Analyze Diet
FEMS microbiology ecology2012; 82(3); 642-652; doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01441.x

A comparison of the microbiome and the metabolome of different regions of the equine hindgut.

Abstract: The microbiome and associated metabolome of faecal samples were compared to those from the caecum and right dorsal colon of horses and ponies euthanised for nonresearch purposes by investigating the microbial population community structure as well as their functional metabolic products. Through the use of 16S rRNA gene dendrograms, the caecum microbiome was shown to cluster separately from the other gut regions. 16S rRNA gene-based quantitative PCR (q-PCR) also demonstrated differences between the caecum and the other gut regions. Metabolites as identified by Fourier transform infrared clustered in a similar way and specific metabolic products (volatile fatty acids and ammonia) also varied by region. Protozoal 18S rDNA concentration and archaeal mcrA gene concentration quantified by q-PCR were found in higher numbers in the colon than the other gut regions. Diversity calculations using Simpson and Shannon-Wiener indices demonstrated higher diversity in the right dorsal colon and faeces than in the caecum. All findings of this study suggest that faecal samples are likely to represent the microbial population of the right dorsal colon to some extent but not that of the caecum, indicating careful consideration is required when planning microbial investigations of the hindgut of the horse.
Publication Date: 2012-07-23 PubMed ID: 22757649DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01441.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper studies the differences between the microbiome (the microorganisms in a particular environment) and metabolome (the complete set of small-molecule metabolites) in different areas of the horse’s hindgut. The study suggests that fecal samples may not fully represent the microbiome of certain hindgut regions like the caecum, which might have implications for scientific investigations of the horse’s digestive system.

Microbial Population Community Structure and Their Functional Metabolic Products

  • The study compares the microbiome and metabolome of fecal samples to those from the caecum and right dorsal colon of horses. The key method of comparison was the investigation of the microbial population community structure and their functional metabolic products.
  • 16S rRNA gene dendrograms were used to illustrate the distinct microbiome of the caecum, which was found to cluster separately from the other gut regions. The 16S rRNA gene-based quantitative PCR (q-PCR) also underlined these differences.
  • By using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, metabolites were identified and found to show a similar pattern of clustering, reinforcing that microbial composition and metabolites vary across different gut regions.

Protozoal and Archaeal Concentrations

  • Using q-PCR, the concentration of protozoal 18S rDNA and archaeal mcrA gene were quantified and found in higher numbers in the colon compared to other gut regions.

Diversity Assessments

  • Diversity in the horse’s gut was quantified using the Simpson and Shannon-Wiener indices. These calculations revealed higher diversity of bacteria in the right dorsal colon and feces than in the caecum.

Implications

  • Collectively, the results suggest that fecal samples likely represent the microbial population of the right dorsal colon to some extent but not that of the caecum.
  • This implies that careful consideration is necessary when planning microbial investigations of the hindgut of the horse, as the microbial population and metabolic products can significantly vary across different parts of the hindgut.

Cite This Article

APA
Dougal K, Harris PA, Edwards A, Pachebat JA, Blackmore TM, Worgan HJ, Newbold CJ. (2012). A comparison of the microbiome and the metabolome of different regions of the equine hindgut. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 82(3), 642-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01441.x

Publication

ISSN: 1574-6941
NlmUniqueID: 8901229
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 82
Issue: 3
Pages: 642-652

Researcher Affiliations

Dougal, Kirsty
  • Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Penglais, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, UK. kkd09@aber.ac.uk
Harris, Patricia A
    Edwards, Arwyn
      Pachebat, Justin A
        Blackmore, Tina M
          Worgan, Hilary J
            Newbold, C Jamie

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Archaea / genetics
              • Archaea / isolation & purification
              • Archaea / metabolism
              • Bacteria / genetics
              • Bacteria / isolation & purification
              • Cecum / metabolism
              • Cecum / microbiology
              • Colon / metabolism
              • Colon / microbiology
              • DNA, Ribosomal / genetics
              • Fatty Acids, Volatile / analysis
              • Fungi / genetics
              • Fungi / isolation & purification
              • Fungi / metabolism
              • Horses / microbiology
              • Metabolome
              • Metagenome
              • Polymerase Chain Reaction
              • RNA, Ribosomal, 18S / genetics

              Grant Funding

              • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

              Citations

              This article has been cited 63 times.
              1. Zaitseva S, Dagurova O, Radnagurueva A, Kozlova A, Izotova A, Krylova A, Noskov S, Begmatov S, Patutina E, Barkhutova DD. Fecal Microbiota and Diet Composition of Buryatian Horses Grazing Warm- and Cold-Season Grass Pastures.. Microorganisms 2023 Jul 30;11(8).
              2. Meili CH, Jones AL, Arreola AX, Habel J, Pratt CJ, Hanafy RA, Wang Y, Yassin AS, TagElDein MA, Moon CD, Janssen PH, Shrestha M, Rajbhandari P, Nagler M, Vinzelj JM, Podmirseg SM, Stajich JE, Goetsch AL, Hayes J, Young D, Fliegerova K, Grilli DJ, Vodička R, Moniello G, Mattiello S, Kashef MT, Nagy YI, Edwards JA, Dagar SS, Foote AP, Youssef NH, Elshahed MS. Patterns and determinants of the global herbivorous mycobiome.. Nat Commun 2023 Jun 26;14(1):3798.
                doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39508-zpubmed: 37365172google scholar: lookup
              3. Hepworth-Warren KL, Erwin SJ, Moore CB, Talbot JR, Young KAS, Neault MJ, Haugland JC, Robertson JB, Blikslager AT. Risk factors associated with an outbreak of equine coronavirus at a large farm in North Carolina.. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1060759.
                doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1060759pubmed: 36937023google scholar: lookup
              4. Zhang Z, Huang B, Gao X, Shi X, Wang X, Wang T, Wang Y, Liu G, Wang C. Dynamic changes in fecal microbiota in donkey foals during weaning: From pre-weaning to post-weaning.. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1105330.
                doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1105330pubmed: 36778861google scholar: lookup
              5. Adams VJ, LeBlanc N, Penell J. Results of a Clinical Trial Showing Changes to the Faecal Microbiome in Racing Thoroughbreds after Feeding a Nutritional Supplement.. Vet Sci 2022 Dec 30;10(1).
                doi: 10.3390/vetsci10010027pubmed: 36669028google scholar: lookup
              6. Li C, Li X, Guo R, Ni W, Liu K, Liu Z, Dai J, Xu Y, Abduriyim S, Wu Z, Zeng Y, Lei B, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zeng W, Zhang Q, Chen C, Qiao J, Liu C, Hu S. Expanded catalogue of metagenome-assembled genomes reveals resistome characteristics and athletic performance-associated microbes in horse.. Microbiome 2023 Jan 12;11(1):7.
                doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01448-zpubmed: 36631912google scholar: lookup
              7. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Sacy A, Karges K, Apper E. Gastro-Intestinal Microbiota in Equines and Its Role in Health and Disease: The Black Box Opens.. Microorganisms 2022 Dec 19;10(12).
              8. Zhang Z, Huang B, Shi X, Wang T, Wang Y, Zhu M, Wang C. Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Diversity between the Liquid Phase and Adherent Fraction within the Donkey Caeco-Colic Ecosystem.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 26;12(9).
                doi: 10.3390/ani12091116pubmed: 35565542google scholar: lookup
              9. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Huang B, Zhu M, Wang C. The Fibrolytic Enzyme Profiles and the Composition of Fungal Communities in Donkey Cecum-Colon Ecosystem.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 9;12(4).
                doi: 10.3390/ani12040412pubmed: 35203120google scholar: lookup
              10. Potter SJ, Bamford NJ, Baskerville CL, Harris PA, Bailey SR. Comparison of Feed Digestibility between Ponies, Standardbreds and Andalusian Horses Fed Three Different Diets.. Vet Sci 2021 Dec 31;9(1).
                doi: 10.3390/vetsci9010015pubmed: 35051099google scholar: lookup
              11. Goodman-Davis R, Figurska M, Cywinska A. Gut Microbiota Manipulation in Foals-Naturopathic Diarrhea Management, or Unsubstantiated Folly?. Pathogens 2021 Sep 4;10(9).
                doi: 10.3390/pathogens10091137pubmed: 34578169google scholar: lookup
              12. Johnson ACB, Biddle AS. A Standard Scale to Measure Equine Keeper Status and the Effect of Metabolic Tendency on Gut Microbiome Structure.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 1;11(7).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11071975pubmed: 34359102google scholar: lookup
              13. Walshe N, Cabrera-Rubio R, Collins R, Puggioni A, Gath V, Crispie F, Cotter PD, Brennan L, Mulcahy G, Duggan V. A Multiomic Approach to Investigate the Effects of a Weight Loss Program on the Intestinal Health of Overweight Horses.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:668120.
                doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.668120pubmed: 34222398google scholar: lookup
              14. Park T, Cheong H, Yoon J, Kim A, Yun Y, Unno T. Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota of Horses with Intestinal Disease and Their Healthy Counterparts.. Vet Sci 2021 Jun 17;8(6).
                doi: 10.3390/vetsci8060113pubmed: 34204317google scholar: lookup
              15. Kinoshita Y, Niwa H, Uchida-Fujii E, Nukada T. Establishment and assessment of an amplicon sequencing method targeting the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon for analysis of the equine gut microbiome.. Sci Rep 2021 Jun 4;11(1):11884.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91425-7pubmed: 34088956google scholar: lookup
              16. Zhu Y, Wang X, Deng L, Chen S, Zhu C, Li J. Effects of Pasture Grass, Silage, and Hay Diet on Equine Fecal Microbiota.. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 7;11(5).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11051330pubmed: 34066969google scholar: lookup
              17. Slater R, Frau A, Hodgkinson J, Archer D, Probert C. A Comparison of the Colonic Microbiome and Volatile Organic Compound Metabolome of Anoplocephala perfoliata Infected and Non-Infected Horses: A Pilot Study.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 9;11(3).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11030755pubmed: 33803473google scholar: lookup
              18. Martin de Bustamante M, Gomez D, MacNicol J, Hamor R, Plummer C. The Fecal Bacterial Microbiota in Horses with Equine Recurrent Uveitis.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 9;11(3).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11030745pubmed: 33803123google scholar: lookup
              19. Wimmer-Scherr C, Taminiau B, Renaud B, van Loon G, Palmers K, Votion D, Amory H, Daube G, Cesarini C. Comparison of Fecal Microbiota of Horses Suffering from Atypical Myopathy and Healthy Co-Grazers.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 15;11(2).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11020506pubmed: 33672034google scholar: lookup
              20. Reed KJ, Kunz IGZ, Scare JA, Nielsen MK, Turk PJ, Coleman RJ, Coleman SJ. The pelvic flexure separates distinct microbial communities in the equine hindgut.. Sci Rep 2021 Feb 22;11(1):4332.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83783-zpubmed: 33619300google scholar: lookup
              21. Sorensen RJ, Drouillard JS, Douthit TL, Ran Q, Marthaler DG, Kang Q, Vahl CI, Lattimer JM. Effect of hay type on cecal and fecal microbiome and fermentation parameters in horses.. J Anim Sci 2021 Jan 1;99(1).
                doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa407pubmed: 33515482google scholar: lookup
              22. Edwards JE, Shetty SA, van den Berg P, Burden F, van Doorn DA, Pellikaan WF, Dijkstra J, Smidt H. Multi-kingdom characterization of the core equine fecal microbiota based on multiple equine (sub)species.. Anim Microbiome 2020 Feb 12;2(1):6.
                doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-0023-1pubmed: 33499982google scholar: lookup
              23. Kauter A, Epping L, Semmler T, Antao EM, Kannapin D, Stoeckle SD, Gehlen H, Lübke-Becker A, Günther S, Wieler LH, Walther B. The gut microbiome of horses: current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives.. Anim Microbiome 2019 Nov 13;1(1):14.
                doi: 10.1186/s42523-019-0013-3pubmed: 33499951google scholar: lookup
              24. Edwards JE, Schennink A, Burden F, Long S, van Doorn DA, Pellikaan WF, Dijkstra J, Saccenti E, Smidt H. Domesticated equine species and their derived hybrids differ in their fecal microbiota.. Anim Microbiome 2020 Mar 16;2(1):8.
                doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-00027-7pubmed: 33499942google scholar: lookup
              25. Walshe N, Mulcahy G, Hodgkinson J, Peachey L. No Worm Is an Island; The Influence of Commensal Gut Microbiota on Cyathostomin Infections.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 5;10(12).
                doi: 10.3390/ani10122309pubmed: 33291496google scholar: lookup
              26. Garber A, Hastie P, McGuinness D, Malarange P, Murray JA. Abrupt dietary changes between grass and hay alter faecal microbiota of ponies.. PLoS One 2020;15(8):e0237869.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237869pubmed: 32810164google scholar: lookup
              27. Arroyo LG, Rossi L, Santos BP, Gomez DE, Surette MG, Costa MC. Luminal and Mucosal Microbiota of the Cecum and Large Colon of Healthy and Diarrheic Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Aug 12;10(8).
                doi: 10.3390/ani10081403pubmed: 32806591google scholar: lookup
              28. Arnold CE, Isaiah A, Pilla R, Lidbury J, Coverdale JS, Callaway TR, Lawhon SD, Steiner J, Suchodolski JS. The cecal and fecal microbiomes and metabolomes of horses before and after metronidazole administration.. PLoS One 2020;15(5):e0232905.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232905pubmed: 32442163google scholar: lookup
              29. Mach N, Ruet A, Clark A, Bars-Cortina D, Ramayo-Caldas Y, Crisci E, Pennarun S, Dhorne-Pollet S, Foury A, Moisan MP, Lansade L. Priming for welfare: gut microbiota is associated with equitation conditions and behavior in horse athletes.. Sci Rep 2020 May 20;10(1):8311.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65444-9pubmed: 32433513google scholar: lookup
              30. Morrison PK, Newbold CJ, Jones E, Worgan HJ, Grove-White DH, Dugdale AH, Barfoot C, Harris PA, Argo CM. Effect of age and the individual on the gastrointestinal bacteriome of ponies fed a high-starch diet.. PLoS One 2020;15(5):e0232689.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232689pubmed: 32384105google scholar: lookup
              31. Mullen KR, Yasuda K, Divers TJ, Weese JS. Equine faecal microbiota transplant: Current knowledge, proposed guidelines and future directions.. Equine Vet Educ 2018 Mar;30(3):151-160.
                doi: 10.1111/eve.12559pubmed: 32313396google scholar: lookup
              32. Xu L, Surathu A, Raplee I, Chockalingam A, Stewart S, Walker L, Sacks L, Patel V, Li Z, Rouse R. The effect of antibiotics on the gut microbiome: a metagenomics analysis of microbial shift and gut antibiotic resistance in antibiotic treated mice.. BMC Genomics 2020 Mar 30;21(1):263.
                doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6665-2pubmed: 32228448google scholar: lookup
              33. Su S, Zhao Y, Liu Z, Liu G, Du M, Wu J, Bai D, Li B, Bou G, Zhang X, Dugarjaviin M. Characterization and comparison of the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract compartments of Mongolian horses.. Microbiologyopen 2020 Jun;9(6):1085-1101.
                doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1020pubmed: 32153142google scholar: lookup
              34. Salem SE, Maddox TW, Antczak P, Ketley JM, Williams NJ, Archer DC. Acute changes in the colonic microbiota are associated with large intestinal forms of surgical colic.. BMC Vet Res 2019 Dec 21;15(1):468.
                doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2205-1pubmed: 31864369google scholar: lookup
              35. Liu G, Bou G, Su S, Xing J, Qu H, Zhang X, Wang X, Zhao Y, Dugarjaviin M. Microbial diversity within the digestive tract contents of Dezhou donkeys.. PLoS One 2019;14(12):e0226186.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226186pubmed: 31834903google scholar: lookup
              36. Leng J, Walton G, Swann J, Darby A, La Ragione R, Proudman C. "Bowel on the Bench": Proof of Concept of a Three-Stage, In Vitro Fermentation Model of the Equine Large Intestine.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019 Dec 13;86(1).
                doi: 10.1128/AEM.02093-19pubmed: 31676474google scholar: lookup
              37. Lindenberg F, Krych L, Fielden J, Kot W, Frøkiær H, van Galen G, Nielsen DS, Hansen AK. Expression of immune regulatory genes correlate with the abundance of specific Clostridiales and Verrucomicrobia species in the equine ileum and cecum.. Sci Rep 2019 Sep 3;9(1):12674.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49081-5pubmed: 31481726google scholar: lookup
              38. Peachey LE, Castro C, Molena RA, Jenkins TP, Griffin JL, Cantacessi C. Dysbiosis associated with acute helminth infections in herbivorous youngstock - observations and implications.. Sci Rep 2019 Jul 31;9(1):11121.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47204-6pubmed: 31366962google scholar: lookup
              39. Salem SE, Hough R, Probert C, Maddox TW, Antczak P, Ketley JM, Williams NJ, Stoneham SJ, Archer DC. A longitudinal study of the faecal microbiome and metabolome of periparturient mares.. PeerJ 2019;7:e6687.
                doi: 10.7717/peerj.6687pubmed: 30976468google scholar: lookup
              40. Wang L, Jin L, Xue B, Wang Z, Peng Q. Characterizing the bacterial community across the gastrointestinal tract of goats: Composition and potential function.. Microbiologyopen 2019 Sep;8(9):e00820.
                doi: 10.1002/mbo3.820pubmed: 30829000google scholar: lookup
              41. Morrison PK, Newbold CJ, Jones E, Worgan HJ, Grove-White DH, Dugdale AH, Barfoot C, Harris PA, Argo CM. The Equine Gastrointestinal Microbiome: Impacts of Age and Obesity.. Front Microbiol 2018;9:3017.
                doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03017pubmed: 30581426google scholar: lookup
              42. Biddle AS, Tomb JF, Fan Z. Microbiome and Blood Analyte Differences Point to Community and Metabolic Signatures in Lean and Obese Horses.. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:225.
                doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00225pubmed: 30294603google scholar: lookup
              43. Andersen-Ranberg EU, Barnes CJ, Rasmussen L, Salgado-Flores A, Grøndahl C, Mosbacher JB, Hansen AJ, Sundset MA, Schmidt NM, Sonne C. A Comparative Study on the Faecal Bacterial Community and Potential Zoonotic Bacteria of Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) in Northeast Greenland, Northwest Greenland and Norway.. Microorganisms 2018 Jul 25;6(3).
                doi: 10.3390/microorganisms6030076pubmed: 30044373google scholar: lookup
              44. Ryan EP, Heuberger AL, Broeckling CD, Borresen EC, Tillotson C, Prenni JE. Advances in Nutritional Metabolomics.. Curr Metabolomics 2013;1(2):109-120.
                doi: 10.2174/2213235x11301020001pubmed: 29682447google scholar: lookup
              45. Laghi L, Zhu C, Campagna G, Rossi G, Bazzano M, Laus F. Probiotic supplementation in trained trotter horses: effect on blood clinical pathology data and urine metabolomic assessed in field.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2018 Aug 1;125(2):654-660.
              46. Clark A, Sallé G, Ballan V, Reigner F, Meynadier A, Cortet J, Koch C, Riou M, Blanchard A, Mach N. Strongyle Infection and Gut Microbiota: Profiling of Resistant and Susceptible Horses Over a Grazing Season.. Front Physiol 2018;9:272.
                doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00272pubmed: 29618989google scholar: lookup
              47. Warzecha CM, Coverdale JA, Janecka JE, Leatherwood JL, Pinchak WE, Wickersham TA, McCann JC. Influence of short-term dietary starch inclusion on the equine cecal microbiome.. J Anim Sci 2017 Nov;95(11):5077-5090.
                doi: 10.2527/jas2017.1754pubmed: 29293739google scholar: lookup
              48. O' Donnell MM, Harris HMB, Ross RP, O'Toole PW. Core fecal microbiota of domesticated herbivorous ruminant, hindgut fermenters, and monogastric animals.. Microbiologyopen 2017 Oct;6(5).
                doi: 10.1002/mbo3.509pubmed: 28834331google scholar: lookup
              49. Trosko JE, Lenz HJ. What roles do colon stem cells and gap junctions play in the left and right location of origin of colorectal cancers?. J Cell Commun Signal 2017 Mar;11(1):79-87.
                doi: 10.1007/s12079-017-0381-ypubmed: 28220297google scholar: lookup
              50. Ericsson AC, Johnson PJ, Lopes MA, Perry SC, Lanter HR. A Microbiological Map of the Healthy Equine Gastrointestinal Tract.. PLoS One 2016;11(11):e0166523.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166523pubmed: 27846295google scholar: lookup
              51. Zhao Y, Li B, Bai D, Huang J, Shiraigo W, Yang L, Zhao Q, Ren X, Wu J, Bao W, Dugarjaviin M. Comparison of Fecal Microbiota of Mongolian and Thoroughbred Horses by High-throughput Sequencing of the V4 Region of the 16S rRNA Gene.. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016 Sep;29(9):1345-52.
                doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0587pubmed: 26954132google scholar: lookup
              52. Verbeke KA, Boobis AR, Chiodini A, Edwards CA, Franck A, Kleerebezem M, Nauta A, Raes J, van Tol EA, Tuohy KM. Towards microbial fermentation metabolites as markers for health benefits of prebiotics.. Nutr Res Rev 2015 Jun;28(1):42-66.
                doi: 10.1017/S0954422415000037pubmed: 26156216google scholar: lookup
              53. Coulson GB, Miranda-CasoLuengo AA, Miranda-CasoLuengo R, Wang X, Oliver J, Willingham-Lane JM, Meijer WG, Hondalus MK. Transcriptome reprogramming by plasmid-encoded transcriptional regulators is required for host niche adaption of a macrophage pathogen.. Infect Immun 2015 Aug;83(8):3137-45.
                doi: 10.1128/IAI.00230-15pubmed: 26015480google scholar: lookup
              54. Fernandes KA, Kittelmann S, Rogers CW, Gee EK, Bolwell CF, Bermingham EN, Thomas DG. Faecal microbiota of forage-fed horses in New Zealand and the population dynamics of microbial communities following dietary change.. PLoS One 2014;9(11):e112846.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112846pubmed: 25383707google scholar: lookup
              55. Schoster A, Weese JS, Guardabassi L. Probiotic use in horses - what is the evidence for their clinical efficacy?. J Vet Intern Med 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):1640-52.
                doi: 10.1111/jvim.12451pubmed: 25231539google scholar: lookup
              56. Dassa B, Borovok I, Ruimy-Israeli V, Lamed R, Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Henrissat B, Coutinho P, Morrison M, Mosoni P, Yeoman CJ, White BA, Bayer EA. Rumen cellulosomics: divergent fiber-degrading strategies revealed by comparative genome-wide analysis of six ruminococcal strains.. PLoS One 2014;9(7):e99221.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099221pubmed: 24992679google scholar: lookup
              57. Dougal K, de la Fuente G, Harris PA, Girdwood SE, Pinloche E, Geor RJ, Nielsen BD, Schott HC 2nd, Elzinga S, Newbold CJ. Characterisation of the faecal bacterial community in adult and elderly horses fed a high fibre, high oil or high starch diet using 454 pyrosequencing.. PLoS One 2014;9(2):e87424.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087424pubmed: 24504261google scholar: lookup
              58. McHardy IH, Goudarzi M, Tong M, Ruegger PM, Schwager E, Weger JR, Graeber TG, Sonnenburg JL, Horvath S, Huttenhower C, McGovern DP, Fornace AJ Jr, Borneman J, Braun J. Integrative analysis of the microbiome and metabolome of the human intestinal mucosal surface reveals exquisite inter-relationships.. Microbiome 2013 Jun 5;1(1):17.
                doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-1-17pubmed: 24450808google scholar: lookup
              59. Dougal K, de la Fuente G, Harris PA, Girdwood SE, Pinloche E, Newbold CJ. Identification of a core bacterial community within the large intestine of the horse.. PLoS One 2013;8(10):e77660.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077660pubmed: 24204908google scholar: lookup
              60. Blackmore TM, Dugdale A, Argo CM, Curtis G, Pinloche E, Harris PA, Worgan HJ, Girdwood SE, Dougal K, Newbold CJ, McEwan NR. Strong stability and host specific bacterial community in faeces of ponies.. PLoS One 2013;8(9):e75079.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075079pubmed: 24040388google scholar: lookup
              61. Bordin AI, Suchodolski JS, Markel ME, Weaver KB, Steiner JM, Dowd SE, Pillai S, Cohen ND. Effects of administration of live or inactivated virulent Rhodococccus equi and age on the fecal microbiome of neonatal foals.. PLoS One 2013;8(6):e66640.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066640pubmed: 23785508google scholar: lookup
              62. Schoster A, Arroyo LG, Staempfli HR, Weese JS. Comparison of microbial populations in the small intestine, large intestine and feces of healthy horses using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism.. BMC Res Notes 2013 Mar 12;6:91.
                doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-91pubmed: 23497580google scholar: lookup
              63. Steelman SM, Chowdhary BP, Dowd S, Suchodolski J, Janečka JE. Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes in fecal samples reveals high diversity of hindgut microflora in horses and potential links to chronic laminitis.. BMC Vet Res 2012 Nov 27;8:231.
                doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-231pubmed: 23186268google scholar: lookup