Analyze Diet
Iranian journal of basic medical sciences2020; 22(12); 1440-1444; doi: 10.22038/IJBMS.2019.14052

A comparative study on the equine and camelid antivenoms upon cardiovascular changes induced with Hemiscorpius lepturus venom in rats.

Abstract: In this study, the neutralizing abilities of the equine and the recently introduced camelid antivenoms on the hemodynamic parameters (inotropism, chronotropism, and arrhythmogenicity) were assessed following envenomation by venom in rats. Methods: At first, the electrophoretic profiles of both products were obtained by using the SDS-PAGE method (12.5%) and stained with Coomassie blue and silver nitrate. Secondly, different doses of the camelid antivenom (10, 50, and 100 µl) were given intravenously in 10 min before venom injection (400 µg/rat). The neutralizing potencies of camelid and equine antivenoms were measured by preincubation (100 µl) with venom for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, equal amounts of the antivenoms were injected intravenously to observe the hemodynamic changes. Results: Based on the electrophoretic profile, it was evident that undesired proteins significantly decreased in equine antivenom, owing to impurities. Pretreatment with the camelid antivenom (100 µl), neutralized the elevation of the mean arterial pressure evoked with scorpion venom injection (88.15±4.56 versus 10.2±1.23 percent at the 8th min). The Incubation of the venom and the camelid antivenom counteracted the hemodynamic changes, but the equine product had no effect. The intravascular injection of the equine antivenom transiently increased the mean arterial pressure as compared to the control (108.67±8.63 mmHg versus 52.67±1.93 mmHg at the 10 min). Conclusions: The most obvious finding emerging from this study was that the camelid antivenom neutralized the hemodynamic changes in rats significantly, but in comparison, the equine antivenom had just a minor ability.
Publication Date: 2020-03-07 PubMed ID: 32133062PubMed Central: PMC7043884DOI: 10.22038/IJBMS.2019.14052Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the comparison of neutralizing effects of equine and camelid antivenoms on cardiovascular changes brought about by Hemiscorpius lepturus venom in rats. The study concluded that camelid antivenom was significantly effective in neutralizing venom-induced hemodynamic changes in rats, while the equine antivenom showed only minor ability.

Methods

  • Firstly, the electrophoretic profiles of both the equine and camelid antivenoms were obtained using the Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) method, a common laboratory technique used to separate proteins according to their molecular weight. The Gel was then stained with Coomassie blue and silver nitrate.
  • In the second phase, different doses of the camelid antivenom were injected intravenously into rats 10 minutes before the venom injection. The doses used for this purpose were 10, 50, and 100 µl.
  • The neutralizing potentials of the antivenoms were then measured by preincubating them with the Hemiscorpius lepturus venom for about 30 minutes at room temperature.
  • Lastly, equal amounts of both antivenoms were injected into the rats intravenously, and the resulting hemodynamic changes were observed.

Results

  • The electrophoretic profile indicated that the equine antivenom contained a significant number of undesired proteins, which are attributed to impurities. This might affect the efficacy of this antivenom.
  • Pre-treatment with the camelid antivenom significantly neutralized the elevation of the mean arterial pressure that occurs with the scorpion venom injection.
  • The camelid antivenom showed positive results in countering the venom-induced hemodynamic changes. However, the equine product failed to show any significant effect.
  • The administration of equine antivenom led to a transient increase in the mean arterial pressure when compared to that of the control.

Conclusions

  • The most crucial finding in this study is the pronounced ability of camelid antivenom in neutralizing venom-induced hemodynamic changes which involve the functions and rhythmic activities of the heart.
  • In contrast, the equine antivenom, despite being widely used, only showed minor neutralizing ability under the same conditions.

Overall, this study emphasizes the need for better purification methods for equine antivenom and draws attention to the effectiveness of camelid antivenom against Hemiscorpius lepturus venom in preventing cardiovascular changes.

Cite This Article

APA
Fatemikia H, Kamyab M, Movahed A, Sadeghi M, Kim E, Behdani M, Mohammadpour Dounighi N, Shahrivar M, Seyedian R. (2020). A comparative study on the equine and camelid antivenoms upon cardiovascular changes induced with Hemiscorpius lepturus venom in rats. Iran J Basic Med Sci, 22(12), 1440-1444. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJBMS.2019.14052

Publication

ISSN: 2008-3866
NlmUniqueID: 101517966
Country: Iran
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 12
Pages: 1440-1444

Researcher Affiliations

Fatemikia, Hossein
  • Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Kamyab, Mostafa
  • Department of Aquatic Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Movahed, Ali
  • The Persian Gulf Tropical Research Center, Biochemistry Group, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
Sadeghi, Mehdi
  • Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
Kim, Euikyung
  • College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea.
Behdani, Mahdi
  • Biotechnology Research Center, Venom and Biotherapeutics Molecules Laboratory, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadpour Dounighi, Naser
  • Department of Human Vaccine and Serum, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran.
Shahrivar, Mehrnaz
  • School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
Seyedian, Ramin
  • Department of Pharmacology, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

Conflict of Interest Statement

None.

References

This article includes 29 references
  1. Dunlop JA, Selden PA. Scorpion fragments from the Silurian of Powys, Wales.. J Arachnol 2013;16:27–32.
  2. Shahbazzadeh D, Amirkhani A, Djadid ND, Bigdeli S, Akbari A, Ahari H, Amini H, Dehghani R. Epidemiological and clinical survey of scorpionism in Khuzestan province, Iran (2003).. Toxicon 2009 Mar 15;53(4):454-9.
    pubmed: 19708123doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.01.002google scholar: lookup
  3. Gueron M, Ilia R, Sofer S. The cardiovascular system after scorpion envenomation. A review.. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1992;30(2):245-58.
    pubmed: 1588674doi: 10.3109/15563659209038636google scholar: lookup
  4. Gueron M, Yaron R. Cardiovascular manifestations of severe scorpion sting. Clinicopathologic correlations.. Chest 1970 Feb;57(2):156-62.
    pubmed: 5411717doi: 10.1378/chest.57.2.156google scholar: lookup
  5. Jalali A, Rahim F. Epidemiological review of scorpion envenomation in iran.. Iran J Pharm Res 2014 Summer;13(3):743-56.
    pmc: PMC4177636pubmed: 25276176
  6. Valavi E, Ansari MJ. Hemolytic uremic syndrome following Hemiscorpius lepturus (scorpion) sting.. Indian J Nephrol 2008 Oct;18(4):166-8.
    pmc: PMC2813541pubmed: 20142930doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.45293google scholar: lookup
  7. Alirahimi E, Kazemi-Lomedasht F, Shahbazzadeh D, Habibi-Anbouhi M, Hosseininejad Chafi M, Sotoudeh N, Ghaderi H, Muyldermans S, Behdani M. Nanobodies as novel therapeutic agents in envenomation.. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2018 Dec;1862(12):2955-2965.
    pubmed: 30309831doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.08.019google scholar: lookup
  8. Ismail M, Abd-Elsalam MA. Pharmacokinetics of 125I-labelled IgG, F(ab')2 and Fab fractions of scorpion and snake antivenins: merits and potential for therapeutic use.. Toxicon 1998 Nov;36(11):1523-8.
    pubmed: 9792168doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(98)00144-5google scholar: lookup
  9. Freire-Maia L, Campos JA, Amaral CF. Approaches to the treatment of scorpion envenoming.. Toxicon 1994 Sep;32(9):1009-14.
    pubmed: 7801334doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(94)90382-4google scholar: lookup
  10. Cook DA, Samarasekara CL, Wagstaff SC, Kinne J, Wernery U, Harrison RA. Analysis of camelid IgG for antivenom development: Immunoreactivity and preclinical neutralisation of venom-induced pathology by IgG subclasses, and the effect of heat treatment.. Toxicon 2010 Sep 15;56(4):596-603.
    pubmed: 20547172doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.06.004google scholar: lookup
  11. Pourkhalili K, Fatemikia H, Kim E, Mashayekhy NR, Dounighi NM, Hajivandi A, Hassan Y, Seyedian R. Hemodynamic Changes in Experimentally Envenomed Anaesthetized Rats by Intravenous Injection of Hemiscorpius lepturus Venom.. J Arthropod Borne Dis 2018 Mar;12(1):31-40.
    pmc: PMC6046103pubmed: 30018992
  12. Behdani M, Zeinali S, Karimipour M, Shahreza HK, Ghasemi P, Asadzadeh N. Antiserum production in immunized camel by the venom of Hemiscorpius lepturus scorpion: evaluation of neutralizing test in vivo.. Tehran Univ Med J 2010;68:268–273.
  13. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.. Anal Biochem 1976 May 7;72:248-54.
    pubmed: 942051doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999google scholar: lookup
  14. Chippaux JP, Goyffon M. Epidemiology of scorpionism: a global appraisal.. Acta Trop 2008 Aug;107(2):71-9.
  15. Isbister GK, Bawaskar HS. Scorpion envenomation.. N Engl J Med 2014 Jul 31;371(5):457-63.
    pubmed: 25075837doi: 10.1056/nejmra1401108google scholar: lookup
  16. Dehghani R, Fathi B. Scorpion sting in Iran: a review.. Toxicon 2012 Oct;60(5):919-33.
    pubmed: 22750221doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.06.002google scholar: lookup
  17. Sofer S, Gueron M. Vasodilators and hypertensive encephalopathy following scorpion envenomation in children.. Chest 1990 Jan;97(1):118-20.
    pubmed: 2295229doi: 10.1378/chest.97.1.118google scholar: lookup
  18. Cook DA, Owen T, Wagstaff SC, Kinne J, Wernery U, Harrison RA. Analysis of camelid antibodies for antivenom development: Neutralisation of venom-induced pathology.. Toxicon 2010 Sep 1;56(3):373-80.
    pubmed: 20412814doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.04.005google scholar: lookup
  19. Freire-Maia L, Pinto GI, Franco I. Mechanism of the cardiovascular effects produced by purified scorpion toxin in the rat.. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1974 Jan;188(1):207-13.
    pubmed: 4809270
  20. Pucca MB, Cerni FA, Pinheiro Junior EL, Bordon Kde C, Amorim FG, Cordeiro FA, Longhim HT, Cremonez CM, Oliveira GH, Arantes EC. Tityus serrulatus venom--A lethal cocktail.. Toxicon 2015 Dec 15;108:272-84.
    pubmed: 26522893doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.10.015google scholar: lookup
  21. Seyedian R, Pipelzadeh MH, Jalali A, Kim E, Lee H, Kang C, Cha M, Sohn ET, Jung ES, Rahmani AH, Mirakabady AZ. Enzymatic analysis of Hemiscorpius lepturus scorpion venom using zymography and venom-specific antivenin.. Toxicon 2010 Sep 15;56(4):521-5.
    pubmed: 20493200doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.05.008google scholar: lookup
  22. Lauwereys M, Arbabi Ghahroudi M, Desmyter A, Kinne J, Hölzer W, De Genst E, Wyns L, Muyldermans S. Potent enzyme inhibitors derived from dromedary heavy-chain antibodies.. EMBO J 1998 Jul 1;17(13):3512-20.
    pmc: PMC1170688pubmed: 9649422doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.13.3512google scholar: lookup
  23. Lovrecek D, Tomić S. A century of antivenom.. Coll Antropol 2011 Mar;35(1):249-58.
    pubmed: 21667541
  24. Padula AM, Winkel KD. Fatal presumed tiger snake (Notechis scutatus) envenomation in a cat with measurement of venom and antivenom concentration.. Toxicon 2016 Apr;113:7-10.
    pubmed: 26836396doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.01.065google scholar: lookup
  25. Padula AM, Winkel KD. Antivenom production in the alpaca (Vicugna pacos): Monovalent and polyvalent antivenom neutralisation of lethal and procoagulant toxins in Australian elapid venoms.. Small Rumin Res 2017;149:34–39.
  26. Ramasamy S, Isbister GK, Seymour JE, Hodgson WC. The in vivo cardiovascular effects of box jellyfish Chironex fleckeri venom in rats: efficacy of pre-treatment with antivenom, verapamil and magnesium sulphate.. Toxicon 2004 May;43(6):685-90.
    pubmed: 15109889doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.02.024google scholar: lookup
  27. Sofer S, Shahak E, Gueron M. Scorpion envenomation and antivenom therapy.. J Pediatr 1994 Jun;124(6):973-8.
    pubmed: 8201489doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83196-8google scholar: lookup
  28. Abroug F, ElAtrous S, Nouira S, Haguiga H, Touzi N, Bouchoucha S. Serotherapy in scorpion envenomation: a randomised controlled trial.. Lancet 1999 Sep 11;354(9182):906-9.
    pubmed: 10489950doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)12083-4google scholar: lookup
  29. Darvish M, Ebrahimi SA, Shahbazzadeh D, Bagheri KP, Behdani M, Shokrgozar MA. Camelid antivenom development and potential in vivo neutralization of Hottentotta saulcyi scorpion venom.. Toxicon 2016 Apr;113:70-5.
    pubmed: 26809016doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.01.063google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.