Analyze Diet
Microbios1978; 21(85-86); 185-212;

Regulation of the synthesis of M protein by sugars, Todd Hewitt broth, and horse serum, in growing cells of Streptococcus pyogenes.

Abstract: Various sugars were tested for their effect on the differential rate of synthesis of M protein during the growth of Streptococcus pyogenes strain 0055 M12T12. In a semisynthetic medium alone, a high rate of M protein synthesis occurred with glucose as a substrate; decreasing rates of synthesis occurred with sucrose and trehalose, in that order, although the rates of growth were approximately equal with all sugars. A period of derepressed synthesis of M protein occurred in the lag phase of growth and in the stationary period as the substrates were being depleted. Although glucose inhibited the utilization of other sugars, diauxie was not apparent from the growth curves. However, synthesis of M protein followed strong diauxie curves with a reduction in rate of synthesis during the utilization of the second sugar. With glucose as a substrate, 2-deoxyglucose showed a strong permanent repression of M protein synthesis, whereas both glucose and 2-deoxyglucose caused temporary repression when sucrose was the substrate. Horse serum increased the rate of synthesis of M protein in a manner very similar to that caused by adding cyclic AMP, although quantitative analyses suggested that cyclic AMP, per se, was not the effector in horse serum. Addition of Todd Hewitt broth permitted the organisms to grow on phosphorylated sugars. Although the rates of growth on phosphorylated sugars were similar to that obtained with glucose, M protein was not synthesized when a phosphorylated sugar was the sole substrate. The addition of phosphorylated sugars with glucose or sucrose as substrates strongly repressed the synthesis of M protein with glucose-1-phosphate and with fructose 1,6-diphosphate repressing M protein synthesis the most. Clearly, M protein synthesis, which was not required for growth, was preferentially induced by glucose as compared to the other sugars and was dependent upon the metabolic route by which glucose was utilized.
Publication Date: 1978-01-01 PubMed ID: 377029
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the effects of different types of sugars on the synthesis of M protein during the growth of Streptococcus pyogenes, a bacterium causing strep throat and other illnesses. It has been discovered that M protein synthesis is preferably induced by glucose among other types of sugars and depends on the metabolic process by which glucose is used.

Testing the Effects of Different Sugars on M Protein Synthesis

  • The researchers experimented with different sugars to see how they affect the rate of synthesis of M protein in the bacterial strain Streptococcus pyogenes 0055 M12T12.
  • In a base of a semisynthetic medium, it was found that glucose promotes a high rate of M protein synthesis. Sucrose and trehalose, on the other hand, led to decreasing rates of synthesis. However, the growth rate of the bacteria remained relatively equal regardless of the type of sugar used.
  • Interestingly, the researchers noted a period of increased M protein synthesis during the lag phase of growth and in the stationary period when the substrates were being exhausted.

The Role of Glucose in Sugar Utilization and M Protein Production

  • Despite inhibiting the use of other sugars, glucose did not cause apparent diauxie, a phenomenon in which one sugar is consumed preferentially to another. However, the synthesis of M protein did exhibit strong diauxic curves, with a reduction in the synthesis rate seen while using the second sugar.
  • It was also observed that 2-deoxyglucose caused a strong, permanent repression of M protein synthesis when glucose was the substrate, but only temporary repression when sucrose was the substrate.
  • The addition of Todd Hewitt broth (a nutritional boost) allowed the bacteria to grow on phosphorylated sugars, though it did not promote the synthesis of M protein when a phosphorylated sugar was the sole substrate.

Impact of Horse Serum and Cyclic AMP

  • Horse serum was found to increase the rate of M protein synthesis in a way that was very similar to cyclic AMP, a molecule used for intracellular signaling. However, the researchers suggested that cyclic AMP itself might not be the effector in horse serum based on quantitative analysis.
  • Further, the researchers observed that the addition of phosphorylated sugars and glucose or sucrose as substrates strongly repressed M protein synthesis, with glucose-1-phosphate and fructose 1,6-diphosphate being the most repressive.

Conclusions

  • Most importantly, the research concluded that the synthesis of M protein, while not necessary for the bacteria’s growth, was preferentially triggered by glucose compared to other sugars, and depended on how glucose was metabolically utilized.
  • This finding could have further implications for understanding the metabolic behaviour and growth of Streptococcus pyogenes, thus offering potential implications for therapeutic targets against this bacterium.

Cite This Article

APA
Pine L, Reeves MW. (1978). Regulation of the synthesis of M protein by sugars, Todd Hewitt broth, and horse serum, in growing cells of Streptococcus pyogenes. Microbios, 21(85-86), 185-212.

Publication

ISSN: 0026-2633
NlmUniqueID: 0207257
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 85-86
Pages: 185-212

Researcher Affiliations

Pine, L
    Reeves, M W

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Bacterial Proteins / biosynthesis
      • Blood
      • Carbohydrates / pharmacology
      • Culture Media / pharmacology
      • Glucose / pharmacology
      • Horses
      • Streptococcus pyogenes / drug effects
      • Streptococcus pyogenes / metabolism
      • Sucrose / pharmacology
      • Trehalose / pharmacology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 7 times.
      1. Rom JS, Hart MT, McIver KS. PRD-Containing Virulence Regulators (PCVRs) in Pathogenic Bacteria.. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021;11:772874.
        doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.772874pubmed: 34737980google scholar: lookup
      2. López-Garrido J, Puerta-Fernández E, Cota I, Casadesús J. Virulence Gene Regulation by L-Arabinose in Salmonella enterica.. Genetics 2015 Jul;200(3):807-19.
        doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178103pubmed: 25991823google scholar: lookup
      3. Gera K, Le T, Jamin R, Eichenbaum Z, McIver KS. The phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system in group A Streptococcus acts to reduce streptolysin S activity and lesion severity during soft tissue infection.. Infect Immun 2014 Mar;82(3):1192-204.
        doi: 10.1128/IAI.01271-13pubmed: 24379283google scholar: lookup
      4. Hondorp ER, Hou SC, Hause LL, Gera K, Lee CE, McIver KS. PTS phosphorylation of Mga modulates regulon expression and virulence in the group A streptococcus.. Mol Microbiol 2013 Jun;88(6):1176-93.
        doi: 10.1111/mmi.12250pubmed: 23651410google scholar: lookup
      5. Almengor AC, Kinkel TL, Day SJ, McIver KS. The catabolite control protein CcpA binds to Pmga and influences expression of the virulence regulator Mga in the Group A streptococcus.. J Bacteriol 2007 Dec;189(23):8405-16.
        doi: 10.1128/JB.01038-07pubmed: 17905980google scholar: lookup
      6. Chaussee MS, Somerville GA, Reitzer L, Musser JM. Rgg coordinates virulence factor synthesis and metabolism in Streptococcus pyogenes.. J Bacteriol 2003 Oct;185(20):6016-24.
      7. Hardy L, Jacques NA, Forester H, Campbell LK, Knox KW, Wicken AJ. Effect of fructose and other carbohydrates on the surface properties, lipoteichoic acid production, and extracellular proteins of Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt grown in continuous culture.. Infect Immun 1981 Jan;31(1):78-87.
        doi: 10.1128/iai.31.1.78-87.1981pubmed: 7216459google scholar: lookup