a simulation study. Biophys J 2007 Apr 1;92(7):2281-9.
- Chattopadhyay K, Elson EL, Frieden C. The kinetics of conformational fluctuations in an unfolded protein measured by fluorescence methods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005 Feb 15;102(7):2385-9.
- Arora P, Oas TG, Myers JK. Fast and faster: a designed variant of the B-domain of protein A folds in 3 microsec. Protein Sci 2004 Apr;13(4):847-53.
- Gulotta M, Rogatsky E, Callender RH, Dyer RB. Primary folding dynamics of sperm whale apomyoglobin: core formation. Biophys J 2003 Mar;84(3):1909-18.
- Makarov DE, Plaxco KW. The topomer search model: A simple, quantitative theory of two-state protein folding kinetics. Protein Sci 2003 Jan;12(1):17-26.
- Lee JC, Gray HB, Winkler JR. Cytochrome c' folding triggered by electron transfer: fast and slow formation of four-helix bundles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 Jul 3;98(14):7760-4.