Antibiotic prophylaxis and hospitalization of horses subjected to median laparotomy: gut microbiota trajectories and abundance increase of Escherichia.
Abstract: Horse clinics are hotspots for the accumulation and spread of clinically relevant and zoonotic multidrug-resistant bacteria, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing (ESBL) Enterobacterales. Although median laparotomy in cases of acute equine colic is a frequently performed surgical intervention, knowledge about the effects of peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) based on a combination of penicillin and gentamicin on the gut microbiota is limited. Unassigned: We collected fecal samples of horses from a non-hospitalized control group (CG) and from horses receiving either a pre-surgical single-shot (SSG) or a peri-operative 5-day (5DG) course of PAP. To assess differences between the two PAP regimens and the CG, all samples obtained at hospital admission (t), on days three (t) and 10 (t) after surgery, were screened for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and subjected to 16S rRNA V1-V2 gene sequencing. Unassigned: We included 48 samples in the SSG ( = 16 horses), 45 in the 5DG ( = 15), and 20 in the CG (for t and t, = 10). Two samples of equine patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis (6.5%) were positive for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales at t, while this rate increased to 67% at t and decreased only slightly at t (61%). Shannon diversity index (SDI) was used to evaluate alpha-diversity changes, revealing there was no significant difference between horses suffering from acute colic (5DG, SDI of 5.90, SSG, SDI of 6.17) when compared to the CG (SDI of 6.53) at t. Alpha-diversity decreased significantly in both PAP groups at t, while at t the onset of microbiome recovery was noticed. Although we did not identify a significant SDI difference with respect to PAP duration, the community structure (beta-diversity) was considerably restricted in samples of the 5DG at t, most likely due to the ongoing administration of antibiotics. An increased abundance of especially , was noted for both study groups at t. Unassigned: Colic surgery and PAP drive the equine gut microbiome towards dysbiosis and reduced biodiversity that is accompanied by an increase of samples positive for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. Further studies are needed to reveal important factors promoting the increase and residency of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales among hospitalized horses.
Copyright © 2023 Kauter, Brombach, Lübke-Becker, Kannapin, Bang, Franzenburg, Stoeckle, Mellmann, Scherff, Köck, Guenther, Wieler, Gehlen, Semmler, Wolf and Walther.
Publication Date: 2023-11-23 PubMed ID: 38075913PubMed Central: PMC10701544DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1228845Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research article investigates how peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis impacts the gut microbiota of horses undergoing median laparotomy, a common surgical procedure for treating acute colic. The research also documents an increase in multidrug-resistant bacteria following the procedure.
Research Methodology
- The researchers collected fecal samples from two groups of horses receiving different peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) treatment plans: one group received a single pre-surgical dose while the other received a 5-day course of the treatment. A third control group made up of non-hospitalized horses was also monitored.
- These samples were collected at hospital admission and on days three and ten post-surgery, then tested for the presence of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, a multidrug-resistant bacterium, and subjected to 16S rRNA V1-V2 gene sequencing to identify the bacterial species present.
- A total of 48 samples from the single shot group (SSG), 45 from the 5-day group (5DG), and 20 from the control group (CG) were included in the study.
Findings
- The results indicated that at the time of surgery, 6.5% of samples from horses receiving PAP treatment were positive for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. This rate dramatically increased to 67% by day three post-surgery and stayed relatively unchanged at day ten.
- The study utilized the Shannon Diversity Index (SDI) to evaluate the diversity of bacterial life within the gut microbiomes of the horses. Initial results did not find a significant variance in the bacteria diversity in the acute colic-affected horses compared to the control group.
- However, SDI significantly decreased in both PAP groups by day three and only began to recover by day ten. Although no significant variance in SDI with respect to PAP duration was found, community structure was notably limited in the 5-day group samples, likely due to the extended antibiotic administration.
- A higher abundance of Escherichia, specifically an ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bacteria, was found in the samples from the two experimental groups.
Conclusion
- The study concludes that colic surgery in conjunction with PAP promotes dysbiosis (a microbial imbalance) in the equine gut, leading to a reduction in microbiome diversity and an increase in multidrug-resistant bacteria.
- More research is necessary to understand the factors that promote the multiplication and persistence of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales among hospitalized horses in order to develop strategies for controlling its spread.
Cite This Article
APA
Kauter A, Brombach J, Lübke-Becker A, Kannapin D, Bang C, Franzenburg S, Stoeckle SD, Mellmann A, Scherff N, Köck R, Guenther S, Wieler LH, Gehlen H, Semmler T, Wolf SA, Walther B.
(2023).
Antibiotic prophylaxis and hospitalization of horses subjected to median laparotomy: gut microbiota trajectories and abundance increase of Escherichia.
Front Microbiol, 14, 1228845.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1228845 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Advanced Light and Electron Microscopy (ZBS4), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
- Center for Infection Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Veterinary Center for Resistance Research (TZR), Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Center for Infection Medicine, Institute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Veterinary Center for Resistance Research (TZR), Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Equine Clinic, Surgery and Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
- Equine Clinic, Surgery and Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Institute of Hygiene, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
- Institute of Hygiene, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
- Institute of Hygiene, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
- Institute of Hygiene, DRK Kliniken Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Pharmaceutical Biology, Institute of Pharmacy, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
- Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
- Equine Clinic, Surgery and Radiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Genome Sequencing and Genomic Epidemiology (MF2), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
- Genome Sequencing and Genomic Epidemiology (MF2), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
- Advanced Light and Electron Microscopy (ZBS4), Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
- Section Microbiological Risks (1.4), Department II Environmental Hygiene, German Environment Agency, Berlin, Germany.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
This article includes 75 references
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists