FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / Beyond nocardioform: Transcriptionally active microbes and h...
Equine veterinary journal2025; 58(2); 601-618; doi: 10.1111/evj.70112

Beyond nocardioform: Transcriptionally active microbes and host responses in equine mucoid placentitis.

Abstract: Nocardioform placentitis (NP) is an understudied form of equine placentitis historically attributed to nocardioform bacteria, yet it remains uncertain whether these organisms are the sole pathogens involved. Objective: To elucidate the pathophysiology of NP and the host-pathogen interaction. Methods: In vivo clinical multi-omics study. Methods: Dual RNA sequencing was performed to profile transcriptionally active microbial communities and concurrent placental transcriptome responses in samples from 31 placentas with and without NP. Untargeted metabolomics was performed to study the associated metabolites in the placenta. Results: The most abundant microbial transcripts belonged to Amycolatopsis, Crossiella, Lentzea, Enterococcus, and Mycobacterium. Bacterial gene expression in NP-affected placentas was enriched in pathways related to ribosomal activity and metabolic processes involving amino acid, carbohydrate, and glycosphingolipid metabolism. Concurrently, placental transcripts demonstrated significant upregulation of inflammatory pathways and downregulation of pathways associated with blood vessel formation. Untargeted metabolomics highlighted an elevated abundance of metabolites such as beta-D-fucose, nervonic acid, and zymostenol in the placentitis samples. Significant correlations were found between microbial genes (mraW, rlmB, amy, afuA, and cysC) and host inflammation genes (CXCL14, IL15RA, TASL, and IFIH1). Additionally, elevated beta-D-fucose, a microbe-specific metabolite, showed a strong correlation with microbial genes involved in stress-adaptive metabolism and DNA repair (ydhP, ybgC, serC, puuE, and radA). The bacterial enzymes involved in beta-D-fucose were notably upregulated and predominantly expressed by Amycolatopsis and Lentzea. Conclusions: Classification based on RNA abundance limited the number of Crossiella cases (n = 3). Conclusions: Both nocardioform and non-nocardioform bacteria are involved in NP-diagnosed cases, challenging the current generalisation of the term 'nocardioform placentitis' and supporting the need to broaden diagnostic protocols for mucoid placentitis. Multi-omics profiling revealed potential host-microbe interactions mediated by microbial metabolites, offering mechanistic insights and opportunities for improved diagnostic strategies.
© 2025 The Author(s). Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-11-18 PubMed ID: 41255097PubMed Central: PMC12892373DOI: 10.1111/evj.70112Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigates the complex microbial communities and host immune responses in equine nocardioform placentitis (NP), revealing that a broader range of bacteria beyond nocardioform species contributes to this disease.
  • Researchers used advanced multi-omics approaches, including dual RNA sequencing and untargeted metabolomics, to understand microbial gene activity, placental responses, and metabolite changes associated with NP.

Background and Objective

  • Nocardioform placentitis (NP) is a disease affecting the placenta in horses, traditionally thought to be caused by nocardioform bacteria.
  • There is uncertainty whether only nocardioform bacteria cause NP or if other microbes are involved.
  • The study aimed to clarify the pathophysiology of NP, specifically investigating which microbes are active during infection and how the equine placenta responds at the transcriptional and metabolic levels.

Methods

  • Clinical samples were collected from 31 equine placentas, both affected by NP and healthy controls.
  • Dual RNA sequencing (dual RNA-seq) was employed to simultaneously profile:
    • Transcriptionally active microbes (i.e., bacteria actively expressing genes in the placenta), and
    • The host placental transcriptome (gene expression profiles in horse placenta cells).
  • Untargeted metabolomics analysis was conducted to identify and quantify metabolites present in the placental tissue, highlighting biochemical changes associated with infection.

Key Findings: Microbial Communities and Gene Expression

  • Multiple bacteria were transcriptionally active in NP, including:
    • Amycolatopsis
    • Crossiella
    • Lentzea
    • Enterococcus
    • Mycobacterium
  • This indicates involvement beyond just nocardioform bacteria, challenging the traditional classification.
  • Bacterial genes differentially expressed in NP placentas were enriched in functions including:
    • Ribosomal activity — indicating active protein synthesis
    • Metabolic processes involving amino acids, carbohydrates, and glycosphingolipids, suggesting that bacteria are metabolically active and adapting to the placental environment
  • Enzymes linked to beta-D-fucose metabolism were highly expressed particularly in Amycolatopsis and Lentzea, pointing to important microbial metabolic pathways during infection.

Host Placental Responses

  • Placental tissue showed upregulation of genes involved in inflammation:
    • Indicating an active immune response to infection
    • Genes such as CXCL14, IL15RA, TASL, and IFIH1 were correlated with microbial genes, showing close host-microbe interaction
  • There was a downregulation of pathways related to blood vessel formation (angiogenesis), which may contribute to impaired placental function and pathology.

Metabolomics Results

  • Untargeted metabolomics revealed increased abundance of specific metabolites in NP placentas, including:
    • Beta-D-fucose — a sugar metabolite associated with microbial activity
    • Nervonic acid — a fatty acid possibly related to inflammation or cell membrane changes
    • Zymostenol — a sterol intermediate that may reflect altered lipid metabolism
  • Elevated beta-D-fucose was strongly correlated with bacterial genes involved in stress adaptation and DNA repair, suggesting it has a role in bacterial survival and pathogenicity.

Interpretations and Conclusions

  • The study redefines NP as a polymicrobial condition involving both nocardioform and non-nocardioform bacteria rather than exclusively nocardioform pathogens.
  • This challenges the current clinical diagnostic category of ‘nocardioform placentitis’ and suggests that diagnostic protocols should be broadened to detect a wider variety of bacterial species.
  • Integrated multi-omics profiling provided mechanistic insights into how microbial metabolites can mediate host immune responses, potentially informing the development of new diagnostic markers or therapeutic targets.
  • Importantly, the work demonstrates the power of dual RNA sequencing combined with metabolomics to dissect complex host-microbe interactions in infectious diseases.

Implications for Future Research and Veterinary Practice

  • Refined diagnosis: Multi-species involvement suggests that diagnostics need to screen for a broader bacterial spectrum in mucoid placentitis.
  • Potential biomarkers: Microbial metabolites like beta-D-fucose and host inflammation genes could serve as biomarkers for early detection or monitoring disease progression.
  • Therapeutic advances: Understanding metabolic pathways and host responses could lead to more targeted antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory treatments.
  • Further studies are needed to validate findings in larger cohorts and explore the causal roles of specific microbes and metabolites in NP pathogenesis.

Cite This Article

APA
van Heule M, Verstraete M, Norris JK, Graniczkowsa KB, Scoggin KE, Ali HE, Ball BA, De Spiegelaere W, Daels P, Weimer BC, Dini P. (2025). Beyond nocardioform: Transcriptionally active microbes and host responses in equine mucoid placentitis. Equine Vet J, 58(2), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.70112

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 58
Issue: 2
Pages: 601-618

Researcher Affiliations

van Heule, Machteld
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Verstraete, Margo
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Norris, Jamie Kaj
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Graniczkowsa, Kinga Barbara
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Scoggin, Kirsten E
  • Gluck Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Ali, Hossam El-Sheikh
  • Gluck Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
  • Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ball, Barry A
  • Gluck Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
De Spiegelaere, Ward
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Daels, Peter
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Weimer, Bart C
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
  • 100K Pathogen Genome Project, UCDavis, Davis, California, USA.
Dini, Pouya
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Female
  • Pregnancy
  • Placenta Diseases / veterinary
  • Placenta Diseases / microbiology
  • Transcriptome
  • Actinomycetales Infections / veterinary
  • Actinomycetales Infections / microbiology

Grant Funding

  • UC Davis Center for Equine Health
  • Special Research Fund at University of Ghent (BOF)
  • Clay Endowment at UKY
  • John Hughes Endowment at UCDavis
  • Foundation for the Horse
  • Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared no conflicting interests.

References

This article includes 126 references
  1. Donahue JM, Williams NM. Emergent causes of placentitis and abortion. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2000;16:443–456.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30088-3pubmed: 11219342google scholar: lookup
  2. LeBlanc MM. Ascending placentitis in the mare: an update. Reprod Domest Anim 2010;45:28–34.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01633.xpubmed: 20591062google scholar: lookup
  3. Canisso IF, Loux SC, Lima FS. Biomarkers for placental disease in mares. Theriogenology 2020;150:302–307.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.073pubmed: 32088026google scholar: lookup
  4. Troedsson MHT, Miller LMJ. Equine placentitis. Pferdeheilkunde 2016;32:49–53.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20160109google scholar: lookup
  5. Cummins C, Carrington S, Fitzpatrick E, Duggan V. Ascending placentitis in the mare: a review. Irish Vet J 2008;61:307–313.
    doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-61-5-307pmc: PMC3113861pubmed: 21851713google scholar: lookup
  6. Canisso IF, Ball BA, Erol E, Squires EL, Troedsson MHT. Comprehensive review on equine placentitis. Proceedings of the 61st annual convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Lexington, KY: AAEP; 2015. p. 490–509.
  7. Barr BS. The outcome of foals born to mares treated for placentitis. Havemeyer foundation monograph series no. 19: Proceedings of a workshop on uterine infection in mares and women: a comparative study II New York, NY: Havemeyer Foundation; 2005. p. 49–50.
  8. Govaere J, Roels K, Ververs C, VandeVelde M, De Lange V, Gerits I. Ascending placentitis in the mare. Vlaams Diergeneeskd Tijdschr 2018;87:115–126.
    doi: 10.21825/vdt.v87i3.16074google scholar: lookup
  9. Erol E, Sells SF, Williams NM, Kennedy L, Locke SJ, Labeda DP. An investigation of a recent outbreak of nocardioform placentitis caused abortions in horses. Vet Microbiol 2012;158:425–430.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.02.023pubmed: 22410309google scholar: lookup
  10. Ball B, Loux SC, Dini P, Ali HE. Genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics of normal and abnormal equine placenta: better understanding of late pregnancy function and dysfunction. Clin Theriogenol 2020;12:333–339.
  11. Fedorka CE, Scoggin KE, Ruby RE, Erol E, Ball BA. Clinical, pathologic, and epidemiologic features of nocardioform placentitis in the mare. Theriogenology 2021;171:155–161.
    doi: 10.1016/J.THERIOGENOLOGY.2021.05.023pubmed: 34058508google scholar: lookup
  12. Elsheikh HA, Ball BA, Fedorka C, Scoggin KE, Schnobrich M, Erol E. Nocardioform placentitis: a continuing question. Vol 67 Lexington, KY: American Association of Equine Practitioners; 2021. p. 308–318.
  13. Stonehouse O, Stefanovski D, Bowman B, Sertich PL, Demchur J, Lewis GM. Nocardioform placentitis in a sample population of mares foaling in southeastern Pennsylvania and northeastern Maryland in 2020. Theriogenology 2022;192:52–61.
    doi: 10.1016/J.THERIOGENOLOGY.2022.08.002pubmed: 36049382google scholar: lookup
  14. van Heule M, El‐Sheikh Ali H, Monteiro HF, Scoggin K, Fedorka C, Weimer BC. Characterization of the equine placental microbial population during nocardioform placentitis. Theriogenology 2024;225:172–179.
    doi: 10.1016/J.THERIOGENOLOGY.2024.05.025pubmed: 38810343google scholar: lookup
  15. Canisso IF, Ball BA, Erol E, Claes A, Scoggin KE, McDowell KJ. Attempts to induce nocardioform placentitis () experimentally in mares. Equine Vet J 2015;47:91–95.
    doi: 10.1111/EVJ.12249pubmed: 24612109google scholar: lookup
  16. van Heule M, Monteiro HF, Bazzazan A, Scoggin K, Rolston M, El‐Sheikh Ali H. Characterization of the equine placental microbial population in healthy pregnancies. Theriogenology 2023;206:60–70.
    doi: 10.1016/J.THERIOGENOLOGY.2023.04.022pubmed: 37187056google scholar: lookup
  17. Briana DD, Papaevangelou V, Malamitsi‐Puchner A. The jury is still out on the existence of a placental microbiome. Acta Paediatr 2021;110:2958–2963.
    doi: 10.1111/APA.16048pubmed: 34319607google scholar: lookup
  18. Sterpu I, Fransson E, Hugerth LW, Du J, Pereira M, Cheng L. No evidence for a placental microbiome in human pregnancies at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;224:296.e1–296.e23.
    doi: 10.1016/J.AJOG.2020.08.103pubmed: 32871131google scholar: lookup
  19. Theis KR, Romero R, Winters AD, Greenberg JM, Gomez‐Lopez N, Alhousseini A. Does the human placenta delivered at term have a microbiota? Results of cultivation, quantitative real‐time PCR, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and metagenomics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;220:267.
    doi: 10.1016/J.AJOG.2018.10.018pmc: PMC6733039pubmed: 30832984google scholar: lookup
  20. Willyard C. Could baby's first bacteria take root before birth?. Nature 2018;553:264–266.
    doi: 10.1038/D41586-018-00664-8pubmed: 29345664google scholar: lookup
  21. Kliman HJ. Comment on ‘The placenta harbors a unique microbiome’. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:254.
    doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009864pubmed: 25232175google scholar: lookup
  22. Kuperman AA, Zimmerman A, Hamadia S, Ziv O, Gurevich V, Fichtman B. Deep microbial analysis of multiple placentas shows no evidence for a placental microbiome. BJOG 2020;127:159–169.
    doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15896pubmed: 31376240google scholar: lookup
  23. Dudley DJ. The placental microbiome: yea, nay or maybe?. BJOG 2020;127:170.
    doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15994pubmed: 31628695google scholar: lookup
  24. Leiby JS, McCormick K, Sherrill‐Mix S, Clarke EL, Kessler LR, Taylor LJ. Lack of detection of a human placenta microbiome in samples from preterm and term deliveries. Microbiome 2018;6:196.
    doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0575-4pmc: PMC6208038pubmed: 30376898google scholar: lookup
  25. Joseph S, Carda‐Diéguez M, Aduse‐Opoku J, Alsam A, Mira A, Curtis MA. The murine oral metatranscriptome reveals microbial and host signatures of periodontal disease. J Dent Res 2023;102:565–573.
    doi: 10.1177/00220345221149675/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_00220345221149675-FIG5.JPEGpmc: PMC10152569pubmed: 36883648google scholar: lookup
  26. Raita Y, Pérez‐Losada M, Freishtat RJ, Hahn A, Castro‐Nallar E, Ramos‐Tapia I. Nasopharyngeal metatranscriptome profiles of infants with bronchiolitis and risk of childhood asthma: a multicentre prospective study. Eur Respir J 2022;60:2102293.
    doi: 10.1183/13993003.02293-2021pmc: PMC9206513pubmed: 34916264google scholar: lookup
  27. Westermann AJ, Barquist L, Vogel J. Resolving host–pathogen interactions by dual RNA‐seq. PLoS Pathog 2017;13:1–19.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006033pmc: PMC5313147pubmed: 28207848google scholar: lookup
  28. Westermann AJ, Förstner KU, Amman F, Barquist L, Chao Y, Schulte LN. Dual RNA‐seq unveils noncoding RNA functions in host–pathogen interactions. Nature 2016;529:496–501.
    doi: 10.1038/nature16547pubmed: 26789254google scholar: lookup
  29. Wolf T, Kämmer P, Brunke S, Linde J. Two's company: studying interspecies relationships with dual RNA‐seq. Curr Opin Microbiol 2018;42:7–12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.09.001pubmed: 28957710google scholar: lookup
  30. Westermann AJ, Gorski SA, Vogel J. Dual RNA‐seq of pathogen and host. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012;10:618–630.
    doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2852pubmed: 22890146google scholar: lookup
  31. Knight R, Vrbanac A, Taylor BC, Aksenov A, Callewaert C, Debelius J. Best practices for analysing microbiomes. Nat Rev Microbiol 2018;16:410–422.
    doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0029-9pubmed: 29795328google scholar: lookup
  32. Bashiardes S, Zilberman‐Schapira G, Elinav E. Use of metatranscriptomics in microbiome research. Bioinform Biol Insights 2016;10: 19–25.
    doi: 10.4137/BBi.s34610pmc: PMC4839964pubmed: 27127406google scholar: lookup
  33. Mukherjee A, Reddy MS. Metatranscriptomics: an approach for retrieving novel eukaryotic genes from polluted and related environments. 3 Biotech 2020;10.
    doi: 10.1007/S13205-020-2057-1pmc: PMC6985312pubmed: 32030340google scholar: lookup
  34. Aguiar‐Pulido V, Huang W, Suarez‐Ulloa V, Cickovski T, Mathee K, Narasimhan G. Metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metabolomics approaches for microbiome analysis. Evol Bioinform 2016;12:5–16.
    doi: 10.4137/EBO.S36436pmc: PMC4869604pubmed: 27199545google scholar: lookup
  35. Bi Y, Tu Y, Zhang N, Wang S, Zhang F, Suen G. Multiomics analysis reveals the presence of a microbiome in the gut of fetal lambs. Gut 2021;70:853–864.
    doi: 10.1136/GUTJNL-2020-320951pmc: PMC8040156pubmed: 33589511google scholar: lookup
  36. Di Carlo P, Serra N, Alduina R, Guarino R, Craxì A, Giammanco A. A systematic review on omics data (metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metabolomics) in the role of microbiome in gallbladder disease. Front Physiol 2022;13:888233.
    doi: 10.3389/FPHYS.2022.888233/BIBTEXpmc: PMC9468903pubmed: 36111147google scholar: lookup
  37. El‐Sheikh Ali H, Loux SC, Kennedy L, Scoggin KE, Dini P, Fedorka CE. Transcriptomic analysis of equine chorioallantois reveals immune networks and molecular mechanisms involved in nocardioform placentitis. Vet Res 2021;52:103.
    doi: 10.1186/S13567-021-00972-4pmc: PMC8268225pubmed: 34238364google scholar: lookup
  38. Ball BA, Loux SC, Kennedy L, Kalbfleisch TS, Scoggin KE, Esteller‐Vico A. Transcriptomic analysis of the chorioallantois from mares with nocardioform placentitis. J Equine Vet Sci 2018;66:231.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.05.118google scholar: lookup
  39. El‐Sheikh Ali H, Dini P, Scoggin K, Loux S, Fedorka C, Boakari Y. Transcriptomic analysis of equine placenta reveals key regulators and pathways involved in ascending placentitis. Biol Reprod 2021;104:638–656.
    doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaa209pubmed: 33345276google scholar: lookup
  40. Marsh JW, Humphrys MS, Myers GSA. A laboratory methodology for dual RNA‐sequencing of bacteria and their host cells in vitro. Front Microbiol 2017;8:1830.
    doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2017.01830pmc: PMC5613115pubmed: 28983295google scholar: lookup
  41. Salter SJ, Cox MJ, Turek EM, Calus ST, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence‐based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol 2014;12:1–12.
    doi: 10.1186/s12915-014-0087-zpmc: PMC4228153pubmed: 25387460google scholar: lookup
  42. Eisenhofer R, Minich JJ, Marotz C, Cooper A, Knight R, Weyrich LS. Contamination in low microbial biomass microbiome studies: issues and recommendations. Trends Microbiol 2019;27:105–117.
    doi: 10.1016/J.TIM.2018.11.003pubmed: 30497919google scholar: lookup
  43. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114–2120.
    doi: 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTU170pmc: PMC4103590pubmed: 24695404google scholar: lookup
  44. Dobin A, Gingeras TR, Spring C, Flores R, Sampson J, Knight R. Mapping RNA‐seq with STAR. Curr Protoc Bioinform 2016;51:11.14.1–11.14.19.
    doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1114s51pmc: PMC4631051pubmed: 26334920google scholar: lookup
  45. Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol 2019;20:1–13.
    doi: 10.1186/S13059-019-1891-0pmc: PMC6883579pubmed: 31779668google scholar: lookup
  46. Pierce NT, Reiter T, Brooks P, Brown TC. Large‐scale sequence comparisons with sourmash. F1000Res 2019;8.
    doi: 10.1101/687285pmc: PMC6720031pubmed: 31508216google scholar: lookup
  47. Bokulich NA, Robeson MS. Bioinformatics challenges for profiling the microbiome in cancer: pitfalls and opportunities. Trends Microbiol 2024;32:1163–1166.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2024.08.011pubmed: 39271424google scholar: lookup
  48. Kalbfleisch TS, Rice ES, DePriest MS, Walenz BP, Hestand MS, Vermeesch JR. Improved reference genome for the domestic horse increases assembly contiguity and composition. Commun Biol 2018;1:197–204.
    doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0199-zpmc: PMC6240028pubmed: 30456315google scholar: lookup
  49. Janečka JE, Davis BW, Ghosh S, Paria N, Das PJ, Orlando L. Horse Y chromosome assembly displays unique evolutionary features and putative stallion fertility genes. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):1–15.
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05290-6pmc: PMC6063916pubmed: 30054462google scholar: lookup
  50. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 2013;8:e61217.
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0061217pmc: PMC3632530pubmed: 23630581google scholar: lookup
  51. Oksanen J, Simpson GL, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR. vegan: community ecology package. 2022.
  52. Lahti L, Shetty S. microbiome R package. n.d..
  53. Liu Y‐X, Wen T, Chen T. amplicon: Statistics and visualization for microbiome data. 2023.
  54. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA‐seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15:1–21.
    doi: 10.1186/S13059-014-0550-8pmc: PMC4302049pubmed: 25516281google scholar: lookup
  55. Hagey JV, Bhatnagar S, Heguy JM, Karle BM, Price PL, Meyer D. Fecal microbial communities in a large representative cohort of California dairy cows. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1093.
    doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2019.01093pmc: PMC6532609pubmed: 31156599google scholar: lookup
  56. Martinez AP. pairwiseAdonis: pairwise multilevel comparison using adonis. R package version 0.4. 2020.
  57. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer‐Verlag; 2016.
  58. Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K, Vaughan D. dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. 2023.
  59. Neuwirth E. RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer palettes. 2022.
  60. Sarkar D. Lattice: multivariate data visualization with R. New York: Springer; 2008.
  61. Beghini F, McIver LJ, Blanco‐Míguez A, Dubois L, Asnicar F, Maharjan S. Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain‐level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. Elife 2021;10.
    doi: 10.7554/ELIFE.65088pmc: PMC8096432pubmed: 33944776google scholar: lookup
  62. Mallick H, Rahnavard A, McIver LJ, Ma S, Zhang Y, Nguyen LH. Multivariable association discovery in population‐scale meta‐omics studies. PLoS Comput Biol 2021;17.
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1009442pmc: PMC8714082pubmed: 34784344google scholar: lookup
  63. Yu G, Wang LG, Yan GR, He QY. DOSE: an R/Bioconductor package for disease ontology semantic and enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics 2015;31:608–609.
    doi: 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTU684pubmed: 25677125google scholar: lookup
  64. Luo W, Brouwer C. Pathview: an R/Bioconductor package for pathway‐based data integration and visualization. Bioinformatics 2013;29:1830–1831.
    doi: 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTT285pmc: PMC3702256pubmed: 23740750google scholar: lookup
  65. Xu S, Hu E, Cai Y, Xie Z, Luo X, Zhan L. Using clusterProfiler to characterize multiomics data. Nat Protoc 2024;2024:1–29.
    doi: 10.1038/s41596-024-01020-zpubmed: 39019974google scholar: lookup
  66. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014;30:923–930.
    doi: 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTT656pubmed: 24227677google scholar: lookup
  67. Durinck S, Moreau Y, Kasprzyk A, Davis S, De Moor B, Brazma A. BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics 2005;21:3439–3440.
    doi: 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTI525pubmed: 16082012google scholar: lookup
  68. Zhang W, Liu Z, Luo L, Xu L, Ma Q, Huang S. GC‐MS‐ and LC‐TOF‐MS/MS‐based ginger volatile oil serum analysis and the potential mechanism of the anticancer effect of serum component citral on MCF‐7 breast cancer cells. J Pharm Pharmacol 2025;77:532–549.
    doi: 10.1093/JPP/RGAE116pubmed: 39589181google scholar: lookup
  69. Fu J, Gong Z, Bae S. Assessment of the effect of methyl‐triclosan and its mixture with triclosan on developing zebrafish () embryos using mass spectrometry‐based metabolomics. J Hazard Mater 2019;368:186–196.
    doi: 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2019.01.019pubmed: 30677650google scholar: lookup
  70. Fiehn O, Wohlgemuth G, Scholz M, Kind T, Lee DY, Lu Y. Quality control for plant metabolomics: reporting MSI‐compliant studies. Plant J 2008;53:691–704.
    doi: 10.1111/J.1365-313X.2007.03387.Xpubmed: 18269577google scholar: lookup
  71. . Picard toolkit. 2019.
  72. Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, Lê Cao KA. mixOmics: an R package for omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput Biol 2017;13:e1005752.
    doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PCBI.1005752pmc: PMC5687754pubmed: 29099853google scholar: lookup
  73. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform 2008;9:1–13.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559pmc: PMC2631488pubmed: 19114008google scholar: lookup
  74. Krupa A, Krupa MM, Pawlak K. Kynurenine pathway—an underestimated factor modulating innate immunity in sepsis‐induced acute kidney injury?. Cells 2022;11:2604.
    doi: 10.3390/cells11162604pmc: PMC9406744pubmed: 36010680google scholar: lookup
  75. Eller SK, Däubener W. Chapter 14: role of kynurenine pathway in infections. In: Mittal S, editor. Targeting the broadly pathogenic kynurenine pathway. Cham: Springer; 2015.
  76. Mándi Y, Stone TW, Guillemin GJ, Vécsei L, Williams RO. Editorial: multiple implications of the kynurenine pathway in inflammatory diseases: diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Front Immunol 2022;13:860867.
    doi: 10.3389/FIMMU.2022.860867pmc: PMC8892578pubmed: 35251052google scholar: lookup
  77. Jiao L, Liu Y, Yu XY, Pan X, Zhang Y, Tu J. Ribosome biogenesis in disease: new players and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023;8:1–22.
    doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01285-4pmc: PMC9826790pubmed: 36617563google scholar: lookup
  78. Wagner R. The regulation of ribosomal RNA synthesis and bacterial cell growth. Arch Microbiol 1994;161:100–109.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00276469/METRICSpubmed: 7511368google scholar: lookup
  79. Lindahl L, Zengel JM. Expression of ribosomal genes in bacteria. Adv Genet 1982;21:53–121.
    doi: 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60297-7pubmed: 7036693google scholar: lookup
  80. Oppermann S, Seng K, Shweich L, Friedrich T. The gene order in the nuo‐operon is not essential for the assembly of complex I. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) – Bioenerg 2022;1863:148592.
    doi: 10.1016/J.BBABIO.2022.148592pubmed: 35863511google scholar: lookup
  81. Aljghami ME, Barghash MM, Majaesic E, Bhandari V, Houry WA. Cellular functions of the ClpP protease impacting bacterial virulence.. Front Mol Biosci 2022;9:1054408.
    doi: 10.3389/FMOLB.2022.1054408/BIBTEXpmc: PMC9753991pubmed: 36533084google scholar: lookup
  82. Sun D, Liu Y, Peng X, Dong H, Jiang H, Fan X. ClpP protease modulates bacterial growth, stress response, and bacterial virulence in. Vet Res 2023;54:68.
    doi: 10.1186/s13567-023-01200-xpmc: PMC10464072pubmed: 37612737google scholar: lookup
  83. Ibrahim YM, Kerr AR, Silva NA, Mitchell TJ. Contribution of the ATP‐dependent protease ClpCP to the autolysis and virulence of. Infect Immun 2005;73:730.
    doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.2.730-740.2005pmc: PMC546992pubmed: 15664911google scholar: lookup
  84. Luong TT, Sau K, Roux C, Sau S, Dunman PM, Lee CY. ClpC divergently regulates capsule via sae and codY in strain newman but activates capsule via codY in strain UAMS‐1 and in strain Newman with repaired saeS.. J Bacteriol 2011;193:686–694.
    doi: 10.1128/JB.00987-10pmc: PMC3021213pubmed: 21131496google scholar: lookup
  85. Ripio M-T, Vazquez-Boland J-A, Vega Y, Nair S, Berche P. Evidence for expressional crosstalk between the central virulence regulator PrfA and the stress response mediator ClpC in. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1998;158:45–50.
    doi: 10.1111/J.1574-6968.1998.TB12798.Xpubmed: 9453154google scholar: lookup
  86. Cummings HS, Sands JF, Foreman PC, Fraser J, Hershey JWB. Structure and expression of the infA operon encoding translational initiation factor IF1. Transcriptional control by growth rate.. J Biol Chem 1991;266:16491–16498.
    doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55327-8pubmed: 1909328google scholar: lookup
  87. Cheng-Guang H, Gualerzi CO. The ribosome as a switchboard for bacterial stress response.. Front Microbiol 2021;11:619038.
    doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2020.619038pmc: PMC7873864pubmed: 33584583google scholar: lookup
  88. Arabyan N, Park D, Foutouhi S, Weis AM, Huang BC, Williams CC. Salmonella degrades the host glycocalyx leading to altered infection and glycan remodeling.. Sci Rep 2016;6:29525.
    doi: 10.1038/SREP29525pmc: PMC4937416pubmed: 27389966google scholar: lookup
  89. Litwin CM, Calderwood SB. Role of iron in regulation of virulence genes.. Clin Microbiol Rev 1993;6:137–149.
    doi: 10.1128/CMR.6.2.137pmc: PMC358274pubmed: 8472246google scholar: lookup
  90. Frey J, Chang C-F, Chang Y-F. Identification of a locus involved in the utilization of iron by. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1996;143:6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08452.xpubmed: 8807793google scholar: lookup
  91. Ingham A, Zhang Y, Prideaux C. Attenuation of by inactivation of aroQ.. Vet Microbiol 2002;84:263–273.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00465-5pubmed: 11731178google scholar: lookup
  92. Parish T, Stoker NG. The common aromatic amino acid biosynthesis pathway is essential in. Microbiology (N Y) 2002;148:3069–3077.
    doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-10-3069/CITE/REFWORKSpubmed: 12368440google scholar: lookup
  93. Kim SK, Reddy SK, Nelson BC, Vasquez GB, Davis A, Howard AJ. Biochemical and structural characterization of the secreted chorismate mutase (Rv1885c) from H37Rv: an *AroQ enzyme not regulated by the aromatic amino acids.. J Bacteriol 2006;188:8638–8648.
    doi: 10.1128/JB.00441-06/ASSET/C3DBC202-A759-4A5E-B517-AB848DA6A7E8/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ZJB0200661300008.JPEGpmc: PMC1698256pubmed: 17146044google scholar: lookup
  94. Panina EM, Vitreschak AG, Mironov AA, Gelfand MS. Regulation of biosynthesis and transport of aromatic amino acids in low‐GC gram‐positive bacteria.. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2003;222:211–220.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00303-3pubmed: 12770710google scholar: lookup
  95. Nishio Y, Nakamura Y, Usuda Y, Sugimoto S, Matsui K, Kawarabayasi Y. Evolutionary process of amino acid biosynthesis in at the whole genome level.. Mol Biol Evol 2004;21:1683–1691.
    doi: 10.1093/MOLBEV/MSH175pubmed: 15163767google scholar: lookup
  96. Michel G, Sauvé V, Larocque R, Li Y, Matte A, Cygler M. The structure of the RlmB 23S rRNA methyltransferase reveals a new methyltransferase fold with a unique knot.. Structure 2002;10:1303–1315.
    doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00852-3pubmed: 12377117google scholar: lookup
  97. Kyuma T, Kimura S, Hanada Y, Suzuki T, Sekimizu K, Kaito C. Ribosomal RNA methyltransferases contribute to Staphylococcus aureus virulence.. FEBS J 2015;282:2570–2584.
    doi: 10.1111/FEBS.13302pubmed: 25893373google scholar: lookup
  98. Xu X, Zhang H, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Wu C, Gao P. Beyond a ribosomal RNA methyltransferase, the wider role of MraW in DNA methylation, motility and colonization in O157:H7.. Front Microbiol 2019;10:2520.
    doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2019.02520/FULLpmc: PMC6863780pubmed: 31798540google scholar: lookup
  99. Terluk MR, Tieu J, Sahasrabudhe SA, Moser A, Watkins PA, Raymond GV. Nervonic acid attenuates accumulation of very long‐chain fatty acids and is a potential therapy for adrenoleukodystrophy.. Neurotherapeutics 2022;19:1007–1017.
    doi: 10.1007/S13311-022-01226-7pmc: PMC9294126pubmed: 35378685google scholar: lookup
  100. Kunst C, Elger T, Loibl J, Huss M, Kandulski A, Krautbauer S. Fecal nervonic acid as a biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring inflammatory bowel disease.. Biomedicine 2024;12:2764.
    doi: 10.3390/BIOMEDICINES12122764/S1pmc: PMC11673069pubmed: 39767671google scholar: lookup
  101. Zeng X, Fan X, Yu H, Cai S, Zhou L, Wu H. Nervonic acid triggered ovarian inflammation by inducing mitochondrial oxidative stress to activate NLRP3/ IL‐1β pathway.. J Adv Res 2024;73:73–91.
    doi: 10.1016/J.JARE.2024.08.028pmc: PMC12225940pubmed: 39181200google scholar: lookup
  102. Khadke SK, Lee JH, Kim YG, Raj V, Lee J. Assessment of antibiofilm potencies of nervonic and oleic acid against using in vitro and computational approaches.. Biomedicine 2021;9:1133.
    doi: 10.3390/BIOMEDICINES9091133/S1pmc: PMC8466663pubmed: 34572317google scholar: lookup
  103. Challagundla N, Phadnis D, Gupta A, Agrawal-Rajput R. Host lipid manipulation by intracellular bacteria: moonlighting for immune evasion.. J Membr Biol 2023;256:393–411.
    doi: 10.1007/S00232-023-00296-8pubmed: 37938349google scholar: lookup
  104. Tall AR, Yvan-Charvet L. Cholesterol, inflammation and innate immunity.. Nat Rev Immunol 2015;15:104–116.
    doi: 10.1038/nri3793pmc: PMC4669071pubmed: 25614320google scholar: lookup
  105. Yang C, Mcdonald JG, Patel A, Zhang Y, Umetani M, Westover EJ. Sterol intermediates from cholesterol biosynthetic pathway as liver X receptor ligands.. J Biol Chem 2006;281(38):27816–27826.
    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603781200pubmed: 16857673google scholar: lookup
  106. Toledo A, Benach JL. Hijacking and use of host lipids by intracellular pathogens.. Microbiol Spectr 2015;3:1–37.
    doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0001-2014pmc: PMC5790186pubmed: 27337282google scholar: lookup
  107. Olivier I, Loots DT. A comparison of two extraction methods for differentiating and characterising various species and using GC‐MS metabolomics.. Afr J Microbiol Res 2012;6:3159–3172.
    doi: 10.5897/AJMR11.1269google scholar: lookup
  108. Brennan P, Nikaido H. The envelope of mycobacteria.. Annu Rev Biochem 1996;64:29–63.
    pubmed: 7574484
  109. Ko E, Katz S, Mraz M. COVID‐19 and cholesterol biosynthesis: towards innovative decision support systems.. iScience 2023;26(10):107799.
    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107799pmc: PMC10502404pubmed: 37720097google scholar: lookup
  110. Leuenberger L, Tallman KA, Kim H-YH, Schott E, Cochran SJ, Fessler MB. Differences in sterol metabolites in survivors of COVID‐19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023;207:A6290.
    doi: 10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2023.207.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A6290google scholar: lookup
  111. Yassin AF, Rainey FA, Brzezinka H, Jahnke K-D, Weissbrodt H, Budzikiewicz H. gen. nov., a new genus of the order actinomycetales.. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995;45:357–363.
    pubmed: 7537071
  112. Sun X, Zhao J, Luo X, Hou W, Xiang W, Song J. sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from soil.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021;71:1–7.
    doi: 10.1099/IJSEM.0.004661pubmed: 33502301google scholar: lookup
  113. Huang J, Huang Y. sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium with antimicrobial activity isolated from soil of the Qinghai–Tibet plateau.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021;71:004976.
    doi: 10.1099/IJSEM.0.004976pubmed: 34427551google scholar: lookup
  114. Rammali S, Ciobică A, El Aalaoui M, Rahim A, Kamal FZ, Dari K. Exploring the antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of strain E25‐2 isolated from Moroccan forest soil.. Front Microbiol 2024;15:1429035.
    doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2024.1429035/BIBTEXpmc: PMC11298423pubmed: 39104582google scholar: lookup
  115. Labeda DP, Donahue JM, Sells SF, Kroppenstedt RM. sp. nov., of equine origin.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007;57:1780–1783.
    doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64245-0pubmed: 17684256google scholar: lookup
  116. Qin X, Dong R, He S, Zhou X, Zhang Z, Cui Y. Characterization of the role of ybgC in lysozyme resistance of. Food Control 2020;109:106732.
    doi: 10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2019.106732google scholar: lookup
  117. Zhuang Z, Song F, Martin BM, Dunaway-Mariano D. The YbgC protein encoded by the ybgC gene of the tol‐pal gene cluster of catalyzes acyl‐coenzyme A thioester hydrolysis.. FEBS Lett 2002;516:161–163.
    doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02533-4pubmed: 11959124google scholar: lookup
  118. Rodrigues F, Sarkar-Tyson M, Harding SV, Siew HS, Hui HC, Chi HL. Global map of growth‐regulated gene expression in , the causative agent of melioidosis.. J Bacteriol 2006;188:8178–8188.
    doi: 10.1128/JB.01006-06/ASSET/D210C7DB-5C76-4522-BE2B-6A68ADCBB4ED/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ZJB0230662720003.JPEGpmc: PMC1698202pubmed: 16997946google scholar: lookup
  119. Marie L, Rapisarda C, Morales V, Bergé M, Perry T, Soulet AL. Bacterial RadA is a DnaB‐type helicase interacting with RecA to promote bidirectional D‐loop extension.. Nat Commun 2017;8(1):1–14.
    doi: 10.1038/ncomms15638pmc: PMC5512693pubmed: 28561029google scholar: lookup
  120. Inoue M, Fukui K, Fujii Y, Nakagawa N, Yano T, Kuramitsu S. The Lon protease‐like domain in the bacterial RecA paralog RadA is required for DNA binding and repair.. J Biol Chem 2017;292:9801–9814.
    doi: 10.1074/JBC.M116.770180pmc: PMC5465501pubmed: 28432121google scholar: lookup
  121. Kurihara S, Kato K, Asada K, Kumagai H, Suzuki H. A putrescine‐inducible pathway comprising PuuE‐YneI in which‐aminobutyrate is degraded into succinate in K‐12.. J Bacteriol 2010;192:4582–4591.
    doi: 10.1128/JB.00308-10pmc: PMC2937417pubmed: 20639325google scholar: lookup
  122. Stadthagen G, Korduláková J, Griffin R, Constant P, Bottová I, Barilone N. p‐Hydroxybenzoic acid synthesis in mycobacterium tuberculosis.. J Biol Chem 2005;280:40699–40706.
    doi: 10.1074/JBC.M508332200pubmed: 16210318google scholar: lookup
  123. Wang M, Zeng J, Zhu Y, Chen X, Guo Q, Tan H. A 4‐hydroxybenzoic acid‐mediated signaling system controls the physiology and virulence of. Microbiol Spectr 2023;11:e0483522.
    doi: 10.1128/SPECTRUM.04835-22/SUPPL_FILE/REVIEWER-COMMENTS.PDFpmc: PMC10269604pubmed: 37036340google scholar: lookup
  124. Mistou MY, Sutcliffe IC, Van Sorge NM. Bacterial glycobiology: rhamnose‐containing cell wall polysaccharides in gram‐positive bacteria.. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2016;40:464–479.
    doi: 10.1093/FEMSRE/FUW006pmc: PMC4931226pubmed: 26975195google scholar: lookup
  125. Mäki M, Renkonen R. Biosynthesis of 6‐deoxyhexose glycans in bacteria.. Glycobiology 2004;14:1R–15R.
    doi: 10.1093/GLYCOB/CWH040pubmed: 14693916google scholar: lookup
  126. . Ligand view of beta‐D‐fucose (2644 – SHZGCJCMOBCMKK‐FPRJBGLDSA‐N).. .

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,002 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.