Analysis of Tokyo 2020 Olympic modern pentathlon equestrian jumping results.
Abstract: Modern Pentathlon (MP) includes an equestrian Jumping discipline, with horses drawn blindly by unfamiliar riders. At the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Summer Games, concerns regarding inadequate horsemanship generated adverse publicity for MP. Conventional stadium Jumping in Tokyo provided an opportunity for comparison of the two closest Olympic equestrian Jumping disciplines. The objectives of this study were to complete an objective analysis of the Tokyo MP riding phases, and to test the hypothesis that MP riding faults in women's and men's Tokyo competitions combined were more frequent than in the Individual Jumping Qualifier (JQ). Types of faults for Tokyo MP (n = 71 riders) and JQ (n = 73 riders) were tabulated from published official results and detailed observation of online videos of each competition. Fault distributions were compared using Chi-square analysis (significance at P < .05). MP riders had more jumping faults (15.4 %) than JQ (7.8 %, P < .0001). Both MP and JQ riders had more faults at oxers (17.1 %, P < .0001 and 9.7 %, P = .0171, respectively) than verticals (14.5 % and 6.2 %). JQ (9.8 %, P = .0093) but not MP (15.7 %, p = .5166) riders had more faults in the second half of the course compared to the first half (5.7 % and 15.0 %, respectively). Double clear rounds (no jumping or time faults) were 4.9 times more likely in JQ (34.2 %) than in MP (6.9 %: P < .0001). Proposed solutions to decrease MP fault frequency include lower maximum fence heights, fewer jumping efforts, and a more liberal re-ride policy.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-04-29 PubMed ID: 38688122DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105068Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research paper analyzes the equestrian jumping results from the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. It focuses particularly on the Modern Pentathlon event and compares the results with the Individual Qualifier event. The study finds that riders in the Modern Pentathlon had more faults, and it suggests improvements including lowering fence heights, reducing jumping efforts, and allowing redo attempts to reduce these faults.
Study Objectives and Methodology
- The study makes an in-depth analysis of the equestrian jumping discipline of Modern Pentathlon in the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, with the aim to understand the high frequency of faults in the event.
- To provide a basis of comparison, researchers included the Individual Jumping Qualifier event— another closely related Olympic equestrian event.
- Data for this analysis was collected from official results and extensive observation of online videos of each competition.
- The analysis included 71 riders from Modern Pentathlon and 73 from the Individual Jumping Qualifier. The types of faults in both events were studied and compared using a statistical method called Chi-square analysis.
Findings and Observations
- The analysis revealed that faults were more frequent in Modern Pentathlon than in the Individual Jumping Qualifier. The incidence of faults was 15.4% in Modern Pentathlon compared to 7.8% in the Individual Jumping Qualifier.
- The researchers also noted that both events recorded more faults at ‘oxers’ (fences that horses need to jump over) than at verticals. This was a significant finding, with fault percentages at 17.1% and 9.7% for Modern Pentathlon and the Individual Jumping Qualifier, respectively.
- Interestingly, the riders in the Individual Jumping Qualifier experienced more faults in the second half of the course, unlike those in the Modern Pentathlon wherein the frequency of faults was relatively consistent throughout the course.
- The chances of completing a round flawlessly (without jumping or time faults) were significantly higher (about 4.9 times) in the Individual Jumping Qualifier than in Modern Pentathlon.
Recommendations and Conclusions
- Based on the observations, the researchers suggest potential remedies to reduce the frequency of faults in Modern Pentathlon.
- The researchers recommend lowering the maximum fence heights and decreasing the number of jumping attempts to help reduce the occurrence of faults.
- They also suggest implementing more forgiving redo policies, which could provide athletes another chance at completing the course without faults.
Cite This Article
APA
Foreman JH.
(2024).
Analysis of Tokyo 2020 Olympic modern pentathlon equestrian jumping results.
J Equine Vet Sci, 136, 105068.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105068 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, 1008 West Hazelwood Drive, Urbana, Illinois 61802 USA. Electronic address: jhf@illinois.edu.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest The author has no financial or personal relationship that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper. The author was a member of the AAEP task force charged with studying and making recommendations to the AAEP President and Board of Directors regarding horse safety in pentathlon after Tokyo 2020.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists