Analyze Diet

Antimicrobial activity of tulathromycin and 14 other antimicrobials against virulent Rhodococcus equi in vitro.

Abstract: This study determined the antimicrobial activity of tulathromycin against Rhodococcus equi in vitro. Ninety-eight virulent isolates of R. equi from equine clinical cases were examined, of which 20 isolates were macrolide resistant. A custom 96-well antimicrobial susceptibility testing plate was used, allowing 14 additional antimicrobials to be tested against R. equi. Isolates were cultured with various concentrations of antimicrobials, and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined. Tulathromycin was found to have poor activity in vitro against R. equi isolates susceptible or resistant to macrolides, with MIC50 and MIC90 values >64 ug/mL for all isolates. MIC values for other macrolides tested were similar to previously published data.
Publication Date: 2010-10-20 PubMed ID: 20957614
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research discusses the performance of the antibiotic tulathromycin, among others, against the bacterium Rhodococcus equi. The antibiotic was found to perform poorly in laboratory conditions, regardless of whether the bacterial strains were resistant or susceptible to a group of antibiotics known as macrolides.

Study Overview

The study focused on demonstrating the ability of tulathromycin to combat Rhodococcus equi under laboratory conditions. The experiment used:

  • Ninety-eight virulent isolates of the bacterium R. equi, which is often responsible for severe respiratory infections in horses. Twenty of these were already identified as resistant to macrolides, a group of antibiotics including tulathromycin.
  • A custom 96-well antimicrobial susceptibility testing plate was used, with each section receiving different concentrations of antimicrobials.

Methodology and Findings

The researchers cultured the bacterial isolates amidst different concentrations of the antimicrobials. They then used the resulting data to establish the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for each antimicrobial – essentially, the minimum quantity at which the growth of the bacterium was significantly inhibited.

  • The results highlighted that tulathromycin was not very effective against R. equi, with the required concentration (MIC) being more than 64 µg/mL for both macrolide-resistant and susceptible strains. This result refers to the MIC50 and MIC90 values, which are common indicators of the amount of the drug needed to inhibit 50% and 90% of the bacterium growth, respectively.
  • The study also found that the MIC values for other macrolides in the test were consistent with past published data, meaning their results were not outlying or unexpected.

Implications of Results

This study’s findings suggest that tulathromycin may not be as effective as hoped in dealing with R. equi infections, especially considering the high concentration required for it to inhibit bacterial growth. These results could be crucial to the treatment of equine clinical cases caused by R. equi, allowing for the adjustment of strategies including the selection of a more effective antibiotic. The consistency of the results with past data also offers reassurance about the reliability of their findings and methodology.

Cite This Article

APA
Carlson KL, Kuskie KR, Chaffin KM, Libal MC, Giguère S, Lawhon SD, Cohen ND. (2010). Antimicrobial activity of tulathromycin and 14 other antimicrobials against virulent Rhodococcus equi in vitro. Vet Ther, 11(2), E1-E9.

Publication

ISSN: 1528-3593
NlmUniqueID: 100936368
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 2
Pages: E1-E9

Researcher Affiliations

Carlson, Kelly L
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Kuskie, Kyle R
    Chaffin, Keith M
      Libal, Melissa C
        Giguère, Steeve
          Lawhon, Sara D
            Cohen, Noah D

              MeSH Terms

              • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
              • Disaccharides / pharmacology
              • Drug Resistance, Bacterial
              • Heterocyclic Compounds / pharmacology
              • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
              • Rhodococcus equi / drug effects
              • Rhodococcus equi / pathogenicity
              • Virulence

              Citations

              This article has been cited 4 times.
              1. Lord J, Carter C, Smith J, Locke S, Phillips E, Odoi A. Antimicrobial resistance among Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus and Rhodococcus equi isolated from equine specimens submitted to a diagnostic laboratory in Kentucky, USA.. PeerJ 2022;10:e13682.
                doi: 10.7717/peerj.13682pubmed: 36164606google scholar: lookup
              2. Rutenberg D, Venner M, Giguère S. Efficacy of Tulathromycin for the Treatment of Foals with Mild to Moderate Bronchopneumonia.. J Vet Intern Med 2017 May;31(3):901-906.
                doi: 10.1111/jvim.14717pubmed: 28421633google scholar: lookup
              3. Rhodes DM, Magdesian KG, Byrne BA, Kass PH, Edman J, Spier SJ. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of equine Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates (1996-2012).. J Vet Intern Med 2015 Jan;29(1):327-32.
                doi: 10.1111/jvim.12534pubmed: 25586790google scholar: lookup
              4. Berghaus LJ, Giguère S, Guldbech K, Warner E, Ugorji U, Berghaus RD. Comparison of Etest, disk diffusion, and broth macrodilution for in vitro susceptibility testing of Rhodococcus equi.. J Clin Microbiol 2015 Jan;53(1):314-8.
                doi: 10.1128/JCM.02673-14pubmed: 25378571google scholar: lookup