FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Genet Sel Evol / The genetics of gaits in Icelandic horses goes beyond DMRT3,...
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE2023; 55(1); 89; doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00863-6

The genetics of gaits in Icelandic horses goes beyond DMRT3, with RELN and STAU2 identified as two new candidate genes.

Abstract: In domesticated animals, many important traits are complex and regulated by a large number of genes, genetic interactions, and environmental influences. The ability of Icelandic horses to perform the gait 'pace' is largely influenced by a single mutation in the DMRT3 gene, but genetic modifiers likely exist. The aim of this study was to identify novel genetic factors that influence pacing ability and quality of the gait through a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and correlate new findings to previously identified quantitative trait loci (QTL) and mutations. Results: Three hundred and seventy-two Icelandic horses were genotyped with the 670 K+ Axiom Equine Genotyping Array, of which 362 had gait scores from breeding field tests. A GWAS revealed several SNPs on Equus caballus chromosomes (ECA) 4, 9, and 20 that were associated (p < 1.0 × 10-5) with the breeding field test score for pace. The two novel QTL on ECA4 and 9 were located within the RELN and STAU2 genes, respectively, which have previously been associated with locomotor behavior in mice. Haplotypes were identified and the most frequent one for each of these two QTL had a large favorable effect on pace score. The second most frequent haplotype for the RELN gene was positively correlated with scores for tölt, trot, gallop, and canter. Similarly, the second most frequent haplotype for the STAU2 gene had favorable effects on scores for trot and gallop. Different genotype ratios of the haplotypes in the RELN and STAU2 genes were also observed in groups of horses with different levels of pacing ability. Furthermore, interactions (p < 0.05) were detected for the QTL in the RELN and STAU2 genes with the DMRT3 gene. The novel QTL on ECA4, 9, and 20, along with the effects of the DMRT3 variant, were estimated to account jointly for 27.4% of the phenotypic variance of the gait pace. Conclusions: Our findings provide valuable information about the genetic architecture of pace beyond the contribution of the DMRT3 gene and indicate genetic interactions that contribute to the complexity of this trait. Further investigation is needed to fully understand the underlying genetic factors and interactions.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-12-11 PubMed ID: 38082412PubMed Central: PMC10712087DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00863-6Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the genetic factors influencing the gait (way of moving) of Icelandic horses, specifically the gait called ‘pace’. Beyond the well-known DMRT3 gene, the study identifies two new genes, RELN and STAU2, as the possible contributors.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers studied 372 Icelandic horses, all of which were genotyped using the 670K+ Axiom Equine Genotyping Array. Genotyping is a process of determining the genetic makeup, or genotype, of an individual.
  • Out of these horses, 362 had gait scores from breeding field tests to help determine the quality of their gait.
  • They used a genome-wide association study (GWAS), a method that involves rapidly scanning markers across complete genomes of many people to find genetic variations associated with a particular disease or trait.

Findings

  • The GWAS revealed several Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs or variations in a single nucleotide) on Equus caballus chromosomes (ECA) 4, 9, and 20 that were associated with the breeding field test score for pace. These SNPs were located within the RELN and STAU2 genes.
  • Several haplotypes (a group of genes within an organism that was inherited together from a single parent) were identified for the RELN and STAU2 genes. Different genotype ratios of these haplotypes were observed in groups of horses with different levels of pacing ability. The most frequent haplotype for each of these two QTL had a large favorable effect on pace score. The second most frequent haplotype for the RELN was positively correlated with scores for other gaits like trot, tölt, gallop, and canter.
  • Different genotype ratios of the haplotypes in the RELN and STAU2 genes were also spotted in groups of horses with different levels of pacing ability. For instance, the second frequent haplotype for both genes had favorable effects on other gait scores as well.
  • Interactions were detected between the QTL in the RELN and STAU2 genes with the DMRT3 gene.
  • The newly identified regions on chromosomes 4,9 and 20, along with the effects of the DMRT3 variant, altogether accounted for approximately 27.4% of the phenotypic variance of the gait pace.

Conclusion

  • The study provides credible information about the genetic architecture of pace in Icelandic horses, thereby enriching the existing knowledge that was only limited to the contribution of the DMRT3 gene.
  • The findings suggest that there are genetic interactions that add to the complexity of this trait.
  • However, the researchers recommend further investigation to fully understand the underlying genetic factors and interactions.

Cite This Article

APA
Sigurðardóttir H, Boije H, Albertsdóttir E, Kristjansson T, Rhodin M, Lindgren G, Eriksson S. (2023). The genetics of gaits in Icelandic horses goes beyond DMRT3, with RELN and STAU2 identified as two new candidate genes. Genet Sel Evol, 55(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00863-6

Publication

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
NlmUniqueID: 9114088
Country: France
Language: English
Volume: 55
Issue: 1
Pages: 89

Researcher Affiliations

Sigurðardóttir, Heiðrún
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7023, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. heidrun.sigurdardottir@slu.se.
  • Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural University of Iceland, Borgarbyggð, 311, Hvanneyri, Iceland. heidrun.sigurdardottir@slu.se.
Boije, Henrik
  • Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Albertsdóttir, Elsa
  • The Icelandic Agricultural Advisory Centre, Hagatorgi 1, 107, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Kristjansson, Thorvaldur
  • Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural University of Iceland, Borgarbyggð, 311, Hvanneyri, Iceland.
Rhodin, Marie
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7011, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lindgren, Gabriella
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7023, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Department of Biosystems, Center for Animal Breeding and Genetics, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 30, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Eriksson, Susanne
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7023, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses / genetics
  • Animals
  • Mice
  • Genome-Wide Association Study
  • Iceland
  • Transcription Factors / genetics
  • Genotype
  • Gait / genetics
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Grant Funding

  • Agricultural University of Iceland's Doctoral Fund / Agricultural University of Iceland's Doctoral Fund
  • The Stock Protection Fund for the Icelandic Horse Breed / The Stock Protection Fund for the Icelandic Horse Breed
  • The Swedish Icelandic Horse Association (SIF) / The Swedish Icelandic Horse Association (SIF)
  • Blikastaðir Fund / Blikastaðir Fund
  • Icelandic Genetic Resource Council in Agriculture (AGROGEN) / Icelandic Genetic Resource Council in Agriculture (AGROGEN)
  • Vetenskapsrådet / Vetenskapsrådet
  • Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning / Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare competing interests concerning the commercial applications of the current study. GL is a co-inventor of a patent application concerning commercial testing of the DMRT3 mutation. The stated patent does not restrict research applications of the method.

References

This article includes 72 references
  1. Mackay TFC. Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene–gene interactions.. Nat Rev Genet 2014;15:22–33.
    doi: 10.1038/nrg3627pmc: PMC3918431pubmed: 24296533google scholar: lookup
  2. Carlborg Ö, Haley CS. Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies?. Nat Rev Genet 2004;5:618–625.
    doi: 10.1038/nrg1407pubmed: 15266344google scholar: lookup
  3. Sackton TB, Hartl DL. Genotypic context and epistasis in individuals and populations.. Cell 2016;166:279–287.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.047pmc: PMC4948997pubmed: 27419868google scholar: lookup
  4. Forsberg SKG, Bloom JS, Sadhu MJ, Kruglyak L, Carlborg Ö. Accounting for genetic interactions improves modeling of individual quantitative trait phenotypes in yeast.. Nat Genet 2017;49:497–503.
    doi: 10.1038/ng.3800pmc: PMC5459553pubmed: 28250458google scholar: lookup
  5. Boucher B, Jenna S. Genetic interaction networks: better understand to better predict.. Front Genet 2013;4:290.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00290pmc: PMC3865423pubmed: 24381582google scholar: lookup
  6. Fang G, Wang W, Paunic V, Heydari H, Costanzo M, Liu X. Discovering genetic interactions bridging pathways in genome-wide association studies.. Nat Commun 2019;10:4274.
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12131-7pmc: PMC6753138pubmed: 31537791google scholar: lookup
  7. Andersson LS, Larhammar M, Memic F, Wootz H, Schwochow D, Rubin C-J. Mutations in DMRT3 affect locomotion in horses and spinal circuit function in mice.. Nature 2012;488:642–646.
    doi: 10.1038/nature11399pmc: PMC3523687pubmed: 22932389google scholar: lookup
  8. Kristjansson T, Bjornsdottir S, Sigurdsson A, Andersson L, Lindgren G, Helyar S. The effect of the ‘Gait keeper’ mutation in the DMRT3 gene on gaiting ability in Icelandic horses.. J Anim Breed Genet 2014;131:415–425.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12112pubmed: 25073639google scholar: lookup
  9. Jäderkvist K, Holm N, Imsland F, Árnason T, Andersson L, Andersson LS. The importance of the DMRT3 ‘Gait keeper’ mutation on riding traits and gaits in Standardbred and Icelandic horses.. Livest Sci 2015;176:33–39.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.025google scholar: lookup
  10. Albertsdóttir E, Eriksson S, Sigurdsson Á, Árnason T. Genetic analysis of ‘breeding field test status’ in Icelandic horses.. J Anim Breed Genet 2011;128:124–132.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00902.xpubmed: 21385227google scholar: lookup
  11. General rules and regulations: breeding rules and regulations. 2023. https://www.feiffengur.com/documents/FEIF%20Breeding_2023.pdf/. Accessed 12 May 2023.
  12. Albertsdóttir E, Eriksson S, Näsholm A, Strandberg E, Árnason T. Genetic correlations between competition traits and traits scored at breeding field-tests in Icelandic horses.. Livest Sci 2008;114:181–187.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.04.022google scholar: lookup
  13. Sigurðardóttir H. Athugun á úrvalsstyrkleika og erfðaframförum í einstökum eiginleikum í íslenskri hrossarækt (investigation of selection intensity and genetic gain within breeding field test traits in Icelandic horse breeding).. BSc. thesis, Agricultural University of Iceland. 2012.
  14. Kristjansson T, Bjornsdottir S, Albertsdóttir E, Sigurdsson A, Pourcelot P, Crevier-Denoix N. Association of conformation and riding ability in Icelandic horses.. Livest Sci 2016;189:91–101.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.05.010google scholar: lookup
  15. Rosengren MK, Sigurðardóttir H, Eriksson S, Naboulsi R, Jouni A, Novoa-Bravo M. A QTL for conformation of back and croup influences lateral gait quality in Icelandic horses.. BMC Genomics 2021;22:267.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07454-zpmc: PMC8048352pubmed: 33853519google scholar: lookup
  16. McCoy AM, Beeson SK, Rubin C-J, Andersson L, Caputo P, Lykkjen S. Identification and validation of genetic variants predictive of gait in standardbred horses.. PLoS Genet 2019;15:e1008146.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008146pmc: PMC6555539pubmed: 31136578google scholar: lookup
  17. Amano T, Onogi A, Yamada F, Kawai M, Shirai K, Ueda J. Genome-wide association mapping and examination of possible maternal effect for the pace trait of horses.. Anim Genet 2018;49:461–463.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12711pubmed: 30109696google scholar: lookup
  18. Staiger EA, Abri MA, Silva CAS, Brooks SA. Loci impacting polymorphic gait in the Tennessee walking horse.. J Anim Sci 2016;94:1377–1386.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9936pubmed: 27135997google scholar: lookup
  19. Jäderkvist Fegraeus K, Hirschberg I, Árnason T, Andersson L, Velie B, Andersson L. To pace or not to pace: a pilot study of four-and five‐gaited Icelandic horses homozygous for the DMRT3 ‘Gait Keeper’mutation.. Anim Genet 2017;48:694–697.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12610pubmed: 29023800google scholar: lookup
  20. Worldfengur—the studbook of origin for the Icelandic horse. Farmers Association of Iceland and FEIF International Federation of Icelandic Horse, Reykjavik. 2001. https://www.worldfengur.com/. Accessed 19 July 2022.
  21. Kristjansson T, Bardarson S, Aevarsson S, Reynisson G. The gaits of the Icelandic horse. 2014. https://horsesoficeland.cdn.prismic.io/horsesoficeland/3f1b003e-5e7d-404f-875c-a286be86925b_gangteg_ens_p.pdf/. Accessed 12 May 2023.
  22. General information on breeding field tests—measurements (body measures). 2018. https://www.rml.is/static/files/Hrossaraekt_RML/skrokkmal.pdf/. Accessed 12 May 2023.
  23. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, Van Duijn CM. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis.. Bioinformatics 2007;23:1294–1296.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108pubmed: 17384015google scholar: lookup
  24. GenABEL project developers. GenABEL: genome-wide SNP association analysis. 2013. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=GenABEL/. Accessed 12 May 2023.
  25. R Core team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing.. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.
  26. Rönnegård L, Shen X, Alam M. Hglm: a package for fitting hierarchical generalized linear models.. R J 2010;2:20–28.
    doi: 10.32614/RJ-2010-009google scholar: lookup
  27. Duggal P, Gillanders EM, Holmes TN, Bailey-Wilson JE. Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies.. BMC Genomics 2008;9:519.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-516pmc: PMC2621212pubmed: 18976480google scholar: lookup
  28. Lander E, Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results.. Nat Genet 1995;11:241–247.
    doi: 10.1038/ng1195-241pubmed: 7581446google scholar: lookup
  29. Cunningham F, Allen JE, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, Amode MR, Armean IM. Ensembl 2022.. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;50:D988–D995.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1049pmc: PMC8728283pubmed: 34791404google scholar: lookup
  30. Hu Z-L, Park CA, Reecy JM. Bringing the animal QTLdb and CorrDB into the future: meeting new challenges and providing updated services.. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;50:D956–D961.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1116pmc: PMC8728226pubmed: 34850103google scholar: lookup
  31. Stelzer G, Rosen N, Plaschkes I, Zimmerman S, Twik M, Fishilevich S. The GeneCards suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses.. Curr Protoc Bioinform 2016;54:1.30.1–1.30.33.
    doi: 10.1002/cpbi.5pubmed: 27322403google scholar: lookup
  32. Safran M, Rosen N, Twik M, BarShir R, Stein TI, Dahary D. The GeneCards suite.. In: Abugessaisa I, Kasukawa T, et al.et al., editors. Practical guide to Life science databases. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2021. pp. 27–56.
  33. Kierczak M, Jablonska J, Forsberg SKG, Bianchi M, Tengvall K, Pettersson M. Cgmisc: enhanced genome-wide association analyses and visualization.. Bioinformatics 2015;31:3830–3831.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv426pmc: PMC4653382pubmed: 26249815google scholar: lookup
  34. Purcell S, Chang C. PLINK v1.90. 2021. https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9/. Accessed 12 May 2023.
  35. Gaunt TR, Rodríguez S, Day INM. Cubic exact solutions for the estimation of pairwise haplotype frequencies: implications for linkage disequilibrium analyses and a web tool ‘CubeX’.. BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8:428.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-428pmc: PMC2180187pubmed: 17980034google scholar: lookup
  36. Sinnwell JP, Schaid DJ. Haplo.stats: statistical analysis of haplotypes with traits and covariates when linkage phase is ambiguous. 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=haplo.stats/. Accessed 12 May 2023.
  37. Kassambara A. rstatix: pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests. 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/packages/rstatix/index.html/. Accessed 20 July 2023.
  38. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis.. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016.
  39. Hattori M, Kohno T. Regulation of Reelin functions by specific proteolytic processing in the brain.. J Biochem 2021;169:511–516.
    doi: 10.1093/jb/mvab015pubmed: 33566063google scholar: lookup
  40. Lakatosova S, Ostatnikova D. Reelin and its complex involvement in brain development and function.. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012;44:1501–1504.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.06.002pubmed: 22705982google scholar: lookup
  41. Vaswani AR, Blaess S. Reelin signaling in the migration of ventral brain stem and spinal cord neurons.. Front Cell Neurosci 2016;10:62.
    doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00062pmc: PMC4786562pubmed: 27013975google scholar: lookup
  42. Nimura T, Itoh T, Hagio H, Hayashi T, Di Donato V, Takeuchi M. Role of Reelin in cell positioning in the cerebellum and the cerebellum-like structure in zebrafish.. Dev Biol 2019;455:393–408.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.07.010pubmed: 31323192google scholar: lookup
  43. Krzyzanowska A, Cabrerizo M, Clascá F, Ramos-Moreno T. Reelin immunoreactivity in the adult spinal cord: a comparative study in rodents, carnivores, and non-human primates.. Front Neuroanat 2020;13:102.
    doi: 10.3389/fnana.2019.00102pmc: PMC6960112pubmed: 31969808google scholar: lookup
  44. Andersen TE, Finsen B, Goffinet AM, Issinger O-G, Boldyreff B. A reeler mutant mouse with a new, spontaneous mutation in the reelin gene.. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2002;105:153–156.
    doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(02)00389-3pubmed: 12399118google scholar: lookup
  45. Kikkawa S, Yamamoto T, Misaki K, Ikeda Y, Okado H, Ogawa M. Missplicing resulting from a short deletion in the reelin gene causes reeler-like neuronal disorders in the mutant shaking rat Kawasaki.. J Comp Neurol 2003;463:303–315.
    doi: 10.1002/cne.10761pubmed: 12820163google scholar: lookup
  46. Miao GG, Smeyne RJ, D’Arcangelo G, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Morgan JI. Isolation of an allele of reeler by insertional mutagenesis.. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:11050–11054.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.23.11050pmc: PMC45164pubmed: 7972007google scholar: lookup
  47. Caviness VS, Jr, So DK, Sidman RL. The hybrid reeler mouse.. J Hered 1972;63:241–246.
    doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108286pubmed: 4644329google scholar: lookup
  48. Falconer DS. Two new mutants, ‘trembler’ and ‘reeler’, with neurological actions in the house mouse (Mus musculus L.). J Genet 1951;50:192–205.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02996215pubmed: 24539699google scholar: lookup
  49. Phelps PE, Rich R, Dupuy-Davies S, Ríos Y, Wong T. Evidence for a cell-specific action of reelin in the spinal cord.. Dev Biol 2002;244:180–198.
    doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0580pubmed: 11900467google scholar: lookup
  50. Menelaou E, Kishore S, McLean DL. Mixed synapses reconcile violations of the size principle in zebrafish spinal cord.. Elife 2022;11:e64063.
    doi: 10.7554/eLife.64063pmc: PMC9514842pubmed: 36166290google scholar: lookup
  51. Cockburn DM, Charish J, Tassew NG, Eubanks J, Bremner R, Macchi P. The double-stranded RNA-binding protein staufen 2 regulates eye size.. Mol Cell Neurosci 2012;51:101–111.
    doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2012.08.008pubmed: 22940085google scholar: lookup
  52. Chowdhury R, Wang Y, Campbell M, Goderie SK, Doyle F, Tenenbaum SA. STAU2 binds a complex RNA cargo that changes temporally with production of diverse intermediate progenitor cells during mouse corticogenesis.. Development 2021;148:dev199376.
    doi: 10.1242/dev.199376pmc: PMC8353167pubmed: 34345913google scholar: lookup
  53. Pernice HF, Schieweck R, Jafari M, Straub T, Bilban M, Kiebler MA. Altered glutamate receptor ionotropic delta subunit 2 expression in Stau2-deficient cerebellar purkinje cells in the adult brain.. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:1797.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms20071797pmc: PMC6480955pubmed: 30979012google scholar: lookup
  54. Arnórsson K. Ræktunin [The breeding]. In: Björnsson GB, Sveinsson HJ, editors. Íslenski hesturinn [The Icelandic horse] 1. Reykjavík: Mál og menning; 2006. pp. 202–247.
  55. Hreiðarsdóttir GE, Árnason Þ, Svansson V, Hallsson JH. Analysis of the history and population structure of the Icelandic horse using pedigree data and DNA analyses.. Icel Agric Sci 2014;27:63–79.
  56. Jin J, Cardozo T, Lovering RC, Elledge SJ, Pagano M, Harper JW. Systematic analysis and nomenclature of mammalian F-box proteins.. Gene Dev 2004;18:2573–2580.
    doi: 10.1101/gad.1255304pmc: PMC525538pubmed: 15520277google scholar: lookup
  57. Kim D, LaQuaglia MP, Yang SY. A cDNA encoding a putative 37 kDa leucine-rich repeat (LRR) protein, p37NB, isolated from S-type neuroblastoma cell has a differential tissue distribution.. Biochim Biophys Acta 1996;1309:183–188.
    doi: 10.1016/S0167-4781(96)00158-3pubmed: 8982252google scholar: lookup
  58. Zhou X, Yang G, Huang R, Chen X, Hu G. SVH-B interacts directly with p53 and suppresses the transcriptional activity of p53.. FEBS Lett 2007;581:4943–4948.
    doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.09.025pubmed: 17904127google scholar: lookup
  59. Tsuboi K, Okamoto Y, Ikematsu N, Inoue M, Shimizu Y, Uyama T. Enzymatic formation of N-acylethanolamines from N-acylethanolamine plasmalogen through N-acylphosphatidylethanolamine-hydrolyzing phospholipase D-dependent and -independent pathways.. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1811:565–577.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.07.009pubmed: 21801852google scholar: lookup
  60. Hölzen L, Syré K, Mitschke J, Brummer T, Miething C, Reinheckel T. Degradome-focused RNA interference screens to identify proteases important for breast cancer cell growth.. Front Oncol 2022;12:960109.
    doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.960109pmc: PMC9598039pubmed: 36313646google scholar: lookup
  61. Helary L, Castille J, Passet B, Vaiman A, Beauvallet C, Jaffrezic F. DNAJC2 is required for mouse early embryonic development.. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2019;516:258–263.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.06.009pubmed: 31230751google scholar: lookup
  62. Sahu I, Glickman MH. Proteasome in action: substrate degradation by the 26S proteasome.. Biochem Soc Trans 2021;49:629–644.
    doi: 10.1042/BST20200382pmc: PMC8106498pubmed: 33729481google scholar: lookup
  63. Wang Z, Wang Q, Wu H, Huang Z. Identification and characterization of amphibian SLC26A5 using RNA-Seq.. BMC Genomics 2021;22:564.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07798-6pmc: PMC8296623pubmed: 34294052google scholar: lookup
  64. Dillin A, Rine J. Separable functions of ORC5 in replication initiation and silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Genetics 1997;147:1053–1062.
    doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1053pmc: PMC1208233pubmed: 9383052google scholar: lookup
  65. Dou T, Fu M, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Bian Z. Signatures of positive selection in LY96 gene in vertebrates.. J Biosci 2013;38:899–904.
    doi: 10.1007/s12038-013-9377-9pubmed: 24296893google scholar: lookup
  66. Sánchez-Caballero L, Elurbe DM, Baertling F, Guerrero-Castillo S, van den Brand M, van Strien J. TMEM70 functions in the assembly of complexes I and V.. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenergy 2020;1861:148202.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2020.148202pubmed: 32275929google scholar: lookup
  67. Andreou A, Yngvadottir B, Bassaganyas L, Clark G, Martin E, Whitworth J. Elongin C (ELOC/TCEB1)-associated Von Hippel–Lindau disease.. Hum Mol Genet 2022;31:2728–2737.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddac066pmc: PMC9402235pubmed: 35323939google scholar: lookup
  68. Mroczek S, Dziembowski A. U6 RNA biogenesis and disease association.. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2013;4:581–592.
    doi: 10.1002/wrna.1181pubmed: 23776162google scholar: lookup
  69. Lei B, Xie L, Zhang S, Lv D, Shu F, Deng Y. UBE2W down-regulation promotes cell apoptosis and correlates with hypospermatogenesis.. Andrologia 2020;52:e13474.
    doi: 10.1111/and.13474pubmed: 31710394google scholar: lookup
  70. Sandell LL, Lynn ML, Inman KE, McDowell W, Trainor PA. RDH10 oxidation of vitamin A is a critical control step in synthesis of retinoic acid during mouse embryogenesis.. PLoS One 2012;7:e30698.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030698pmc: PMC3271098pubmed: 22319578google scholar: lookup
  71. De Falco S, Russo G, Angiolillo A, Pietropaolo C. Human L7a ribosomal protein: sequence, structural organization, and expression of a functional gene.. Gene 1993;126:227–235.
    doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90371-9pubmed: 8482538google scholar: lookup
  72. Li JSZ, Miralles Fusté J, Simavorian T, Bartocci C, Tsai J, Karlseder J. TZAP: a telomere-associated protein involved in telomere length control.. Science 2017;355:638–641.
    doi: 10.1126/science.aah6752pmc: PMC5518674pubmed: 28082411google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.