Analyze Diet
Journal of animal science1971; 32(2); 245-248; doi: 10.2527/jas1971.322245x

Apparent digestion in various segments of the digestive tract of ponies fed diets with varying roughage-grain ratios.

Abstract: Eleven ponies were fed diets containing 1:0, 3:2 or 1:4 forage-grain ratios for 30 days. Animals were killed 4 hr. after feeding and the entire digestive tracts were removed and segments isolated. Digestion coefficients were calculated for dry matter, protein, available carbohydrate (ACHO) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) by Cr2O3-nutrient ratio for seven segments of the gut. The major site of ACHO and protein digestion was prececal; whereas, the major sites of NDF digestion were the colon and cecum regardless of the hay:grain ratio. Therefore the relative importance of digestion in the lower gut increased with increased levels of forage.
Publication Date: 1971-02-01 PubMed ID: 5543016DOI: 10.2527/jas1971.322245xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examines the effects of different forage-to-grain ratios in the diets of ponies on the digestion process across various segments of their digestive tracts.

Experiment Setup:

  • Sample: 11 ponies participated.
  • Dietary Treatments: The ponies were fed three different diets based on the forage (like hay) to grain ratio:
    • 1:0 – Only forage, no grain.
    • 3:2 – More forage than grain.
    • 1:4 – More grain than forage.
  • Duration: The diets were given for 30 days.
  • End Point: Four hours after their last feeding, the ponies were euthanized, and their digestive tracts were extracted and divided into specific segments for analysis.

Analysis:

  • The efficiency with which the ponies digested different nutrients (dry matter, protein, available carbohydrate [ACHO], and neutral detergent fiber [NDF]) was calculated in seven specific segments of the digestive system.
  • Chromium oxide (Cr2O3) was used as a marker to help in the calculation of these digestion coefficients.

Findings:

  • Available Carbohydrate and Protein Digestion:
    • Most of the digestion for ACHO and protein happened before reaching the cecum, which is the beginning of the large intestine (prececal digestion).
  • Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) Digestion:
    • The primary sites for NDF digestion were the colon and cecum, which are parts of the large intestine.
  • Effect of Forage-Grain Ratio:
    • As the proportion of forage in the diet increased, the importance of digestion in the lower parts of the gut (like the colon and cecum) also increased.

Conclusion:

  • While the digestion of carbohydrates and proteins mainly occurs in the earlier parts of the digestive tract, the digestion of fibers (NDF) predominantly takes place in the large intestine.
  • The more forage (like hay) there is in the diet, the more significant the role of the large intestine in the digestion process.

In simpler terms, the study found that ponies digest most of their carbohydrates and proteins in the early parts of their digestive system. In contrast, they digest fibers mainly in their large intestines, especially when their diet has more hay and less grain.

Cite This Article

APA
Hintz HF, Hogue DE, Walker EF, Lowe JE, Schryver HF. (1971). Apparent digestion in various segments of the digestive tract of ponies fed diets with varying roughage-grain ratios. J Anim Sci, 32(2), 245-248. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1971.322245x

Publication

ISSN: 0021-8812
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 32
Issue: 2
Pages: 245-248

Researcher Affiliations

Hintz, H F
    Hogue, D E
      Walker, E F
        Lowe, J E
          Schryver, H F

            MeSH Terms

            • Animal Feed
            • Animals
            • Cecum / metabolism
            • Colon / metabolism
            • Dietary Carbohydrates / analysis
            • Dietary Carbohydrates / metabolism
            • Dietary Proteins / analysis
            • Dietary Proteins / metabolism
            • Digestion

            Citations

            This article has been cited 7 times.
            1. Muhonen S, Philippeau C, Julliand V. Effects of Differences in Fibre Composition and Maturity of Forage-Based Diets on the Fluid Balance, Water-Holding Capacity and Viscosity in Equine Caecum and Colon Digesta. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 29;12(23).
              doi: 10.3390/ani12233340pubmed: 36496860google scholar: lookup
            2. Zhu Y, Wang X, Deng L, Chen S, Zhu C, Li J. Effects of Pasture Grass, Silage, and Hay Diet on Equine Fecal Microbiota. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 7;11(5).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11051330pubmed: 34066969google scholar: lookup
            3. Zeyner A, Kirchhof S, Susenbeth A, Südekum KH, Kienzle E. A new protein evaluation system for horse feed from literature data. J Nutr Sci 2015;4:e4.
              doi: 10.1017/jns.2014.66pubmed: 26090101google scholar: lookup
            4. Pluznick JL, Caplan MJ. Chemical and Physical Sensors in the Regulation of Renal Function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015 Sep 4;10(9):1626-35.
              doi: 10.2215/CJN.00730114pubmed: 25280495google scholar: lookup
            5. Pluznick J. A novel SCFA receptor, the microbiota, and blood pressure regulation. Gut Microbes 2014 Mar-Apr;5(2):202-7.
              doi: 10.4161/gmic.27492pubmed: 24429443google scholar: lookup
            6. Pluznick JL. Renal and cardiovascular sensory receptors and blood pressure regulation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2013 Aug 15;305(4):F439-44.
              doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00252.2013pubmed: 23761671google scholar: lookup
            7. Kranenburg LC, Bouwmeester BF, van den Boom R. Findings and Prognosis in 149 Horses with Histological Changes Compatible with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Animals (Basel) 2024 May 30;14(11).
              doi: 10.3390/ani14111638pubmed: 38891685google scholar: lookup