Analyze Diet
Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2013; 24(2); 84-91; doi: 10.1007/s00399-013-0260-z

The ECG in cardiovascular-relevant animal models of electrophysiology.

Abstract: The most frequently used animal species in experimental cardiac electrophysiology are mice, rabbits, and dogs. Murine and human electrocardiograms (ECGs) show salient differences, including the occurrence of a pronounced J-wave and a less distinctive T-wave in the murine ECG. Mouse models can resemble human cardiac arrhythmias, although mice differ from human in cardiac electrophysiology. Thus, arrhythmia mechanisms in mice may differ from those in humans and should be transferred to the human situation with caution. Further relevant cardiovascular animal models are rabbits, dogs, and minipigs, as they show similarities of cardiac ion channel distribution with the human heart and are suitable to study ventricular repolarization or pro- and antiarrhythmic drug effects. ECG recordings in large animals like goats and horses are feasible. Both goats and horses are a suitable animal model to study atrial fibrillation (AF) mechanisms. Horses frequently show spontaneous AF due to their high vagal tone and large atria. The zebrafish has become an important animal model. Models in "exotic" animals such as kangaroos may be suitable for particular studies.
Publication Date: 2013-06-06 PubMed ID: 23740318DOI: 10.1007/s00399-013-0260-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study discusses the use of various animal models in cardiac electrophysiology, highlighting the differences and similarities between the electrocardiograms (ECGs) of these animals and humans, and explores the potential implications for studying cardiac arrhythmias and drug effects.

Animal Models in Cardiac Electrophysiology

  • The research primarily discusses the use of mice, rabbits, and dogs in experimental cardiac electrophysiology. These animals are most frequently used due to their accessibility and the relative ease of experimentation.
  • The electrocardiograms (ECGs) of mice and humans are compared, with significant differences being noted. Particularly, mice have a pronounced J-wave and a less distinctive T-wave in their ECGs. Despite these differences, mouse models can still resemble human cardiac arrhythmias.
  • However, the study emphasizes that the differences in cardiac electrophysiology between mice and humans could lead to differences in arrhythmia mechanisms. Therefore, any findings from mouse models should be transferred to human applications cautiously.

Other Relevant Cardiovascular Animal Models

  • Rabbits, dogs, and minipigs are also highlighted as relevant cardiovascular animal models. These animals show similarities with human cardiac ion channel distribution and are thus suitable for studying ventricular repolarization as well as the effects of pro- and antiarrhythmic drugs.
  • Large animals such as goats and horses are suitable for ECG recordings and can be used to study mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF). Notably, horses often show spontaneous AF due to their high vagal tone and large atria which can provide valuable insight on AF mechanisms.
  • The zebrafish is mentioned as an important animal model, though the study does not provide details on its specific use or relevance.
  • Lastly, the study suggests the potential of “exotic” animal models such as kangaroos, though it does not elaborate on the specifics of their utility in cardiac electrophysiology studies.

In summary, the study presents a comprehensive review of the different animal models used in cardiac electrophysiology research. It underscores the importance of considering the physiological differences between these animals and humans when interpreting and extrapolating the results.

Cite This Article

APA
Kaese S, Frommeyer G, Verheule S, van Loon G, Gehrmann J, Breithardt G, Eckardt L. (2013). The ECG in cardiovascular-relevant animal models of electrophysiology. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol, 24(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-013-0260-z

Publication

ISSN: 1435-1544
NlmUniqueID: 9425873
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 24
Issue: 2
Pages: 84-91

Researcher Affiliations

Kaese, Sven
  • Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany. sven.kaese@ukmuenster.de
Frommeyer, Gerrit
    Verheule, Sander
      van Loon, Gunther
        Gehrmann, Josef
          Breithardt, Günter
            Eckardt, Lars

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / diagnosis
              • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / physiopathology
              • Disease Models, Animal
              • Dogs
              • Electrocardiography / methods
              • Goats
              • Heart Conduction System / physiopathology
              • Heart Rate
              • Horses
              • Humans
              • Mice
              • Rabbits
              • Species Specificity
              • Swine
              • Swine, Miniature

              References

              This article includes 30 references
              1. J Card Fail. 2012 Dec;18(12):939-49
                pubmed: 23207083
              2. Basic Res Cardiol. 2002 Nov;97(6):452-60
                pubmed: 12395207
              3. Basic Res Cardiol. 2001 Apr;96(2):169-74
                pubmed: 11327335
              4. Am J Physiol. 1998 Mar;274(3):H747-51
                pubmed: 9530184
              5. Toxicol Pathol. 2003 Jan-Feb;31 Suppl:11-6
                pubmed: 12597426
              6. Circ Res. 1998 Mar 9;82(4):519-22
                pubmed: 9506713
              7. Circ Res. 1999 Jul 23;85(2):174-81
                pubmed: 10417399
              8. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002 Jan;300(1):64-71
                pubmed: 11752098
              9. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002 Oct;303(1):218-25
                pubmed: 12235254
              10. Aust N Z J Med. 1990 Apr;20(2):160-5
                pubmed: 2344320
              11. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Oct;13(10):1060-9
                pubmed: 21873342
              12. Front Physiol. 2012 Sep 05;3:345
                pubmed: 22973235
              13. Circ Res. 2004 Jun 11;94(11):1458-65
                pubmed: 15117823
              14. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999 Oct;10(10):1380-9
                pubmed: 10515563
              15. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2008 May-Jun;57(3):202-11
                pubmed: 18434212
              16. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 May;15(5):572-80
                pubmed: 15149428
              17. Am J Physiol. 1995 Feb;268(2 Pt 2):H604-13
                pubmed: 7864185
              18. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2010 Nov-Dec;62(3):196-220
                pubmed: 20685310
              19. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Dec;14(12):1322-31
                pubmed: 23099358
              20. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2010 May;134(2):188-94
                pubmed: 19652927
              21. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008 Oct-Nov;98(2-3):208-18
                pubmed: 19041335
              22. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000 Mar;11(3):354-68
                pubmed: 10749360
              23. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Sep;8(9):1492-500
                pubmed: 21459164
              24. Cardiovasc Res. 1999 Oct;44(1):37-46
                pubmed: 10615388
              25. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000 Aug;279(2):H733-40
                pubmed: 10924073
              26. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Feb;6(1):202-11
                pubmed: 23390124
              27. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Aug;20(2):475-9
                pubmed: 1634688
              28. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998 Sep;32(3):425-34
                pubmed: 9733356
              29. J Physiol. 2004 Feb 15;555(Pt 1):267-79
                pubmed: 14634200
              30. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Jul;291(1):H269-73
                pubmed: 16489111