Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2024; 106079; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106079

Refinement and revalidation of the Equine Ophthalmic Pain Scale: R-EOPS a new scale for ocular pain assessment in horses.

Abstract: This study addresses the refinement and revalidation of a composite pain scale that focuses on equine facial expressions and behavioural indicators as exhibitions of ophthalmic pain. This scale included only Behavioural and Facial and Ocular expression indicators and, compared to the first version of Equine Ophthalmic Pain Scale (EOPS), item descriptors and related ratings were changed. Thirteen horses with ocular diseases that required medical or surgical treatment were enrolled (group P). In each animal, the refined EOPS (R-EOPS) was applied prior to any treatment (T0) and one week later (T7). The R-EOPS was applied twice, 7 days apart, to 16 healthy control horses (group C). Two 30-second videos were recorded each time to allow the retrospective analysis by eight observers. Inter-observer reliability of items was moderate or substantial (Krippendorff's alpha, Kα>0.40) while their intra-observer reliability was substantial or almost perfect for most items (Kα ≥0.61). Both inter- and intra-observer reliability of Total Score (TS) were however excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients, ICC>0.75). The TS also showed good reproducibility (Kendall coefficient=0.786, ICC=0.684) and high consistency of its items (Cronbach's α=0.847). The comparison between groups as well as the sensitivity and specificity values supported the validity of the R-EOPS. In particular, for each extra point added to the TS, the risk of the horse having pain increased by more than two times (Odds Ratio=2.079, 95%CI=1.542-2.804; P<0.001). The Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis identified 6 as the threshold value of R-EOPS for discriminating horses with ocular pathology (sensitivity=83%, specificity=100%). This scale may be an effective tool for reliably assessing the pain level in horses with ophthalmic diseases and potentially guiding pain management although it still requires large-scale application and external validation.
Publication Date: 2024-02-13 PubMed ID: 38360135DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106079Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates the effectiveness of an improved version of the Equine Ophthalmic Pain Scale (EOPS) for accurately assessing pain in horses suffering from eye-related diseases. The researchers modified the original scale, focused on behavior and facial and ocular expressions, and tested it on horses with ocular diseases and healthy controls to determine its reliability and validity.

Refining and Revalidating the Equine Ophthalmic Pain Scale (EOPS)

  • The research team revised the original EOPS by only including behavioral and facial and ocular expression indicators to assess pain.
  • The revised scale (R-EOPS) was tested on two groups. Group P consisted of 13 horses with ocular diseases while Group C consisted of 16 healthy horses used as controls.
  • For each horse, the R-EOPS was applied at the start (T0) and one week later (T7). Researchers recorded two 30-second videos at each time point for retrospective analysis by eight observers.

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the R-EOPS

  • The inter-observer reliability (reliability between different observers) of items was moderate or substantial (Krippendorff’s alpha, Kα>0.40); whereas, intra-observer reliability (reliability within the same observer) was substantial or almost perfect for most items (Kα ≥0.61).
  • The total score (TS) showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients, ICC>0.75), good reproducibility (Kendall coefficient=0.786, ICC=0.684) and high consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.847).
  • The researchers performed comparisons between groups and assessed sensitivity and specificity values to determine the validity of the R-EOPS.

Findings and Conclusions

  • The study found that for each additional point in the TS, the risk of the horse experiencing pain more than doubled (Odds Ratio=2.079, 95% Confidence Interval=1.542-2.804; P<0.001).
  • A Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis determined 6 as the threshold value of the R-EOPS for accurately distinguishing horses with an ocular disease (sensitivity=83%, specificity=100%).
  • The results suggest that the R-EOPS can be an effective tool for reliably assessing pain in horses with eye-related diseases and potentially assisting in pain management. However, further large-scale application and external validation of the scale is needed.

Cite This Article

APA
Nannarone S, Ortolani F, Scilimati N, Gialletti R, Menchetti L. (2024). Refinement and revalidation of the Equine Ophthalmic Pain Scale: R-EOPS a new scale for ocular pain assessment in horses. Vet J, 106079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106079

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Pages: 106079
PII: S1090-0233(24)00018-2

Researcher Affiliations

Nannarone, S
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy; Department of Veterinary Medicine, CRCS (Centro di Ricerca sul Cavallo Sportivo), University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy; Department of Veterinary Medicine, CeRiDA (Centro di Ricerca sul Dolore Animale), University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy. Electronic address: sara.nannarone@unipg.it.
Ortolani, F
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
Scilimati, N
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
Gialletti, R
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy; Department of Veterinary Medicine, CRCS (Centro di Ricerca sul Cavallo Sportivo), University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
Menchetti, L
  • School of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Via Circonvallazione 93/95, 62024 Matelica, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Conflict of interest None of the Authors has any financial or personal relationship that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.