Analyze Diet
International journal for parasitology2025; 104755; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2025.11.007

Beneath the surface: gut microbes, cyathostomins and resident immune cells – Characterising the baseline.

Abstract: Cyathostomins are the most prevalent and currently considered the most pathogenic gastrointestinal nematodes in horses. Their life cycle includes an encystment phase within the large intestinal mucosa, where up to 90 % of the total worm burden resides. Clinical disease ranges from chronic protein-losing enteropathy to acute, sometimes fatal, typhlocolitis. Despite their significance, the ecological interplay between cyathostomins, the host immune response, and the gut microbiota remains poorly understood. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate these interactions at the mucosal level. Eleven horses were randomly selected from an abattoir survey. Samples were collected from the caecum, right ventral colon, and left dorsal colon. Parasitological assessments included faecal egg counts, luminal worm enumeration, and mucosal larval counts. Immunological analysis comprised histopathology and immunohistochemistry, while microbiota profiling was performed using bioinformatics. All horses were infected with cyathostomins, including those with zero faecal egg counts. Mucosal larval burdens were highest in the caecum and right ventral colon, while luminal adult worms predominated in the ventral and dorsal colon. T lymphocytes and macrophages were the dominant immune cells in the mucosa; eosinophils and goblet cell hyperplasia showed no correlation with parasite load. Larval invasion of the submucosa was observed only in horses with high mucosal burdens, suggesting density-dependent tissue penetration. Microbiota analysis revealed increasing divergence along the intestinal tract, with caecal and faecal samples showing the greatest differences. These findings highlight regional specialization and suggest that faecal samples may not accurately reflect mucosal microbiota composition. This descriptive study provides novel insights into the spatial dynamics of cyathostomin infection, mucosal immunity, and microbiota composition in the equine large intestine, offering a foundation for future research into equine gastrointestinal health and parasitology.
Publication Date: 2025-12-07 PubMed ID: 41365394DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2025.11.007Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study examines the interactions between cyathostomin parasites, the immune response, and gut microbiota at the mucosal level in horses, revealing important patterns in parasite distribution, immune cell presence, and microbial communities within different regions of the equine large intestine.

Background and Importance

  • Cyathostomins: These are the most common and pathogenic gastrointestinal nematodes in horses.
  • Life cycle and pathology: Cyathostomins undergo an encystment phase within the large intestine’s mucosa, where up to 90% of the parasite burden resides.
  • Clinical effects: Infection severity ranges from chronic protein loss from the gut (protein-losing enteropathy) to acute and sometimes fatal inflammation of the cecum and colon (typhlocolitis).
  • Knowledge gap: The complex interactions between cyathostomins, the equine immune system, and gut microbes at the mucosal level were previously underexplored.

Study Objective and Design

  • Goal: To characterize baseline relationships among cyathostomin infection, mucosal immune cells, and gut microbiota in different large intestinal regions of horses.
  • Sampling: Eleven horses were randomly selected from an abattoir (slaughterhouse) source to represent a broad population.
  • Tissue sampling: Three intestinal sites were analyzed: the caecum, right ventral colon, and left dorsal colon.

Parasitological Assessments

  • Faecal egg counts (FEC): Measured to estimate parasite load; however, some horses with zero FEC were still infected.
  • Worm counts: Included luminal adult worm enumeration and mucosal larval counting.
  • Findings:
    • Mucosal larvae were predominantly located in the caecum and right ventral colon.
    • Luminal adult worms were mainly found in the ventral and dorsal colon regions.
    • High larval burdens were associated with deeper tissue invasion, specifically larval penetration into the submucosa, indicating that tissue invasion is density-dependent.

Immunological Analysis

  • Techniques: Histopathology and immunohistochemistry to characterize immune cells present in the mucosa.
  • Dominant immune cells: T lymphocytes and macrophages were the main immune cells detected in mucosal tissues.
  • Other immune responses: Surprisingly, eosinophil counts and goblet cell hyperplasia (which typically correlate with parasite infections) did not correlate with parasite loads in this study.

Microbiota Profiling

  • Method: Bioinformatics approaches were used to analyze microbial composition and diversity from sampled regions.
  • Regional differences: Microbial communities varied significantly across intestinal locations, with caecal and faecal samples showing the greatest differences.
  • Implications: Faecal samples, commonly used to assess gut microbiota, may not accurately reflect the mucosal microbiota in the large intestine.

Key Findings and Implications

  • All horses were infected with cyathostomins regardless of their faecal egg counts, indicating that FEC alone is not a reliable infection indicator.
  • Parasite burden and location vary regionally within the large intestine: larvae concentrate in some areas while adults prefer others.
  • Tissue invasion by larvae correlates with local parasite density, potentially informing disease severity mechanisms.
  • T lymphocytes and macrophages dominate the mucosal immune environment, pointing to their key role in responding to cyathostomin infections.
  • Traditional markers like eosinophils and goblet cell responses may not be as relevant in all parasite burdens or stages.
  • The composition of microbiota differs along the intestinal tract, highlighting complex spatial dynamics in host-microbe-parasite interactions.
  • Faecal sampling may be insufficient to capture these complex mucosal bacterial communities.

Contribution to the Field

  • This is the first study to characterize the ecological relationships of cyathostomins, immune cells, and microbiota at the mucosal level in the equine large intestine.
  • Provides a foundational understanding of spatial dynamics within the gut, which can aid future research on equine gastrointestinal health and parasitology.
  • Suggests that targeting specific intestinal regions or immune pathways might improve diagnosis or treatment of cyathostomin-related diseases.

Cite This Article

APA
Yerlikaya Z, Miranda-CasoLuengo R, Jahns H, Byrne O, Meijer WG, Mulcahy G, Walshe N. (2025). Beneath the surface: gut microbes, cyathostomins and resident immune cells – Characterising the baseline. Int J Parasitol, 104755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2025.11.007

Publication

ISSN: 1879-0135
NlmUniqueID: 0314024
Country: England
Language: English
Pages: 104755
PII: S0020-7519(25)00225-5

Researcher Affiliations

Yerlikaya, Zeynep
  • UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazığ, Türkiye.
Miranda-CasoLuengo, Raúl
  • UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jahns, Hanne
  • UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Byrne, Orla
  • UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Meijer, Wim G
  • UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Mulcahy, Grace
  • UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Walshe, Nikki
  • UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: Nikki.walshe@ul.ie.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.