Analyze Diet
Archives of microbiology2022; 204(7); 382; doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03009-2

A high-throughput DNA sequencing study of fecal bacteria of seven Mexican horse breeds.

Abstract: Horses are non-ruminant, herbivorous mammals, been used through history for various purposes, with a gut microbiota from cecum to the colon, possessing remarkable fermentative capacity. We studied the fecal microbiota of Azteca, Criollo, Frisian, Iberian, Pinto, Quarter and Spanish horse breeds living in Mexico by next-generation DNA sequencing of 16S rRNA gene libraries. Dominant phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes, Fibrobacteres, Actinobacteria and Verrucomicrobia have different relative abundances among breeds, with contrasted alpha and beta diversities as well. Heatmap analysis revealed that Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Mogibacteriaceae families, and order Clostridiales are more abundant in Spanish, Azteca, Quarter and Criollo breeds. The LEfSe analysis displayed higher abundance of order Bacteroidales, family BS11, and genera Faecalibacterium, Comamonas, Collinsella, Acetobacter, and Treponema in Criollo, Azteca, Iberian, Spanish, Frisian, Pinto, and Quarter horse breeds. The conclusion is that dominant bacterial taxa, found in fecal samples of horse breeds living in Mexico, have different relative abundances.
Publication Date: 2022-06-10 PubMed ID: 35687150PubMed Central: 7676713DOI: 10.1007/s00203-022-03009-2Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explores the composition of fecal bacteria in seven horse breeds in Mexico using advanced DNA sequencing techniques, and it uncovers that the dominant bacterial families vary significantly among these breeds.

Objective of the Study

  • The main idea behind this research was to investigate the microbiota found in the fecal matter of different horse breeds living in Mexico. The analysis was based on sequencing the 16S rRNA gene libraries using next-generation DNA sequencing technology.

Methodology

  • Researchers collected fecal samples from seven horse breeds – Azteca, Criollo, Frisian, Iberian, Pinto, Quarter, and Spanish.
  • The samples were then analyzed using a sophisticated DNA sequencing method known as next-generation sequencing targeted at 16S rRNA gene libraries. This technique is commonly used in microbiota studies due to its accuracy and high throughput.
  • They compared the bacteria found in these samples, namely Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes, Fibrobacteres, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia, across the different horse breeds.

Results

  • The results showed that the dominant bacterial phyla had different relative abundances among the horse breeds.
  • Moreover, there were evident differences in alpha and beta diversity among the breeds studied. Alpha diversity refers to the diversity within a particular area or ecosystem, and beta diversity describes the diversity between ecosystems.
  • The heatmap analysis revealed that families such as Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Mogibacteriaceae, and the order Clostridiales were more abundant in the Spanish, Azteca, Quarter, and Criollo horse breeds.
  • The LEfSe analysis, a tool for biomarker discovery and explanation, signified higher abundance of order Bacteroidales, family BS11, and the genera including Faecalibacterium, Comamonas, Collinsella, Acetobacter, and Treponema across different horse breeds including Criollo, Azteca, Iberian, Spanish, Frisian, Pinto, and Quarter.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that the dominant bacterial taxa present in fecal samples of horse breeds in Mexico differ in their relative abundances. This suggests the possibility of breed-determined differences in the gut microbiota of horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Hernández-Quiroz F, Murugesan S, Flores-Rivas C, Piña-Escobedo A, Juárez-Hernández JI, García-Espitia M, Chávez-Carbajal A, Nirmalkar K, García-Mena J. (2022). A high-throughput DNA sequencing study of fecal bacteria of seven Mexican horse breeds. Arch Microbiol, 204(7), 382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03009-2

Publication

ISSN: 1432-072X
NlmUniqueID: 0410427
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 204
Issue: 7
Pages: 382

Researcher Affiliations

Hernández-Quiroz, Fernando
  • Departamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av IPN 2508 Col Zacatenco, CDMX, 07360, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
  • Computer Science Department, University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL), Lincoln, NE, USA.
Murugesan, Selvasankar
  • Departamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av IPN 2508 Col Zacatenco, CDMX, 07360, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
  • Division of Translational Medicine, Research Department, Sidra Medicine, 26999, Doha, Qatar.
Flores-Rivas, Cintia
  • Departamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av IPN 2508 Col Zacatenco, CDMX, 07360, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Piña-Escobedo, Alberto
  • Departamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av IPN 2508 Col Zacatenco, CDMX, 07360, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Juárez-Hernández, Josué Isaac
  • Departamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av IPN 2508 Col Zacatenco, CDMX, 07360, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
García-Espitia, Matilde
  • Escuela Nacional de Medicina y Homeopatía del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Guillermo Massieu Helguera 239, CDMX, 07320, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Chávez-Carbajal, Alejandra
  • Departamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av IPN 2508 Col Zacatenco, CDMX, 07360, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
  • Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Nirmalkar, Khemlal
  • Departamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av IPN 2508 Col Zacatenco, CDMX, 07360, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
  • Biodesign Center for Health through Microbiomes, Arizona State 16 University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
García-Mena, Jaime
  • Departamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av IPN 2508 Col Zacatenco, CDMX, 07360, Ciudad de México, Mexico. jgmena@cinvestav.mx.

MeSH Terms

  • Actinobacteria / genetics
  • Animals
  • Bacteroidetes / genetics
  • Clostridiales / genetics
  • Feces / microbiology
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
  • Horses
  • Mammals / genetics
  • Mexico
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
  • Verrucomicrobia / genetics

Grant Funding

  • CONACyT 163235 INFR-2011-01 / Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • FONSEC SS/IMSS/ISSSTE-CONACYT-233361 / Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología

References

This article includes 40 references
  1. Al Jassim RAM, Andrews FM. The bacterial community of the horse gastrointestinal tract and its relation to fermentative acidosis, laminitis, colic, and stomach ulcers. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 25:199–215.
    doi: 10.1016/J.CVEQ.2009.04.005pubmed: 19580934google scholar: lookup
  2. Arnold CE, Isaiah A, Pilla R. The cecal and fecal microbiomes and metabolomes of horses before and after metronidazole administration. PLoS One .
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0232905pubmed: 33211733pmc: 7676713google scholar: lookup
  3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57:289–300.
  4. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857.
    doi: 10.1038/S41587-019-0209-9pubmed: 31341288pmc: 7015180google scholar: lookup
  5. Brooks SA, Palermo KM, Kahn A, Hein J. Impact of white-spotting alleles, including W20, on phenotype in the American Paint Horse. Anim Genet 51:707–715.
    doi: 10.1111/AGE.12960pubmed: 32686191google scholar: lookup
  6. Cañon J, Checa ML, Carleos C. The genetic structure of Spanish Celtic horse breeds inferred from microsatellite data. Anim Genet 31:39–48.
  7. Coleman MC, Whitfield-Cargile CM, Madrigal RG, Cohen ND. Comparison of the microbiome, metabolome, and lipidome of obese and non-obese horses. PLoS One .
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0215918pubmed: 31805076pmc: 6894790google scholar: lookup
  8. Costa MC, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses and horses with colitis by high throughput sequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene. PLoS One .
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0041484pubmed: 23300853pmc: 3532467google scholar: lookup
  9. Costa MC, Silva G, Ramos RV. Characterization and comparison of the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract compartments in horses. Vet J 205:74–80.
    doi: 10.1016/J.TVJL.2015.03.018pubmed: 25975855google scholar: lookup
  10. Denhardt RM. Quarter horses: a story of two centuries. .
  11. Destrez A, Grimm P, Julliand V. Dietary-induced modulation of the hindgut microbiota is related to behavioral responses during stressful events in horses. Physiol Behav 202:94–100.
    doi: 10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2019.02.003pubmed: 30726719google scholar: lookup
  12. Dini P, Bartels T, Revah I. A retrospective study on semen quality parameters from four different Dutch horse breeds with different levels of inbreeding. Theriogenology 157:18–23.
  13. Dougal K, de la Fuente G, Harris PA. Identification of a core bacterial community within the large intestine of the horse. PLoS One .
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0077660pubmed: 24204908pmc: 3812009google scholar: lookup
  14. Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld JR. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol 38:685–688.
    doi: 10.1038/S41587-020-0548-6pubmed: 32483366pmc: 7365738google scholar: lookup
  15. Ericsson AC, Johnson PJ, Lopes MA. A microbiological map of the healthy equine gastrointestinal tract. PLoS One .
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0166523pubmed: 27846295pmc: 5112786google scholar: lookup
  16. Fierer N, Hamady M, Lauber CL, Knight R. The influence of sex, handedness, and washing on the diversity of hand surface bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA .
    doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0807920105pubmed: 19004758pmc: 2584711google scholar: lookup
  17. Garber A, Hastie P, Murray JA. Factors influencing equine gut microbiota: current knowledge. J Equine Vet Sci .
    doi: 10.1016/J.JEVS.2020.102943pubmed: 32303307google scholar: lookup
  18. García-Mena J, Murugesan S, Pérez-Muñoz AA. Airborne bacterial diversity from the low atmosphere of greater Mexico city. Microb Ecol 72:70–84.
    doi: 10.1007/S00248-016-0747-3pubmed: 26944561google scholar: lookup
  19. Gaunitz C, Fages A, Hanghøj K. Ancient genomes revisit the ancestry of domestic and Przewalski’s horses. Science 360(6384):111–114.
    doi: 10.1126/science.aao3297pubmed: 29472442google scholar: lookup
  20. Gilroy R, Leng J, Ravi A. Metagenomic investigation of the equine faecal microbiome reveals extensive taxonomic diversity. PeerJ 10:e13084.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.13084google scholar: lookup
  21. Glatter M, Borewicz K, van den Bogert B. Modification of the equine gastrointestinal microbiota by Jerusalem artichoke meal supplementation. PLoS One .
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0220553pubmed: 31393892pmc: 6687111google scholar: lookup
  22. Kunz IGZ, Reed KJ, Metcalf JL. Equine fecal microbiota changes associated with anthelmintic administration. J Equine Vet Sci 77:98–106.
    doi: 10.1016/J.JEVS.2019.01.018pubmed: 31133326google scholar: lookup
  23. Lindenberg F, Krych L, Kot W. Development of the equine gut microbiota. Sci Rep .
    doi: 10.1038/S41598-019-50563-9pubmed: 31594971pmc: 6783416google scholar: lookup
  24. Lynghaug F. The official horse breeds standards guide: the complete guide to the standards of all North American equine breed associations. .
  25. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One .
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0061217pubmed: 23630581pmc: 3632530google scholar: lookup
  26. Metcalf JL, Song SJ, Morton JT. Evaluating the impact of domestication and captivity on the horse gut microbiome. Sci Rep .
    doi: 10.1038/S41598-017-15375-9pubmed: 29138485pmc: 5686199google scholar: lookup
  27. Morrison PK, Newbold CJ, Jones E. The equine gastrointestinal microbiome: impacts of age and obesity. Front Microbiol .
    doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2018.03017pubmed: 30619201pmc: 6305589google scholar: lookup
  28. Morrison PK, Newbold CJ, Jones E. The equine gastrointestinal microbiome: impacts of weight-loss. BMC Vet Res .
    doi: 10.1186/S12917-020-02295-6pubmed: 32131835pmc: 7057583google scholar: lookup
  29. Müller V, dos Moraes B, SS, Carvalho IR. Genetic parameters of morphometric measurements in Criollo horses. J Anim Breed Genet 138:174–178.
    doi: 10.1111/JBG.12503pubmed: 33009860google scholar: lookup
  30. Murugesan S, Ulloa-Martínez M, Martínez-Rojano H. Study of the diversity and short-chain fatty acids production by the bacterial community in overweight and obese Mexican children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34:1337–1346.
    doi: 10.1007/S10096-015-2355-4pubmed: 25761741google scholar: lookup
  31. O’Donnell MM, Harris HMB, Jeffery IB. The core faecal bacterial microbiome of Irish Thoroughbred racehorses. Lett Appl Microbiol 57:492–501.
    doi: 10.1111/LAM.12137google scholar: lookup
  32. Orlando L. ancient genomes reveal unexpected horse domestication and management dynamics. BioEssays .
    doi: 10.1002/BIES.201900164pubmed: 31808562google scholar: lookup
  33. Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 30:3123–3124.
    doi: 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTU494pubmed: 25061070pmc: 4609014google scholar: lookup
  34. Royo LJ, Álvarez I, Beja-Pereira A. The origins of Iberian horses assessed via mitochondrial DNA. J Hered 96:663–669.
    doi: 10.1093/JHERED/ESI116pubmed: 16251517google scholar: lookup
  35. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol .
    doi: 10.1186/GB-2011-12-6-R60pubmed: 21702898pmc: 3439064google scholar: lookup
  36. Shepherd ML, Swecker WS, Jensen RV, Ponder MA. Characterization of the fecal bacteria communities of forage-fed horses by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA V4 gene amplicons. FEMS Microbiol Lett 326:62–68.
  37. Su S, Zhao Y, Liu Z. Characterization and comparison of the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract compartments of Mongolian horses. Microbiologyopen 9:1085–1101.
    doi: 10.1002/MBO3.1020pubmed: 32153142google scholar: lookup
  38. Toloza Beltrán PA, Lora Suarez FM. Identificación de bacterias y parásitos asociados a la materia fecal de diferentes ejemplares de Equus ferus caballus de Salento, departamento del Quindío. Rev LA Asoc Colomb CIENCIAS Biol 1:73–86.
  39. Vermorel M, Martin-Rosset W. Concepts, scientific bases, structure and validation of the French horse net energy system (UFC). Livest Prod Sci 47:261–275.
  40. Whiteley AS, Jenkins S, Waite I. Microbial 16S rRNA Ion Tag and community metagenome sequencing using the Ion Torrent (PGM) Platform. J Microbiol Methods 91:80–88.
    doi: 10.1016/J.MIMET.2012.07.008pubmed: 22849830google scholar: lookup