Transcriptomic profiling reveals similarities between equine IVF and ICSI embryos.
Abstract: In vitro production of equine embryos has been performed using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for the last two decades. Since 2022, a repeatable protocol for conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) provides a successful alternative. However, little is known about the influence of the fertilization method on embryo quality and the transcriptomic profile. In this study, we aimed to examine differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between ICSI and IVF embryos in the horse. Therefore, ten equine sibling blastocysts, produced in vitro by either ICSI or IVF from three different mares, were subjected to Full-Length Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing (FLASH-sequencing). As such, 11,518 genes were identified, with no DEGs between ICSI and IVF embryos. Cleavage rates, calculated on collected COCs, of IVF zygotes (55.0 %) were similar to those of ICSI zygotes (51.9 %; P = 0.74), but blastocyst rates were higher following ICSI (37.0 % vs 22.5 % calculated on collected COCs and 71.4 % vs 40.9 % calculated on cleaved zygotes; P = 0.04 and 0.004, respectively). The average day of blastocyst development did not differ (P = 0.55). In conclusion, gene expression was similar for the two fertilization techniques, supporting the safety of equine IVF for further clinical studies. Overall, the horse provides a valuable model to study long-term effects of assisted reproductive technologies with potential extrapolation to human medicine.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2025-11-08 PubMed ID: 41237435DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117749Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
- This research compares the gene expression profiles and embryo development outcomes of equine embryos produced by two different fertilization techniques: conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
- The study finds no significant differences in gene expression between embryos produced by IVF and ICSI, suggesting IVF is a safe and viable alternative to ICSI for equine embryo production.
Background and Objective
- For about 20 years, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been the primary method used for in vitro production of horse embryos.
- Since 2022, a repeatable conventional IVF protocol has been developed as an alternative fertilization method.
- The influence of the fertilization method on embryo quality and gene expression profiles was previously unclear.
- The objective was to compare transcriptomic profiles and developmental outcomes between equine embryos created by IVF versus ICSI to assess their similarity and safety.
Experimental Design and Methods
- Ten sibling blastocysts were produced in vitro from three different mares.
- Half the blastocysts were fertilized using conventional IVF and the other half by ICSI.
- Full-length single-cell RNA sequencing (FLASH-sequencing) was performed on each blastocyst to analyze gene expression.
- Gene expression data were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the two groups.
- Cleavage rates (early embryo cell division) and blastocyst formation rates were monitored and compared between IVF and ICSI groups.
Key Findings
- A total of 11,518 genes were identified from the RNA sequencing data.
- No statistically significant differentially expressed genes were found between IVF and ICSI embryos, indicating similar transcriptional profiles.
- Cleavage rates were comparable: 55.0% for IVF zygotes and 51.9% for ICSI zygotes; the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.74).
- Blastocyst formation rates were significantly higher in the ICSI group compared to IVF: 37.0% vs. 22.5% based on collected cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), and 71.4% vs. 40.9% based on cleaved zygotes (P = 0.04 and 0.004 respectively).
- The average day of blastocyst development did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.55).
Interpretation and Implications
- The lack of gene expression differences suggests that both fertilization methods produce embryos with similar molecular qualities at the blastocyst stage.
- Despite similar cleavage rates, ICSI yielded higher blastocyst rates, which may impact clinical decisions about the preferred fertilization technique.
- The results support the safety and potential adoption of the new equine IVF protocol for assisted reproduction, providing an alternative to ICSI.
- Since horses share some reproductive features with humans, this work positions the horse as a useful model for studying long-term impacts of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) that might be relevant to human medicine.
Summary
- This study provides the first transcriptomic comparison between equine IVF and ICSI embryos, revealing no differences in gene expression.
- The comparable molecular profiles and developmental timings suggest IVF can reliably substitute ICSI in equine embryo production.
- Higher blastocyst rates with ICSI highlight factors beyond gene expression that influence embryo viability.
- The research opens pathways for further clinical studies on equine IVF and offers insights applicable to ART in other species, including humans.
Cite This Article
APA
Broothaers K, Jouneau A, Angel-Velez D, De Coster T, Festuccia N, Archilla C, Calderari S, Jouneau L, Van den Branden E, Peere S, Polfliet E, Dewulf M, Govaere J, Chavatte-Palmer P, Smits K.
(2025).
Transcriptomic profiling reveals similarities between equine IVF and ICSI embryos.
Theriogenology, 251, 117749.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117749 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: Klaartje.broothaers@ugent.be.
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France; Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, BREED, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France. Electronic address: Alice.jouneau@inrae.fr.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium; School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad CES, Medellin, Colombia. Electronic address: Daniel.angelvelez@ugent.be.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: Tine.decoster@ugent.be.
- Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR3738, Epigenomics, Proliferation, and the Identity of Cells Unit, France. Electronic address: Nicola.festuccia@pasteur.fr.
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France; Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, BREED, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France. Electronic address: Catherine.archilla@inrae.fr.
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France; Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, BREED, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France. Electronic address: Sophie.calderari@inrae.fr.
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France; Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, BREED, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France. Electronic address: Luc.jouneau@inrae.fr.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: Emma.vandenbranden@ugent.be.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: Sofie.peere@ugent.be.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: Ellen.polfliet@ugent.be.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: Manon.dewulf@ugent.be.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: Jan.govaere@ugent.be.
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INRAE, BREED, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France; Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, BREED, 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France. Electronic address: Pascale.chavatte-palmer@inrae.fr.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, ReproGenT, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: Katrien.smits@ugent.be.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Horses / embryology
- Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic / veterinary
- Fertilization in Vitro / veterinary
- Female
- Gene Expression Profiling / veterinary
- Transcriptome
- Blastocyst / physiology
- Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
- Embryo, Mammalian
- Embryonic Development
- Male
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Klaartje Broothaers reports financial support was provided by INRAE BREED. Klaartje Broothaers reports financial support was provided by Ghent University. Klaartje Broothaers reports a relationship with Ghent University that includes: employment, funding grants, and non-financial support. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists