Analyze Diet
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2024; 22(4); e8732; doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8732

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from fresh leaves of Melaleuca cajuputi Maton & Sm. ex R. Powell and Melaleuca leucadendra (L.) L. (cajuput oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).

Abstract: Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of cajuput oil obtained from fresh leaves of Maton & Sm. ex R. Powell and (L.) L., when used as a sensory additive for all animal species. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that cajuput oil is safe up to the maximum proposed use levels in complete feed of 30 mg/kg for sows and dogs, 50 mg/kg for horses and ornamental fish, 40 mg/kg for salmon and 5 mg/kg for cats. For the other species, the calculated safe concentrations were 18 mg/kg for chickens for fattening, 26 mg/kg for laying hens, 23 mg/kg for turkeys for fattening, 37 mg/kg for pigs for fattening, 31 mg/kg for piglets, 78 mg/kg for veal calves (milk replacer), 69 mg/kg for cattle for fattening and sheep/goats, 45 mg/kg for dairy cows and 28 mg/kg for rabbits. These conclusions were extrapolated to other physiologically related species. For any other species, the additive is safe at 5 mg/kg complete feed. The use of cajuput oil in water for drinking was considered safe provided that the total daily intake does not exceed the daily amount considered safe when consumed via feed. No concerns for consumers and the environment were identified following the use of the additive up to the highest safe use level in feed. The essential oil under assessment should be considered as an irritant to skin and eyes, and as a dermal and respiratory sensitiser. Since cajuput oil was recognised to flavour food and their function in feed would be essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy was considered necessary.
Publication Date: 2024-04-10 PubMed ID: 38601874PubMed Central: PMC11004901DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8732Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses EFSA’s findings on the safety and effectiveness of a feed additive derived from cajuput oil, an essential oil sourced from fresh leaves of certain Melaleuca species, when used as a sensory additive for different animal species.

Objective of Research

  • In this study, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was tasked with forming a scientific opinion regarding the use of cajuput oil, sourced from fresh leaves of Maton & Sm. ex R. Powell and (L.) L. species, as a sensory additive for all animal species.

Findings

  • The study indicated that cajuput oil is safe for various animal species up to varying established maximum proposed use levels in complete feed. The given levels ranged from 5 mg/kg (for cats) to 78 mg/kg (for veal calves). The safe concentrations were calculated for different species like chickens for fattening, laying hens, turkeys for fattening, pigs for fattening, piglets, veal calves, cattle for fattening and sheep/goats, dairy cows and rabbits.
  • The usage of cajuput oil has also been deemed safe in water for drinking, as long as the total daily intake does not exceed the safe daily amount when consumed via feed.
  • From an environmental perspective, the use of the additive posed no identified concerns for consumers and the environment, up to the highest safe use level in feed.

Safety Concerns

  • The research found some safety concerns related to the essential oil. It was deemed an irritant to both skin and eyes, and also a potential cause of dermal and respiratory sensitisation, referring to allergic reactions that could occur with skin contact or inhalation.

Efficacy Assertions

  • Since cajuput oil is already recognised for its flavouring properties in food, and its function in feed would essentially be identical to that in food, there was no need for further testing of its efficacy. It was deemed effective based on its existing known uses.

Cite This Article

APA
Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos ML, Christensen H, Durjava M, Kouba M, López-Alonso M, Puente SL, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Villa RE, Woutersen R, Chesson A, Schlatter J, Westendorf J, Dirven Y, Manini P, Dusemund B. (2024). Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from fresh leaves of Melaleuca cajuputi Maton & Sm. ex R. Powell and Melaleuca leucadendra (L.) L. (cajuput oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl). EFSA J, 22(4), e8732. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8732

Publication

ISSN: 1831-4732
NlmUniqueID: 101642076
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 4
Pages: e8732
PII: e8732

Researcher Affiliations

Bampidis, Vasileios
    Azimonti, Giovanna
      Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
        Christensen, Henrik
          Durjava, Mojca
            Kouba, Maryline
              López-Alonso, Marta
                Puente, Secundino López
                  Marcon, Francesca
                    Mayo, Baltasar
                      Pechová, Alena
                        Petkova, Mariana
                          Ramos, Fernando
                            Villa, Roberto Edoardo
                              Woutersen, Ruud
                                Chesson, Andrew
                                  Schlatter, Josef
                                    Westendorf, Johannes
                                      Dirven, Yvette
                                        Manini, Paola
                                          Dusemund, Birgit

                                            Conflict of Interest Statement

                                            If you wish to access the declaration of interests of any expert contributing to an EFSA scientific assessment, please contact interestmanagement@efsa.europa.eu.

                                            References

                                            This article includes 37 references
                                            1. Andersen A. Final report on the safety assessment of benzaldehyde. International Journal of Toxicology 25(Suppl 1), 11–27.
                                              doi: 10.1080/10915810600716612pubmed: 16835129google scholar: lookup
                                            2. Brophy J J. Potentially commercial Melaleucas. .
                                            3. Burdock G A. Fenaroli's handbook of flavor ingredients (6th ed., p. 736). .
                                              doi: 10.1201/9781439847503google scholar: lookup
                                            4. Carson C F, Riley T V. Safety, efficacy and provenance of tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil. Contact Dermatitis 45, 65–67.
                                            5. Court M H, Greenblatt D J. Molecular basis for deficient acetaminophen glucuronidation in cats. An interspecies comparison of enzyme kinetics in liver microsomes. Biochemical Pharmacology 53, 1041–1047.
                                              doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00072-5pubmed: 9174118google scholar: lookup
                                            6. Cramer G M, Ford R A, Hall R L. Estimation of toxic hazard–a decision tree approach. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology 16, 255–276.
                                              doi: 10.1016/s0015-6264(76)80522-6pubmed: 357272google scholar: lookup
                                            7. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Compendium of botanicals reported to contain naturally occurring substances of possible concern for human health when used in food and food supplements. EFSA Journal 10(5), 2663.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2663google scholar: lookup
                                            8. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Guidance on the data required for the risk assessment of flavourings to be used in or on foods. EFSA Journal 8(6), 1623.
                                              doi: 10.2093/j.efsa.2010.1623google scholar: lookup
                                            9. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 11, Revision 2 (FGE.11Rev2): Aliphatic dialcohols, diketones, and hydroxyketones from chemical groups 8 and 10. EFSA Journal 9(2), 1170.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1170google scholar: lookup
                                            10. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 25, Revision 2 (FGE.25Rev2): Aliphatic hydrocarbons from chemical group 31. EFSA Journal 9(6), 2177.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2177google scholar: lookup
                                            11. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 82, Revision 1 (FGE.82Rev1): Consideration of epoxides evaluated by the JECFA (65th meeting). EFSA Journal 12(6), 3708.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3708google scholar: lookup
                                            12. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 25, Revision 3 (FGE.25Rev3): Aliphatic hydrocarbons from chemical group 31. EFSA Journal 13(4), 4069.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4069google scholar: lookup
                                            13. EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids). Scientific opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 78, Revision 2 (FGE.78Rev2): Consideration of aliphatic and alicyclic and aromatic hydrocarbons evaluated by JECFA (63rd meeting) structurally related to aliphatic hydrocarbons evaluated by EFSA in FGE.25Rev3. EFSA Journal 13(4), 4067.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4067google scholar: lookup
                                            14. EFSA FAF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings), Younes M, Aquilina G, Castle L, Engel K‐H, Fowler P, Fürst P, Gürtler R, Gundert‐Remy U, Husøy T, Mennes W, Moldeus P, Oskarsson A, Shah R, Waalkens‐Berendsen I, Wölfle D, Boon P, Crebelli R, Di Domenico A, Frutos Fernandez M J. Scientific opinion on the re‐evaluation of benzyl alcohol (E 1519) as food additive. EFSA Journal 17(10), 5876.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5876google scholar: lookup
                                            15. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for sensory additives. EFSA Journal 10(1), 2534.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2534google scholar: lookup
                                            16. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic saturated and unsaturated tertiary alcohols and esters with esters containing tertiary alcohols ethers (chemical group 6) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 10(11), 2966.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2966google scholar: lookup
                                            17. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and alicyclic ethers (chemical group 16) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 10(11), 2967.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2967google scholar: lookup
                                            18. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of benzyl alcohols, aldehydes, acids, esters and acetals (chemical group 23) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 10(7), 2785.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2785google scholar: lookup
                                            19. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (chemical group 31) when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 13(3), 4053.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4053google scholar: lookup
                                            20. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (chemical group 31) when used as flavourings for all animal species and categories. EFSA Journal 14(1), 4339.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4339google scholar: lookup
                                            21. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos M L, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli P S, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Innocenti M L. Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives. EFSA Journal 15(10), 5023.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5023google scholar: lookup
                                            22. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos M L, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli P S, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species. EFSA Journal 15(10), 5021.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5021google scholar: lookup
                                            23. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos M L, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli P S, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Innocenti M L. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer. EFSA Journal 15(10), 5022.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5022google scholar: lookup
                                            24. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos M L, Bories G, Cocconcelli P S, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López Puente S, López‐Alonso M, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Villa R E, Chesson A. Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of aryl‐substituted primary alcohol, aldehyde, acid, ester and acetal derivatives belonging to chemical group 22 when used as flavourings for all animal species. EFSA Journal 15(2), 4672.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4672google scholar: lookup
                                            25. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos M L, Bories G, Chesson A, Cocconcelli P S, Flachowsky G, Gropp J, Kolar B, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Mantovani A, Mayo B, Ramos F, Saarela M, Martino L. Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives. EFSA Journal 16(5), 5274.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5274google scholar: lookup
                                            26. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Bampidis V, Bastos M, Christensen H, Dusemund B, Kouba M, Kos Durjava M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa R E, Woutersen R, Brock T, de Knecht J, Azimonti G. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the environment. EFSA Journal 17(4), 5648.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5648google scholar: lookup
                                            27. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed). Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of feed additives consisting of expressed lemon oil and its fractions from Citrus limon (L.) Osbeck and of lime oil from Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle for use in all animal species. EFSA Journal 19(4), 6548.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6548google scholar: lookup
                                            28. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos M L, Christensen H, Durjava M, Dusemund B, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Villa R E, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Galobart J. Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the users. EFSA Journal 21(12), e8469.
                                              pmc: PMC10698700pubmed: 38075627
                                            29. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos M L, Christensen H, Durjava M, Kouba M, López‐Alonso M, López Puente S, Marcon F, Mayo B, Pechová A, Petkova M, Ramos F, Sanz Y, Villa R E, Woutersen R, Brantom P, Chesson A, Dusemund B. Safety and efficacy of feed additives consisting of essential oils derived from the flower buds or the leaves of Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & L.M. Perry (clove bud oil and clove leaf oils) for all animal species (FEFANA asbl). EFSA Journal 21(7), 1–43.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8183google scholar: lookup
                                            30. EFSA SC (EFSA Scientific Committee). Guidance on safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use as ingredients in food supplements. EFSA Journal 7(9), 1249.
                                              doi: 10.2093/j.efsa.2009.1249google scholar: lookup
                                            31. EFSA SC (EFSA Scientific Committee), More S J, Hardy A, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bennekou S H, Bragard C, Boesten J, Halldorsson T I, Hernandez‐Jerez A F, Jeger M J, Knutsen H K, Koutsoumanis K P, Naegeli H, Noteborn H, Ockleford C, Ricci A, Rychen G, Schlatter J R, Hogstrand C. Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals. EFSA Journal 17(3), 5634.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5634google scholar: lookup
                                            32. EFSA SC (EFSA Scientific Committee), More S, Bampidis V, Benford D, Boesten J, Bragard C, Halldorsson T, Hernandez‐Jerez A, Hougaard‐Bennekou S, Koutsoumanis K, Naegeli H, Nielsen S S, Schrenk D, Silano V, Turck D, Younes M, Aquilina G, Crebelli R, Gürtler R, Schlatter J. Statement on the genotoxicity assessment of chemical mixtures. EFSA Journal 17(1), 5519.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5519google scholar: lookup
                                            33. EFSA SC (EFSA Scientific Committee), More S J, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bragard C, Halldorsson T I, Hernandez‐Jerez A F, Hougaard B S, Koutsoumanis K P, Machera K, Naegeli H, Nielsen S S, Schlatter J R, Schrenk D, Silano V, Turck D, Younes M, Gundert‐Remy U, Kass G E N, Wallace H M. Guidance on the use of the threshold of toxicological concern approach in food safety assessment. EFSA Journal 17(6), 5708.
                                              doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5708google scholar: lookup
                                            34. Farag R S, Shalaby A S, El‐Baroty G A, Ibrahim N A, Ali M A, Hassan E M. Chemical and biological evaluation of the essential oils of different Melaleuca species. Phytotherapy Research 18(1), 30–35.
                                              doi: 10.1002/ptr.1348pubmed: 14750197google scholar: lookup
                                            35. Lautz L S, Jeddi M Z, Girolami F, Nebbia C, Dorne J L C M. Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of pharmaceuticals in cats (Felix sylvestris catus) and implications for the risk assessment of feed additives and contaminants. Toxicology Letters 338, 114–127.
                                              doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.11.014pubmed: 33253781google scholar: lookup
                                            36. Monzote L, Scherbakov A M, Scull R, Satyal P, Cos P, Shchekotikhin A E, Gille L, Setzer W N. Essential oil from Melaleuca le쫞ndra: Antimicrobial, antikinetoplastid, antiproliferative and cytotoxic assessment. Molecules 25, 5514.
                                              doi: 10.3390/molecules25235514pmc: PMC7728144pubmed: 33255562google scholar: lookup
                                            37. Munro I C, Ford R A, Kennepohl E, Sprenger J G. Correlation of structural class with no‐observed‐effect levels: A proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. Food and Chemical Toxicology 34, 829–867.
                                              doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(96)00049-xpubmed: 8972878google scholar: lookup

                                            Citations

                                            This article has been cited 0 times.