Characterization of the major antigens of Haemophilus equigenitalis (contagious equine metritis organism).
Abstract: Immunoelectrophoresis of ultrasonically disrupted Haemophilus equigenitalis (contagious equine metritis organism) cells against rabbit and equine antisera disclosed at least 11 precipitating antigens. Two of these, a polysaccharide and a lipopolysaccharide-protein complex, were of high molecular weight and located on the cell surface. The remaining antigens were intracellular and were small- to medium-sized proteins. The surface antigens were the most significant in relation to the serological response in infected horses. They also reacted with sera from apparently healthy cattle, but the reason for this was not determined. No serological cross-reaction between H. equigenitalis and species of Achromobacter and Moraxella was detected.
Publication Date: 1982-12-01 PubMed ID: 7153516PubMed Central: PMC2134243DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400071102Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The study explores the main antigens of Haemophilus equigenitalis, a bacteria causing contagious equine metritis in horses, identifying 11 different antigens, two of them being significant for the serological response in horses.
Research Methods
- The team used immunoelectrophoresis to analyze ultrasonically disrupted Haemophilus equigenitalis cells against rabbit and equine antisera.
- The technique helped to reveal 11 precipitating antigens in the bacteria, inclusive of a polysaccharide and a lipopolysaccharide-protein complex.
- Importantly, the two mentioned compounds were of high molecular weight and were located on the cell surface of the bacteria.
- Smaller intracellular antigens were also identified, primarily comprised of protein.
Findings & Interpretation
- The study found that the surface antigens, i.e., the polysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide-protein complex, were significant in forming the serological response in infected horses. In simple terms, the immune response displayed by horses infected with the bacteria was significantly associated with these surface antigens.
- Interestingly, these antigens also showed reactivity with sera from healthy cattle. However, the research did not provide an explanation for this observation.
- Also, the study ruled out any serological cross-reaction between H. equigenitalis and species of Achromobacter and Moraxella. This indicates that the immune responses triggered by H. equigenitalis are not mistaken for those by Achromobacter and Moraxella, thereby minimizing concerns for misdiagnosis.
Implications
- This serological specificity and detailed antigenic characterization of H. equigenitalis thus sheds more light on the pathogen’s immune-related behavior.
- This could assist in developing more targeted treatment strategies for contagious equine metritis, and might contribute to improved diagnosis methods for this bacterial infection.
- Understanding why these antigens reacted with the serum of healthy cattle might further expand knowledge on cross-species bacterial behaviors and infectious disease biology.
Cite This Article
APA
Corbel MJ, Brewer RA.
(1982).
Characterization of the major antigens of Haemophilus equigenitalis (contagious equine metritis organism).
J Hyg (Lond), 89(3), 529-538.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400071102 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Antigens, Bacterial / analysis
- Antigens, Surface / analysis
- Bacterial Proteins / immunology
- Haemophilus / immunology
- Haemophilus Infections / immunology
- Haemophilus Infections / veterinary
- Horse Diseases / immunology
- Horses
- Polysaccharides, Bacterial / immunology
References
This article includes 16 references
- Ann Sclavo. 1977 Jan-Feb;19(1):131-42
- Vet Rec. 1978 Jan 7;102(1):20
- Lancet. 1978 May 13;1(8072):1038
- Vet Rec. 1978 Apr 1;102(13):277-80
- Lancet. 1978 Jun 10;1(8076):1266
- Equine Vet J. 1978 Jul;10(3):136-44
- Equine Vet J. 1978 Jul;10(3):153-9
- Vet Rec. 1978 Sep 9;103(11):243-4
- Vet Rec. 1978 Sep 23;103(13):275-8
- Vet Rec. 1978 Dec 16;103(25):564
- Vet Rec. 1979 Mar 24;104(12):260-2
- Vet Rec. 1980 Jan 12;106(2):35
- Am J Vet Res. 1980 Jan;41(1):127-32
- Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1955;7(2):103-10
- Anal Biochem. 1965 Feb;10:358-61
- J Chromatogr. 1965 Feb;17:245-51
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists