FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / An Ultrasound-Guided Thoracolumbar Erector Spinae Plane Bloc...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(15); 2264; doi: 10.3390/ani15152264

An Ultrasound-Guided Thoracolumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block: An Experimental Preliminary Study in Horses.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar erector spinae plane (TL-ESP) block in standing horses. A total of 24 injections ( = 12) were performed at the L1 level using either 0.1 mL/kg of saline solution (SS group) or 2% lidocaine (LID group). The block feasibility was assessed based on needle visualization and injection time, while efficacy was evaluated through craniocaudal and dorsoventral (DV) spread using the pinprick technique over 270 min. Desensitization was observed at least once in 100% of horses in the LID group and in 75% in the SS group ( = 0.001). However, in the SS group, desensitization was primarily limited to the Th18 metamer at the 2 cm DV position, with a shorter duration compared to the LID group. The block onset occurred at 22.5 (11.25-60) min in the LID group and at 5 (5-30) min in the SS group ( = 0.069). The number of affected metamers was significantly higher in the LID group (2 [1-3]) compared to the SS group (1 [1-2.25], = 0.014). At the 2 cm DV point, the end of the block effect occurred at 135 (120-210) min in the LID group and at 60 (3.75-60) min in the SS group ( = 0.001). Needle visualization was excellent in 95.8% of cases, and the mean injection time was 2.5 (2-3) min. These findings confirm that the TL-ESP block is a feasible technique in standing horses. However, its effect is predominantly localized to dorsal dermatomes with a limited ventral spread. Future studies evaluating larger volumes and multiple injection sites are warranted to enhance its clinical applicability.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-08-01 PubMed ID: 40805053PubMed Central: PMC12345547DOI: 10.3390/ani15152264Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper investigates the feasibility and efficacy of performing a particular type of anaesthesia, called a thoracolumbar erector spinae plane (TL-ESP) block, in standing horses. The researchers compared the use of saline solution against 2% lidocaine and found that the technique is feasible and has a predominantly dorsal therapeutic effect, but that further research is necessary to improve its clinical application.

Introduction and Methodology

  • The study aimed to understand if a TL-ESP block—where anaesthesia is injected into a certain part of the back—could be carried out on standing horses. A total of 24 injections were performed, divided into two groups: one receiving a saline solution (the SS group), and the other receiving 2% lidocaine (the LID group).
  • Needle visualization and injection time were used as indicators of the procedure’s feasibility. The effect of the anaesthesia, or efficacy, was evaluated in two different ways by using a pinprick technique over four and a half hours to see how widely and how effectively the anaesthetic spread.

Results

  • Desensitization, or numbness, was observed in 100% of the horses in the LID group and 75% in the SS group, indicating that lidocaine was more effective at numbing the horses than the saline solution.
  • The onset time of the block was slower in the LID group (22.5 min) compared to the SS group (5 min), meaning the lidocaine took longer to start working.
  • At the designated injection site (2 cm dorsoventral), the block effect of lidocaine lasted significantly longer than with saline solution—135 min compared to 60 min.
  • Needle visibility was claimed to be excellent in nearly all cases, and it took an average of 2.5 minutes to administer the injection, indicating the procedure was easily feasible.

Discussion and Conclusion

  • The results confirm that the TL-ESP block technique is viable in standing horses, but the block’s effect is mainly limited to dorsal (towards the back) dermatomes with limited spread towards the belly of the animal.
  • The LID group demonstrated a higher number of temporarily numbed zones and lengthier duration, suggesting that lidocaine is a more effective agent for this type of block.
  • Nevertheless, to improve its clinical applicability, further studies are necessary particularly investigating the effects of larger volumes and varying injection sites.

Cite This Article

APA
Medina-Bautista F, Nocera I, Sánchez de Medina A, Di Franco C, Briganti A, Morgaz J, Granados MDM. (2025). An Ultrasound-Guided Thoracolumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block: An Experimental Preliminary Study in Horses. Animals (Basel), 15(15), 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15152264

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 15
PII: 2264

Researcher Affiliations

Medina-Bautista, Francisco
  • Animal Medicine and Surgery Department, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Nocera, Irene
  • Institute of Life Sciences, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Via Santa Cecilia 3, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Sánchez de Medina, Antonia
  • Animal Medicine and Surgery Department, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.
Di Franco, Chiara
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Briganti, Angela
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Morgaz, Juan
  • Animal Medicine and Surgery Department, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.
Granados, María Del Mar
  • Animal Medicine and Surgery Department, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 43 references
  1. Walmsley JP, Pettersson H, Winberg F, McEvoy F. Impingement of the dorsal spinous processes in two hundred and fifteen horses: Case selection, surgical technique and results.. Equine Vet. J. 2002;34:23–28.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776181259pubmed: 11817548google scholar: lookup
  2. Girodroux M, Dyson S, Murray R. Osteoarthritis of the thoracolumbar synovial intervertebral articulations: Clinical and radiographic features in 77 horses with poor performance and back pain.. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:130–138.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X345099pubmed: 19418740google scholar: lookup
  3. Wennerstrand J, Johnston C, Roethliberger-Holm K, Erichsen C, Eksell P, Drevemo S. Kinematic evaluation of the back in the sport horse with back pain.. Equine Vet. J. 2004;36:707–711.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044848226pubmed: 15656501google scholar: lookup
  4. Spoormakers TJP, Stefanie V, Graat EAM, van-Weeren R, Brommer H. Osseous pathologic changes in the lumbar region of the equine vertebral column: A descriptive post-mortem study in three breeds.. Equine Vet. J. 2024;56:1031–1040.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14035pubmed: 38126939google scholar: lookup
  5. Treß D, Lischer C, Merle R, Ehrle A. International survey of equine orthopaedic specialists reveals diverse treatment strategies for horses with overriding spinous processes.. Vet. Rec. 2024;194:e3899.
    doi: 10.1002/vetr.3899pubmed: 38379241google scholar: lookup
  6. Chin KJ, El-Boghdadly K. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A narrative review.. Can. J. Anaesth. 2021;68:387–408.
    doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2pubmed: 33403545google scholar: lookup
  7. Chin KJ, Lirk P, Hollmann MW, Schwarz SKW. Mechanisms of action of fascial plane blocks: A narrative review.. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2021;46:618–628.
    doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102305pubmed: 34145073google scholar: lookup
  8. Chin KJ, Versyck B, Elsharkawy H, Rojas Gomez MF, Sala-Blanch X, Reina MA. Anatomical basis of fascial plane blocks.. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2021;46:581–599.
    doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102506pubmed: 34145071google scholar: lookup
  9. Kim DH, Kim SJ, Liu J, Beath J, Memtsoudis SG. Fascial plane blocks: A narrative review of the literature.. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2021;46:600–617.
    doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101909pubmed: 34145072google scholar: lookup
  10. Lönnqvist PA, Karmakar M. Close-to-the-nerve vs interfascial plane blocks: Sniper rifle vs shotgun—Which will hit the target most reliably?. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2019;63:1126–1128.
    doi: 10.1111/aas.13438pubmed: 31283833google scholar: lookup
  11. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain.. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2016;41:621–627.
    doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451pubmed: 27501016google scholar: lookup
  12. Restrepo-Garces CE, Chin KJ, Suarez P, Diaz A. Bilateral continuous erector spinae plane block contributes to effective postoperative analgesia after major open abdominal surgery: A case report.. A A Case Rep. 2017;9:319–321.
    doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000605pubmed: 28727597google scholar: lookup
  13. Portela DA, Campoy L, Otero PE, Martin-Flores M, Gleed RD. Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral injection in dogs: A cadaveric study.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2017;44:636–645.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.05.012pubmed: 28526487google scholar: lookup
  14. Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block for the management of chronic shoulder pain: A case report.. Can. J. Anesth. 2018;65:288–293.
    doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-1010-1pubmed: 29134518google scholar: lookup
  15. Hernandez M, Palazzi L, Lapalma J, Forero M, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block for surgery of the posterior thoracic wall in a pediatric patient.. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2018;43:217–219.
    doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000716pubmed: 29278605google scholar: lookup
  16. Bugada D, Zarcone AG, Manini M, Lorini LF. Continuous erector spinae block at lumbar level (L4) for prolonged postoperative analgesia after hip surgery.. J. Clin. Anesth. 2019;52:24–25.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.08.023pubmed: 30153539google scholar: lookup
  17. Ferreira TH, St James M, Schroeder CA, Hershberger-Braker KL, Teixeira LBC, Schroeder KM. Description of an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and the spread of dye in dog cadavers.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2019;46:516–522.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.03.002pubmed: 31029460google scholar: lookup
  18. Portela DA, Castro D, Romano M, Gallastegui A, Garcia-Pereira F, Otero PE. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in canine cadavers: Relevant anatomy and injectate distribution.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2019;47:229–237.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.10.005pubmed: 31980367google scholar: lookup
  19. Medina-Serra R, Foster A, Plested M, Sanchis S, Gil-Cano F, Viscasillas J. Lumbar erector spinae plane block: An anatomical and dye distribution evaluation of two ultrasound-guided approaches in canine cadavers.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2021;48:125–133.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.07.038pubmed: 33334690google scholar: lookup
  20. Portela DA, Romano M, Zamora GA, Garcia-Pereira F, Pablo LS, Gatson BJ, Johnson AN, Otero PE. The effect of erector spinae plane block on perioperative analgesic consumption and complications in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy surgery: A retrospective cohort study.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2021;48:116–124.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.10.005pubmed: 33277182google scholar: lookup
  21. Alza Salvatierra DN, Herrera Linares ME, Motta L, Martinez M. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae interfascial plane block for spinal surgery in three cats.. JFMS Open Rep. 2021;7:1–6.
    doi: 10.1177/20551169211043814pmc: PMC8451256pubmed: 34552759google scholar: lookup
  22. d’Anselme O, Hartnack A, Suarez Sanchez Andrade J, Alfaro Rojas C, Ringer SK, de Carvalho Papa P. Description of an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and comparison to a blind proximal paravertebral nerve block in cows: A cadaveric study.. Animals 2022;12:2191.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12172191pmc: PMC9454813pubmed: 36077911google scholar: lookup
  23. d’Anselme O, Gamsjäger L, Hartnack A. Clinical application of a described erector spinae plane block for locoregional anaesthesia technique in a cow undergoing standing laparotomy.. Vet. Rec. Case Rep. 2024;12:e782.
    doi: 10.1002/vrc2.782google scholar: lookup
  24. Rodriguez A, Medina-Serra R, Lynch N, Veres-Nyeki K. Erector spinae block as part of a multimodal analgesic approach in an anaesthetised horse undergoing dorsal spinous process ostectomy and desmotomy.. Vet. Rec. Case. Rep. 2022;10:345.
    doi: 10.1002/vrc2.345google scholar: lookup
  25. Chiavaccini L, Calvancanti M, De Gasperi D, Portela DA. Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block for standing lumbar spinous osteotomy in a horse.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2022;49:517–519.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2022.06.001pubmed: 35764459google scholar: lookup
  26. Perez BR, Hawkins A, Fiske-Jackson A, Jimenez CP. Opioid-free anaesthesia protocol for standing spinal surgery in a horse.. Vet. Rec. Case Rep. 2023;11:590.
    doi: 10.1002/vrc2.590google scholar: lookup
  27. Delgado OBD, Louro LF, Rocchigiani G, Verin R, Humphreys W, Senior M, Campagna I. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in horses: A cadaver study.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2021;48:577–584.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.11.009pubmed: 33934991google scholar: lookup
  28. Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine.. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011;128:305–310.
    doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171pmc: PMC3124652pubmed: 21701348google scholar: lookup
  29. Arun N, Singh S. Is ESP block an answer for upper abdominal surgeries where epidural analgesia can’t be used?. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020;36:117–118.
    doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_278_19pmc: PMC7047696pubmed: 32174672google scholar: lookup
  30. Kamel AAF, Amin OAI, Ibrahem MAM. Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy.. Pain Physician. 2020;23:375–382.
    doi: 10.36076/ppj.2020/23/375pubmed: 32709172google scholar: lookup
  31. Henneke DR, Potter GD, Kreider JL, Yeates BF. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares.. Equine Vet. J. 1983;15:371–372.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1983.tb01826.xpubmed: 6641685google scholar: lookup
  32. Donaldson LL, Dunlop GS, Holland MS, Burton BA. The Recovery of Horses From Inhalant Anesthesia: A Comparison of Halothane and Isoflurane.. Vet. Surg. 2000;29:92–101.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2000.00092.xpubmed: 10653499google scholar: lookup
  33. Otero PE, Portela DA, Fuensalida SE, Romano M, Cavalcanti M, Texeira JG, Jones R, Guerrero JA. Pericapsular hip desensitization in dogs. A cadaveric study and case series.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2022;49:664–673.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2022.08.001pubmed: 36064499google scholar: lookup
  34. Hector R, Rezende ML, Mama KR, Hess AM. Recovery quality following a single post-anaesthetic dose of dexmedetomidine or romifidine in sevoflurane anaesthetised horses.. Equine Vet. J. 2020;52:685–691.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13238pubmed: 31975413google scholar: lookup
  35. Di Franco C, Tayari H, Nardi S, Briganti A. Along or across the visual axis: A comparison of two ultrasound screen, needle, and transducer orientation techniques.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2021;48:147–150.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.08.009pubmed: 33303397google scholar: lookup
  36. Küls N, Trujanovic R, Otero PE, Larenza-Menzies MP. Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Shetland Ponies: A Description of a Three-Point Injection Technique and Evaluation of Potential Analgesic Effects.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;90:102994.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102994pubmed: 32534772google scholar: lookup
  37. Elsharkawy H, Pawa A, Mariano ER. Interfascial Plane Blocks: Back to Basics.. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2018;43:341–346.
    doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000750pubmed: 29561295google scholar: lookup
  38. Otero PE, Fuensalida SE, Russo PC, Verdier N, Blanco C, Portela DA. Mechanism of action of the erector spinae plane block:dsitribution of dye in a porcine model.. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2020;45:198–203.
    doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100964pubmed: 31911430google scholar: lookup
  39. Stecco C, Macchi V, Porzionato A, Duparc F, De Caro R. The fascia: The forgotten structure.. Ital. J. Anat. Embryol. 2011;116:127–138.
    pubmed: 22852442
  40. Ishizuka K, Sakai H, Tsuzuki N, Nagashima M. Topographic anatomy of the posterior ramus of thoracic spinal nerve and surrounding structures.. Spine. 2012;37:17–22.
    doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824b65eapubmed: 22310092google scholar: lookup
  41. Kanai A, Suzuki A, Hoka S. Rapid injection of epidural mepivacaine speeds the onset of nerve blockade.. Can. J. Anesth. 2005;3:281–284.
    doi: 10.1007/BF03016064pubmed: 15753500google scholar: lookup
  42. Son WG, Jang M, Junghee Y, Lee LY, Lee I. The effect of epidural injection speed on epidural pressure and dsitribution of solution in anaesthetized dogs.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2014;5:526–533.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12147pubmed: 24628876google scholar: lookup
  43. Kuhlmann L, Olesen SS, Grønlund D, Olesen AE, Wilder-Smith OHG, Drewes AM. Clinical pain phenotype associates with sensory testing results in chronic pancreatitis.. Clin. J. Pain. 2019;35:894–902.
    doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000740pmc: PMC6693925pubmed: 31268890google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.