Analyze Diet

Antimicrobial use in critically ill horses.

Abstract: To discuss controversies surrounding antimicrobial use in critically ill horses. Methods: PubMed searches from 1970-present for terms including, but not limited to: "horse," "foal," "antimicrobial," "prophylaxis," "infection," "surgery," "sepsis," and "antimicrobial resistance." Results: Increasing bacterial antimicrobial resistance has changed first-line antimicrobial choices and prompted shortening of the duration of prophylactic and therapeutic treatment. The need to decrease bacterial resistance development to critically important antimicrobials has been highlighted. Results: Veterinary medicine has followed a similar trend but often without a high-level evidence. Common dilemmas include diseases in which the theoretically most effective drug is a reserved antimicrobial, the inability to differentiate infectious from noninfectious disease, the duration and necessity of prophylactic antimicrobials and use of antimicrobials in primary gastrointestinal disease. These problems are illustrated using examples of purulent infections, neonatal sepsis, colic surgery, and treatment of colitis. Although enrofloxacin, cephalosporins, and doxycycline, in contrast to gentamicin, reach therapeutic concentrations within the lungs of healthy horses, the first two should not be used as first line treatment due to their reserved status. Due to the high risk of bacterial sepsis, antimicrobial treatment remains indispensable in compromised neonatal foals but shortening the length of antimicrobial treatment might be prudent. One prospective randomized study demonstrated no difference between 3 and 5 days of perioperative antimicrobial treatment in colic surgery but shorter durations were not evaluated. High-level evidence to recommend antimicrobial treatment of adult horses with undifferentiated diarrhea does not exist. Conclusions: Few evidence-based recommendations can be made. Commonly used antimicrobial combinations remain the mainstay for treating purulent infections. Antimicrobial treatment for compromised foals should not extend beyond recovery. Continuation of prophylactic antimicrobials >3 days is likely unnecessary after colic surgery; shorter durations might be equally effective. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in adult horses with diarrhea is unlikely to be beneficial.
Publication Date: 2015-01-13 PubMed ID: 25582245DOI: 10.1111/vec.12275Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on the issue of antimicrobial use in critically ill horses and the increasing problem of antimicrobial resistance. It evaluates the current practices used in veterinary medicine, highlighting various challenges and suggesting possible adjustments to existing protocols.

Methodology

  • The study was conducted using PubMed searches from the period of 1970-present. The researchers searched with specific terms such as “horse,” “foal,” “antimicrobial,” “prophylaxis,” “infection,” “surgery,” “sepsis” and “antimicrobial resistance” to locate relevant articles.

Findings

  • The results pointed towards the increasing problem of bacterial antimicrobial resistance which has led to a change in first-line antimicrobial choices, and shortening of duration of prophylactic and therapeutic treatment in horses.
  • The veterinary medicine trend appears similar with growing bacterial resistance, but much of it lacks high-level evidence.
  • The study outlines medical dilemmas such as cases where the most effective drug is a reserved antimicrobial or distinguishing infectious from noninfectious diseases, and questions around the duration and necessity of prophylactic antimicrobials and their use in primary gastrointestinal disease.
  • Important examples noted included purulent infections, neonatal sepsis, colic surgery, and treatment of colitis in horses.

Treatment and Recommendations

  • The study indicates that enrofloxacin, cephalosporins, and doxycycline reach therapeutic concentrations within the lungs of healthy horses but should not be used as first-line treatment due to their reserved status.
  • For neonatal foals at high risk of bacterial sepsis, antimicrobial treatment remains essential but the length of treatment should perhaps be reduced.
  • One study suggested no difference between 3 and 5 days of perioperative antimicrobial treatment in colic surgery but shorter durations were not evaluated.
  • No high-level evidence exists to recommend antimicrobial treatment of adult horses with undifferentiated diarrhea.

Conclusions

  • The study concludes there are few conclusive, evidence-based recommendations but commonly used antimicrobial combinations remain vital for treating purulent infections.
  • Antimicrobial treatment for compromised foals should be halted after recovery.
  • Prophylactic antimicrobials are likely not necessary beyond three days after colic surgery and perhaps even shorter durations could be equally effective. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in adult horses with diarrhea is considered unlikely to be beneficial.

Cite This Article

APA
Dunkel B, Johns IC. (2015). Antimicrobial use in critically ill horses. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio), 25(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12275

Publication

ISSN: 1476-4431
NlmUniqueID: 101152804
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 25
Issue: 1
Pages: 89-100

Researcher Affiliations

Dunkel, Bettina
  • Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertforshire, United Kingdom, United Kingdom.
Johns, Imogen C

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Animals, Newborn
    • Anti-Infective Agents / administration & dosage
    • Anti-Infective Agents / adverse effects
    • Anti-Infective Agents / therapeutic use
    • Antibiotic Prophylaxis / veterinary
    • Bacteremia / drug therapy
    • Bacteremia / veterinary
    • Critical Care
    • Critical Illness
    • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
    • Horses
    • Humans
    • Prospective Studies
    • Veterinary Medicine

    Citations

    This article has been cited 5 times.
    1. Gomez DE, Leclere M, Arroyo LG, Li L, John E, Afonso T, Payette F, Darby S. Acute diarrhea in horses: A multicenter Canadian retrospective study (2015 to 2019).. Can Vet J 2022 Oct;63(10):1033-1042.
      pubmed: 36185796
    2. Shnaiderman-Torban A, Navon-Venezia S, Dor Z, Paitan Y, Arielly H, Ahmad WA, Kelmer G, Fulde M, Steinman A. Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Shedding in Farm Horses Versus Hospitalized Horses: Prevalence and Risk Factors.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 11;10(2).
      doi: 10.3390/ani10020282pubmed: 32054111google scholar: lookup
    3. Potier JFN, Durham AE. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from ambulatory practice and from a referral hospital.. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Jan;34(1):300-306.
      doi: 10.1111/jvim.15685pubmed: 31849110google scholar: lookup
    4. Fielding CL. Practical Fluid Therapy and Treatment Modalities for Field Conditions for Horses and Foals with Gastrointestinal Problems.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2018 Apr;34(1):155-168.
      doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2017.11.013pubmed: 29534809google scholar: lookup
    5. Prüller S, Rensch U, Meemken D, Kaspar H, Kopp PA, Klein G, Kehrenberg C. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bordetella bronchiseptica Isolates from Swine and Companion Animals and Detection of Resistance Genes.. PLoS One 2015;10(8):e0135703.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135703pubmed: 26275219google scholar: lookup